NHS staff must be protected from abuse | Letters
It is right to draw attention to the physical, verbal, racial and sexual violence and abuse experienced by ever increasing numbers of NHS staff in the course of their work (Editorial, 19 January).These threats to NHS staff safety are experienced both physically – in wards, departments and GP practices across the country – and virtually, as staff are filmed and photographed without their consent, and humiliated or abused on social media.The data on the sharp and continuing increase in violence and abuse rightly creates headlines.Beneath it are complex lives and rapid shifts in societal and behavioural norms.This complexity means that there is no neat solution to the growing problem of violence and abuse towards NHS staff.
The patient with dementia who hits and kicks the healthcare assistant who is trying to provide them with personal care will not be deterred by police intervention or exclusion.These patients may be better supported, and violence averted, with care environments and routines designed for them, and through a national mandatory training framework on de-escalation skills for NHS staff.There is certainly a place for consistent enforcement intervention.Operation Cavell – a partnership between healthcare, local police services and the Crown Prosecution Service to prevent and reduce assaults against emergency workers – should be rolled out nationally.The NHS should develop a national exclusion framework for patients with mental capacity who abuse or assault staff.
The Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Act 2018 should be strengthened to include online abuse and racist abuse.The NHS is here for all and it must be safe for all – patients and staff alike.Kate JarmanMilton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Recent suggestions that the NHS sexual safety charter has failed underline a long-standing problem: many NHS staff do not feel safe reporting sexual misconduct within their own NHS trust (Charter to tackle sexual harassment across NHS in England has failed, say unions, 18 January).Research by the Working Party on Sexual Misconduct in Surgery (WPSMS), culminating in the Breaking the Silence report, found that staff are reluctant to report incidents when perpetrators hold positions of power or when confidence in local processes is low.The charter signals good intentions and sets expectations, but it cannot drive cultural change unless credible reporting mechanisms are implemented – systems that staff can trust, that provide consistency across NHS trusts, and that collect reliable data.
Seventy-six percent of NHS trusts have introduced trust-level anonymous reporting, according to NHS England.Yet individuals affected by sexual misconduct consistently tell us that fear of reprisal remains a significant barrier to reporting, particularly when reporting processes are controlled locally.Without a trusted reporting mechanism, sexual misconduct remains underreported, harmful behaviour goes unchecked, and organisations are unable to recognise or address the scale of the problem.If the NHS is serious about tackling sexual misconduct, establishing a national, independent, anonymous reporting mechanism must be an urgent priority – something the Royal College of Surgeons of England and WPSMS have repeatedly called for.Without it, the real extent of sexual misconduct in NHS trusts will continue to sit below the radar, and any efforts to create a safer workplace will inevitably fall short.
Prof Vivien LeesSenior vice-president, Royal College of Surgeons of England Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
AI systems could use Met Office and National Archives data under UK plans
Met Office data and legal documents from the National Archives could be used by artificial intelligence systems as the UK government pushes ahead with plans to employ nationally owned material in AI tools.The government is providing funds for researchers to test how Met Office content could be used by the technology, such as in helping agencies and councils know when to buy more road grit. Another project will explore whether legal data from the National Archives – the UK’s repository for official documents – could help medium- and small-sized businesses with legal support.The government has also announced plans to license content from national institutions such as the National History Museum and the National Library of Scotland for AI development.Ian Murray, the minister for digital government and data, said the National Archives plan was “what smart use of the public sector” looked like
Sam Altman’s make-or-break year: can the OpenAI CEO cash in his bet on the future?
