‘The admin’: why it’s not easy to rename streets called after Prince Andrew
Streets named after Andrew, formerly known as Prince but now plain Mountbatten-Windsor, can be found from Broadstairs to Belfast to Birmingham,Roads, avenues, terraces, lanes, crescents, closes, drives and ways are all afflicted – to the dismay of some residents,In Carrickfergus, Northern Ireland, Prince Andrew Way, celebrating Mountbatten-Windsor’s 1986 marriage to Sarah Ferguson, will be purged after Mid and East Antrim council passed a motion, described by one councillor as “sad but necessary”, to rename,A public consultation is under way,In Maidenhead, Berkshire, there is a double whammy of Prince Andrew Road adjoining Prince Andrew Close, where some residents have complained of “surface-level embarrassment” , “smirks” and “raised eyebrows” whenever they give their address.
The Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead this week made it easier for any name change, tailoring its regulations to require two-thirds of residents to agree, where previously all had to.It does not have a timeline for any changes, but is working through it internally.There are others, too, that will be considering options following the formal stripping of Mountbatten-Windsor of his styles and titles in the fallout over sex allegations he has always denied relating to Virginia Giuffre, a victim of the US financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.Cambridge, Hitchin, Telford, Newport, Enniskillen and Dungannon all have roads bearing his name and royal prefix.A road in Norwich, however, is disputed, with one local councillor claiming it is in fact named after Prince Philip’s father, Prince Andrew of Greece.
It will not be an easy process, however.Details on residents’ bank accounts, credit cards, driving licences, utility bills, property deeds, even pet microchips, will have to change, as will business letterheads and cards.Crucially, there also has to be consensus on any new name, which is not always easy.When Black Boy Lane in Tottenham, north London, was renamed in 2023 after Black Lives Matter protests over claims it was linked to slavery, it took Haringey council three years and cost at least £50,000 in reimbursing residents in 168 properties for the expense of changing addresses.The road was eventually renamed La Rose Lane, after John La Rose, a black publisher, writer and local political activist.
But in the weeks that followed, residents on the road reportedly put up their own “Black Boy Lane” signs in windows in protest and a graffiti mural featuring the street’s original name was painted on the wall behind the road sign, since removed.Councils must also consult with the emergency services and Royal Mail to avoid duplicates and confusion.To cover administrative costs, councils can charge a fee, varying from authority to authority.Land Registry legal fees, Google maps, sat navs – there are far-reaching implications.Perhaps it is for this reason that the GeoPlace best-practice manual on street names discourages the use of names of living people, because of the risk of an Andrew-like situation.
The dead can also be problematic,The sign for Plaza Margaret Thatcher, named in Madrid in 2014, has been repeatedly vandalised, and politicised, even briefly being unofficially renamed Bobby Sands Plaza on the 40th anniversary of the death of the IRA member who died on hunger strike in the Maze prison,Meanwhile, Churchill Street in Tehran, where the British embassy was based, was officially renamed Bobby Sands Street in 1981, a problem the embassy swerved by creating a new entrance in next-door Ferdowsi Street, safely named after the Persian poet Ferdowsi, an Iranian hero,Bristol city council, despite calls from some, has not changed streets named after the 17th-century trade slaver Edward Colston, a council spokesperson confirming this week that there are no open consultations on the subject,Sign up to First EditionOur morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it mattersafter newsletter promotion“I think one reason why changes aren’t very common, and one reason for it being contentious, is the admin,” said Richard Harwood KC, an expert in planning law and joint head of 39 Essex Chambers.
Under the current legal framework, set out in the Levelling Up and Regeneration Act 2023, local authorities must demonstrate they have secured “sufficient local support”.However, the Labour government has not introduced the secondary legislation – the regulations – to define precisely what “sufficient local support” means or to mandate a specific process, such as a formal referendum with a two-thirds majority.“All we’ve got now is section 81 of the 2023 act.And that means it’s a matter for the local authority to alter the name, and the operation needs to have the necessary support,” said Harewood.Whether that was simply a vote of residents in the street, or getting a two-thirds majority, “none of that has been clarified”.
Local authorities “would have to make a judgment whether the alteration has the necessary support and that it has sufficient local support”, which, he added, “is a bit muddy.”Removing plaques seems a lot easier.In the Falkland Islands, four plaques unveiled by the former prince, who fought in the 1982 conflict with Argentina, have reportedly been removed, including one at a school and another at a hospital.An MoD spokesperson told the Guardian a plaque marking the opening of the £300m RAF Mount Pleasant airbase in 1985 had also gone, but was in fact removed during renovations before the Epstein allegations and just never put back up.
