Democrats are playing with fire in trying to reclaim tax cuts from Republicans
Senator Chris Van Hollen and other Democratic lawmakers are embracing a policy that hardly benefits the middle classSoul-searching within the Democratic party is to be expected after its loss in the 2024 election,Donald Trump’s edge over Kamala Harris in voters’ perceptions of economic competence (perplexing though it now appears following a year of erratic policymaking) was bound to inspire a call to rethink the party platform,Yet the second-guessing is steering the Democrats down a dangerous path to embracing a tax-cutting strategy that risks defeating the project to enable a healthier, more equitable society,The most prominent proposal bouncing around Democratic circles comes in a bill from Chris Van Hollen, a Maryland senator,In a nutshell, it proposes cutting taxes for Americans earning up to $80,500 ($161,000 for married couples) and funding the $1.
6tn dollar hole this would leave in the budget over a decade with a new surtax on Americans making more than $1m.It is politically smart – a deft response to the tax cuts, on tips, overtime, car loans and social security, that Trump offered up last year in his One Big Beautiful Bill Act.Middle-class Americans, in the 40th to 80th percentile of the income scale, would save, on average, about $1,500 in taxes in 2026 under Van Hollen’s proposal – paid for mainly by the very rich in the top 0.1% of the distribution, who would see their taxes go up by an average of $1.2m, according to the Penn-Wharton budget model.
The proposal, which has the support of Vermont’s Bernie Sanders – icon of the party’s progressive left – is also a clever way to chip away at Republicans’ longstanding ownership of tax cuts.Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act reserved much of its goodies for the richest taxpayers.A tax cut aimed at middle-income families would be nice for a change.But Van Hollen et al are playing with fire.The strategy endangers the prospect that the United States might ever build a social contract based on a promise of shared prosperity.
It furthers the case for depriving the state of the resources it needs to mitigate ballooning inequities and help build a social contract based on shared prosperity.Among the 38 nations in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), only six countries raise less in taxes than the United States, as a share of the economy.US tax revenues amount to roughly the same share of gross domestic product (GDP) as in the 1960s.But the US is a different country: spending on social security and Medicare grew by six points of GDP from 1967 to 2025.Interest payments on the federal debt grew by two points.
Resources available for everything else the government does declined from 22% to 14,5% of GDP over the period,Improving the progressivity of the tax schedule – as Van Hollen’s idea would do – is not, in fact, particularly effective at mitigating inequality,Mitigating inequality requires government resources to fund cash transfers or services to improve the lives of ordinary families and individuals (known in the jargon as government transfers),For instance, economists from the World Bank and the Paris School of Economics evaluated the impact of redistribution via taxes and transfers since 1980.
Transfers, they concluded, account for 90% of the reduction in inequality.Taxes account for merely 10%.The US’s poor track record at mitigating depths of inequality unseen in other industrialized nations, is largely a story of a state impoverished by half-a-century worth of tax cuts.To put it in concrete terms: middle-class taxpayers would get an extra $1,500 a year or so from Van Hollen’s proposal.And they would pay roughly that much out of pocket for health services, nearly the most in the OECD.
Or they would skip seeing the doctor.It’s hard to see this as a path to shared prosperity.This is no time for Democrats to throw in the towel.Van Hollen’s tax proposal would not further defund the American state.But it would require a massive investment of political capital to get not much of anything.
The political moment, with Trump’s polling on the economy underwater by 31%, offers an opportunity for something more ambitious,What’s more, there is the economic imperative: American social democracy simply needs more money,It can be done,Consider Sweden, where tax revenue amounts to 42% of GDP, 16 percentage points more than in the US,But it gets there with a tax structure that is less progressive than the US.
Its personal income tax is flatter – the gap between the highest and the lowest rate is smaller.It gets a large share of revenue from value-added taxes – which hit lower-income taxpayers harder because they consume more of what they earn.Still, redistribution by the Swedish state does a lot more than the US’s to build an equitable society.Sweden’s poverty rate of only 8%, by the OECD’s definition, owes a great deal to taxes and transfers that boost lower-income families’ disposable income.Based on market income, before such government intervention, the poverty rate would be 24%.
Government redistribution reduces poverty in the US by much less: from 27% to 18%.Another way to look at this is through the Gini index, which measures the concentration of income on a scale from zero – which means perfect equality – to a maximum of one – in which one person hogs all the income and everybody else has nothing.Government redistribution reduces Sweden’s Gini index by a third, to 0.289.By contrast, it trims inequality in the US by less than a quarter, to 0.
394.This is by no means a call to leave the rich alone.In the United States, the very rich pay almost nothing in taxes.They make most of their money not via wages or other taxable income but through capital gains.Because they rarely sell their assets – they borrow against them to pay for yachts and stuff, continuously rolling loans over – these “unrealized” gains multiply over time tax-free.
When the oligarchs die, clever loopholes allow them to bequeath the pile untouched by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), cleansed of capital gains achieved during their lifetime,They must be taxed much more,Tackling that monster will not be easy, though,It will require a lot of political capital to perform major surgery on a tax structure that has been pared back over the last 50 years to let the plutocracy off the hook,For the sake of a more equitable US, Democrats should not just give the money back to everyday working families – everyday working families deserve more.
