The Guide #236: Is celebrity casting a cynical marketing stunt or does it help to democratise theatre?
Timothée Chalamet might have smirked his way out of an Oscar.Sabrina Carpenter might have been roundly snubbed at the Grammys.But there’s one place both would be welcomed with open arms: the UK theatre scene.It seems we can’t get enough of celebs on stage (acting chops preferable but not mandatory).This week alone, London’s West End features Stranger Things star Sadie Sink, singer Self Esteem and Strictly cutie pie Johannes Radebe.
Meanwhile, Mischa Barton, best known for playing Marissa Cooper in the 00s TV series The OC, is touring the UK and Ireland in a new adaptation of James M,Cain’s crime novel Double Indemnity,Celebrity casting or stunt casting as it’s sometimes less kindly known, isn’t new: the Donmar Warehouse was at it back in 1998, casting Nicole Kidman in erotic two-hander The Blue Room, to quite the commotion,But in recent years it’s become increasingly common and, to many, increasingly cynical,There are shows with a rotating roster of leads for every taste: last year’s Every Brilliant Thing offered Lenny Henry and Minnie Driver among others.
There are cameos, either advertised as nightly reveals – Inside No.9: Stage/Fright’s recent tour unveiled everyone from Jonathan Ross to Basil Brush – or thrown in as sales-boosting surprises (why not chance it at the Les Mis tour when Ian McKellen has already popped up?).Then there’s 2:22 A Ghost Story, widely seen as the play that lets non-actors – the likes of Cheryl Tweedy and Love Island presenter Laura Whitmore – have a bash at the boards.As the trend has intensified, so has the criticism.In October, the Casting Directors’ Guild co-chair Nadine Rennie warned celebrity casting is “killing” the industry.
Other insiders say some theatres won’t book shows without a big name, making it harder for smaller productions (often the work of new talent) to compete.It can also bring out the ugly side of audiences.When Love Island winner Amber Davies recently took a sick break from starring as Elle Woods in the Legally Blonde musical, fans (bend and) snapped, sending online abuse and demanding refunds, despite a capable understudy.Which brings us to another common complaint: that celebrities take work from experienced actors and, sometimes, make rubbish theatre.Just last week, Maimuna Memon, who says her Olivier win last year was followed by job-offer tumbleweed, told the Guardian: “It’s brutal right now.
Celebrity casting is massive and is reducing the amount of jobs available … A lot of people I know who are incredible had a really shit time last year,”But as sad as this makes me, and as much as I believe in supporting new and existing talent, I’m not convinced celebrity casting is the enemy of great theatre or a successful industry,At least, not always,For one thing, not all star-turns are created equal,YouTuber Tanya Burr’s “flat delivery, and often oddly stressed sentences” probably did make Confidence at Southwark Playhouse worse, and rob someone more talented of an opportunity.
But Bryan Cranston’s “magnetic” turn in All My Sons? No chance.Besides, many screen juggernauts were masters of the stage first (I’m looking at you, Michael Sheen).Celebrities may hog the limelight, but they also bring welcome eyeballs to lesser-known castmates and, sometimes, to the very productions they’re accused of squeezing out.Take 2:22 A Ghost Story.It wasn’t always a theatrical behemoth – when it opened, first-time playwright Danny Robins and his producers had to take a huge financial risk, committing to the theatre’s rent for the show’s entire run, with audiences only just trickling back after lockdown.
“We needed to think in terms of ‘Who would you catch Covid for?’” Robins said.Enter Lily Allen as its sellout star.Those sold-out runs can also be good for more than just the box office.In 2022, Jodie Comer took the lead in a play by Suzie Miller, then relatively unknown outside Australia.It became an instant hot ticket and today Prima Facie, a scorching monologue about the legal system’s handling of sexual assault cases, has two Oliviers, a Tony and a Cynthia Erivo-fronted film adaptation on the way.
More importantly, it has also led a senior judge in England to rewrite the directions given to juries in rape trials, and a recording of the play is shown to newly appointed judges in Northern Ireland before they sit on sexual assault cases.Celebrities, of course, contribute to UK theatre’s healthy audience numbers – over 37 million last year, exceeding pre-pandemic levels.But they also tempt people to try theatre for the first time.Tom Holland’s run as Romeo in 2024 led to an Eras tour-level scramble for tickets among young fans – no bad thing when creative school subjects and extracurricular activities are still undervalued and underfunded.A recent report also found that, with a median price of £41 for a UK ticket last year, “for many people, the barrier [to going to the theatre] is not price, but uncertainty about whether the space is for them”.
