Top Foreign Office official ‘felt pressure’ for ‘rapid outcome’ on Mandelson vetting
A top Foreign Office security official who played a key role in granting Peter Mandelson’s vetting clearance “felt pressure to deliver a rapid outcome” because of contacts from Downing Street, MPs have been told.In testimony relayed to parliament via the Foreign Office (FCDO), Ian Collard said he had not seen the assessment summary produced by the vetting agency when he gave an oral briefing to Olly Robbins, the department’s former permanent secretary.Instead, Collard had received an oral briefing from a member of the FCDO’s personnel security team.Robbins was dismissed from his position by Keir Starmer on 16 April after the Guardian revealed the FCDO gave Mandelson “developed vetting” clearance despite United Kingdom Security Vetting (UKSV) recommending it not be granted in late January 2025.The clearance was necessary for Mandelson to take up his announced role as British ambassador to Washington.
Collard has claimed that it was only after Mandelson was removed from his post in September 2025 that he saw the UKSV assessment summary.He said the summary document featured tickboxes noting Mandelson was a “high concern” and vetting officers recommended “clearance denied”, as well as a statement from UKSV that he was a “very borderline case”.Collard’s answers to questions from MPs on the foreign affairs committee, published on Monday evening, add a new name to the list of officials who were aware Mandelson had not been recommended for clearance by UKSV.He said, before speaking to Robbins, he discussed it with his line manager, the chief operating officer in the FCDO, then Corin Robertson.Robertson is now the British ambassador to Japan.
The question of whether to grant Mandelson clearance, Collard said, was the only time he had spoken with Robbins or his predecessors as permanent secretary about a specific decision to grant vetting.The FCDO described the decision to go against the recommendations made by UKSV as “unusual but not exceptional”, but this includes instances where the department decided to block security clearance despite UKSV concluding it would be appropriate.While Collard said he “felt pressure” to rapidly conclude Mandelson’s vetting process, he said that this did not affect the “professional judgment that was reached by himself” or members of the personnel security team he led.But it is this, among many remarkable claims in his account, that will probably attract the most attention.Since Robbins gave oral testimony to the foreign affairs committee last week, accounts have differed between the Foreign Office and Downing Street as to whether there had been pressure on the department to get Mandelson in post as soon as possible.
Robbins told MPs: “Throughout January, honestly, my office and the foreign secretary’s office were under constant pressure.” He characterised the questions from Downing Street as being about “when” Mandelson would be in post, not “whether” he might.At prime minister’s questions last Wednesday, Starmer sought to use Robbins’s testimony to dismiss claims Downing Street had put pressure on the FCDO to get Mandelson to Washington as soon as possible.Starmer said: “No pressure existed whatsoever in relation to this case.”Starmer faces a vote on a parliamentary inquiry into whether he misled MPs.
His comment that “no pressure existed whatsoever” is among the comments that opposition MPs claim are misleading, alongside a statement that “full due process” was followed.Downing Street has said the prime minister’s comment about “pressure” referred to the security vetting process, rather than the broader appointment of Mandelson.But Collard’s comment that – while it did not affect his professional judgment – he was aware of pressure to complete the vetting process rapidly will probably add to the criticism of the prime minister’s remarks.The prime minister’s former chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, and Philip Barton, Robbins’s immediate predecessor as permanent secretary, are due to appear in front of the foreign affairs committee on Tuesday morning.They may face questions over the differing accounts as to the pressure exerted on the FCDO by Downing Street.
Barton may be quizzed about his role in giving Mandelson access to the FCDO’s headquarters before the security clearance process had concluded,Collard said he was given an exemption as a member of the House of Lords and that Mandelson’s private secretary informed people that the vetting process was ongoing,
Musk and Altman’s bitter feud over OpenAI to be laid bare in court
The bitter rivalry between two of the tech world’s most powerful men arrives in court this week, as Elon Musk’s lawsuit against Sam Altman and OpenAI heads to trial in Oakland, California. The case is set to feature some of the biggest names in Silicon Valley, and its outcome could affect the course of the AI boom.Musk’s suit, filed in 2024, focuses on the formative years of OpenAI when he, Altman and others co-founded the artificial intelligence company as a nonprofit with a grand purpose.“OpenAI is a non-profit artificial intelligence research company. Our goal is to advance digital intelligence in the way that is most likely to benefit humanity as a whole, unconstrained by a need to generate financial return,” reads the company’s mission statement, published in late 2015
UK departments at odds over energy demands of AI datacentres
One vision of the UK’s future involves a decarbonised economy powered by clean, renewable energy. Another involves making the UK an AI superpower.The government departments responsible for these two visions do not appear to have agreed on their numbers.The Department of Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) thinks AI datacentres will consume 6GW of electricity by 2030. The Department of Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) appears to think they will use less than a tenth of that
Cannes AI film festival raises eyebrows – and questions about future
In Cannes’ darkened screening rooms, the supposed future of cinema flickered into life this week and it was strange. The first edition of the World AI film festival (WAIFF) showcased visions of men with fish scales erupting from their necks and seaweed from their mouths, a heroine with a heart beating outside her body and so many massed armies of AI-generated tanned men sweeping across battlefields that David Lean would have blushed.Last week the Cannes film festival, entering its 76th year, banned the emerging technology from its Palme d’Or competition, insisting “AI imitates very well but it will never feel deep emotions”. But this week the Croisette was taken over by the upstart AI film movement and their big-tech backers amid increasing investment and attention from the Hollywood studios. A “nouvelle vague”, they said, is coming
Facing AI and a tough job market, gen Z turns to entrepreneurship: ‘I have to prove myself’
When Ashley Terrell graduated from the University of Hawaii in 2024, she planned to find a job in marketing, maybe for a tech company. She had a bachelor’s degree in business administration and a college résumé that included a student marketing job for Red Bull. But after months of applying, her only offer was to work in the power tools section at Home Depot. “It was quite a shock,” she told the Guardian. “I searched for jobs every single day in that Home Depot bathroom
TikTok and Visa launch debit card to speed payouts to UK creators
TikTok and Visa have launched a debit card for content creators in the UK which they say will allow people to quickly access their earnings from the platform.The creator card is designed for the growing numbers of people making money through TikTok Live, a livestreaming feature where creators receive virtual gifts from viewers that are later converted into cash.The two companies said the card, which links to a user’s creator account on TikTok, was designed to address cashflow issues faced by users who often wait days or weeks for payments to clear.Launched in 2020, TikTok Live is a section of the app where users can broadcast to viewers in real time. According to TikTok, more than 15 million people broadcasted via its platform in Europe in 2025
Officials hugely underestimated impact of AI datacentres on UK carbon emissions
The UK government vastly underestimated the climate impact of artificial intelligence, it has emerged, after officials raised their estimate of carbon emissions from AI by a factor of more than 100.According to new data quietly published this week, energy use by AI datacentres in the UK could cause the emission of up to 123m tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO₂) – about as much as generated by 2.7 million people – over the next 10 years.That latest figure replaces a previous estimate – since deleted – that claimed emissions would reach a maximum of 0.142m tonnes of CO₂ in a single year
Mandelson and McSweeney: a partnership forged on winning and crushing the Labour left
Starmer tells MPs to ‘fight together’ before critical day for his premiership
Lights. Camera. Lindsay! Speaker’s show lands Starmer with yet another headache | John Crace
Rachel Reeves considering rent freeze to limit Iran war fallout
What might McSweeney and Barton reveal about Mandelson vetting scandal?
Hannah Spencer riles fellow MPs with attack on parliament’s drinking culture