Children need to get their hands on a project, not a screen | Letters
Emine Saner’s article on screen time and toddlers identifies a key symptom, but doesn’t pay enough attention to the deeper diagnosis (How screen time affects toddlers: ‘We’re losing a big part of being human’, 22 January).The problem isn’t simply that children are watching screens.It’s that they’re not creating anything meaningful.For 11 years, Red Paper Plane has worked with more than 30,000 children in Bulgaria using a project-based learning programme we call Design Champions.As part of it, five- to 10-year-old children don’t consume content – they become park designers, car engineers and city architects.
They work on “missions” lasting weeks, solving real problems with real materials.The contrast with the children described in your article is stark.While reception teachers watch children make cardboard iPhones because “that’s what they know”, our children build models of their dream playgrounds and present them to their communities.Same age, radically different outcomes.What your article describes isn’t a screen problem, but a purpose problem.
Children who spend hours passively consuming are missing the serve-and-return interactions that build language and social skills.But the solution isn’t simply less screen time.It’s more meaningful time: hands-on projects, collaborative challenges, real-world problems scaled for small hands and increasingly large minds.Maria Montessori understood this a century ago.Children don’t need better content delivery – they need environments where they can act on the world, not just watch it.
The forthcoming UK government guidance on screen use should address not just duration, but purpose.The question isn’t how many hours children spend on screens, but what experiences they’re missing – and how we can design early years education to restore what’s being lost.Georgi KamovCo-founder, Red Paper Plane Thank you for publishing this much-needed article about screen time and child development.I write as a psychologist who’s studied child development and the critical role of the early years in establishing a child’s sense of self, world, self-esteem, trust and attachment.The brain is rapidly developing during the first five years, and that development is critical and dependent on the child’s interaction with its primary “object”, typically the mother.
It sets the stage for that child’s life, relationships, ability to trust and attach to others, and its sense of self and of others.Basically, the child’s personal/emotional, psychological, social and cognitive development.The “hard wiring” is being established and is not easily amenable to change.I live, unfortunately, in the US, where we have a very sick society focused on money and power as success.There are many things wrong, but I’m often heartsick about child-rearing.
We don’t really value child-rearing here and often look down on those who chose to be stay-at-home moms.But the critical obstacle is typically financial.We do not support child-rearing in any way that’s even close to what’s needed.Take some of the Scandinavian countries that offer long paid parental leave and child subsidies, plus other benefits.What’s really lacking, profoundly lacking, is an understanding of child development and how the brain is growing and “hardwiring” the child’s experiences and establishing the foundations for its sense of self, self-esteem, trust and attachment etc, as I mentioned above.
This has got to be understood by everyone in order to emphasise the critical importance of these early years.Or perhaps people don’t want to know, because it might mean making big changes in their lives, if they can even afford them.I often recommend an excellent book called A General Theory of Love, which addresses the critical importance of these early years, child-rearing and brain development.Lisa HarmsSt Petersburg, Florida, US Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
AI systems could use Met Office and National Archives data under UK plans
Met Office data and legal documents from the National Archives could be used by artificial intelligence systems as the UK government pushes ahead with plans to employ nationally owned material in AI tools.The government is providing funds for researchers to test how Met Office content could be used by the technology, such as in helping agencies and councils know when to buy more road grit. Another project will explore whether legal data from the National Archives – the UK’s repository for official documents – could help medium- and small-sized businesses with legal support.The government has also announced plans to license content from national institutions such as the National History Museum and the National Library of Scotland for AI development.Ian Murray, the minister for digital government and data, said the National Archives plan was “what smart use of the public sector” looked like
Sam Altman’s make-or-break year: can the OpenAI CEO cash in his bet on the future?
