BP’s chair deserved a kick for his silly obstinacy over shareholder resolution
BP has fresh faces in the boardroom and a rigged strategy: it’s pivoting back to oil and gas and away from its low-carbon assets in an attempt to improve a weak share price.One can agree or disagree with the approach.But it was a silly act of overreach for a newish chair to try to stifle debate on such matters.That, in effect, was what Albert Manifold did when he excluded a resolution for Thursday’s annual meeting from Follow This, a Dutch investor group.The proposal itself cannot be described as explosive.
It was pitched in investor-friendly terms and would merely have obliged BP to describe how it would protect shareholder value if demand for oil and gas falls.Nor is Follow This some two-bob outfit within the ranks of climate groups.It was claiming support from investors with $1tn under management.BP’s reaction to the submission, however, was to speak to its lawyers.“The board, having taken legal advice, concluded that the proposal from Follow This was not valid and would be ineffective were it to pass,” Manifold declared without offering a reason for the supposed lack of validity.
Come on, if it was something to do with the proposal not being filed as a “special” resolution requiring 75% support, as has been suggested, just use common sense to get it on the agenda in some form.There’s always a bit of negotiation in these cases.Compare the approach of Shell when presented with a near-identical resolution from Follow This for its annual meeting next month.At the UK’s bigger oil and gas company, the chair, Andrew Mackenzie, allowed the motion to go forward without a fuss.The notice of Shell’s meeting devotes a full page to the proposers’ resolution and supporting statement and another page to the directors’ explanation of why they recommend a vote against.
That is the grown-up and confident style: address the points and let the owners have their say,Shell’s counter-arguments included: scenarios are not forecasts and are updated constantly; and the company already publishes enough information about break-even points, demand sensitivities and so forth to enable investors to make informed judgments about financial resilience,It is hard to see why BP couldn’t have done the same,Manifold’s obstinacy seems to have fuelled rebellions on some of the company’s own resolutions, notably one that would have abolished BP-specific requirements on climate impact reporting that were adopted in 2015 and 2019 and are now regarded by the board as duplicative,On that one, BP got support from only 47% of voting shareholders when it needed 75%.
On a plan to abolish in-person annual meetings, BP also lost.Most embarrassingly, 18% of votes were against the re-election of Manifold himself, which is a stinker of a result for a chair on his first outing.Legal & General Investment Management, a top-10 investor, was in the “no” camp and cited the non-admittance of the Follow This resolution as one reason why.The wonder is that BP’s boardroom still includes some heavyweight non-executives, including the Aviva boss, Amanda Blanc, and the former Barclays finance director Tushar Morzaria.They must surely have known a heavy-handed approach to shareholder democracy could backfire.
Did they warn the chair? Or is it true, as some say, that BP is now the Albert Manifold show?As it happens, his “simpler, stronger, more valuable” strategy for BP probably has broad majority shareholder support, just as a similar one at Shell does.The point, though, is that you’ve still got to let debate flow and set out arguments.Manifold deserved the kick he got.
BP’s chair deserved a kick for his silly obstinacy over shareholder resolution
BP has fresh faces in the boardroom and a rigged strategy: it’s pivoting back to oil and gas and away from its low-carbon assets in an attempt to improve a weak share price. One can agree or disagree with the approach. But it was a silly act of overreach for a newish chair to try to stifle debate on such matters.That, in effect, was what Albert Manifold did when he excluded a resolution for Thursday’s annual meeting from Follow This, a Dutch investor group. The proposal itself cannot be described as explosive
Lockheed Martin CEO sees Trump’s Pentagon as ‘golden opportunity’ for growth
Lockheed Martin’s CEO has called the Trump administration a “golden opportunity” for the company as it expands its contracting work for the federal government amid the conflict in the Middle East.In an earnings call on Thursday covering the first quarter of 2026, Lockheed Martin CEO Jim Taiclet told investors that the company is well positioned “based on more available resources for us”.“This is a golden opportunity right now based on who’s in government,” Taiclet said, citing “their experience, their willingness to change, the demand that they have for what we do and what our partners in our industry do”.He added that the company could move past the “burden” that came with government contracting and move it “towards a commercial contracting system”.“I’m encouraged by all of this in the evolving landscape,” Taiclet said
Microsoft and Meta announce large staff reductions as they spend big on AI
Meta and Microsoft are trimming their workforces by thousands as they make heavy investments in AI and executives claim that the technology is meeting their companies’ productivity needs.Meta told staff on Thursday that on 20 May it would cut some 10% of its personnel – just under 8,000 employees– to boost efficiency, part of a layoff plan made months ago. The company is also closing about 6,000 open roles. The same day, Microsoft announced to employees, for the first time, that it would offer voluntary retirement to about 7% of its American workforce of roughly 125,000.In an internal memo to Meta’s staff, Janelle Gale, the chief people officer, didn’t mention AI explicitly but said the cuts would allow the company to “offset the other investments we’re making”
Thousands call on UK ministers to cut ties with US tech giant Palantir
More than 200,000 people have called on ministers to break contracts with Palantir in an apparent groundswell of public concern about the US tech company’s role in the NHS, police, military and councils.Two petitions have attracted 229,000 signatures, one calling for the government to end all public contracts with the company, the software of which is used by Donald Trump’s ICE immigration enforcement programme and the Israeli military, and another urging the health secretary, Wes Streeting, to cancel its £330m patient data contract with the NHS.This week, the Guardian revealed the Metropolitan police was in talks to use the company’s AI to analyse sensitive intelligence, and Palantir published a manifesto described by one MP as the “ramblings of a supervillain”.But the tech company is pushing back against the multipronged campaign challenging its work in the UK by taking issue with claims made widely on social media by the Green party leader, Zack Polanski, and the legal campaigner Jolyon Maugham, who this week launched a podcast investigation into Palantir. The Liberal Democrats are also calling for the NHS contract to be cancelled and new contracts to be halted
NFL draft 2026: Fernando Mendoza, Jeremiyah Love and other top prospects await call – live
Fernando MendozaThe QB widely expected to be selected no1 overall by the Las Vegas Raiders, will be the first presumptive top pick to not attend the draft in person since Trevor Lawrence was selected by Jacksonville. Mendoza wants to be at home to share the moment with his mother, who has multiple sclerosis, his father, and other close family and friends. But don’t worry, ESPN TV in the US will have at least one camera inside the Mendoza home to document the moment.And speaking of Mendoza, he’s going to be off the board shortly. Stick with us!New RulesIf you’re after the whole kit and caboodle of how this thing works, you can find all the details here
Patriots back coach Vrabel’s ‘leadership’ as new photos with NFL reporter Russini emerge
The New England Patriots have given their backing to Mike Vrabel as new photos of their head coach and NFL reporter Dianna Russini emerged on Thursday.Russini resigned from her post at the Athletic last week after the New York Post published photos of her and Vrabel embracing and holding hands at an Arizona resort. The pair are married to different people and have said their relationship is platonic. On Wednesday, Vrabel said he will miss day three of the NFL draft on Saturday to undergo counseling in the fallout from the controversy. He made an appearance before Thursday’s draft where he said “my priorities are my family and this football team
Warner-Judd reveals mid-race seizure led to depression, deli shifts – and her London Marathon debut
Sportradar’s share price falls after reports claim it had links to hundreds of illegal gambling sites
‘Worth a thousand words’: Trump photo obscuring women’s tennis team sparks backlash
Over-75s drive levels of physical activity in England to record high but inequalities remain
New England coach McDermott backs Connor and criticises Wane’s ‘unfair’ treatment
NFL 2026 draft predictions: the stars, the needs and the lower-round gems