Google developers significantly misstate carbon emissions of proposed UK datacentres
Developers working for Google have significantly misstated how much carbon two proposed AI datacentres will contribute to the UK’s total emissions in planning documents reviewed by the Guardian.The tech company wants to build two huge datacentres – one 52-hectare (130 acre) project in Thurrock and another at an airfield in North Weald, both in Essex.To do so, developers are required to submit planning documents calculating how much carbon these projects will emit as a proportion of the UK’s total carbon footprint.In both cases, they appear to have compared one year of the proposed datacentre’s emissions with the UK’s entire five-year carbon budget, understating the significance of their emissions by a factor of five, according to experts at the tech justice nonprofit Foxglove.Greystoke, a company planning to build another datacentre in north Lincolnshire, one of the largest in the UK, also appears to have misstated the emissions of its project in the same way.
Taken together, the three developments will account for more than 1% of the UK’s carbon budget in 2033,This is the equivalent to the emissions of a mid-sized city such as Bristol,“Google has serious questions to answer about its dubious datacentre pollution figures,” said Tim Squirrell, the head of strategy for Foxglove, which discovered the errors,“By comparing one year of datacentre emissions with five years of UK emissions, they’re making the environmental impact look five times smaller than it really is,”He added: “Unless they can explain themselves, it looks like they are seriously misleading the council and the public over the climate pollution their facility will cause.
”These apparent misstatements are another example of a pile-up of faulty calculations surrounding AI development and its environmental footprint in the UK.Last month, the Guardian reported on a large gap between the government’s plan to decarbonise the economy and its roadmap for AI computing.The two government departments behind these plans appeared to differ on their estimates for how much UK energy datacentres will use – by a factor of 10.Google’s Thurrock datacentre, to be built on “grey belt” land, has claimed its emissions will amount to 0.033% of the UK’s budgeted carbon footprint between 2028 and 2032.
In fact, its emissions during that period will be 0,165% of the total,The North Weald datacentre, to be built on an airfield near Epping Forest, has said it will emit 0,043% of the UK’s total carbon budget from 2033 to 2037, but it will actually emit 0,215% of the total.
Steven Heather, a local councillor, said this datacentre had been given outline planning permission only and the planning department would research what Google was proposing.“If there is a gross error, they’ll obviously pick up on it.When it goes to the submissions stage, the developers will have to come back with the proper figure.”Greystoke’s datacentre in north Lincolnshire, Elsham Tech Park, has stated in planning documents that its emissions will be 0.1043% of the UK’s carbon budget in 2033, when in fact they will be 0.
5215%,Google and Greystoke have publicly argued that their developments will have a tolerable, in some cases insignificant, impact on the UK’s climate roadmap,Elsham Tech Park’s developers have said it will improve biodiversity on its campus by having bird and bat boxes, and wildflower grassland,All three developments are classed as having a “minor adverse” impact on the UK’s overall climate goals,However, the Thurrock datacentre will produce more emissions than an international airport, and Elsham Tech Park’s peak emissions will reach 1m tonnes of CO2 equivalent in 2033-34 – just short of the 1.
