‘It’s really sad’: US TikTok users rethink app over concerns about privacy and censorship

A picture


Many TikTok users across the US say they’re rethinking their relationship with the platform since its ownership and terms and conditions have recently changed, with some citing censorship and lack of trust as reasons why they’re removing themselves from the app.Keara Sullivan, a 26-year-old comedian, says TikTok jumpstarted her career and provided a pathway to getting a manager and a literary agent.“I’m not one of those creators who’s a TikTok hater,” said Sullivan, who has more than half a million followers on the platform.“I’m very transparent about the fact that where I am in my career is largely because of TikTok.”That’s why, she said, it’s “really sad” for her to step away from the platform – at least for now.

TikTok, the short-form video platform owned by Chinese company ByteDance, has faced scrutiny after the decision to create a new US-based entity, TikTok USDS Joint Venture, in an effort to avoid being banned in the country.Investors in the majority US-owned venture include Oracle, which is owned by Trump ally Larry Ellison, the private equity-group Silver Lake and Abu Dhabi’s MGX, who will own 80.1% of the new entity.ByteDance will own the remaining 19.9%.

The announcement was made five years after Donald Trump first threatened to ban the popular app in the US during his first term in office,TikTok’s new deal has been accompanied by changes to app’s terms and conditions, reports of technical issues and a growing debate among users and creators about privacy and censorship,The daily average of US users deleting the TikTok app has increased 195% from 22 Januaryto 28 January compared to the previous 90 days, according to data collected by Sensor Tower, a market intelligence firm,Many social media users have voiced concern over language in the app’s terms and conditions, which specifically point out the types of data that TikTok may collect on its users, including “racial and ethnic origin” and “sexual life or sexual orientation, status as transgender or nonbinary, citizenship or immigration status, or financial information”,That language was present in the previous version of platform’s terms, which were updated in 2024, but one noticeable new feature in the terms is the explicit acknowledgment that TikTok collects precise location data (unless you opt out), as reported by Mashable.

TikTok user Julia, a 32-year-old caregiver based in Washington, told the Guardian that she deleted the app as soon as she heard about the company’s new agreement.“I trust Oracle and Ellison about as much as I trust eating a raw burger on a hot summer day,” she said.After the killing of Alex Pretti by ICE agents on 24 January, some content creators expressed concern that videos condemning the federal agency were being suppressed by TikTok.Comedian Meg Stalter said in an Instagram post that a video she made urging fellow Christians to speak up against ICE tactics was not being uploaded to the app.In response, she decided to delete the app.

“[TikTok] is under new ownership and we are being completely censored and monitored,” she wrote in her post.California governor Gavin Newsom also voiced concern about potential TikTok censorship this past week, writing on X: “Following TikTok’s sale to a Trump-aligned business group, our office has received reports, and independently confirmed instances, of suppressed content critical of President Trump.” Newsom announced that the state will be launching an investigation into the platform and whether it is violating California law by censoring anti-Trump content.TikTok USDS Joint Venture attributed the issues to a power outage at a US datacenter, unrelated to the weekend’s events.On 27 January, the entity issued the following statement: “We’ve made significant progress in recovering our U.

S.infrastructure with our U.S.data center partner.However, the U.

S.user experience may still have some technical issues, including when posting new content.We’re committed to bringing TikTok back to its full capacity as soon as possible.”A 21-year-old software engineer, who asked to remain anonymous, first encountered TikTok in 2020 as a high school junior.“I was amazed how quickly it learned my interests, kept up with trends and recommended things I would’ve never sought out myself,” he said.

“For better or for worse, I was probably using it at least four hours a day.”He says he stayed on the app for so long due to the quality of his algorithm; but after TikTok’s temporary shutdown in the US in January 2025, he began to notice differences.“I didn’t like how the pop-up message painted Trump as the ‘savior’ that would bring back TikTok once he was in office,” he said.“After it was brought back, I noticed a significant decline in recommendation quality.”Sullivan also noticed major changes following TikTok’s brief blackout, including a reduction in the income she was receiving through the company’s Creator Fund.

