H
trending
H
HOYONEWS
HomeBusinessTechnologySportPolitics
Others
  • Food
  • Culture
  • Society
Contact
Home
Business
Technology
Sport
Politics

Food

Culture

Society

Contact
Facebook page
H
HOYONEWS

Company

business
technology
sport
politics
food
culture
society

© 2025 Hoyonews™. All Rights Reserved.
Facebook page

‘It feels like they’re pulling figures out of the sky’: UK pet owners welcome crackdown on vet fees

1 day ago
A picture


The UK’s competition watchdog has ordered vets to cap written prescription fees at £21, and practices will have to publish price lists in a crackdown on rising fees,The Competition and Markets Authority also said a costcomparison website would be introduced to increase competition and drive down costs,These are just some of the measures due to come into force later this year,The Guardian spoke to pet owners in the UK about their experiences with vet bills,Many felt prices had increased so much that they were becoming difficult to afford.

Others were concerned they were paying “over the odds” for medication when it could be bought cheaper online.Many people who contacted us also spoke up for their vets, saying that while treatment was expensive, they felt they were made fully aware of what they were paying for.Here are some of their responses.Anna Radley, a retired co-director from Wiltshire, said she was left angry after being quoted £1,400 for dental treatment for her cat, which was more than double what she ultimately paid elsewhere.Radley has been caring for Perdy, an older stray cat she inherited from her mother, for the past 12 years.

“We’ve only ever had strays in my family,” she said,“You look after them,”Perdy, who is uninsured, developed gum disease and first had treatment in about 2021, costing about £200,But when Radley returned to the same practice two years later, by then taken over by a larger company, she was quoted £1,400,“I expected it to be a bit more expensive, maybe £400 or £500,” she said.

“But £1,400 was just unbelievable.”Radley challenged the estimate and asked for a breakdown of the costs, but said she struggled to get a clear explanation.“It was all jargon.You’ve got no real benchmark.”Instead, she took Perdy to a different, independent vet.

The procedure, which included multiple extractions, X-rays, blood tests and follow-up care, cost £627.“The difference was shocking,” she said.“It just feels like they’re pulling figures out of the sky.”She believed rising costs risk deterring people from seeking care for their pets.“These kinds of fees undermine the very purpose of veterinary healthcare,” she said.

“If we can’t afford to look after them, animals are going to be abandoned or untreated.”Kim, 68, who lives in Wiltshire, said she was left annoyed when she took her dog, Suki, to the vet after the cockapoo developed an eye problem.“I paid £35 before I even walked through the door,” she said of the vet, which is part of a chain.She was told Suki, four-and-a-half, who is insured, had an infection and was prescribed antibiotics costing £48 plus the cost of painkillers.But after the course of antibiotics, Suki had not improved.

Kim returned to the vet.She paid £35, and again was prescribed antibiotics for £48 and painkillers.After the antibiotics had run their course, Suki was still not right.Kim, who is retired, said her insurance company told her to ask for the prescription because they could get the antibiotics cheaper.When she went back to the vet, after paying another £35, she did just that.

She was told a prescription would “take a few days to order them” and that Suki “really needed to start on them that evening”.“I felt anxious and guilty,” Kim said.“So I paid the £48.I wouldn’t do that again.I’ve learned.

”Suki’s issue persisted, so Kim went back to the vet again.The vet then referred Suki to an eye specialist who performed a small operation on her.“My bill was just over £1,500,” said Kim, adding that the antibiotics she was prescribed “could be bought much cheaper online”.“I feel very annoyed as I believe a referral to the eye specialist should have happened after no improvement after the first lot of antibiotics, this would have saved me a lot of money in prescriptions and vet appointments,” she said.“I’d be quite reluctant to go back to the vet.

Obviously, if she were injured or she was really sick, I would, but it’s made me quite wary.You put your trust in vets because you think they do what they do because they actually care about animals, but actually, it’s all about money-making.”Vikki White, a freelance editor from Manchester, said the rising cost of treating her 11-year-old British blue shorthair cat, Humphrey, had left her feeling “at a massive disadvantage”.Humphrey was diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis in 2024 after his back legs began collapsing.“I thought it was something really serious, like a stroke,” she said.

“So in a way it was a relief as it’s manageable, but it’s an expensive condition.”He now receives monthly injections of Solensia at the vet.Initially costing £113 a month, the price has risen to £125.White’s insurance covered the treatment for a year, but because arthritis is a chronic condition, she must now pay out of her own pocket.Recently, a nearby independent clinic quoted her £85 a month for the same injections, £40 less.

“That’s a significant difference,” she said,Despite the potential savings, she was reluctant to switch,“My cat has had quite a few health problems and his vets know him,I’m worried about moving him and then regretting it,” she said,White said the lack of clarity around pricing made it difficult to judge what was fair.

“I feel like, a bit like when you take your car to a garage, you just don’t know what you should be charged,” she said.“You just have to take the vet’s word for it.And because your cat is like family and you would do anything for them, they really have you.”She believed greater regulation would help.“Standardising fees would be great.

”Paul, 60, said he would travel to France for non-emergency treatment for his cane corso, Benny, as he believed it would work out cheaper,Last September, Benny, who is four in June, suffered a bee sting on the back of his throat,Paul, who is semi-retired and recently returned to the UK after living in France, contacted a vet in the Brighton area, which is part of a chain,He was quoted £1,200 and told Benny would have to be “examined, X-rayed, sedated and registered for a new UK passport as he had a French passport”,Paul decided to ring around and was also quoted £600 to £800.

