Is David Lammy persuaded by his own jury trials proposal? Not sure. But he said it anyway | John Crace
Spare a thought for David Lammy,Not so long ago he was foreign secretary,His dream job,Turning left on boarding planes to go to meet his counterparts around the world,An important player in global geopolitics.
Then he found himself out on his ear.Replaced by Yvette Cooper, who had been booted out of the Home Office for being perceived to be soft on asylum seekers.But at least Yvette got to fail upwards.Lammy just found himself downgraded to justice secretary.A department that has been unloved, downgraded and underfunded for years.
Worse still, David now finds himself being forced to advocate policies the old David Lammy never once dreamed of himself making,Even as foreign secretary he would have been shaking his head in disapproval,Yet needs must,Still, one man’s pain was another woman’s gain,For Rachel Reeves there was the relief that the dial had finally shifted on the budget.
The worst of the storm had passed, most of the rightwing papers had dialled down their interest and only Kemi Badenoch and Mel Stride were still to be found howling to each other in a cupboard at some imagined wrongdoing.So it was that at lunchtime on Tuesday, Lammy appeared in the Commons to make a statement on curtailing the right to trial by jury.This was once-in-a-generation reform, he said.The justice system was falling to pieces.The court backlog was now running at 78,000 and would soon reach 100,000.
Defendants were pleading not guilty to buy some time in the hope that victims and courts would lose patience and drop their cases,Now you might have thought that the sensible answer was to fund the system properly,To make sure there were more sitting days,To fix the heating and air-conditioning units,To build new courts and prison stock.
To train more barristers and judges, and increase legal aid funding.But that would require a level of time and investment no one is prepared to make.People like to moan about the justice system but no one wants to pay for it.So it falls apart.And instead we get sticking plaster solutions that even the government doesn’t believe will really make a difference.
Investment was not enough, said Lammy.At least, not the amounts he was prepared to put in.So there would now be judge-only trials for either-way cases with a sentence of three years.This would be a good thing, he insisted.A balance in favour of the victims.
It was one of the founding principles of Magna Carta.More important than the right to trial by jury was the article stating that justice delayed is justice denied.It had just taken successive governments 800 years to properly implement it.This is what the barons had wanted all along at Runnymede.In any case, when you came to think about it, a judge-only trial was in many ways fairer than trial by 12 men and women.
Because at least when judges deliver their verdict they have to give their reasoning.A jury just came back with a guilty verdict.No explanation.So they could just have all had it in for the defendant.Taken exception to the way he looked.
We were entering a new era of transparency.The same with the decision to increase cases that magistrates could judge to ones with a sentence of 18 months.Let’s face it.Magistrates lived in the community and were part of the community.Much like jurors.
Judges lived on their own private islands.So actually being tried by a magistrate was exactly the same as being tried by a jury.I’m not sure Lammy was entirely persuaded of this argument that had been prepared for him, but he said it nonetheless.Lammy ended by pointing out this was no big deal, as 90% of cases were already tried by magistrates and only 3% went to jury trial.So you rather wondered why he was going to so much trouble to do something that wouldn’t make much difference.
But David was nothing if not hopeful,There would be more people banged up, he declared,At least there would be if the prisons weren’t already full and there was somewhere to put them,Maybe accidentally releasing a further 12 prisoners was a cunning plan all along,Who knows? All the escapers could form their own roving jury.
In reply, the shadow justice secretary, Robert Jenrick, was condescension personified.Speaking … extra … slowly … to … sound … clever.He seems to think everything is an audition for a TV gameshow, “So You Think You Want To Be Tory Leader”.He is ever optimistic that Kemi might implode.Honest Bob has had it in for judges ever since the Daily Mail told him they were the “enemies of the people”.
But his newfound enthusiasm for the rights of defendants to a trial by jury is an unexpected development,Not so long ago he seemed to be all for summary justice for most offenders,Especially asylum seekers,Do what you like with them,Just as long as they don’t take up any of our time and money.
But now he was coming over as a latter-day Rumpole of the Bailey.The quality of mercy is not strained.He sounded fake.A man in search of a soundbite rather than solutions.Not even his own backbenchers take him seriously.
Jeremy Wright ignored him and commended Lammy for at least trying to come up with a solution to the court backlog,Just not the right one,Would it not be better if the jury reform was made temporary? To be reinstated once the system was functioning again?Lammy didn’t realise he was being offered a life belt,Something that might appease MPs who were queasy about a permanent change,Even if the system was hardwired never to work properly.
Instead he mumbled something about “jury trials being a peculiar way to run a public service”.What? Sometimes he is his own worst enemy.MPs on his own side of the chamber were less than impressed.Diane Abbott observed that judge-only trials would result in a greater number of miscarriages of justice.Many judges came from the same class and had the same unconscious biases.