‘The admin’: why it’s not easy to rename streets called after Prince Andrew
Streets named after Andrew, formerly known as Prince but now plain Mountbatten-Windsor, can be found from Broadstairs to Belfast to Birmingham. Roads, avenues, terraces, lanes, crescents, closes, drives and ways are all afflicted – to the dismay of some residents.In Carrickfergus, Northern Ireland, Prince Andrew Way, celebrating Mountbatten-Windsor’s 1986 marriage to Sarah Ferguson, will be purged after Mid and East Antrim council passed a motion, described by one councillor as “sad but necessary”, to rename. A public consultation is under way.In Maidenhead, Berkshire, there is a double whammy of Prince Andrew Road adjoining Prince Andrew Close, where some residents have complained of “surface-level embarrassment” , “smirks” and “raised eyebrows” whenever they give their address
Brain damage, blindness and death: the global trail of trauma left by methanol-laced alcohol
For Bethany Clarke, poison tasted like nothing. There was no bitter aftertaste, no astringent sting at the back of the tongue. If anything, she thought in passing, the free shots she and her friends were drinking at a hostel bar in Laos had probably been watered down – she wasn’t detecting a strong vodka flavour through the veil of Sprite she had mixed it with.All in all, Clarke remembers drinking about five of those shots, sitting with her best friend, Simone White, and a crowd of others at the hostel’s happy hour. CCTV footage shows the group laughing in the warm air of the open bar in the town of Vang Vieng, green and red lights dancing over their shoulders
Londoners told to be vigilant with messages after cyber-attack on council
A London council has urged thousands of residents to be “extra vigilant” when receiving calls, emails or text messages after confirming that data had been taken in a cyber-attack.The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC), which has 147,500 residents, said some data had been copied from its systems in an attack this week.The council said it believed the theft related to “historical data” but it was checking whether it contained any personal or financial details of residents, customers or service users.“With advice from the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), we are encouraging all residents, customers and service users to be extra vigilant when called, emailed or sent text messages,” the council said.Three London councils have been affected by cyber-attacks this week, with RBKC and Westminster city council saying a number of systems had been affected across both authorities, including phone lines
The loss of access to and respect for autonomous midwifery is tragic | Letters
I’m an NHS midwife, despairing over your article (Influencers made millions pushing ‘wild’ births – now the Free Birth Society is linked to baby deaths around the world, 22 November). My key frustration, though, is how, as with any successful charlatanism, there is truth and real fear being exploited: medical overreach blights lives, women can and should trust their bodies, and a healthy body rarely grows a baby it can’t birth.However, physiology is not a perfected endpoint. Evolution continues with genetic variation spreading through a population by “survival of the fittest”. In the brutal “wild”, the least “well-adapted” (whether by health or circumstance) do not survive
We older people are always a footnote | Brief letters
As one of your older readers, I was looking forward to reading the interesting article on the five epochs of brain development (Brain has five ‘eras’, scientists say – with adult mode not starting until early 30s, 25 November). But why was I not surprised to find the final two epochs given just one sentence between them?Dave HeadeyFaringdon, Oxfordshire I was delighted to find out that the Royal Opera House is replacing its 26-year-old stage curtains. Perhaps the old ones could be reused to make new riser cushions for the stage of Huddersfield town hall. We’re still waiting to be levelled up. (See my Guardian letter, 14 February 2022
Expert panel advises against prostate cancer screening for most men in UK
Prostate cancer screening should not be made available to the vast majority of men across the UK, a panel of expert government health advisers has said, to the “deep disappointment” of several charities and campaigners.The UK National Screening Committee (UKNSC) has instead recommended that there should be a targeted screening programme for men with a confirmed BRCA1 or BRCA2 faulty gene variant, which means they are more at risk of faster growing and aggressive cancers at an earlier age. Men in that category could be screened every two years between the ages of 45 and 61, they said.The committee found that the “harms would outweigh the benefits” if it were to recommend prostate cancer screening for all men or for men with a relevant family history of cancer, as it could lead to a small reduction in the number of prostate cancer deaths but “very high levels of over-diagnosis”.When it came to screening black men, who have an elevated risk of prostate cancer, the committee found current evidence to be “lacking and uncertain”
Facing burnout, she chased her dream of making pie - and built an empire: ‘Pie brings us together’
Yes, there are reasons to be cynical about Thanksgiving. But there’s also turkey …
Wine magnums aren’t just for Christmas – or even champagne
Danish delight: Tim Anderson’s cherry marzipan kringle recipe for Thanksgiving
How to turn the dregs of a jar of Marmite into a brilliant glaze for roast potatoes – recipe | Waste not
What’s the secret to great chocolate mousse? | Kitchen aide