‘It felt hypocritical’: child internet safety campaign accused of censoring teenagers’ speeches
An internet safety campaign backed by US tech companies has been accused of censoring two teenagers they invited to speak out about the biggest issues facing children online.Childnet, a UK charity part-funded by companies including Snap, Roblox and Meta, edited out warnings from Lewis Swire and Saamya Ghai that social media addiction was an “imminent threat to our future” and obsessive scrolling was making people “sick”, according to a record of edits seen by the Guardian.Swire, then 17, from Edinburgh, and Ghai, then 14, from Buckinghamshire, had been asked to speak at an event to mark Safer Internet Day in 2024 in London in front of representatives from government, charities and tech companies.The tech-backed charity also edited out references to children feeling unable to stop using TikTok and Snap, social media exacerbating a “devastating epidemic” of isolation, and a passage questioning why people would want to spend years of their lives “scrolling TikTok and binge-watching Netflix”, the edits show.The 2026 iteration of the Childnet-run event takes place on Tuesday with more than 2,800 schools and colleges listed as supporters.
Childnet, whose core purpose is “helping to make the internet a great and safe place for children”, is one of several internet safety charities part-funded by tech companies.Childnet denied making edits to keep tech funders happy and insisted it would not stop young people making their points.Aspects of the approved speech did acknowledge that excessive screen time had led to depression and anxiety, and that social media companies should reduce the use of devices such as notifications, autoplay and streaks to prolong user engagement.But Swire said he had “felt censored” by the charity’s handling of their speeches.One line cut warned: “Young people are begging for a rope to pull them from the quicksand” and described social media as “one of the worst psychological addictions in history”.
Another was: “Social media companies are in bed with the very same psychology used to exploit gambling victims.” When Swire found out this had been removed at the last minute, he scribbled a similar line back into his speech.“I was pretty surprised because at this stage I didn’t know there was a conflict of interest with where their funding was coming from,” said Swire, who was at the time a member of Childnet’s youth advisory board.“I felt like we were being censored and almost betrayed by this organisation which we wanted to represent with integrity.It was a pretty difficult experience.
”Ghai, now 16, said: “It was quite shocking because the stuff that they deleted was bringing to light a lot of things that were happening in the industry.It felt hypocritical because they were asking us to speak up against this and then at the same time they watered down what we wanted to say so much.”Swire said some of the cuts became apparent only in a final paper copy of the speech handed to them shortly before they were due to speak.Will Gardner, the Childnet chief executive, denied making edits to keep tech funders happy.“If young people want to make a point we allow them to make a point but there are constraints – not due to who gives us money, there are constraints in the nature of the event that we’re running, and the time constraints,” he said.
“We would certainly advise and edit around tone and language but we wouldn’t stop young people making a point.”He said it was “not true” that edits were made if proposed content could compromise the charity’s relationship with its social media company funders.“I completely refute that,” he said.“Because we work in the online safety space we do get some funding from tech companies … but that doesn’t compromise our voice.”Daisy Greenwell, the co-founder of the Smartphone Free Childhood campaign, said teenagers “should not be asked to censor themselves to protect the commercial interests of Big Tech”.
“Young people’s voices are often positioned as the moral authority in debates about online safety, but too often those voices are only welcomed when they align with an organisation’s existing policy position,” she said.“When young people are filtered until they echo a pre-approved line, that isn’t participation – it’s cover.”Harry Amies, the co-founder of Unplug.Scot, a network of parents in Scotland concerned about the impact of screens and educational technology in classrooms, said: “The evidence that Lewis has presented has left us speechless.Most parents across the UK will be shocked to learn that Safer Internet Day is actually funded by Snapchat and other addictive social media platforms.
”Swire, now 19, is campaigning for a social media ban for under-16s.In his original version of his speech, he wrote about a schoolfriend who had told him he felt “terrible” about spending 40 hours a week on social media and wished he could stop, but couldn’t because “I can’t delete TikTok because I make £10 a month on the app.I can’t delete Twitter because that’s where I get my footy news.I can’t remove Snapchat because I’ll lose my streak.” This did not appear in the final speech.
Another cut section mentioned research showing “excessive social media consumption is exacerbating a devastating epidemic of loneliness”,The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know,If you have something to share on this subject, you can contact us confidentially using the following methods:The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories,Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs,This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said.
If you don’t already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu.Select ‘Secure Messaging’.Our guide at theguardian.com/tips lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each.