And it was defendants like her and the justice secretary who would be the victims.Richard Burgon wondered what would happen if Reform – “Putin’s Pals” – were in power and started appointing their own judges.Unlikely, said Lammy.Yes.But the Lammy of just a few months ago would have been one of the most vocal in saying that cutting jury trials was the hallmark of an authoritarian regime.
Charlie Kirk tops Wikipedia’s list of most-read articles in 2025
Wikipedia’s article on Charlie Kirk was the most read on the online encyclopedia this year, as users sought out information on the conservative activist.People viewed the entry on Kirk nearly 45m times, many after he was shot at a university campus debate on 10 September.Although Kirk was a well-known figure in the US as co-founder of the Turning Point USA organisation, his death attracted headline coverage around the world. More than 40% of the views for the most-read article on English-language Wikipedia in 2025 came from outside the US, according to data from the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organisation that operates the website.The second-most read is a regular feature in Wikipedia’s annual list: notable deaths of the year
Age of the ‘scam state’: how an illicit, multibillion-dollar industry has taken root in south-east Asia
For days before the explosions began, the business park had been emptying out. When the bombs went off, they took down empty office blocks and demolished echoing, multi-cuisine food halls. Dynamite toppled a four-storey hospital, silent karaoke complexes, deserted gyms and dorm rooms.So came the end of KK Park, one of south-east Asia’s most infamous “scam centres”, press releases from Myanmar’s junta declared. The facility had held tens of thousands of people, forced to relentlessly defraud people around the world
Siri-us setback: Apple’s AI chief steps down as company lags behind rivals
Apple’s head of artificial intelligence, John Giannandrea, is stepping down from the company. The move comes as the Silicon Valley giant has lagged behind its competitors in rolling out generative AI features, in particular its voice assistant Siri. Apple made the announcement on Monday, thanking Giannandrea for his seven-year tenure at the company.Tim Cook, Apple’s CEO, said his fellow executive helped the company “in building and advancing our AI work” and allowing Apple to “continue to innovate”. Giannandrea will be replaced by longtime AI researcher Amar Subramanya
‘It’s going much too fast’: the inside story of the race to create the ultimate AI
On the 8.49am train through Silicon Valley, the tables are packed with young people glued to laptops, earbuds in, rattling out code.As the northern California hills scroll past, instructions flash up on screens from bosses: fix this bug; add new script. There is no time to enjoy the view. These commuters are foot soldiers in the global race towards artificial general intelligence – when AI systems become as or more capable than highly qualified humans
AI’s safety features can be circumvented with poetry, research finds
Poetry can be linguistically and structurally unpredictable – and that’s part of its joy. But one man’s joy, it turns out, can be a nightmare for AI models.Those are the recent findings of researchers out of Italy’s Icaro Lab, an initiative from a small ethical AI company called DexAI. In an experiment designed to test the efficacy of guardrails put on artificial intelligence models, the researchers wrote 20 poems in Italian and English that all ended with an explicit request to produce harmful content such as hate speech or self-harm.They found that the poetry’s lack of predictability was enough to get the AI models to respond to harmful requests they had been trained to avoid – a process know as “jailbreaking”
ChatGPT-5 offers dangerous advice to mentally ill people, psychologists warn
ChatGPT-5 is offering dangerous and unhelpful advice to people experiencing mental health crises, some of the UK’s leading psychologists have warned.Research conducted by King’s College London (KCL) and the Association of Clinical Psychologists UK (ACP) in partnership with the Guardian suggested that the AI chatbotfailed to identify risky behaviour when communicating with mentally ill people.A psychiatrist and a clinical psychologist interacted with ChatGPT-5 as if they had a number of mental health conditions. The chatbot affirmed, enabled and failed to challenge delusional beliefs such as being “the next Einstein”, being able to walk through cars or “purifying my wife through flame”.For milder conditions, they found some examples of good advice and signposting, which they thought may reflect the fact OpenAI, the company that owns ChatGPT, had worked to improve the tool in collaboration with clinicians – though the psychologists warned this should not be seen as a substitute for professional help
Is David Lammy persuaded by his own jury trials proposal? Not sure. But he said it anyway | John Crace
UK ministers aim to ban cryptocurrency political donations over anonymity risks
David Lammy tells of ‘traumatic’ racial abuse in youth after Farage allegations
Angela Rayner to lay amendment to speed up workers’ rights bill
UK terror watchdog warns national security plan ignores escalating online threats
Attorney general urges Nigel Farage to apologise over alleged racism and antisemitism