Reform plan to cap aid at £1bn would damage UK’s international influence, critics warn
Plans by Reform UK to slash the aid budget by 90% would not cover existing contributions to global bodies such as the UN and World Bank, shredding Britain’s international influence and risking its standing within those organisations, charities and other parties have warned.Under cuts announced by Nigel Farage in November, overseas aid would be capped at £1bn a year, or about 0.03% of GDP.Keir Starmer’s government is already set to reduce aid from 0.5% of GDP to 0.
3% by 2027, but even that lower proportion would still amount to £9bn a year.If a Reform government attempted to cut aid to £1bn, it would involve cutting back existing multi-year commitments to organisations, as well as global efforts connected to vaccinations and other health initiatives.Multilateral overseas aid totalled £2.8bn in 2024, the most recent year for which detailed figures are available.The UK’s existing commitments to the UN, the World Bank’s International Development Association, the Gavi vaccination alliance and the Global Fund to Fight Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria total more than £1.
6bn a year.Cutting those immediately would be difficult, with most settlements agreed over several years.Even if the total could be brought down to £1bn, there would be no funding left to respond to new natural disasters such as Hurricane Melissa, which devastated Jamaica in October.Gideon Rabinowitz, the director of policy at Bond, the umbrella group for development NGOs, said a £1bn limit would “drastically reduce the UK government’s capacity to play a role in the global fight against disease, poverty and inequality”, and leave no scope to help with future disasters and conflicts.He said: “Further cuts would also mean failing to honour our existing commitments to international institutions, damaging the UK’s reputation as a reliable global partner and undermining its presence in key decision-making forums.
“A budget of £1bn would put UK aid below that of Russia and China, weakening our own national interests whilst leaving opportunity for other states to gain influence.”Rabinowitz said the UK had already cut back its contributions to Gavi and the Global Fund, which was expected to cause hundreds of thousands of otherwise-preventable deaths.“The consequences of yet further reduction to UK pledges such as this would be unconscionable.This approach does not align with the values of the British public who want to see the UK play their part,” he said.A Labour party spokesperson called Reform’s aid policy “back-of-a-fag-packet politics”.
They said: “It wouldn’t even cover the UK’s existing commitments, would leave nothing for future crises, and risks Britain losing influence and seats at the table.This is not tough decision making – it’s reckless and unserious.”Monica Harding, the Liberal Democrats’ international development spokesperson, said even existing cuts to aid had resulted in a loss of UK influence and stalled progress in global health.Further reductions, she said, showed “a complete ignorance of how our influence works overseas”.She said: “It would hollow out our diplomatic presence across Africa and Asia, affecting partnerships and economic opportunities, and our influence globally, including in international institutions like the UN, World Bank and IMF, would collapse.
“It would leave us all poorer, less secure and less safe – with Britain as an isolated and declining power.Their policy is the very opposite of patriotic.”Zia Yusuf, Reform’s head of policy, said the £1bn limit would not threaten the UK’s place on any multilateral organisation, and would leave sufficient money for aid to Ukraine and a fund for “genuine disaster relief”.He said: “Tory and Labour governments have poured eye-watering sums into wasteful foreign aid projects for decades.The Conservatives spent £230bn in real terms on foreign aid – is Britain more or less powerful on the world stage than in 2010?“The Tories and Labour have abused the generosity of the British taxpayer to virtue signal.
A Nigel Farage government will finally put British citizens and taxpayers first.”
