In Peter Mandelson evidence, Cat Little had the best weapon: an audit trail
Seen through the Westminster bubble, the Peter Mandelson vetting affair looks like an age-old conflict pitting ministers against mandarins,Yet the latest top civil servant to testify to parliament over what some are now calling “Mandygate” gave an intriguing account that suggested it has never been as simple as that,Cat Little, the top civil servant at the Cabinet Office, did not put it in these terms, but what she revealed was an extraordinary dispute between the country’s most senior civil servants,Little cut a very different figure to Olly Robbins, her recently departed counterpart at the Foreign Office, who gave evidence to the foreign affairs select committee two days earlier,Whereas Robbins exuded civil service finesse and ease, and was perhaps somewhat freed by no longer being in post, Little at times looked genuinely pained at the situation in which she found herself: divulging the kind of facts that the British national security state would prefer remain under lock and key.
Yet her evidence was just as revelatory, and perhaps more so, given she came armed with the most deadly of civil servant weapons: an audit trail.It was a contrast with Robbins who, on the key question of why Mandelson was given vetting clearance against the advice of security officials in late January 2025, was reliant on his recollections of an oral briefing that does not appear to have been fully minuted.Little’s key revelation related to a meeting she had held with Robbins in the middle of March – when, she said, he refused to release to her department files related to Mandelson’s vetting decision.This happened to be the very same paperwork that revealed Robbins had been advised not to give Mandelson clearance but did so anyway.Little was a star witness in this affair because of her position in the machinery of government.
She runs the Cabinet Office, the department that houses United Kingdom Security Vetting (UKSV) – the agency that helps decide which employees should get developed vetting (and concluded that Mandelson should not).She is also the civil servant ultimately responsible for complying with the so-called “humble address”: the parliamentary motion passed in February requiring the government to release “all papers” related to Mandelson’s appointment.Under the terms of that motion, the most sensitive documents, such as Mandelson’s UKSV file, were to be handed to parliament’s intelligence and security committee (ISC).And so it was in that capacity, of gathering all the relevant materials that had to be released to the public or the ISC, that Little said she had her crucial face-to-face meeting with Robbins.She had not by that stage seen Mandelson’s UKSV vetting file, and did not know that it had recommended “clearance denied”.
But for complicated reasons, the Foreign Office had a copy and associated documents setting out Robbins’ decision to grant clearance anyway.Little’s account of what happened was delivered with little drama, but it could create a real headache for Robbins.“I specifically asked to see this document and any decision-making audit trail about those judgments at the time,” she said.“It was made clear to me that that information would not be forthcoming.”Asked who told her this, she replied: “Sir Olly.
”Then, when she was asked why Robbins would not want the information to be shared, she said: “In the actual meeting, the specific reasons were not discussed.”Little made clear her account was based on evidence.Asked who witnessed this conversation, she replied: “Three private secretaries in attendance of the meeting, and I personally took a record of it.”It was in the face of Robbins’s resistance, Little said, that she took the “very unusual judgment” that she needed to get the copy from UKSV itself.Little’s evidence was not without awkward questions about her own conduct.
She in effect confirmed the Guardian’s reporting that she and the cabinet secretary, Antonia Romeo, had known about Mandelson’s vetting file but waited almost three weeks before telling the prime minister.She acknowledged it “did take some time” to tell Starmer, but insisted there had been a process to follow, and she needed to get legal, policy and proprietary advice before being sure to whom, precisely, she could reveal this state secret.She acknowledged the Cabinet Office was “very worried” about releasing such a sensitive vetting file to the parliamentary committee.Before concluding, Little wielded her audit trail to once again present a different version of events to Robbins about one of the enduring mysteries in the scandal so far.Why did the foreign office ask to look at Mandelson’s vetting documents on 15 September 2025, four days after Mandelson was sacked?Robbins had told the committee he had “considered” viewing the vetting file and there were “different views” on the matter but ultimately he had been told he could not review it without a national security justification.
Little’s paper trail told a different story,She confirmed the foreign Office security team had requested “a number of documents relating to the vetting file” on that date,The records showed that the documents were shared with the Foreign Office that day, she said,The obvious question: why did Robbins, or anyone else at the Foreign Office, need to see Mandelson’s vetting files after he had been sacked? Asked that question, Little replied: “I don’t recall there being a reason given,”If you have something to share about this story you can contact our head of investigations using one of the following methods:The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories.
Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs.This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said.If you don’t already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu.Select ‘Secure Messaging’.Once you've set yourself up, to send a message to Paul please click on the 'Change Recipient' button, then click on ‘Journalists’, then choose Paul Lewis.
If you don’t need a high level of security or confidentiality you can email the investigations team at investigations.contact@theguardian.com.Finally, our guide at theguardian.com/tips lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each.
