Racing need not fear Green party ‘conversation’ but must continue efforts on horse welfare
The Green party surged to record results at local and national level in last week’s elections, prompting Zack Polanski, the party’s leader in England and Wales, to suggest that two-party politics is “dead and buried”,Ladbrokes, meanwhile, subsequently cut the odds about the Green party winning the most seats at the next general election to 12-1, while an overall majority for the Greens is priced at 28-1,Not likely, in other words but, at the same time, far from impossible,In the case of a majority for Polanski’s party, it is roughly the same price as Moon Chime, the winner of the big handicap hurdle at Haydock last Saturday,However the party fares in terms of seat numbers, the Green voice in the next parliament, in three years’ time or possibly fewer, seems sure to be significantly louder than ever before.
Since recent, or relatively recent, public comment regarding horse racing from significant figures in the party implies a strong abolitionist streak, these are interesting times for the country’s second-biggest spectator sport.As the Sun reported – on its front page, no less – a couple of weeks ago, Polanski himself proposed the removal of “all animals involved in sport” on X in 2024.Hannah Spencer, meanwhile, the recently elected MP for Gorton and Denton, said last month that there needs to be “a conversation: about racing, a few days after two horses sustained fatal injuries at the Grand National meeting.“A conversation needs to be had about horse racing,” Spencer said.“We all saw those awful pictures of a horse that had been raced to death to make money for gambling companies.
That conversation is coming.Those conversations are shifting.People are telling me they don’t think horse racing is acceptable either.”The obvious question that prompts itself here is who and what, exactly, will this conversation involve? Will it just be Green party members and animal rights campaigners? Or will the 80,000 people whose jobs depend on the sport get a say too? And how about the fans who buy nearly 5m tickets to the races each year?Spencer’s comment is infused with the language of animal rights based activism.It holds that the use of animals by humans for any purpose at all is wrong and by extension that it is not possible to cherish and respect racehorses and also ask them to race, which is what they were bred and born to do.
The phrase “raced to death” is particularly telling.No one is trying to kill or injure racehorses, but there is a – very small – risk inherent in asking them to compete, which the sport is constantly and consciously seeking to minimise.Racing is not a blood sport.The fatal injury rate on the Flat is one in every 1,000 starts.Over jumps, it is five in every 1,000.
Unlike the millions of mammals that are killed for meat in the UK each year, in an industry that could also be said to use animals for “entertainment”, racehorses are not born and bred specifically to die.Racing is also worth £4bn to the economy annually according to the British Horse Racing Authority and, while Spencer and at least some of her fellow Greens might not appreciate it, it brings a huge amount of pleasure and social engagement to millions of people each year at race meetings large and small across the country.Antipathy towards the sport in the corridors of power is hardly a new phenomenon.According to Thomas Blake, the honourable member for Forest of Dean, racing is “an amusement which, though it may be innocent in itself, is the cause of enormous evil in almost every town throughout the country … [and] it is impossible to estimate the distress and misery caused by the speculation and gambling which attend all horse races”.Blake was speaking in June 1878, during the annual adjournment debate on the day before the Derby when MPs debated – and, for many years, approved – a motion to adjourn until Thursday to allow them, in many cases, to head for Epsom the following afternoon.
York: 1.45 Spectacular Diver 2.20 Fireblade 2.55 Dark Thirty (nb) 3.30 Cool Hoof Luke 4.
05 Felicitas 4.40 First Legion 5.15 Fox Journey.Perth: 2.00 Kaydence 2.
33 Next Twist 3.08 Manowest 3.43 The Flying Poet 4.18 Potters Party 4.55 Dublinofficecallin 5.
25 Loro White.Yarmouth: 2.08 Tonal 2.40 Almaty Star (nap) 3.18 Dubai Charm 3.
53 Reigning Queen 4.28 Beagle Bay 5.03 Staniel Cay.Bath: 5.09 Wedgewood 5.
42 Romeo Guest 6,12 Darzah 6,42 Just A Gambler 7,12 Lady Aiyana 7,42 Lucky Sevens 8.
12 Man Is King,Newton Abbot: 5,30 Lirone Du Seuil 6,00 Reel Orange 6,30 Inca De Lafayette 7.
00 Cobbler’s Boy 7.30 Viroflay 8.00 Golden Sun 8.30 Mirabello.His objections were based on an antipathy to gambling rather than any concern for welfare of the horses, but have a similar, abolitionist tone to Spencer’s view.
York 1.45 Rock Steady Beat 2.20 Corolla Point (nap) 2.55 Walsingham 3.30 Fallen Angel 4.
05 King’s Trail 4.40 Simplify 5.15 Arc Ole Ole (nb) Perth 1.58 Scriabin 2.33 Largy Force 3.
08 Easy To Follow 3.43 Kado Sacree 4.18 Double Oban 4.55 Tanking Along 5.28 Hold The Throw Salisbury 2.
08 Mumayaz 2.40 Cruden 3.18 American Psycho 3.53 Wareeth 4.28 Pierian 5.
03 Kotari 5.40 Rogue Rebellion Fontwell 5.34 Shutfrontdoor 6.10 Sun Joy 6.40 Thickthorn Tom 7.
10 Lady Henrietta 7.40 Gone In Sixty 8.10 Dernier SetA century and a half later, racing is still going strong.My guess would be that, regardless of how politics plays out over the decades to come, it will be good for another few hundred years yet.There will, at the same time, always be an onus on racing to emphasise, continue and highlight its efforts on welfare, but the sport has no reason to fear a “conversation”.
