OpenAI president’s ‘deeply personal’ diary becomes focus in Musk’s case against Altman

A picture


As Elon Musk’s case against OpenAI entered its second week, focus shifted to the company’s president, Greg Brockman.Over the course of several hours on Monday and Tuesday, Brockman faced questions about his emails, texts and one piece of evidence that has become central to the trial: his personal diary.Musk’s lawsuit revolves around his allegation that Brockman, OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman, violated the founding agreement of the artificial intelligence firm by turning it into a for-profit entity.Musk argues that Altman and Brockman also unjustly enriched themselves in the process, essentially taking Musk’s money while deceiving him about their true intent for the business.He is seeking Altman and Brockman’s removal, the undoing of the for-profit restructuring and $134bn, which Musk wants distributed to OpenAI’s non-profit.

The journal, which Brockman kept during the company’s founding years circa 2015, has provided a consistent line of attack for Musk’s attorneys in the lead-up to the trial and during Brockman’s time on the witness stand.Musk’s team has presented numerous embarrassing excerpts, which OpenAI argues are taken out of context, to portray Brockman as self-interested and deceptive.Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers cited Brockman’s entries multiple times in her decision to deny the AI firm’s motion to prevent the case from going to trial.“Financially what will take me to $1B?” Brockman wrote in one entry in which he asked himself what he “really wants”.During Brockman’s pre-trial deposition, Musk’s attorney brought up the journal a half-dozen times and asked why Brockman wrote “it would be nice to be making the billions”.

Brockman responded that he meant it would be nice to have a revenue plan for the company outside donations.“It’d be wrong to steal the non-profit from him.to convert to a b-corp without him.that’d be pretty morally bankrupt.and he’s really not an idiot,” Brockman wrote in another entry, which considered Musk’s role in the company.

Musk’s lead attorney, Steven Molo, called Brockman to testify on Monday and questioned what he meant by several of his entries, specifically asking about the line that Musk was “really not an idiot”.“Did you mean to say that only an idiot would allow you to steal a charity?” Molo asked.“No,” Brockman responded.During a series of tense exchanges, Musk’s attorney also repeatedly read out portions of Brockman’s journal to the court and accused him of deceiving Musk.“You weren’t honest with Elon Musk when you told him that you wanted OpenAI to remain a non-profit, were you?” Molo asked.

“We were absolutely honest with Elon,” Brockman responded.OpenAI has denied all of Musk’s claims, stating that the Tesla CEO is merely an aggrieved former co-founder who left the company in 2018 after a failed bid to take control.They argue that Musk was always aware of the intent to create a for-profit structure and that OpenAI is still overseen by a non-profit that seeks to benefit humanity through AI.OpenAI published a blogpost in January, titled “the truth Elon left out”, that attempted to show Musk’s team misused quotes and cut out relevant sections.Brockman meanwhile posted a lengthy thread on X on the same day as OpenAI’s blog, which gave his explanation of his diary entries.

“I have great respect for Elon, but the way he cherrypicked from my personal journal is beyond dishonest,” Brockman said on X, stating that he was looking forward to being able to tell his full version of events.Musk’s case against OpenAI, Altman and Brockman isn’t the only lawsuit where the diary has drawn interest.In March, a federal judge ruled that OpenAI must give portions of Brockman’s journal to the New York Times and other plaintiffs in a case that accuses the AI firm of copyright infringement and illegally using newspapers’ intellectual property to train their AI models.OpenAI’s lawyers began their cross-examination of Brockman on Monday afternoon and carried on into Tuesday, giving him a chance to reframe some of Musk’s accusations and reiterate his claim that he never deceived the world’s richest person.When asked about the diary, Brockman downplayed its role as a record of events and referred to it as stream-of-consciousness writing that he never thought would be public.

“It’s very painful,” Brockman said,“It’s very deeply personal writings that weren’t meant for the world to see but there’s nothing in there that I’m ashamed of,”Sarah Eddy, OpenAI’s lawyer, asked Brockman on Tuesday about sharing equity with Musk and the centibillionaire’s attempt to wrest control of the company,Eddy also questioned the company president about a 2017 meeting at a haunted mansion, which came after OpenAI’s artificial intelligence won a video game competition in Seattle against the best human player in the world,Musk described the victory in an email as a “triggering event” that signified the “time to make the next step for OpenAI”, which Brockman testified he thought meant time for the company to create a for-profit.

Musk emailed people at OpenAI suggesting that they celebrate the video game win with “party carnage” at a haunted mansion he’d just bought in San Francisco.Brockman testified that it was clear there had been a party there the night before and Musk’s then girlfriend, Amber Heard, was present and “served some nice whisky”.Brockman said “it was a very celebratory moment” and they discussed making OpenAI a for-profit.After the celebration, rifts grew among OpenAI’s leadership, Brockman said.Altman believed there should be an equal split of equity but that Musk said he deserved more because he “started the most multibillion-dollar companies in history” and provided the most money to found OpenAI, the OpenAI president testified.