Chinese robotaxis due in London next year as Lyft and Uber reveal tie-ups
Chinese robotaxis are due to be on the streets of London next year after the US ride-hailing companies Lyft and Uber announced tie-ups with Beijing-based Baidu to deploy its self-driving technology.Lyft is the third firm to announce plans to introduce self-driving taxis to the UK capital next year, after Uber and Waymo, the main operator of robotaxis in the US.Its ride-hailing services are the major rival to Uber’s in the US and Canada, and this year Lyft expanded into Europe after acquiring the Freenow app in the summer.While Uber had signed a deal to work with Baidu in the summer in other global markets, it had not until now said that the Chinese tech company’s Apollo Go cars were planned for London. It had previously announced its services would be operated with self-driving technology from the UK-US firm Wayve
MPs question UK Palantir contracts after investigation reveals security concerns
UK MPs have raised concerns about the government’s contracts with Palantir after an investigation published in Switzerland highlighted allegations about the suitability and security of its products.The investigation by the Zurich-based research collective WAV and the Swiss online magazine Republik details Palantir’s efforts, over the course of seven years, to sell its products to Swiss federal agencies.Palantir is a US company that provides software to integrate and analyse data scattered across different systems, such as in the health service. It also provides artificial intelligence-enabled military targeting systems.The investigation cites an expert report, internal to the Swiss army, that assessed Palantir’s status as a US company meant there was a possibility sensitive data shared with it could be accessed by the US government and intelligence services
Extremists are using AI voice cloning to supercharge propaganda. Experts say it’s helping them grow
While the artificial intelligence boom is upending sections of the music industry, voice generating bots are also becoming a boon to another unlikely corner of the internet: extremist movements that are using them to recreate the voices and speeches of major figures in their milieu, and experts say it is helping them grow.“The adoption of AI-enabled translation by terrorists and extremists marks a significant evolution in digital propaganda strategies,” said Lucas Webber, a senior threat intelligence analyst at Tech Against Terrorism and a research fellow at the Soufan Center. Webber specializes in monitoring the online tools of terrorist groups and extremists around the world.“Earlier methods relied on human translators or rudimentary machine translation, often limited by language fidelity and stylistic nuance,” he said. “Now, with the rise of advanced generative AI tools, these groups are able to produce seamless, contextually accurate translations that preserve tone, emotion, and ideological intensity across multiple languages
A tape measure, a metal detector and a spirit level: 25 surprisingly useful things you can do with your phone
While many use our phones predominantly to doomscroll, smartphones have a range of little-known functions that could make life better and easier – from heart monitoring to even developing camera filmOur smartphones are magical things – far more than dopamine drip providers and a way to keep in touch with friends and family. Using the built-in features and easily available additional apps, there are plenty of clever things you can do with your smartphone.The iPhone’s Measure app uses augmented reality and the device’s camera to calculate everything from ceiling heights to room dimensions – handy for those DIY tasks that require a quick decision. And, good news for parents, Apple also points out that you can use it to measure a person’s height: the digital equivalent of etched markings on the wall.Metal detectors cost a pretty penny, but many modern devices have built-in magnetometers designed to help improve the accuracy of GPS within apps
‘It can be quite a thankless job’: why driving examiners are quitting
It has long been a stressful rite of passage for many young people but, in recent years, passing the actual driving test is the easy part. Now, many people seeking a test need to wake up early to snag a date before the bots do and, even then, they are looking at a long and arduous wait.Despite moves from the government to address the issue, an audit report released this week found plans to cut the wait for a driving test to seven weeks by the end of the year would not be achieved until November 2027.One of the main barriers is an exodus of driving examiners. Only a net 83 more driving test examiners have been hired despite 19 recruitment campaigns since 2021, with the average wait for a practical test now at 22 weeks across Great Britain, according to the National Audit Office
Tinsel and Home Alone back in style as TikTok seeks comfort in #90sChristmas
Tinsel, DIY tree decorations, deep burgundy drapes – and Home Alone on VHS. Christmas has gone retro on TikTok, and in people’s living rooms.The app has reported a surge in Christmas decor videos, with an emphasis on nostalgia as users embrace festive looks from bygone eras. For younger TikTokers, that means the 90s.More than 8,000 videos have been posted under the hashtag #90sChristmas, celebrating a look that includes multicoloured tree lights, homemade felt ornaments and – in a post with nearly 4m views – VHS tapes of Christmas classics such as the Macaulay Culkin caper
Reform plan to cap aid at £1bn would damage UK’s international influence, critics warn
Keir Starmer told closer EU trade ties ‘strategic necessity’ for UK firms
Labour calls to rejoin EU customs union will become harder for Starmer to resist
More than 75% of Labour, Lib Dem and Green voters think PM should open talks on joining EU customs union – as it happened
Rachel Reeves sets early March date for spring statement as OBR prepares forecast
Britain’s economy has been damaged by Brexit. But what should ministers do about it?