Synthetic opioids may have caused hundreds more UK deaths than thought
Deaths caused by a synthetic opioid that is hundreds of times stronger than heroin may have been underestimated by up to a third across the UK, according to research.Nitazenes are a class of synthetic opioids that are extremely potent, and up to 500 times stronger than heroin. They were manufactured originally as a painkiller in the 1950s but their development was halted due to their extreme potencies resulting in a high risk of addiction.In 2024, the National Crime Agency (NCA) reported that 333 fatalities across the UK were linked to the drug. However, researchers at King’s College London say that the true number of deaths may have been underreported, due to concerns that samples of the drug are likely being missed in postmortem toxicology tests
The troubling rise of longevity fixation syndrome: ‘I was crushed by the pressure I put on myself’
It was a pitta bread that finally broke Jason Wood. It arrived with hummus instead of the vegetable crudites he had preordered in a restaurant that he had painstakingly researched, as he always did, weeks before he and his husband visited. “In that moment, I just snapped,” he recalls. “I hit rock bottom, I got angry … I started crying, I started shaking. I just felt like I couldn’t do it any more, like I had been crushed by all this pressure I put on myself
The sneeze secret: how much should you worry about this explosive reflex?
It is one of the most powerful involuntary actions the human body can perform. But is a big sneeze a sign of illness, pollution or something else entirely?How worried should we be about a sneeze? It depends who you ask. In the Odyssey, Telemachus sneezes after Penelope’s prayer that her husband will soon be home to sort out her house-sitting suitors – which she sees as a good omen for team Odysseus, and very bad news for the suitors. In the Anabasis, Xenophon takes a sneeze from a soldier as godly confirmation that his army can fight their way back to their own territory – great news for them – while St Augustine notes, somewhat disapprovingly, that people of his era tend to go back to bed if they sneeze while putting on their slippers. But is a sneeze an omen of anything apart from pathogens, pollen or – possibly – air pollution?“It’s a physical response to get rid of something that’s irritating your body,” says Sheena Cruickshank, an immunologist and professor at the University of Manchester
‘16 years later, I’m not unhappy’: the rise of Britain’s multigenerational flatmates
When Nicola Whyte first moved into a four-bedroom house share in Balham 16 years ago, she never imagined she would still be living there at 45. But with rents soaring, and ongoing challenges in saving up for a house deposit, she has ended up as a housemate far longer than she anticipated.“I didn’t think I was going to be here 16 years later, but I’m not unhappy,” she said. “My friends sometimes think I’m a bit weird, they ask me how I can still do it. But I really enjoy it
UK’s ‘unsung army’ of full-time unpaid carers needs more support, report says
A growing “unsung army” of 1 million people with full-time caring responsibilities needs better support, according to a report that found one in three unpaid carers from poorer backgrounds were unable to work because of their duties.The trend is the result of an ageing society and rising ill-health and disability concentrated in the poorest half of the country’s working-age families, the Resolution Foundation’s research found.Almost one in three working-age adults in lower-income families had a disability, compared with fewer than one in five in better-off families, the thinktank said.It added that in homes of modest means, 1 million people had caring responsibilities of 35 hours or more a week – the equivalent of a full-time job – making it challenging to secure paid work.Mike Brewer, the deputy chief executive of the Resolution Foundation, said: “Britain is getting older and sicker, while a greater share of its population has a disability
Menstrual blood test could offer alternative to cervical screening for cancer
A pioneering test of period blood for signs of cervical cancer could be a convenient, non-invasive and accurate way of screening for the disease, researchers have said.A regular sanitary pad topped with a blood sample strip can pick up human papillomavirus (HPV), which causes most cases of cervical cancer, and could be used by women at home, the results of a study indicate.Currently, most women undergo cervical screening under the care of a clinician, who collects a sample via a brush inserted into the vagina. But millions of women invited for screening do not attend.Researchers in China compared the diagnostic accuracy of menstrual blood with samples collected by a clinician for detecting cervical cell abnormalities (CIN2 and CIN3), which can require treatment
The Guide #229: How an indie movie distributed by a lone gamer broke the US box office
From Lord of the Flies to Deftones: your complete entertainment guide to the week ahead
Volcanic vulvas and hermaphrodite marble: Ovid’s Metamorphoses reshaped at the Rijksmuseum
‘One of the most stunning sights in the country’: your picks for UK town of culture
From Dorset to the world: wave of donations helps to secure Cerne giant’s home