The key questions for Nigel Farage over £5m gift from crypto-billionaire
Nigel Farage has been dogged by questions about his finances since the Guardian revealed he received a £5m gift from a donor in 2024.Although he insists the gift did not have to be declared, several important questions remain unanswered.The sum was given shortly before Farage decided to stand in the 2024 general election – and it came from a Reform UK mega-donor, the Thai-based crypto-billionaire Christopher Harborne.In recent days, Farage has attempted to deflect attention away from the gift, saying on several occasions that the money was to pay for his personal security, and that he would rather talk about it another time.“Yeah, yeah, well we’ll talk about that any other time that you’d like,” Farage said, when asked as he celebrated Reform’s capture of its first London council, in Havering last week.
However, his political opponents have seized on the disclosure.Among them, Kevin Hollinrake, the Conservative party chair, has said Farage was “obliged” to declare the gift.The Reform leader may soon face questions from the Electoral Commission or the parliamentary standards watchdog, both of which have received reports related to the gift.On Wednesday, the parliamentary standards commissioner opened a formal inquiry into the gift.Here are some of the most important outstanding queries the UK’s potential future prime minister might wish to address.
On Sunday, the Guardian asked if Farage had received any other gifts in the past decade.Reform did not reply.On Monday, Reform UK’s legal team said in response to allegations of a different, earlier gift: “Mr Farage received no personal payment from Mr Harborne before the personal gift made in 2024.” Reform UK did not respond to separate questions about whether any other gifts were made after the one in 2024 or if any other donors made any other gifts, either.The public currently has no idea whether the £5m gift was a one-off or part of a series of large sums given by Harborne or any other donor to Farage or other senior figures in Reform.
After the Guardian asked Farage about the £5m gift, he initially did not respond but then gave an interview to the Telegraph claiming the money “was given to me so that I would be safe and secure for the rest of my life”,He suggested it was essential as he did not receive taxpayer-funded security,There are two odd things about this claim, however,According to Zia Yusuf, the former head of policy at Reform, Farage was receiving some public funding for his security as recently as 2025 – in October of that year he said the amount had been cut by 75%,And he was receiving this support more than a year after he had accepted a £5m gift that was supposed to have covered his security for life.
It is still not clear how much public money was spent on Farage’s security.He said in a recent interview with Sky News that his private security “costs several hundred, many hundred thousand pounds a year”, without providing any further detail.An area of Farage’s personal finances that had already attracted scrutiny was how his partner, Laure Ferrari, had managed to buy an £885,000 home in Clacton-on-Sea, Essex, where Farage was elected in 2024, getting a seat in parliament at the eighth attempt.The Guardian revealed that she had bought the house in her name after Farage had claimed to be the buyer.A BBC investigation raised questions about the size of her family’s alleged wealth.
Ferrari has added to the questions surrounding this by confirming in an interview with the French newspaper Le Monde that she did not cover the full cost with any inheritance from her family.It would have been legal for Farage to give or lend her the funds, and thereby avoid paying £44,000 of additional stamp duty on the purchase.But he said that he didn’t in September last year: “I haven’t lent money to anybody.I didn’t give her money.She comes from a very successful French family and she can afford it herself.
It’s convenient, it works, and she loves it there,”While MPs have conventionally regarded any money from donors as something that ought to be declared, Reform has put great weight on the idea that this was a personal gift and that it was made prior to Farage’s decision to stand for parliament,The party’s deputy leader, Richard Tice, said on Sunday: “The state wouldn’t provide the funding, and this was a personal gift based around safety and security,”It is unclear if this has been a widespread approach throughout the party either before or after the 2024 election, with other Reform UK MPs and senior figures accepting large sums that have not been declared either to the Electoral Commission or the parliamentary authorities,Reform UK’s media team did not respond to most of the Guardian’s questions about this article.