Sam Altman has claimed over the years that the advancement of AI could solve climate change, cure cancer, create a benevolent superintelligence beyond human comprehension, provide a tutor for every student, take over nearly half of the tasks in the economy and create what he calls “universal extreme wealth”.In order to bring about his utopian future, Altman is demanding enormous resources from the present. As CEO of OpenAI, the world’s most valuable privately owned company, he has in recent months announced plans for $1tn of investment into datacenters and struck multibillion-dollar deals with several chipmakers. If completed, the datacenters are expected to use more power than entire European nations. OpenAI is pushing an aggressive expansion – encroaching on industries like e-commerce, healthcare and entertainment – while increasingly integrating its products into government, universities and the US military and making a play to turn ChatGPT into the new default homepage for millions
AI needs to augment rather than replace humans or the workplace is doomed | Heather Stewart
“Who wouldn’t want a robot to watch over your kids?” Elon Musk asked Davos delegates last week, as he looked forward with enthusiasm to a world with “more robots than people”.Not me, thanks: children need the human connection – the love – that gives life meaning.As he works towards launching SpaceX on to the stock market, in perhaps the biggest ever such share sale, the world’s richest man has every incentive to talk big.Yet as Musk waxed eccentrically about this robotic utopia, it was a reminder that major decisions about the direction of technological progress are being taken by a small number of very powerful men – and they are mainly men.In the cosy onstage chat, the World Economic Forum’s interim co-chair, Larry Fink, failed to ask Musk about whichever tweak of internal plumbing allowed his Grok chatbot to produce and broadcast what a New York Times investigation estimated was 1
Google AI Overviews cite YouTube more than any medical site for health queries, study suggests
Google’s search feature AI Overviews cites YouTube more than any medical website when answering queries about health conditions, according to research that raises fresh questions about a tool seen by 2 billion people each month.The company has said its AI summaries, which appear at the top of search results and use generative AI to answer questions from users, are “reliable” and cite reputable medical sources such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Mayo Clinic.However, a study that analysed responses to more than 50,000 health queries, captured using Google searches from Berlin, found the top cited source was YouTube. The video-sharing platform is the world’s second most visited website, after Google itself, and is owned by Google.Researchers at SE Ranking, a search engine optimisation platform, found YouTube made up 4
How the ‘confident authority’ of Google AI Overviews is putting public health at risk
Do I have the flu or Covid? Why do I wake up feeling tired? What is causing the pain in my chest? For more than two decades, typing medical questions into the world’s most popular search engine has served up a list of links to websites with the answers. Google those health queries today and the response will likely be written by artificial intelligence.Sundar Pichai, Google’s chief executive, first set out the company’s plans to enmesh AI into its search engine at its annual conference in Mountain View, California, in May 2024. Starting that month, he said, US users would see a new feature, AI Overviews, which would provide information summaries above traditional search results. The change marked the biggest shake-up of Google’s core product in a quarter of a century
Latest ChatGPT model uses Elon Musk’s Grokipedia as source, tests reveal
The latest model of ChatGPT has begun to cite Elon Musk’s Grokipedia as a source on a wide range of queries, including on Iranian conglomerates and Holocaust deniers, raising concerns about misinformation on the platform.In tests done by the Guardian, GPT-5.2 cited Grokipedia nine times in response to more than a dozen different questions. These included queries on political structures in Iran, such as salaries of the Basij paramilitary force and the ownership of the Mostazafan Foundation, and questions on the biography of Sir Richard Evans, a British historian and expert witness against Holocaust denier David Irving in his libel trial.Grokipedia, launched in October, is an AI-generated online encyclopedia that aims to compete with Wikipedia, and which has been criticised for propagating rightwing narratives on topics including gay marriage and the 6 January insurrection in the US
UK’s biggest private hospital provider Spire in talks on sale to private equity
Ryanair says it could use Starlink in future despite Elon Musk feud
‘A southern economy in the north’: how Warrington has adapted to change
Disposable income in 11 towns and cities has risen twice as fast as rest of UK
US small businesses are doing fine. Don’t believe me? Look at the numbers
More than a quarter of Britons say they fear losing jobs to AI in next five years