Sam Altman has claimed over the years that the advancement of AI could solve climate change, cure cancer, create a benevolent superintelligence beyond human comprehension, provide a tutor for every student, take over nearly half of the tasks in the economy and create what he calls “universal extreme wealth”.In order to bring about his utopian future, Altman is demanding enormous resources from the present. As CEO of OpenAI, the world’s most valuable privately owned company, he has in recent months announced plans for $1tn of investment into datacenters and struck multibillion-dollar deals with several chipmakers. If completed, the datacenters are expected to use more power than entire European nations. OpenAI is pushing an aggressive expansion – encroaching on industries like e-commerce, healthcare and entertainment – while increasingly integrating its products into government, universities and the US military and making a play to turn ChatGPT into the new default homepage for millions
AI needs to augment rather than replace humans or the workplace is doomed | Heather Stewart
“Who wouldn’t want a robot to watch over your kids?” Elon Musk asked Davos delegates last week, as he looked forward with enthusiasm to a world with “more robots than people”.Not me, thanks: children need the human connection – the love – that gives life meaning.As he works towards launching SpaceX on to the stock market, in perhaps the biggest ever such share sale, the world’s richest man has every incentive to talk big.Yet as Musk waxed eccentrically about this robotic utopia, it was a reminder that major decisions about the direction of technological progress are being taken by a small number of very powerful men – and they are mainly men.In the cosy onstage chat, the World Economic Forum’s interim co-chair, Larry Fink, failed to ask Musk about whichever tweak of internal plumbing allowed his Grok chatbot to produce and broadcast what a New York Times investigation estimated was 1
Google AI Overviews cite YouTube more than any medical site for health queries, study suggests
Google’s search feature AI Overviews cites YouTube more than any medical website when answering queries about health conditions, according to research that raises fresh questions about a tool seen by 2 billion people each month.The company has said its AI summaries, which appear at the top of search results and use generative AI to answer questions from users, are “reliable” and cite reputable medical sources such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Mayo Clinic.However, a study that analysed responses to more than 50,000 health queries, captured using Google searches from Berlin, found the top cited source was YouTube. The video-sharing platform is the world’s second most visited website, after Google itself, and is owned by Google.Researchers at SE Ranking, a search engine optimisation platform, found YouTube made up 4
How the ‘confident authority’ of Google AI Overviews is putting public health at risk
Do I have the flu or Covid? Why do I wake up feeling tired? What is causing the pain in my chest? For more than two decades, typing medical questions into the world’s most popular search engine has served up a list of links to websites with the answers. Google those health queries today and the response will likely be written by artificial intelligence.Sundar Pichai, Google’s chief executive, first set out the company’s plans to enmesh AI into its search engine at its annual conference in Mountain View, California, in May 2024. Starting that month, he said, US users would see a new feature, AI Overviews, which would provide information summaries above traditional search results. The change marked the biggest shake-up of Google’s core product in a quarter of a century
Latest ChatGPT model uses Elon Musk’s Grokipedia as source, tests reveal
The latest model of ChatGPT has begun to cite Elon Musk’s Grokipedia as a source on a wide range of queries, including on Iranian conglomerates and Holocaust deniers, raising concerns about misinformation on the platform.In tests done by the Guardian, GPT-5.2 cited Grokipedia nine times in response to more than a dozen different questions. These included queries on political structures in Iran, such as salaries of the Basij paramilitary force and the ownership of the Mostazafan Foundation, and questions on the biography of Sir Richard Evans, a British historian and expert witness against Holocaust denier David Irving in his libel trial.Grokipedia, launched in October, is an AI-generated online encyclopedia that aims to compete with Wikipedia, and which has been criticised for propagating rightwing narratives on topics including gay marriage and the 6 January insurrection in the US
Ignore the snobbery and get into blended whisky
Helen Goh’s recipe for Breton butter cake with marmalade | The sweet spot
Gordon Ramsay says tax changes will make restaurants ‘lambs to the slaughter’
No more sad sandwiches and soggy salads: here’s how to make a proper packed lunch
Rum is booming but only Jamaican classics have the true funk
Rachel Roddy’s recipe for pasta e fagioli with coconut, spring onion, chilli and lemon | A kitchen in Rome