Chinese hackers using everyday devices to target UK firms, warns cybersecurity agency
British businesses are being urged to step up their vigilance against a China-linked hacking ploy that uses everyday devices for espionage.The UK’s National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) and agencies in nine other countries have warned of persistent attempts by Beijing-backed groups to hack equipment such as wifi routers to launch cyber-attacks.Known as “covert networks” or “botnets”, they typically target vulnerable equipment – for instance devices that have not had a software update or are old – as a base for staging activities such as surveillance and data theft.The NCSC said the technique was used by the majority of China-linked hackers. Richard Horne, the centre’s chief executive, said on Wednesday that China’s intelligence and military agencies had an “eye-watering level of sophistication in their cyber-operations”
Criminal gangs profiting as child sexual abuse websites double, experts say
The number of commercial child sexual abuse websites has doubled in a year as experts say that criminal gangs are making “huge profits” from online sexual exploitation.According to data collected by the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF), 15,031 commercial child sexual abuse sites were found in 2025, compared with 7,028 found in 2024, a 114% increase.An analyst who worked on the report but did not wish to be named said that this content exists “across all social media platforms” and is “very easy” to find.“I can find child sexual abuse content, the worst categories, category A content, which is penetration of children as young as babies on any social media platform in as little as one search term and two clicks,” said the analyst.“I think the public have this perception that this sort of material is hidden away in dark and dirty corners of the internet, but it’s not, it’s in plain sight
Tesla reports mixed financial results as Musk pivots automaker to AI and robots
Tesla reported its first-quarter earnings on Wednesday, disclosing some better-than-expected results but faltering in some key areas. The report failed to significantly buoy Tesla’s stock, which has limped along this year while its CEO, Elon Musk, has tried to sell the company’s new vision of humanoid robots and self-driving robotaxis. Its core car business has struggled in the face of competition from Chinese counterparts and backlash against his close involvement with the Trump administration.“There remains significant effort and hard work to realize our mission of Amazing Abundance,” Tesla said in its report, while claiming that demand for its vehicles was rebounding.Tesla revealed earnings of 41 cents a share on Wednesday after market close, more than the 37 cents per share that Wall Street expected
What is Mythos AI and why could it be a threat to global cybersecurity?
Anthropic has ruled out releasing its latest AI model, Claude Mythos, to the public because of the threat it poses to global cybersecurity.However, the US tech startup behind the Claude chatbot confirmed on Wednesday it was investigating a report that a group of people had gained unauthorised access to Mythos. The alleged incident has raised concerns over the pace of development and the ability of tech companies to keep their riskiest products out of the public domain. Here, we examine Mythos and its potential impact.Mythos is an AI model – the underlying technology that powers tools such as chatbots – that, according to Anthropic, represents a serious potential threat to any organisation’s cybersecurity
‘Get back to work’: Amazon faces fresh scrutiny over workplace safety record
Amazon, one of the world’s largest employers, has for years faced scrutiny over its safety record. When Billy Foister, a 48-year-old worker, died after a heart attack inside one of the tech giant’s warehouses in September 2019, managers were accused of telling staff to “get back to work”.When another worker died this month at a distribution center in Troutdale, Oregon, an Amazon spokesperson claimed they had collapsed from an “existing medical issue”. They denied a report that a nearby employee was told: “Please get back to work.”As Donald Trump’s administration continues to overhaul federal government oversight of workplace safety, workers inside Amazon and labor advocates say the company’s injury rates, and how it treats injured workers, remain a problem
Anthropic investigates report of rogue access to hack-enabling Mythos AI
The AI developer Anthropic has confirmed it is investigating a report that unauthorised users have gained access to its Mythos model, which it has warned poses risks to cybersecurity.The US startup made the statement after Bloomberg reported on Wednesday that a small group of people had accessed the model, which has not been released to the public because of its ability to enable cyber-attacks.“We’re investigating a report claiming unauthorised access to Claude Mythos Preview through one of our third-party vendor environments,” said Anthropic.Bloomberg said a “handful” of users in a private online forum gained access to Mythos on the same day Anthropic said it was being released to a small number of companies including Apple and Goldman Sachs for testing purposes.It reported that the unnamed users got to Mythos through access that one of them had as a worker at a third-party contractor for Anthropic and by deploying methods used by cybersecurity researchers
BP’s chair deserved a kick for his silly obstinacy over shareholder resolution
Lockheed Martin CEO sees Trump’s Pentagon as ‘golden opportunity’ for growth
Microsoft and Meta announce large staff reductions as they spend big on AI
Thousands call on UK ministers to cut ties with US tech giant Palantir
NFL draft 2026: Fernando Mendoza, Jeremiyah Love and other top prospects await call – live
Patriots back coach Vrabel’s ‘leadership’ as new photos with NFL reporter Russini emerge