US date rape survivors file lawsuit accusing Hinge and Tinder of ‘accommodating rapists’
The Dating Apps Reporting Project produced this story in partnership with the Pulitzer Center’s AI Accountability Network and The Markup, now a part of CalMatters, and copublished with The Guardian and The 19th,Six women who were drugged and raped or sexually assaulted by the same Denver cardiologist filed a lawsuit against Match Group on Tuesday, accusing the world’s largest dating app company of “accommodating rapists across its products” through “negligence” and a “defective” product,The women, backed by four law firms, said that by allowing known abusers like Stephen Matthews to remain on its apps, Tinder and Hinge, even after they are reported for rape, the company fostered a breeding ground for “sexual predators”,“Even when Match Group receives reports about rapists, they continue to welcome them, fail to warn users about the general and specific risks, and affirmatively recommend known predators to members,” the complaint said,“Rapists know each Match Group platform offers a catalog of available victims.
”Though Match Group claimed to a survivor who reported Matthews that they had “permanently banned” him, the suit contends, he remained active on Hinge – and was even promoted as a “standout” match.“ Dating apps have a duty to protect their users from known dangers,” said Carrie Goldberg, one of the attorneys representing Matthews’s survivors.Goldberg, who is known for high-profile lawsuits against large companies, including Amazon and Meta and high-profile abusers, like Harvey Weinstein, said “Stephen Matthews was a known danger,” and called dating apps “potentially the most dangerous product.”The 54-page complaint, filed in Denver district court, cites an 18-month investigation into Match Group by the Dating App Reporting Project, published in the Guardian in February.In October 2024, Matthews was sentenced to 158 years to life in prison.
He was convicted in August of 35 counts of drugging and/or sexually assaulting 11 women between 2019 and 2023.The six women bringing civil lawsuit against Match Group are proceeding anonymously to protect their identities.Match Group did not provide comment before publication.In February, in a statement provided to the Dating App Reporting Project by former company spokesperson Kayla Whaling, the company cast itself as an industry leader in deploying technology to promote safety, including “harassment-preventing AI tools, ID verification for profiles, and a portal that helps us better support and communicate with law enforcement investigating crimes … Every person deserves safe and respectful experiences.We are committed to doing the work to make dating safer on our platforms and beyond.
”“We recognize our role in fostering safer communities and promoting authentic and respectful connections worldwide,” the February statement read.“We will always work to invest in and improve our systems, and search for ways to help our users stay safe, both online and when they connect in real life.”The Dating Apps Reporting Project investigation found that Match Group, an $8bn dating app behemoth that operates in more than 40 languages and 190 countries, had known the scale of harm on its platforms for years, but kept that information secret.It promised to publish a transparency report to share this data with the public in 2022, but never followed through.After the Dating Apps Reporting Project investigation in February, mentions of this promise have been removed from the company’s website.
The investigation also found Match Group scaled back critical trust and safety teams.Matthews was first reported to Hinge in 2020 but remained on Match Group apps, the investigation found, continuing to match with and assault women until 2023 when one survivor walked into a Denver police station.Relying on the Dating App Reporting Project’s investigation, along with new details from a survivor’s attempts to warn the company of danger, the Denver lawsuit details the cardiologist’s years-long sexual assault spree on Hinge.Even after being reported multiple times, Matthews was able to continue to match with and assault women – usually with the same pattern – disarming them methodically with a trip to the park with his dog, a brunch near his townhouse, or a game of Jenga.The lawsuit calls Hinge’s product design “defective”, alleging a bad actor can easily unmatch with a victim before they report them.
“Once unmatched, the reporting option disappears,” the lawsuit said.Product testing performed by the Dating Apps Reporting Project found banned users were easily able to rejoin Tinder, without changing their name, birthday or profile photo as late as February 2025.The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages for plaintiffs.One of the women suing Match Group told the Dating Apps Reporting Project that she was initially intrigued by a profile showing a handsome doctor hiking with his dog in 2023.“This guy has it together,” she thought.
Alexa, then 22 years old, whose last name is being withheld to protect her privacy, met Matthews at his house where he offered her a shot.Not long after, she said, she started stumbling.Matthews then pushed her into a bedroom and began kissing her, she said.That’s when Alexa said she blacked out.After being contacted by the Denver district attorney’s office, she was infuriated to learn that Matthews had been reported to Hinge three years before her attack.
“Hinge was liable for giving him a platform.” Alexa said.“They had all the power and the resources to prevent this from happening.”Legal analysts say the lawsuit faces an uphill battle against section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a 1996 law that grants online platforms immunity from liability for most user-generated content.In 2019, Goldberg herself lost an effort to sue Grindr, a gay dating app, on behalf of a user who claimed the app’s technology resulted in men following him for sex.
The courts sided with the app and ruled that they were immune from liability due to section 230.In 2023, the US supreme court in Gonzalez v Google declined to rule on whether tech platforms like YouTube are liable for terrorist content recommended to users by their algorithms, with families of Isis victims suing and remanded the case to the ninth circuit and referenced their decision in a separate case, Twitter v Taamneh, finding “little if any” claim for relief.Match says it is improving the safety of its apps.During its most recent earnings call in November, Match Group and Tinder CEO Spencer Rascoff said the company was “doubling down on trust and safety across our platforms” because “trust is core” to its “long term success”.He spoke of the safety tools being integrated into the company’s portfolio – like video verification technology, recommendation algorithms, and AI assisted moderation tools.
