Assisted dying bill is a ‘licence to kill’, Theresa May says
The bill to legalise assisted dying is a “licence to kill” that puts vulnerable people at risk, Theresa May has said, as the legislation was debated in the House of Lords for the first time.The former prime minister said she opposed the bill because she said people in England and Wales with disabilities, chronic illnesses or mental health conditions could feel under pressure to end their lives, and “because there is a risk that legalising assisted dying reinforces the dangerous notion that some lives are less worth living than others”.She added: “I have a friend who calls it ‘the licence to kill bill’.”MPs voted in June to allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales to be helped to end their lives, in a historic move that could transform end-of-life care.After scrutiny by a committee of MPs, peers now have an opportunity to debate the legislation in detail, recommend amendments or even reject the bill outright, though the last is seen as unlikely.
May was one of about 190 peers scheduled to speak in a two-day debate, the first day of which attracted passionate and emotional arguments on both sides as many peers described the painful deaths of loved ones and friends,Opening the debate on Friday, Charlie Falconer said it was the duty of the Lords to pass the legislation because MPs had voted in favour and “the public want this”,Calling it a “historic occasion”, Falconer said the current law was “confused, causes terrible suffering and lacks compassion and safeguards”, adding: “This bill before us has already given hope to those with personal experience of the injustice of the current law,”He was backed by Dawn Primarolo, a former Labour public health minister, who said it was the “fundamental right of the individual to exercise agency and autonomy over their own lives”,Primarolo said: “Denying the ultimate right to end one’s life in peace and dignity in the manner and circumstances of one’s choosing, when the alternative is so scary and appalling, is not being compassionate.
We need to facilitate this bill.”The former Conservative home secretary Kenneth Baker also spoke in support, saying it would be “wonderful” if dying people could instead rely on a choice of palliative care, as many of those opposed suggested, “but it’s totally unrealistic.It’ll cost billions.Is the Labour party or the Conservative party going to say in their next manifesto, we will spent billions on palliative care? It just won’t happen.”Others argued equally passionately against the bill.
Some opposed in principle, while others said the form of legislation under discussion, introduced as a private member’s bill by the Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, was flawed and lacking in safeguards.The bishop of London, Sarah Mullally, a former government’s chief nursing officer, said: “If passed, this bill will signal that we are a society that believes that some lives are not worth living.It is the role of this house to scrutinise, but there are no amendments to this bill that can safeguard us completely from its negative effects.”The crossbench peer Kishwer Falkner said that having been diagnosed with stage 3 ovarian cancer last year, she felt that she had “glimpsed the grim reaper through my hospital window in a morphine-induced haze”.Though she previously supported assisted dying, she said, the current bill raised many questions.
Falkner said: “I do wish we did not have to deal with this flawed bill, but we will do so in good faith.”Peers will continue to debate the bill on 19 September.
Pound dips after UK economy doesn’t grow in July; Ocado shares slide 20% amid robotic warehouses demand fears – as it happened
The pound has weakened since today’s GDP report showed the UK economy failed to grow in July.Sterling is down 0.2% at $1.355 against the US dollar this morning.Kathleen Brooks, research director at XTB, points out there is “not much to like” from the July monthly GDP update, with zero growth in the economy at the start of the third quarter
Barclays boss urges UK ministers to limit public sector pay rises
The chief executive of Barclays has said the UK government needs to limit pay rises for public sector workers and resist a further “squeeze” on banks with tax increases.CS Venkatakrishnan said the government needed to look at its own spending levels as the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, seeks ways to address a fiscal hole when she announces her budget in November.“We need to curb expenditure at the government level,” he told the Financial Times. “We need to find a way to curb wage inflation.”Venkatakrishnan said that while the government needed to restrict rising “public sector” wages, the inflationary impact of pay rises was an issue across the UK economy
UK economy flatlines in July in grim news for Rachel Reeves
The UK economy flatlined in July, according to official figures, in grim news for Rachel Reeves as she gears up for a challenging budget.It was a slowdown compared with June, when the economy grew by 0.4%, according to the Office for National Statistics.GDP expanded strongly in the first half of the year, making the UK the fastest-growing economy in the G7, but it had been widely expected to slow in the second half.The ONS said that growth in the services and construction sectors in July was offset by a 0
Stagnant GDP shows scale of challenge for Rachel Reeves at autumn budget
“Our economy isn’t broken, but it does feel stuck,” is the message from Rachel Reeves.Having made rebooting the economy the No 1 priority for government, it is a brutally honest assessment from a chancellor more than a year into the job.The latest GDP figures, released on Friday, highlight the scale of the challenge for Reeves at her autumn budget. Growth flatlined in July, slowing from 0.4% in June, as the economy struggled for momentum over the summer
Britain is ‘a terrible place’ to sell medicines, says drug firm executive
A senior pharmaceuticals executive has called on the government to come up with a “proper” roadmap for raising spending on new medicines, saying Britain is “not a good place” to develop or sell drugs.Paul Naish, the UK head of market access for the French company Sanofi, said Britain was “at a critical point”.He added: “We’ve still got the best universities, we’ve got some of the best scientists in the world, but it’s not a good place to do the development work for medicines. It’s an expensive place to operate, and it’s a terrible place to sell medicines.”The drugmaker MSD, known as Merck in the US, this week ditched its under-construction £1bn research centre in London
Business rates rise would put hundreds of big shops at risk, say UK retailers
Up to 400 large shops are at risk of closure with as many as 100,000 jobs at risk if the government goes ahead with plans to hit stores with higher business rates, retailers have warned.Some of the UK’s largest retail premises, including supermarkets and department stores, would face higher property tax charges under new rules being considered by the government before November’s budget.The higher charges for larger sites, including warehouses, offices and other premises, are intended to pay for discounts for smaller business properties, such as independent retailers, cafes and pubs, after the Labour government pledged to make the business rates system fairer.The bosses of big retailers including John Lewis, Lidl and B&Q met the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, last week to ask her to exclude retail from the surcharge.The new rules are targeted at all business premises with a rateable value – a figure linked to rents – of more than £500,000
Snapchat allows drug dealers to operate openly on platform, finds Danish study
Skip Apple’s new iPhone – five tips to make your old phone feel new again
How to Save the Internet by Nick Clegg review – spinning Silicon Valley
Apple debuts thinner, $999 iPhone Air at ‘awe-dropping’ annual product event
How Google dodged a major breakup – and why OpenAI is to thank for it
The women in love with AI companions: ‘I vowed to my chatbot that I wouldn’t leave him’