2m tonnes of carbon emissions of all the UK’s domestic flights,Google representatives did not respond to a request for comment,In a comment to the Guardian, Greystoke appeared to acknowledge the discrepancy, saying: “We expect to submit revised figures to the local planning authority as part of the planning process,”Elsham Tech Park said its development would “see £10bn of private investment, generating thousands of well-paid operational and construction jobs in the region, and supporting local supply chains”,
What’s behind surge in support for Reform and Greens across England? Five key takeaways
Local elections have fundamentally reshaped the political landscape in England. Labour suffered heavy losses, losing ground to the Green party and Reform UK, while the Conservatives also sustained significant losses to Reform UK and the Liberal Democrats.Reform and the Green party made significant gains, in results that laid bare an increasingly fragmented political system. Reform gained 1,349 council seats and control of 14 councils, while the Green party won 376 council seats, control of five councils, and took two mayoralties.With both insurgent parties making inroads, what is behind the surge in their support?So far, Reform’s vote in English council seats has grown the most in areas with greater socioeconomic deprivation, early analysis shows
Don’t let Farage and Reform divide us, Labour’s Sarwar urges Holyrood leaders
The Scottish Labour leader, Anas Sarwar, has warned other Scottish political leaders not to spend the next Holyrood parliament “shouting about Nigel Farage”, saying his job is to ensure there is a credible opposition at Holyrood “that holds the SNP’s feet to the fire”.While the Scottish National party won a fifth successive Holyrood victory and ended up with 58 MSPs, Labour had its worst result since devolution in 1999, tying for second place with Reform UK as both parties secured 17 MSPs.Speaking for the first time since he conceded defeat on Friday, Sarwar said he did not believe it was Reform’s intention to do anything more than create division, and he said he would work with other political parties in the Scottish parliament that shared his views.Interviewed on BBC Scotland’s Sunday Show, Sarwar refused to be drawn on speculation about Keir Starmer’s future as Labour leader and batted away questions about his own position, saying: “I’ve got a job to do and I intend to do it.”He said: “If we think the next parliament is all about shouting about Nigel Farage, that only serves the purpose of those who want to use politics to divide us
Farage trying to avoid scrutiny over £5m gift from crypto billionaire, Labour says
Labour has accused Nigel Farage of attempting to dodge scrutiny as the Reform leader continued to face questions over the £5m gift he received from a crypto billionaire shortly before the last general election.Asked about the gift from Christopher Harborne on Sunday, the party’s deputy leader, Richard Tice, sought to present it as an irrelevance to voters and said it had complied with all the rules.When questioned about the Guardian’s revelation of the gift, which Farage had not disclosed, Tice insisted it had been a personal gift that did not need to be declared.“Nigel was not involved in politics at the time. He’s complied with all the laws,” Tice told the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme
Plaid Cymru leader says he hopes to be made first minister as early as Tuesday
The leader of Plaid Cymru is hoping to become Welsh first minister as early as Tuesday after his party won a historic victory in the Senedd elections, soundly beating Labour and holding off Reform UK.Plaid fell short of winning a majority in the Welsh parliament but Rhun ap Iorwerth said on Sunday he hoped other parties would work with him and told UK Labour not to punish Wales over the result.Asked on BBC Radio Wales when he hoped he would be elected as first minister, ap Iorwerth said: “We’re ready to go as quickly as we can. We hope for it to be Tuesday. If there’s a delay it won’t be much
How could Labour remove Keir Starmer? Four possible routes
Many Labour MPs believe Keir Starmer will not survive as Labour leader for long enough to fight the next election. What they cannot agree on, however – even after a disastrous set of results in this week’s elections – is how his departure might come about.The Labour rulebook makes it notoriously difficult to unseat a party leader: none has been formally ejected in the postwar period, though some, including Tony Blair, have resigned under pressure from their own MPs.A curveball was thrown into the mix on Saturday when the backbencher Catherine West launched a leadership challenge.West, the MP for Hornsey and Friern Barnet and a junior Foreign Office minister until she was sacked in the reshuffle last year, announced that unless a cabinet minister came forward to challenge Starmer for the leadership by Monday morning, she would do it herself
Phillipson: challenge to Starmer would be wrong despite election ‘kicking’
Labour MPs would be wrong to remove Keir Starmer, even though voters have given the party a “real kicking” at the ballot box and people feel “bitterly let down”, the education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, has said.Phillipson said Labour had been “too gloomy” and had made a mistake in trying to withdraw the winter fuel allowance, after the party lost control of about 40 councils and 1,500 seats at the local elections on Thursday.However, she said a leadership challenge from the Labour backbencher Catherine West would be “completely wrong”.West, a former minister, said she would begin collecting the 80 necessary names for a challenge on Monday. She is not widely considered a viable candidate but if she triggers a contest then other contenders such as Wes Streeting, Angela Rayner or Ed Miliband could come forward
My egg, my wife’s womb, our baby: how we found our way to lesbian motherhood
‘They’ve invented a spurious pseudo-disease’: why are so many men being told they have low testosterone?
‘A sobering indictment’: 14 homeless people die a year in public parks or countryside in Australia, analysis finds
The emerging cancer treatment that’s exciting scientists: ‘We’ve just scratched the surface on what’s possible’
Barrister says ‘dead woman was put on trial’ after husband cleared of manslaughter
Ash scattering is a risky business | Brief letters