I can tell Stephen A Smith why many Black people don’t like him | Etan Thomas

A picture


Dear Stephen A Smith,Let me first say that I tremendously respect all you do for historically Black colleges and universities,You have helped generate millions in scholarships, promoted student enrollment and brought national media attention to HBCUs across the United States,Specifically, as ambassador, you have promoted the annual HBCU College Fair, which has garnered over $12m in scholarships,You encourage students to consider HBCUs for their higher education, highlighting the community and nurturing environment they provide,And yet, you wonder why many Black people in America feel that you “betrayed your race”.

It’s not a mystery why they may feel this way.Chuck Modiano, my co-host on The Collision, put it well: “Stephen A Smith loves to criticize Black athletes, but he won’t go after Roger Goodell like that.He won’t go after owners that way.”Far too often, you attack Black male athletes in particular – Kyrie Irving, Kwame Brown, LeBron James, Terrell Owens and Kevin Durant are just a few of your targets – with a passion and vitriol you just don’t reserve for white athletes and executives.It doesn’t stop there though.

You parrot rightwing talking points, as you did earlier this year, when you said that racism isn’t as prevalent in the US as some on the “left” claim.You went on to argue that most Americans judge people based on their character rather than skin color, which is not the experience of most Black people in the US.In the midst of ICE’s brutalization of large parts of the country, you blamed Renee Good for her own death at the hands of federal agents.You then claimed that people celebrated ICE under Obama but are condemning Trump.That’s not the only time you were sympathetic to the president: you called Democrats’ efforts to hold Trump accountable in the courts as “lawfare”.

It’s particularly galling for Black people when you chastize Black athletes at the same time as minimizing a president who was convicted of 34 felonies.You’re not much better with Black politicians.You attacked congresswoman Jasmine Crockett for not being respectful enough to Trump.Recently you called out Trump for the delay in releasing the Epstein files, but many of us remember you once questioned why people were outraged by the files when there are other issues to focus on.Then there are your frequent appearances with Sean Hannity, whose denigration of Black people is well known – from his comparison of Black Lives Matter to the Ku Klux Klan to his denial of systemic racism in policing.

The inconsistency is hard to ignore.Recently on Cam Newton’s show you made a case that every Black person should vote Republican because the Democratic Party takes our vote for granted, adding that we have been giving our vote to them since 1964.You failed to mention that the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Act of 1965 and the Fair Housing Act of 1968 were all passed under Lyndon B Johnson, a Democrat.Your specific choice of words - “give” – implies the Black community are sheep, gifting our votes away.As if they weren’t earned by those key pieces of legislation on civil rights and desegregation, things conservative Republicans stood vehemently against.

This comes at a time when the Trump administration celebrated the supreme court gutting the Voting Rights Act, the 1965 civil rights law that prevents racial discrimination in voting.I actually agree with your position that both parties should have to work for Black people’s votes.But here’s the important part you leave out: Democrats don’t do enough for Black people but Republicans actively work against us.Your arguments present the Black community as naive and blindly loyal to Democrats.That’s not only wrong – for many of us, Democrats are simply the lesser of two evils – it’s insulting, and another reason there’s antipathy towards you from Black people.

If you’re looking for misplaced loyalty, you might start elsewhere.Perhaps you could win some favor from Black people if you instead lectured those white people who follow Trump, a man actively working against their interests.I see Maga Christians supporting someone who doesn’t follow any of the principles of Jesus Christ.Someone who has decades of accusations of sexual misconduct.Someone who, on Resurrection Sunday, went on social media and threatened to destroy an entire civilization, but still has the support of the religious right.

He’s also hurt white working people: after his campaign promises to lower the price of eggs and gas prices, put an end to wars, boost the economy and make life better all around, he’s actually done the opposite.Under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the tax burden has shifted toward low- and middle-income earners while windfalls are concentrated at the top 1%.Not to mention broad tariffs, the expiration of pandemic-era social supports and rising health-insurance premiums.Maybe you should lecture the white Maga community about the absurdity of their support for Trump, rather than telling Black people how we should conduct ourselves.And the consequences are tangible.

Anyone voting Republican who isn’t in the top 1% is voting against their own interest.But for Black people, this administration has been even more detrimental.Trump refused to apologize for a racist video posted on his social media depicting the Obamas as apes.It’s just as obvious in his harmful policy.From day one, he set his target on dismantling diversity, equity and inclusion.

He received a standing ovation from the GOP when he declared at the State of the Union, “We Ended DEI in America”.Since Trump took office again, the Black unemployment rate has risen – at one point to 8.2%, the highest since its pandemic peak – because of his policy changes, trade tariffs and the reduction in public-sector opportunities.His administration has targeted the federal workplace, a major employer of Black Americans, and enabled the loss of jobs and opportunities for many people, particularly Black women.The administration has slashed programs like Medicaid and made it more difficult to fight systemic discrimination in housing, lending and education.