The presence of a familiar face on stage, then – or the fellow Love Island fans sitting beside them – can make nervous theatregoers feel they belong.Helpfully, many celeb-fronted shows also run discount schemes: Holland’s Romeo and Juliet released 10,000 tickets at £25 and under, with half reserved for under 30s, key workers, and people receiving government benefits.And I’d like to think newcomers will be tempted to try other, celeb-free theatre, too.Despite the debates, celebrities may not even have as much sway over theatre as we think; plenty of shows sell out, or run for years, not a Netflix star in sight.But, given the trend isn’t going anywhere, it wouldn’t hurt for us all to take more care of this wonderful industry.
For audiences to book a range of shows, casting directors to look beyond the big names, and celebrities to use their star power to champion great productions.And, Timothée, you can still come, too.To read the complete version of this newsletter please subscribe to receive The Guide in your inbox every Friday
‘I decided not to jog here after dark’: new English council guidance prioritises women’s safety
Reetta Vaahtoranta used to go running in the evening along the Greenway, a four-mile (7km) pathway stretching across east London. But increasingly, she found herself receiving unwanted attention from lone male passersby. She switched her running clothes to baggier options, because “the less attractive and weirder you look, the less likely you are to get people following you”.“In the end, I just decided it was not worth it to come jogging here after dark,” she said. “If I know it can be a bit dodgy, then I just stop doing it
What does new guidance in the UK say about screen time for children?
The government has issued new guidance on how much time children below the age of five should spend on screens.Children’s relationships with screens have become one of the key struggles of 21st-century parenting, along with the impact of the content that appears on those devices. The guidance has been developed by a panel led by the children’s commissioner for England, Rachel de Souza, and children’s health expert Prof Russell Viner.Children below two years old should avoid screen time other than for shared activities that encourage interaction. For children between the ages of two and five, screen time should be kept to no more than one hour a day
Starmer vows to ‘fight’ social media firms to protect children from addiction
Keir Starmer has promised a “fight” with social media companies amid efforts to limit children’s use of mobile phones, tablets and TVs, as new official guidance recommends children under five spend no more than an hour a day on screens.The guidance, developed by a panel led by the children’s commissioner, Rachel de Souza and children’s health expert Prof Russell Viner, advises screen time for children under two should be avoided other than for shared activities.Ministers are also considering Australia-style measures to limit or ban social media for under-16s.Speaking at a school in south London about the new guidance, the prime minister said: “When there’s a lot going on, when children are having a tantrum, trying to find something to distract them is an obvious thing, and I don’t think parents and carers have had any guidance at all yet about what would be appropriate, what might be best.”The government is consulting on potential age restrictions on social media and other services, such as gaming sites and AI chatbots, as well as restrictions on addictive design features and risky functionalities, and better support for parents and families
Keep under-fives’ screen time to no more than an hour a day, UK advice says
Children under five should spend no more than an hour a day on screens, new government advice says.Screen time for children under two should be avoided except for shared activities encouraging interaction, families are advised.In addition, the government is considering Australia-style measures to limit or ban social media for under-16s.The guidance was developed by a panel led by the children’s commissioner, Rachel de Souza, and the children’s health expert Prof Russell Viner.Keir Starmer said the guidance would help families keep children safe and ensure they built healthy habits with screens
More than 6m vapes and pods discarded weekly in UK despite single-use ban, study finds
More than 6m vapes and vape pods are still being discarded every week in the UK, with waste management companies warning the sheer volume continues to strain recycling systems despite the ban on disposable e-cigarettes.According to research by the recycling campaign group Material Focus, the 6.3m vapes and pods thrown away each week in 2025 represented a 23% reduction from the previous year.This suggests the ban on sales of single-use vapes that came into effect on 1 June 2025 has had an impact on levels of waste, alongside a 31% drop in the number of vapes bought each week.However, the volume of waste is still creating problems
UK government must urgently apologise for forced adoption, MPs say
The UK government must urgently issue a formal apology for the state’s role in forced adoption as many victims are nearing the end of their lives, a cross-party group of MPs has said.A report from the education select committee said ministers should provide an initial commitment to an apology and begin working with survivor groups as quickly as possible on its wording.It said a formal and public apology was essential to correct the public record and reduce the burdens felt by many mothers and adoptees.Between 1949 and 1976, an estimated 185,000 babies were taken from unmarried mothers and placed for adoption in England and Wales owing to a culture of shame surrounding pregnancy outside marriage. Religious organisations ran most of the mother and baby homes where pregnant women were sent to give birth, while charities and local authorities were also involved in funding the placements and finding adoptive parents
‘We’re quietly chirpy’: some Tories glimpse ray of hope, but others see abyss at May elections
Reform candidate in Wales steps down after apparent Nazi salute
Former miners can finally speak the truth about Orgreave, says inquiry chair
Police find no evidence of criminality in Gorton and Denton byelection
Reports Sadiq Khan could join Starmer’s cabinet dismissed by allies
Social media has led to a ‘complete rewiring of childhood’, says minister – UK politics live