According to Brockman, Musk said: “Look, you guys are great, but I can start another AI company tomorrow.One tweet, that’s all it takes.”By 2018, Musk had left the board.Brockman testified that the departure came after a meeting where Musk “stormed around the table” and then said to him: “When will you be departing OpenAI?”“He said that people needed to know he was in charge,” Brockman testified.“He knows rockets; he knows electric cars; he doesn’t know AI.

”After Musk’s decision to leave the board became final, Brockman said he felt “relief.Some sadness.The end of era.But it also freed us.”
societySee all
A picture

Attempts to stop prison drone drug deliveries hampered by crumbling Victorian walls

Weak and crumbling walls in Victorian prisons are hampering attempts to halt drones from delivering drugs and weapons to inmates.Plans to install tougher netting and window grilles to stop drones from entering have been hampered because the walls have been unable to take the extra weight, prison governors said.Recent attempts to fix anti-drone netting at HMP Pentonville, the Victorian prison in north London, were stalled after they found that the bricks were too soft, sources have said.Charlie Taylor, the chief inspector of prisons for England and Wales, said last month that the Prison Service had “ceded the airspace above many of our prisons to serious organised crime”, resulting in a “national security threat”.The number of incidents at prisons involving drones has risen by more than 1,000% over four years, with gang members able to fly packages carried by drones direct to cell windows

A picture

MPs v the manosphere: ministers battle misogyny as they take a different message to men and boys across Australia

“Gender equality isn’t women versus men or a zero-sum game,” Ged Kearney says.“It delivers better outcomes for everyone. It’s important that, as we engage with men and boys, we make that really clear.”But as the assistant minister for the prevention of family violence sets off on a national listening tour with the special envoy for men’s health, Dan Repacholi, they are up against a pervasive and very different conception of how men and women relate, fostered by the loud voices of the manosphere and men’s rights activists.For decades, those activists have called for Australia to have a minister for men

A picture

Black people in England twice as likely to suffer stroke as white counterparts

People from black backgrounds in England are twice as likely to experience strokes as their white counterparts, while also being less likely to receive timely care, according to the largest study of its kind.The study, conducted by researchers at King’s College London and presented at the European Stroke Organisation conference, analysed 30 years of stroke incidents from the South London Stroke Register, one of the longest-running population-based stroke registers in the world.The register is unique due to the fact that unlike clinical trials, it recruits every single person who has had a stroke in a defined area.Within a population of 333,000 people, according to the analysis, 7,726 strokes occurred. And while stroke incidence fell by 34% between 1995-99 and 2010-14, the rate rose again by 13% between 2020 and 2024

A picture

Prosecutors to ‘fast-track’ hate crime cases in England and Wales after spate of attacks

Prosecutors in England and Wales have been told to “fast-track” hate crime prosecutions after a spate of antisemitic attacks that the prime minister on Tuesday called a “crisis for all of us”.Stephen Parkinson, the director of public prosecutions, issued guidance to his staff on Tuesday telling them to bring forward prosecutions against any sort of hate crime as quickly as they could, rather than waiting until they had gathered all possible evidence.Keir Starmer urged groups including universities, arts groups and charities to do more to tackle antisemitism during a summit in Downing Street.As well as imposing new reporting requirements on universities and the Arts Council, the prime minister threatened “consequences” against Iran if it was found to have been behind last week’s stabbing in Golders Green, north London.Parkinson said in a statement on Tuesday: “The acts of extreme violence and criminal damage that we have seen against the Jewish community in recent months have been deplorable

A picture

Ann Barrett obituary

In 1968, when Ann Barrett qualified in medicine, the fast-changing specialty of oncology was a magnet for young doctors as new drugs and technology were beginning to nudge up survival rates. In her distinguished 40-year oncology career, Barrett, who has died aged 83, played a key part in improving cancer outcomes, particularly for children, becoming a world authority on paediatric radiotherapy.As chair of radiation oncology first at the University of Glasgow and then at the University of East Anglia, she was highly influential in the profession with more than 150 published academic papers. She had a significant impact on student education and was a leading contributor to several textbooks that are still “go-to” classics, including Practical Radiotherapy Planning (1985, now in its fifth edition, 2023), and Cancer in Children: Clinical Management (1975, now in its seventh edition, as the Oxford Textbook of Cancer in Children, 2020).After training at St Bartholomew’s hospital in London and various junior doctor posts, in 1977 Barrett became a consultant at the Royal Marsden hospital, a world leader in cancer research; Barrett specialised in brain tumours in children and in irradiating the central nervous system (the brain and spine)

A picture

Dame Shirley Porter obituary

There was a time in the late 1980s when Shirley Porter was the second most famous and powerful female politician in Britain: “the Iron Lady of the town halls”. Like her heroine, Margaret Thatcher, she was a grocer’s daughter, though the family business, Tesco, was somewhat bigger than the prime minister’s corner shop. Porter’s eventual fall from grace was devastating both for her personal reputation and for Thatcherism’s perceived way of doing things. She was, simply, the most corrupt politician of her time.Porter, who has died aged 95, was pursued by the district auditor from her power base at Westminster city council, where she was leader for eight years, 1983-91, and eventually found to have acted illegally in selling council houses with the aim of increasing Conservative votes, in what became known as the “homes for votes” scandal