AI-powered surveillance company Palantir created a chore coat. Great, now I have no choice but to burn mine | Van Badham

A picture


It’s taken me years to find a chore coat with a cut that flatters my big tits but, now that I finally own one, I want to incinerate it,Such is the power of brand contamination; infamous data surveillance megacorp Palantir has decided to bang a logo on a chore coat to sell as corporate merch,Chore coats are the traditional short denim or twill jacket of the 19th-century French working class,Palantir, however, is a company whose public words and commercial-in-confidence activities are inspiring local calls to have its contracts cancelled and its business banned,The gentle French garment is now as cursed as whatever “Marie Amazonette” will ever wear to the Met Gala.

According to the New York Times, Palantir’s head of strategic engagement wanted to create a merch offering “that wasn’t a bland corporate polo or vest”.Thus the veste de travail, with its convenient pockets and famous styling on the likes of Paul Newman and Jeremy Allen White became the latest cultural victim of a company with a $325bn+ market capitalisation and whose chief executive’s favourite motto is “Dominate”.The NYT reports in-house strategic engagers used to deferentially emblazon this word on hoodies and T-shirts before they decided to ruin my coat.This seems to be effective labelling for one reason, and that is knowing immediately who to avoid in a bar.Let me assure Palantir’s reputational management team that “bland corporate” is not the sticky brand of a company whose very name comes from the seeing-stones manipulated by the dark lord Sauron in The Lord of the Rings as he attempts to take totalitarian control and, uh, dominate the lands of Middle-earth.

With its reputation as the “scariest company in the world”, I’m disappointed the merch-makers didn’t double down on a range of horned war-helms, branded black capes and wearable fog machines for that molten-fire-pits-of-Angband workplace-casual look.Maybe next season?“Sinister” is arguably more the vibe for a global, corporate, Trump-aligned outfit supplying AI-powered surveillance technology to America’s “ICE” paramilitary, delivering “increased efficiency in deportation logistics” – although Palantir pushed back on Amnesty International’s claims operations may have been at “high risk” of contributing to human rights violations.But data-driven deportation is not Palantir’s only business! The Guardian has previously reported on its role in the Pentagon’s lethal unmanned drone program, the company’s assistance in police departments’ allegedly racist criminal profiling and the use of its software by the IDF in Gaza.Militaries and police forces all over the world use its services; so do corporations.So does the British government, and so do Australian governments – the latter to the tune of $80m in contracts and $160m in investment.

Should we discount as hyperbole, then, MPs from both the UK’s governing and opposition parties describing Palantir’s recently issued manifesto as like something from “Robocop” or “the ramblings of a supervillain”?Is it supervillainy for the Palantir co-founder and board chair, Peter Thiel, to be building a bunker in New Zealand, funding far-right political influence operations across the world, investing in for-profit private libertarian charter cities and giving speeches about “the antichrist” that quote a Nazi jurist “whose work he said helped create the core of his own beliefs”?Thiel didn’t write the manifesto! The document that claims “some cultures have produced vital advances; other remain dysfunctional and regressive”, described disarming Germany and Japan after the second world war as an “overcorrection”, backs AI weapons and has many angry words for those who’d scrutinise (for shame!) the rich and powerful was authored by Thiel’s co-founder, now CEO, Alex Karp.The “Dominate” guy.Karp clarified the absolutely-not-supervillain-like values of the company in a video to shareholders in February when he said “Palantir is here to disrupt and make the institutions we partner with the very best in the world, and, when it’s necessary, to scare enemies and, on occasion, to kill them.”Asked to respond to calls for its banning in Australia, it was reported a Palantir spokesperson replied the company was “proud” its software was used to “keep Australians safe and tackle financial crime”.Confidence in this statement somewhat depends on a shared definition of the words “safe” and “financial crime”.

Does Palantir’s version of “safety” match your democratic expectations of the same?Palantir describes itself as “just a software company”.“We simply provide the tools to help customers organise and understand their own information,” its spokesperson has explained.“How those tools are used is determined by the customer and constrained – legally, contractually and technically – by their instructions.”Of course sovereign democracies should restrict Palantir.Of course governments should not hand sensitive data to them – if only because far-right influence campaigns to weaken trust in democratic institutions are rewarded every time governments enfranchise “the scariest”, “sinister” corporations that people already do not trust.

