Starmer faces greater quandary over ‘special relationship’ after Iran attack

A picture


It was perhaps naive of No 10 ever to position Keir Starmer as a “Donald Trump whisperer” capable of persuading the unpredictable US president to step back from reckless decisions.The “special relationship” has been under severe strain in recent months over the UK’s decision to give up sovereignty of the Chagos Islands and the refusal of European countries to back Trump’s play for Greenland.When it came to bombing Iran and assassinating its leader, Starmer appears to have had little influence on Trump, who went ahead regardless of the UK’s refusal to let the US use its military bases.The prime minister now finds himself in the diplomatically precarious position of declining to endorse the strikes – which have won support from Canada and Australia – but also refusing to condemn them as many in his party would like to see him do.At the moment, the UK’s fence-sitting stance is that it played no part in the initial strikes, but will now allow the US to use its military bases to launch attacks that destroy Iranian missiles that would be launched into other Gulf states.

The ambivalent position seems increasingly difficult to hold,The defence secretary, John Healey, struggled to express a moral or legal opinion on Trump’s military action when repeatedly pressed on the issue on Sunday, saying only that it will not mourn the ayatollah whose regime has “menaced” western countries,It seems the UK still calculates that criticising the US president is a difficult move, even when it is clear that Starmer was not onboard with his actions, which the attorney general has warned are in breach of international law,Getting close to Trump has been the prime minister’s strategy from the start,Starmer’s team were ecstatic when they succeeded in setting up a two-hour first meeting with him in New York just 18 months ago.

One aide fist-pumped as the the then Republican presidential candidate said positive things about Starmer being “very nice” and “popular”,From the honour of a state visit for Trump, to refusal to criticise the illegal capture of Venezuela’s president Nicolás Maduro, Starmer has made clear that even when he disagrees with the White House, he will not risk infuriating Trump publicly,The closest he has come to opposing the president has been in defending the British troops who lost their lives in Afghanistan, after the president said Nato troops had stayed “a little off the frontlines”,But time and again, before and since, he has shied away from outright criticism,The question now for Starmer is whether it would be in the national and international interest for the UK government to change course, move closer to Europe and start standing up to the US president more robustly – as some in his party and on the progressive left of politics have long wanted him to do.

There could also come a point when it is in his own narrow political interest to start distancing himself from Trump, with the Green party’s Zack Polanski calling the strikes on Iran illegal and the Lib Dems urging the prime minister to stand up to Trump’s bullying tactics.In the Gorton and Denton byelection, where Labour lost a huge majority, anger over Starmer’s slowness to criticise Israel on Gaza contributed to the drop in support.Starmer said in 2024 that the “special relationship” with the US “sits above whoever holds the particular office”.But it could be time for him to make a special exception for Trump.The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know.

If you have something to share on this subject you can contact the Guardian's UK Politics team confidentially using the following methods:The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories.Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs.This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said.If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu.Scroll down and click on Secure Messaging.

When asked who you wish to contact please select the Politics (UK) team,For end-to-end encrypted email correspondence you can create a free Proton Mail account and email us at guardian,politics,desk@protonmail,com.

You can message the UK Politics team using Signal or WhatsApp on +44 7824 537227,Finally, our guide at theguardian,com/tips lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each,
trendingSee all
A picture

Men almost twice as likely as women to earn high salaries in ‘reality check’ on Australia’s gender pay gap

Men are nearly twice as likely as women to be making $220,000 a year, with minimal progress made on closing Australia’s gender pay gap in the past 12 months.The federal government’s Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA) published its gender pay gap results for 10,500 employers on Tuesday. It revealed there was a slight increase in the number of women in highly paid roles, but men were still 1.8 times more likely to be in the upper quartile of earners on an average salary of $221,000.On the other hand, women were 1

A picture

Maritime insurers cancel war risk cover in Gulf as Iran conflict disrupts shipping

Leading maritime insurers have cancelled war risk cover for vessels operating in the Gulf as the escalating Iran conflict disrupted shipping and sent some freight costs surging.At least 150 vessels including oil and liquefied natural gas tankers have dropped anchor in the strait of Hormuz and surrounding waters, and at least three tankers were damaged and one seafarer killed over the weekend.The vital shipping route, through which about 20% of the world’s oil supplies and 20% of seaborne gas tankers pass, is effectively closed after the US and Israel began intense airstrikes on Iran on Saturday.Several leading mutual marine insurers, including Norway’s Gard and Skuld, the UK’s NorthStandard and the London P&I Club, and the New York-based American Club, said they were cancelling war risk cover for ships operating in the region.This is likely to further dissuade shipowners from traversing the Gulf

A picture

US military reportedly used Claude in Iran strikes despite Trump’s ban

The US military reportedly used Claude, Anthropic’s AI model, to inform its attack on Iran despite Donald Trump’s decision, announced hours earlier, to sever all ties with the company and its artificial intelligence tools.The use of Claude during the massive joint US-Israel bombardment of Iran that began on Saturday was reported by the Wall Street Journal and Axios. It underlines the complexity of the US military withdrawing powerful AI tools from its missions when the technology is already intricately embedded in operations.According to the Journal, US military command used the tools for intelligence purposes, as well as to help select targets and carry out battlefield simulations.On Friday, just hours before the Iran attack began, Trump ordered all federal agencies to stop using Claude immediately

A picture

Datacentre developers face calls to disclose effect on UK’s net emissions

Datacentre developers are facing pressure to reveal whether their projects will increase the UK’s net greenhouse gas emissions, amid concerns the sites could double national electricity demand.Campaign groups have written to the UK technology secretary, Liz Kendall, warning that the energy required by new AI infrastructure poses a “serious threat to efforts to decarbonise the electricity grid”.Developers should demonstrate that their projects will not cause an increase in the UK’s overall CO2 emissions or local water scarcity, as part of a forthcoming national policy statement (NPS) on datacentres, the letter says.“Without these commitments, such vast electricity use will inevitably generate vast climate emissions,” the campaigners write.The letter is signed by Foxglove, a group that campaigns against big tech dominance, and five other non-governmental organisations including the environmental campaign group Friends of the Earth

A picture

Lord Allen to become latest casualty of horse racing’s intractable politics

The wait continues for confirmation that Charles Allen’s brief, troubled – and ultimately ineffectual – tenure as chair of the British Horseracing Authority is over. In racing terms, however, he is nine-tenths out of the saddle, his backside inching towards the turf and gravity is about to take over.Even in the thankless and intractable world of racing politics, few stars have waned as rapidly as that of Lord Allen of Kensington, a former businessman and senior broadcasting executive who arrived in September at the BHA promising to restructure the sport’s governance and, in the words of his day-one mission statement, “develop British racing into a modern commercial and cultural powerhouse”.There were hints of the struggles ahead even before the new chair’s seat was warm. Allen’s appointment had been announced in November 2024, with an intended start date of 1 June, but his arrival was delayed as he delved deeper into the tangled web of factional interests he had been hired to unite, and sought assurances that his plan for a fully independent BHA board of directors would be implemented

A picture

AFL 2026 predicted ladder part two: history suggests Geelong may struggle

The Cats remain a flawed team and could find themselves among footy’s lower middle class after last year’s grand final maulingPart one: Collingwood on a cliff edge as time waits for no oneMelbourne recently released a membership video that leaned into the cliches and the disappointment – one of the better executed and coherent offerings from the club in recent years. They were eight wins off finals last year. But they beat Brisbane at the Gabba, nearly beat Collingwood twice and ran top-placed Adelaide close. They lost half a dozen games by eight points or less.The new coach Steven King wants them to make mistakes, take risks and play with freedom and flair