‘Hold the line’: Burnham tells allies in parliament he still has options to return
Andy Burnham has told Labour MPs they should hold the line and that he has options to return to parliament after several seats identified by his allies failed to materialise.Two seats that backers of the Greater Manchester mayor had described as “nailed on” as recently as Monday night are now out of contention after the MPs concerned got cold feet.Burnham spoke to a number of MPs by phone on Tuesday and assured them that he still intended to seek an imminent return to parliament.The Guardian was told by two MPs on Wednesday that Jeff Smith, who represents Manchester Withington, an affluent suburb of the city, was in talks about stepping aside for Burnham, but his friends denied it. Asked whether he was about to make way, Smith told the Press Association he was not
‘It’s more incrementalism’: Starmer’s safe king’s speech fails to quell mutiny
For Keir Starmer’s Labour critics, his second king’s speech, in which the government set out what it would do in parliament over the next 12 to 18 months, was a crystallisation of everything that was wrong with the prime minister’s strategy.Over 34 bills and three draft ones, Starmer set out a programme he said would “make this country stronger and fairer”. But the package, which included limiting trial by jury, reshaping the NHS and moving the country closer to the EU, fell short of what some in the prime minister’s party feel is needed to win back voters’ trust.“Most of this is incrementalism,” said one Labour MP. “This sums up where we have gone wrong in the first two years in government
Starmer has ‘full confidence’ in Streeting despite health secretary’s allies saying he is planning to resign – as it happened
Downing Street has now confirmed that Wes Streeting is still health secretary. The PM’s spokesperson told reporters the prime minister has “full confidence” in the health secretary.Allies of Wes Streeting have said he is preparing to stand down as health secretary amid deep frustration with Keir Starmer’s leadership, and could mount a formal challenge for the leadership as early as Thursday.Keir Starmer has put long-promised changes to education, health and the courts at the heart of his agenda for the next year, as the embattled prime minister looks to prove he can enact the scale of change being demanded by Labour MPs and voters. There were 37 bills in the speech
Labour politicians should put the country before their party | Letters
As an active and loyal Labour member, I am infuriated by what is happening within the party (Burnham allies warn against quick ‘coronation’ of Streeting if Starmer quits, 12 May). The ongoing circus about the leadership is a terrible distraction from the numerous global and national issues that the government and the prime minister should be focused on. But the most infuriating aspect of the entire shambles is the relentless speculation and briefings from so-called “allies” of Andy Burham.No Labour member has an innate right to be selected as a parliamentary candidate. The assertion that a sitting Labour MP should give up the seat voters elected them to, necessitating a byelection so that Burnham can run, then assuming that he would automatically retain the seat, is arrogance beyond belief
Labour lost the vote of small business owners like me | Letter
Your report (Reform wins across northern England overturn decades of Labour control, 8 May) touched on Labour losing support among small business owners. I wanted to offer the perspective of a small independent business owner who has traditionally supported Labour.Labour’s poor local election results may reflect a growing frustration among small business owners who no longer feel recognised as “working people”. In hospitality, hair and beauty, retail and trades, there are thousands upon thousands of us keeping local economies alive while taking home increasingly modest incomes ourselves.Last year, our small independent restaurant in Margate turned over roughly £350,000
King’s speech might be the last word on Starmer as reluctant monarch does his duty | John Crace
The king looked fed up. His attempts to throw a sickie had come to nothing. Did the government really want to go ahead with the state opening? Apparently it did. Would it be OK if he phoned it in? He fancied a day working from palace. It wouldn’t be OK
Australian workers have been hard done by and tax reforms in the budget only begin to return some fairness | Greg Jericho
US Senate confirms Kevin Warsh as Federal Reserve chair, replacing Jerome Powell
Sam Altman defends OpenAI in courtroom showdown with Elon Musk
Florida students boo graduation speaker who called AI ‘next Industrial Revolution’
Jim Furyk tells US players they need to make Ryder Cup more of a priority
England v New Zealand: second women’s cricket ODI abandoned – as it happened