Billionaires aren’t the only ones who read Lord of the Rings.It’s wise to be attuned to threat, whatever coat it’s wearing.Van Badham is a Guardian Australia columnist
businessSee all
A picture

Global oil inventories falling at record pace amid Iran war; US producer price inflation hits four-year high – as it happened

Global oil stocks are being run down at a record pace as supply losses mount due to the ongoing Iran war, the International Energy Agency has warned.In its latest outlook report, the IEA reports that global oil inventories fell by 129 million barrels in March, and by a further 117 million barrels in April, as countries dipped into their reserves to cover the shortfall following the Middle East conflict.The IEA, which ordered the largest release of government oil reserves in its history in mid-March, reports:double quotation markMore than ten weeks after the war in the Middle East began, mounting supply losses from the Strait of Hormuz are depleting global oil inventories at a record pace.The IEA also forecasts weaker demand this year, as the jump in prices for crude oil and refined products leads to demand destruction.World oil demand is forecast to contract by 420,000 barrels per day this year, to 104m bpd, which is 1

A picture

Lab testing group Intertek to back £10.6bn takeover by Swedish firm EQT

The laboratory testing company Intertek has become the latest FTSE 100 business to agree to a takeover, backing a £10.6bn approach from a private equity firm owned by Sweden’s billionaire Wallenberg family.After rebuffing three previous approaches, Intertek’s board said it was “minded to recommend” the £60-a-share tilt from the Swedish buyout firm EQT to shareholders, if there was a firm offer.The deal is worth £10.6bn including debt, or £9

A picture

Fortescue ordered to pay Yindjibarndi traditional owners $150m in record native title payout

Mining company Fortescue has been ordered to pay $150m in compensation to traditional owners over cultural losses caused by the multibillion-dollar Solomon Hub iron ore mine – the largest compensation payout in native title history.The mine, which has extracted millions of tonnes of iron ore and generated an estimated $80bn in revenue for Fortescue since operations began in 2013, was approved by the Western Australian government without the consent of the Yindjibarndi traditional owners.The Yindjibarndi Ngurra Aboriginal Corporation (YNAC) launched the compensation claim in 2022 and sought $1.8bn, including $1bn for cultural damage, $678m for economic loss, $34.85m for the destruction of sites, and $112

A picture

British Steel: more questions than answers on the future | Nils Pratley

“One of the proudest things we have done in government,” said Keir Starmer in Monday’s big speech about the decision a year ago to recall parliament in order to take control of British Steel at Scunthorpe.It was an odd boast because last year’s action was merely an emergency exercise in saving the patient, as opposed to getting British Steel on its feet and out of the hospital. Taking control meant the Chinese owner, Jingye, could not turn off the two blast furnaces but meant the government was on the hook for operational losses, which will be £615m and counting by next month according to the National Audit Office (NAO).Full nationalisation is now on the cards, which will end the limbo-land state of ownership and give some comfort for 4,000 workers. But it is also the point at which the government will have to choose between its barely described “potential future options” for British Steel

A picture

E.ON agrees to buy Ovo in deal to create UK’s biggest energy supplier

The German energy group E.ON has agreed to buy struggling UK rival Ovo in a deal that would create Britain’s biggest gas and electricity supplier by number of households served.The combined company will supply about 9.6 million customers, overtaking the market leader, Octopus, which serves almost 8m homes in the UK.The value of the deal was not disclosed, but reports have estimated it at £600m

A picture

Thinktank calls for ‘double lock’ England private rent cap to ease living costs

One of the thinktanks closest to the Labour government is urging ministers to introduce private sector rent controls in England, as the chancellor weighs up how to ease a surge in living costs caused by the Iran war.The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) has published a paper calling for a rent “double lock”, which would link rent increases to either wages or inflation, depending on which was lower.While others on the left have previously called for rent controls, the IPPR’s extensive links inside government will increase pressure on ministers to include the idea in a cost of living package to be announced by Rachel Reeves later in May.The Guardian revealed last month that Reeves had been considering a one-year rent freeze to deal with a rise in inflation which economists say is now inevitable, but the idea was quickly dismissed by Downing Street.Maya Singer Hobbs, the author of the paper, said: “There are millions of people living with unaffordable housing costs, and if you want to bring those down quickly there are not many options