Some of these tools, Rascoff admitted, are decreasing the apps’ monthly active users but, he added, “the fact that we’re able to improve user outcomes at minimal impact to revenue” is “a good sign”.Since 2022, the company has been struggling to return its stock price to even a third of its peak.Rascoff, a venture capitalist and co-founder of the real estate website Zillow, cut headcount at the company by 13% after taking the reins in February.In December 2025, the Dating Apps Reporting Project retested whether banned users could still sign up for new accounts on Match Group’s dating apps, without lying about who they are.Testing confirmed that banned users could sign up again on Hinge, Plenty of Fish and OkCupid with the exact same name, birthday and profile photos used in their banned accounts.
Match Group did not respond to an inquiry about the product testing.On Tinder however, testing showed that some new users are now prompted to take a video selfie, so that Tinder can use facial recognition to “confirm users are real and match their profile photos”.The new security feature is called Face Check and Tinder has launched it in several states and countries.This feature also may not have prevented Matthews from returning to a dating app, as he never lied about who he was.Reporters also checked their old accounts from February, which had the same name, birthday, and profile photos of banned accounts, to see if Match Group or its moderation systems eventually banned the accounts.
Every account that reporters checked was still in good standing,Alexa believes that she wouldn’t have been harmed if Hinge had invested more in prioritizing women’s safety,“If these companies are making billions of dollars, they definitely have the resources to make them effective and safe,” she said,She said she no longer uses dating apps,“I will never date the same again,” Alexa said.
“I’ve kind of even accepted that I would be totally fine being alone for the rest of my life if it means keeping myself safe from what happened to me.”
Water levels across the Great Lakes are falling – just as US data centers move in
The sign outside Tom Hermes’s farmyard in Perkins Township in Ohio, a short drive south of the shores of Lake Erie, proudly claims that his family have farmed the land here since 1900. Today, he raises 130 head of cattle and grows corn, wheat, grass and soybeans on 1,200 acres of land.For his family, his animals and wider business, water is life.So when, in May 2024, the Texas-based Aligned Data Centers broke ground on its NEO-01, four-building, 200,000 sq ft data center on a brownfield site that abuts farmland that Hermes rents, he was concerned.“We have city water here
Boost for artists in AI copyright battle as only 3% back UK active opt-out plan
A campaign fronted by popstars including Elton John and Dua Lipa to protect artists’ works from being mined to train AI models without consent has received a boost after almost every respondent to a government consultation backed their case.Ninety-five per cent of the more than 10,000 people who had their say over how music, novels, films and other works should be protected from copyright infringements by tech companies called for copyright to be strengthened and a requirement for licensing in all cases or no change to copyright law.By contrast, only 3% of people backed the government’s initial preferred tech company-friendly option, which was to require artists and copyright holders to actively opt out of having their material fed into data-hungry AI systems.Ministers subsequently dropped that preference in the face of a backlash. Artists who have opposed any dilution of their copyright include Sam Fender, Kate Bush and the Pet Shop Boys
Google AI summaries are ruining the livelihoods of recipe writers: ‘It’s an extinction event’
This past March, when Google began rolling out its AI Mode search capability, it began offering AI-generated recipes. The recipes were not all that intelligent. The AI had taken elements of similar recipes from multiple creators and Frankensteined them into something barely recognizable. In one memorable case, the Google AI failed to distinguish comments on a Reddit thread from legitimate recipe sites and advised users to cook with non-toxic glue.Over the past few years, bloggers who have not secured their sites behind a paywall have seen their carefully developed and tested recipes show up, often without attribution and in a bastardized form, in ChatGPT replies
UK Treasury drawing up new rules to police cryptocurrency markets
Cryptocurrencies will be regulated in a similar way to other financial products under legislation coming into force in 2027.The Treasury is drawing up rules that will require crypto companies to meet a set of standards overseen by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).Ministers have sought to overhaul the crypto market, which has ballooned in popularity as a way of investing money and making payments.Cryptocurrencies have not been subject to the same regulation as traditional financial products such as stocks and shares, which means that in many cases consumers do not enjoy the same level of protection.The government said the new rules would make the crypto industry more transparent, boost consumer confidence and make it easier to detect suspicious activity, impose sanctions and hold companies accountable
YouTube channels spreading fake, anti-Labour videos viewed 1.2bn times in 2025
YouTube channels spreading fake, anti-Labour videos have amassed more than a billion views this year, as opportunists attempt to use AI-generated content to profit from political division in the UK.More than 150 channels have been detected in the last year that promote anti-Labour narratives, as well as outright fake and inflammatory accusations about Keir Starmer.A study seen by the Guardian has found the channels have accumulated 5.3m subscribers and have created more than 56,000 videos, with a total of almost 1.2bn views in 2025
Gavin Newsom pushes back on Trump AI executive order preempting state laws
The ink was barely dry on Donald Trump’s artificial intelligence executive order when Gavin Newsom came out swinging. Just hours after the order went public Thursday evening, the California governor issued a statement saying the presidential dictum, which seeks to block states from regulating AI of their own accord, advances “grift and corruption” instead of innovation.“President Trump and David Sacks aren’t making policy – they’re running a con,” Newsom said, referencing Trump’s AI adviser and crypto “czar”. “Every day, they push the limits to see how far they can take it.”Trump’s executive order is a major victory for tech companies that have campaigned against legislative barriers to developing and deploying their AI products
Paddy Power and Betfair to pay £2m settlement after failing to protect users
Warner Bros reportedly poised to reject Paramount’s $108bn hostile takeover bid
UK insists US tech deal not dead as Trump threatens penalties against European firms
US date rape survivors file lawsuit accusing Hinge and Tinder of ‘accommodating rapists’
Jofra Archer steps up to show his true value lies beyond pundits’ stereotypes | Barney Ronay
England consider formal complaint after Snicko error costs Carey’s wicket