So, Stephen A Smith, that’s the party that you suggest Black people all vote for? So we teach the Democrats to appreciate us more? You’re intelligent, well read, and exceptionally good at your job,You can create a buzz about any topic any time you speak, which is why you are the highest-paid commentator at ESPN,But the reason why many Black people don’t like you is because you are pushing an agenda that is detrimental to the Black community as a whole,Sincerely,Etan ThomasEtan Thomas played in the NBA from 2000 through 2011,He is a published author, podcaster, poet, activist and motivational speaker.

technologySee all
A picture

What I saw at the Musk-OpenAI trial: petty billionaires, protests and a stern judge

For the past couple of weeks, on the fourth floor of a courthouse on a quiet street in downtown Oakland, the world’s richest man and one of the world’s most valuable startups have been at war over the future of artificial intelligence.Being one of the reporters in the room has felt like watching an updated, opposite-coast version of Tom Wolfe’s The Bonfire of the Vanities – ambition, ego, greed and the spectrum of social class on full display. The supporting cast has included Elon Musk fanboys, a stern judge and a who’s who of Silicon Valley’s most influential people.All courtroom battles are theatre, but this one has proved to be a unique spectacle, with the judge chastising the lawyers for leading the witness, raising meritless objections and even too much coughing. With Musk on the stand, he griped that an opposing attorney had asked a leading question, to which the judge told him to “tell the jury you’re not a lawyer”

A picture

Who is Louis Mosley, the man tasked with defending Palantir against its critics?

The hall was packed with rightwing radicals when Louis Mosley heralded a coming revolution. Just as Oliver Cromwell – that “crusader for Christ and liberty” – routed King Charles I’s royalists, “a similar revolution is brewing today”, said the UK and Europe boss of Palantir. Globalism’s “twilight” was upon us, he said in a speech dotted with admiring mentions of the podcaster Joe Rogan and “Elon’s Doge”.It was not a typical peroration for a big UK government contractor with more than £600m in deals with the NHS, the Ministry of Defence and police. But Palantir, the world’s most controversial tech company, is no typical contractor

A picture

AI-powered surveillance company Palantir created a chore coat. Great, now I have no choice but to burn mine | Van Badham

It’s taken me years to find a chore coat with a cut that flatters my big tits but, now that I finally own one, I want to incinerate it.Such is the power of brand contamination; infamous data surveillance megacorp Palantir has decided to bang a logo on a chore coat to sell as corporate merch.Chore coats are the traditional short denim or twill jacket of the 19th-century French working class. Palantir, however, is a company whose public words and commercial-in-confidence activities are inspiring local calls to have its contracts cancelled and its business banned.The gentle French garment is now as cursed as whatever “Marie Amazonette” will ever wear to the Met Gala

A picture

‘Being human helps’: despite rise of AI is there still hope for Europe’s translators?

In February 2022, while he was plugging away at rendering the US writer Dana Spiotta’s novel Wayward into French, the literary translator Yoann Gentric decided he needed a bit of light relief. He would test whether AI could put him out of work.Gentric had been grappling with a short non-verbal sentence that described the book’s protagonist’s feelings upon opening a window: “Bright, sharp night air, bracing.” He put the prompt into DeepL, a neural-network-powered machine translation engine that regularly outperforms Google Translate in accuracy assessments.The proposed translation was reassuring, with his job security in mind: L’air de la nuit, vif et vif, était vivifiant (The night air, lively and lively, was enlivening

A picture

UK schools should remove pupils’ online photos as AI blackmail threat grows, say experts

UK schools should remove pictures of pupils’ faces from their websites and social media accounts because blackmailers are using them to create sexually explicit images, experts have said.Child safety experts and the UK’s National Crime Agency (NCA) warn that criminals are using AI to manipulate photos of children and then demand cash not to publish them.They are recommending educational institutions remove identifiable pictures of children from their websites and social media accounts – or consider not using them at all.The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) said an unnamed UK secondary school had recently been subjected to a blackmail attempt after criminals used the institution’s website or social media accounts to take photos of schoolchildren and then, using AI tools, turned them into child sexual abuse material (CSAM). The blackmailers sent the images to the school and threatened to publish them online if they did not receive money

A picture

Meta sues Ofcom over fines regime for breaches of Online Safety Act

Meta has launched a legal challenge against the UK’s media regulator over the fees and fines regime it is enforcing under landmark digital safety legislation.The Facebook and Instagram owner is claiming that Ofcom’s methodology for calculating the charges is flawed and should not be based on a company’s global revenue. Breaches of the Online Safety Act can be punished by fines of up to 10% of qualifying worldwide revenue (QWR) or £18m – whichever is higher.In the case of Meta, which reported revenues of $201bn last year, Ofcom could in theory impose a fine of $20bn for breaches. Under regulations introduced in September, Ofcom’s fees will also be based on a proportion of an organisation’s QWR and apply to businesses that made more than £250m of this revenue a year