Stephen Colbert on Trump’s 22ft gold statue at his golf club: ‘recreational idolatry’
On Monday night, Stephen Colbert gathered his “best television friends” Jimmy Kimmel, Jimmy Fallon, Seth Meyers and John Oliver on the couch after a monologue which focused on the war in the Middle East, Donald Trump’s latest slew of AI images and Sean Duffy’s return to reality TV.On The Late Show, Colbert discussed reports that the US president sent Iran a one-page memo last week outlining his peace plan. “I’m told we have a copy,” he joked, before flashing up a handwritten note in the style of a school kid’s love letter, which read: “Will you go to peace with me? Yes or no.”Over the weekend, Iran responded to Trump’s proposal with a list of demands that included reparations for the war and full control over the strait of Hormuz. Tehran also said that it as willing to suspend development of its nuclear program but for a shorter time than the 20 years requested by Trump
One in seven in UK prefer consulting AI chatbots to seeing doctor, study finds
One in seven people are using AI chatbots for health advice instead of seeing their GP, a UK study has found.The poll of more than 2,000 people found that – of the 15% turning to chatbots – one in four had done so because of long NHS waiting lists.The study analysed by researchers at King’s College London revealed the potential risks of using AI for health advice. A fifth of respondents who did so said the technology did not encourage them to seek a professional opinion and a similar proportion said they decided against seeking a consultation because of something an AI chatbot had told them.The research is the first to quantify the use of AI chatbots for health advice, according to the researchers, and signals how the technology is changing the way people are dealing with health problems
US Senate confirms Kevin Warsh as Federal Reserve chair, replacing Jerome Powell
The US Senate confirmed Kevin Warsh as chair of the Federal Reserve, one of the most powerful roles in the federal government that holds enormous sway over the economy.The 54-45 Senate vote on Wednesday was split along party lines, with the exception of the Democratic senator John Fetterman from Pennsylvania, who joined the Republican majority. It was most divisive confirmation vote for the position in history.Warsh was confirmed for a four-year term as chair and a 14-year appointment on the Fed’s rate-setting board.Warsh will officially step into the role on 14 May, when the term of outgoing Fed chair, Jerome Powell, ends
Sam Altman defends OpenAI in courtroom showdown with Elon Musk
The OpenAI CEO, Sam Altman, took the stand on Tuesday to defend himself and his company against a lawsuit by Elon Musk. Altman is set to be one of the final witnesses in the trial, which has pitted two of the tech industry’s most powerful men against each other in a dramatic courtroom showdown.Musk has accused Altman and OpenAI of breaking the AI firm’s founding agreement by restructuring it into a for-profit enterprise, alleging that Altman essentially swindled him into co-founding the company and providing tens of millions in financial backing. Musk also claims Altman unjustly enriched himself in the process and is seeking the CEO’s removal from OpenAI, the redistribution of $134bn to the firm’s non-profit and the undoing of its for-profit conversion.OpenAI and Altman have rejected all of Musk’s claims, arguing that he is motivated by jealousy after a failed bid to take over the AI firm in 2018 and a subsequent departure from its board
Florida students boo graduation speaker who called AI ‘next Industrial Revolution’
Though college graduations usually consist of a speaker giving advice to students, one recent ceremony featured students giving the speaker their opinions – loudly.The University of Central Florida’s 2026 graduating class booed as a real estate development executive spoke about how “the rise of artificial intelligence is the next Industrial Revolution” and about “living in a time of profound change”.The crowd of students was so loud that Gloria Caulfield paused, turned away from the podium and threw her hands up in the air.“Woop, what happened?” she asked, before letting out a nervous laugh: “OK, I struck a chord. May I finish?”As the crowd calmed down, Caulfield proceeded
Jim Furyk tells US players they need to make Ryder Cup more of a priority
Jim Furyk has admitted the United States need to make the Ryder Cup more of a priority as the 56-year-old plots a reversal of fortunes at Adare Manor in September 2027.Speaking expansively for the first time since being handed the US captaincy for a second time, Furyk pointed towards an overhaul of approach to the biennial event. He also suggested he will be keen to involve Tiger Woods on his backroom team.Victory for Europe at Bethpage last year means the US have won two of the past eight Ryder Cup stagings. The PGA of America wanted Woods to assume the captaincy for Adare, a scenario that was subject to delay before it was rendered impossible by the 15-time major winner’s Florida car crash in March
The Spin | ‘We have a hoot on the field’: Oswestry CC boasts 10 mother-daughter pairs
From the Pocket: Voss coached the way he played and his brutal football failed Carlton
Cleary to finish up as Panthers coach and end greatest modern-day NRL dynasty
Billy Knight obituary
Rory McIlroy claims he knew LIV was in trouble and breakaway tour was always a ‘risk’
Jake Paul admits broken jaw from Anthony Joshua fight may have ended boxing career