Another vet, also part of a chain, said they could treat Benny for £72.“That’s a huge price difference,” he said.“They also offered free follow-up advice.”He said he would combine using this vet with visits to France for treatment.“Even after paying for a return ferry crossing, petrol and vet’s fees, I’d still be saving compared to UK prices,” he said.

Paul welcomed more price transparency, but said people should “shop around more” as the prices are “not standardised”.“The prices will probably still be high,” he said.“They’ll just be advertising how high they are.But people are loyal to their vets and won’t ring around, because they’ve had their vets for 20 years – they’re a captive audience.” Names have been changed
technologySee all
A picture

Sony to hike PS5 prices by $100 as AI and Iran war push up memory chip costs

Sony is raising global prices of its PlayStation 5 consoles, including a $100 increase in the US, marking its second hike in less than a year as the entertainment giant grapples with rising costs of key components such as memory chips.The tech industry’s race to build out artificial intelligence infrastructure has pushed memory makers to favor higher-margin datacenter chips, tightening supply for consumer devices like the ones Sony sells.The updated US prices, effective 2 April, will put the standard PS5 at $649.99, up from $549.99

2 days ago
A picture

Wikipedia bans AI-generated content in its online encyclopedia

Wikipedia has banned the use of artificial intelligence in the generation or rewriting of content for its voluminous online encyclopedia.In a recent policy change, Wikipedia said that the use of large language models (or LLMs) “often violates” its core principles and will not be allowed. The English language version of Wikipedia has more than 7.1m articles.The use of AI has been a contentious issue among Wikipedia’s community of volunteer editors but a vote among the site’s editors supported the ban, according to 404 Media

2 days ago
A picture

Number of AI chatbots ignoring human instructions increasing, study says

AI models that lie and cheat appear to be growing in number with reports of deceptive scheming surging in the last six months, a study into the technology has found.AI chatbots and agents disregarded direct instructions, evaded safeguards and deceived humans and other AI, according to research funded by the UK government-funded AI Security Institute (AISI). The study, shared with the Guardian, identified nearly 700 real-world cases of AI scheming and charted a five-fold rise in misbehaviour between October and March, with some AI models destroying emails and other files without permission.The snapshot of scheming by AI agents “in the wild”, as opposed to in laboratory conditions, has sparked fresh calls for international monitoring of the increasingly capable models and come as Silicon Valley companies aggressively promote the technology as a economically transformative. Last week the UK chancellor also launched a drive to get millions more Britons using AI

2 days ago
A picture

‘Accountability has arrived’: dual US court losses show shifting tide against Meta and co

In the span of just two days, the most powerful social media company in the world faced a more severe public reckoning than it has in years.Jurors in California and New Mexico gave back-to-back verdicts this week that for the first time ever found Meta liable for products that inflict harm on young people. For years, lawmakers, parents and advocates have raised red flags over how social media can hurt children, but now the tech firms are being held to account via court rulings that could set long-lasting precedents.A jury in New Mexico ordered Meta to pay $375m in damages on Tuesday over claims that its products led to child sexual exploitation, among other harms. The following day, a jury in California ordered Meta and YouTube to pay $6m over claims that both companies deliberately designed addictive products to hook young users

3 days ago
A picture

New York City hospitals drop Palantir as controversial AI firm expands in UK

New York City’s public hospital system announced that it would not be renewing its contract with Palantir as controversy mounts in the UK over the data analytics and AI firm’s government contract.The president of the US’s largest municipal public healthcare system, Dr Mitchell Katz, testified last week before the New York city council that the agreement with Palantir would expire in October.He said at the hearing that the contract, which focused on recovering money for insurance claims, was always meant to be short-term, and that there was an “absolute firewall” preventing Palantir from sharing information with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. He said that the agency had “not had any incidents”.The contract and related payment documents shared with the Guardian by the American Friends Service Committee and first reported by the Intercept, show that NYC Health + Hospitals has paid Palantir nearly $4m since November 2023

3 days ago
A picture

Human rights groups cheer ‘watershed’ verdict in social media addiction trial

The verdict in a landmark social media trial that Meta and YouTube deliberately designed addictive products has sparked calls for reform across borders. International human rights and tech freedom groups issued statements after the decision, praising jurors for holding social media companies accountable for harms to children and urging tech giants to change their design features to ensure children are safe.Amnesty International said in a statement on Thursday that “this court decision is clear: these platforms are unsafe by design and meaningful change is urgently needed”.The day prior, a Los Angeles jury found both Meta and YouTube liable for intentionally creating platforms that hooked a young user and led to her being harmed. The six-week trial was one of more than 20 “bellwether” trials that are expected to go to court in the next few years

3 days ago
societySee all
A picture

‘I decided not to jog here after dark’: new English council guidance prioritises women’s safety

2 days ago
A picture

What does new guidance in the UK say about screen time for children?

2 days ago
A picture

Starmer vows to ‘fight’ social media firms to protect children from addiction

2 days ago
A picture

Keep under-fives’ screen time to no more than an hour a day, UK advice says

2 days ago
A picture

More than 6m vapes and pods discarded weekly in UK despite single-use ban, study finds

2 days ago
A picture

UK government must urgently apologise for forced adoption, MPs say

3 days ago