She ultimately made the decision to pivot away from TikTok after noticing potential censorship issues, including the banning of Palestinian journalist Bisan Owda, who had 1,4 million followers on the app,Even before TikTok found its US owner, Sullivan knew that it was in her best interest to disseminate her content far and wide,“In the internet ecosphere, you kind of have to create these different avenues for yourself, because you can’t rely on one platform,” she said,“The algorithm could change at any time.

societySee all
A picture

‘Menopause gold rush’? Boom in hi-tech products as stigma starts to recede

For any bodily function you want to measure these days there is a gadget – a wristband for step-counting, a watch to track your heart rate or a ring for measuring sleep.Now the march of wearable tech is coming to the aid of what some say is a long underserved market: menopausal women.One startup has recently launched a high-end cooling bracelet that kicks into action during a menopausal hot flush. The device is one of a growing number of lifestyle products being launched in this area, which some experts say is growing as stigma around menopause recedes. Companies are developing everything from apps offering dietary advice to devices that track symptoms, hormones and body temperature

A picture

Paying kidney donors won’t solve the problem | Letters

It is hard not to feel a certain sadness reading arguments for legalising the sale of kidneys that rely more on provocation than on engagement with how healthcare systems actually work in the UK (The big idea: Should we sell our kidneys?, 25 January).Kidney failure is devastating, and the shortage of donor organs costs lives. About 7,000 people in the UK are currently waiting for a kidney transplant, and six people die every week while waiting. It is therefore concerning to read an argument that implicitly accepts continued late diagnosis of kidney disease and progression to kidney failure as an inevitability, rather than recognising the urgent need to raise awareness of kidney disease and prioritise its prevention before lives reach crisis point.Furthermore, the notion that altruism in the UK has reached its limits, justifying a legal market for human organs, is not supported by public attitudes, social evidence or ethics

A picture

On Polymarket, ‘privileged’ users made millions betting on war strikes and diplomatic strategy. What did they know beforehand?

In the early hours of 13 June, more than 200 Israeli fighter jets began pummeling Iran with bombs, lighting up the Tehran skyline and initiating a 12-day war that would leave hundreds dead.But for one user of the prediction market Polymarket, it was their lucky day. In the 24 hours before the strike occurred, they had bet tens of thousands of dollars on “yes” on the market “Israel military action against Iran by Friday?” when the prospect still seemed unlikely and odds were hovering at about 10%. After the strike, Polymarket declared that military action had been taken, and paid the user $128,000 for their lucky wager.But was it just luck?Polymarket is an online platform where people can bet on just about anything, from what the most-streamed song on Spotify will be to how many times Donald Trump will say “terrible” that day

A picture

Abusers using AI and digital tech to attack and control women, charity warns

Domestic abusers are increasingly using AI, smartwatches and other technology to attack and control their victims, a domestic abuse charity says.Record numbers of women who were abused and controlled through technology were referred to Refuge’s specialist services during the last three months of 2025, including a 62% increase in the most complex cases to total 829 women. There was also a 24% increase in referrals of under-30s.Recent cases included perpetrators using wearable tech such as smartwatches, Oura rings and Fitbits to track and stalk women, disrupting their lives through smart home devices that control lights and heating, and using AI spoofing apps to impersonate people.Emma Pickering, head of the tech-facilitated abuse team at Refuge, said: “Time and again, we see what happens when devices go to market without proper consideration of how they might be used to harm women and girls

A picture

‘Chilling’ hacking network is targeting vulnerable children, charity warns

A leading UK online safety charity has issued a “public warning” about a hacking community that is targeting vulnerable children for sexual abuse, self-harm and suicide.The Molly Rose Foundation (MRF) said online networks linked to a global ecosystem labelled the Com were carrying out extreme exploitation, cyberbullying, violence and abuse – and called for a coordinated global response from governments, regulators, law enforcement and tech companies.The warning follows the publication of a report by the online risk consultancy Resolver in partnership with the MRF, which was founded by the family of Molly Russell, a British teenager who killed herself in 2017 after viewing harmful content online.“The growing threat posed by Com networks is the most chilling and urgent threat to children online today and it requires a swift and comprehensive response,” said Andy Burrows, MRF’s chief executive, who described the report as a “public warning”.“These groups prey on children’s vulnerabilities to coerce and groom girls on gaming and messaging platforms, inflicting appalling harm and cruelty including acts of self-harm, livestreamed abuse or even suicide

A picture

Great Ormond Street surgeon harmed 94 children, review finds

Nearly 100 children were harmed by a Great Ormond Street surgeon, according to an independent review.Great Ormond Street hospital (Gosh) conducted an independent review of nearly 800 patients treated by the consultant orthopaedic surgeon Yaser Jabbar between 2017 and 2022, who specialised in limb lengthening and reconstruction.Of the 789 children under his care, the study concluded that 94 were specifically harmed as a result of his actions, of whom 91 had been operated on by Jabbar.Announcing the findings, Matthew Shaw, the chief executive of Gosh, said everyone at the hospital was “profoundly sorry” for all those affected and promised the trust had learned lessons.“We have made significant changes to both the orthopaedic service itself and across the hospital to minimise the chance of something like this happening again