It would be helpful, though, to have it before the next election if possible, to get a clear understanding of what the Greens will, or will not, do to racing, and allow the sport’s fans and professionals alike to assess their votes accordingly.
GameStop’s $55.5bn bid for eBay rejected as ‘neither credible nor attractive’
The board of eBay has rejected the US video games retailer GameStop’s surprise $55.5bn bid (£41bn) for the online marketplace, describing the proposal as “neither credible nor attractive”.Earlier this month, GameStop made an unsolicited bid for eBay, publishing a letter on its website outlining a half-cash, half-stock proposal.This was despite the US games company – which became a global household name during the meme stock craze of 2021 – being worth far less than its takeover target. GameStop had a market valuation of roughly $12bn before its bid, almost a quarter of eBay’s $46bn valuation
Molière Ex Machina: AI used to create ‘new work’ by beloved French playwright
Molière is to the French what Shakespeare is to the English: the last word in historical literature, drama, wit and satire.Now, more than 350 years after his death, the 17th-century dramatist has been revived after scholars at the Sorbonne University in Paris used artificial intelligence to help write an experimental play in his style.L’Astrologue ou les Faux Présages (The Astrologer, or False Omens), a three-act comedy, made its debut at the Royal Opera at the Château de Versailles last week.The two-hour play tells the story of a wealthy bourgeois Parisian who, under the instruction of a charlatan astrologer called Pseudoramus, insists his daughter Lucile marry a debt-ridden and elderly wigmaker.While the theme could well have been dreamed up by Molière, the dialogue, music, costumes and scenery were all created with the help of a French AI tool called Le Chat (The Cat)
Who is Louis Mosley, the man tasked with defending Palantir against its critics?
The hall was packed with rightwing radicals when Louis Mosley heralded a coming revolution. Just as Oliver Cromwell – that “crusader for Christ and liberty” – routed King Charles I’s royalists, “a similar revolution is brewing today”, said the UK and Europe boss of Palantir. Globalism’s “twilight” was upon us, he said in a speech dotted with admiring mentions of the podcaster Joe Rogan and “Elon’s Doge”.It was not a typical peroration for a big UK government contractor with more than £600m in deals with the NHS, the Ministry of Defence and police. But Palantir, the world’s most controversial tech company, is no typical contractor
Europe’s AI translation industry told it risks reputation by partnering with US firms
AI companies in Europe risk losing their world-leading status in the field of machine translation, industry figures have said, after the decision by one of the continent’s leading startups to partner with Amazon’s cloud computing division provoked alarm.While businesses in the EU have generally lagged behind the US and China in AI adoption, a small group of European companies have cornered the global market for high-quality machine translations for professional use.The biggest success story is Cologne-headquartered DeepL, an online translator that regularly outperforms Google Translate in accuracy assessments. Used by governments, courts and half of the Fortune 500 list of highest-earning US companies, last year it was reported to have recorded revenues of $185.2m
Shivon Zilis, mother of four of Elon Musk’s children, testifies in OpenAI trial
Shivon Zilis, a Neuralink executive and the mother of four of Elon Musk’s children, took the stand on Wednesday as one of the most highly anticipated witnesses in Musk’s case against OpenAI. The ChatGPT maker has argued that, while Zilis worked with OpenAI from 2016 to 2023, she was also involved in a secret relationship with Musk, acting as an informant for him.Musk’s case against OpenAI alleges that the company’s CEO, Sam Altman, and president, Greg Brockman, co-founders of the company with Musk, broke a founding agreement when they restructured it from a non-profit to a for-profit enterprise. The Tesla CEO accuses Altman and Brockman of unjustly enriching themselves and wants both removed from their positions at the startup, one of the most valuable in the world. He is also seeking the undoing of the for-profit restructuring and $134bn in damages to be redistributed to OpenAI’s non-profit arm
TikTok’s algorithm favored Republican content in 2024 US elections, study finds
A study published Wednesday in the journal Nature finds that TikTok’s algorithm systematically prioritized pro-Republican content in three states leading up to the 2024 US elections.Researchers created hundreds of dummy accounts and conditioned them to mimic real users’ behavior by watching a set of videos either aligned with the US Democratic or Republican parties. Then, they tracked the videos TikTok recommended on these accounts’ For You pages, TikTok’s main feed.“We found a consistent imbalance,” they wrote in Nature.About 42% of US social media users say that these platforms are important for getting involved with political and social issues, according to Pew Research, but it’s not often clear how recommendation algorithms shape what appears in feeds
Joseph Fiennes on parenting, politics and banning children from social media: ‘Stand up, Keir, this is your kids’ generation’
From The Sheep Detectives to Rivals: your complete entertainment guide to the week ahead
Historic Oxford cinema under threat as Oriel College refuses to extend lease
Arthur Miller opens up about marriage to Marilyn Monroe in newly unearthed recordings
Man charged over bomb hoax after Peter Kay show evacuated
Royal Opera House calls for release of Georgian bass singer jailed over democracy protests