H
technology
H
HOYONEWS
HomeBusinessTechnologySportPolitics
Others
  • Food
  • Culture
  • Society
Contact
Home
Business
Technology
Sport
Politics

Food

Culture

Society

Contact
Facebook page
H
HOYONEWS

Company

business
technology
sport
politics
food
culture
society

© 2025 Hoyonews™. All Rights Reserved.
Facebook page

Forget the AI job apocalypse. AI’s real threat is worker control and surveillance

11/5/2026
A picture


The real danger that artificial intelligence poses to work is not just job loss – it is the growing divide between people who use AI to extend their skills and those whose working lives are increasingly shaped by opaque, AI-powered systems of surveillance and control,The debate about artificial intelligence and how it will affect workers is stuck in the wrong place,On one side are warnings that machines are coming for millions of jobs,On the other are claims that AI will turbocharge productivity,Both stories miss what is already happening in workplaces across the world, from Britain to Kenya to the United States.

For some, AI can help remove the drudgery from daily work.These are often people in better-paid, higher-autonomy roles: analysts, consultants, lawyers, academics, managers.In these jobs, provided AI is being rolled out to augment workers rather than replace them, it can feel like a copilot.It can support human judgment, speed up routine tasks and create space for more creative thinking.For many others, though, AI is not an assistant.

It is a boss.It appears in scheduling and monitoring tools, route optimisation software and automated performance dashboards – all systems that decide who gets what shift, how long a task should take and whether someone is performing at their maximum capacity.In these workplaces, AI is not something you use.It is something that watches and rules you.That is the new divide we should all be paying attention to.

A third of UK employers are already using “bossware” technology to monitor workers’ online activity.This already prevalent worker surveillance is a glimpse of what is yet to come.This is why the question of whether AI is “good” or “bad” is pointlessly crude.The truth is more nuanced.Employers are using AI to empower some workers while subjecting others to more intensive, inhumane forms of oversight.

It is creating new opportunities at the top of the labour market while tightening control lower down.And further down the line, the same methods of algorithmic management and surveillance that are being honed in warehouses, delivery vans and gig work platforms are likely to spread to corporate headquarters, hospitals and schools.We’re already seeing this at companies including Amazon, as its software engineers say they’re being surveilled and pressured to use AI to achieve more productivity, even when it counterintuitively slows them down.And Meta plans to track and capture its employees’ keystrokes, mouse movements and clicks to train its AI models.Some of the same workers benefiting from the rise of AI now are poised to eventually lose that advantage.

My own research over the past decade on worker-AI coexistence, which was cited in the 2024 White House economic report, suggests that the most pressing issue about AI’s impact on work is not immediate mass unemployment.It is the widening gap in skills, autonomy and wellbeing between those who get to work with AI and those who are finding themselves managed by it.Many jobs will remain in the future, but they will be more pressured, more fragmented and less human.That matters because work is not just about income.It is also about dignity, trust and control.

During the pandemic, many people became acutely aware of how deeply work affects mental wellbeing,AI-managed workplaces are only intensifying the pressures of work,When every click, step, call or pause a worker makes can be measured and graded by a system that they cannot fully see or challenge, the effect is stress,For people in warehousing, retail, hospitality, logistics, customer service or the gig economy, it can mean being pushed harder by systems that are presented as neutral, objective or efficient, even when they are anything but,This is not just a technical problem.

It is a social, political and moral one.Take Britain, which likes to present itself as being ambitious about AI.There are now major plans to expand AI skills across the workforce.All of that sounds positive.But beneath the rhetoric lies a more uncomfortable reality: many organisations are still poorly prepared to introduce AI fairly.

A recent global survey of business leaders found that although most say AI skills are now a source of competitive advantage, relatively few dedicated a meaningful budget amount to develop their employees’ AI skills,Even fewer have strong governance in place,Many managers still have little real responsibility for helping their teams adapt,That is how inequality hardens,If better-paid workers are trained to use AI while lower-paid workers are simply exposed to it through surveillance and automated management, then this will not be a story of shared progress.

It will be a story of deepening imbalance.Workers across the economy need access to meaningful training, not just in using digital tools but in building the wider skills that matter even more in an AI age: judgment, communication and critical thinking.We also need basic democratic principles in the workplace.Systems that affect pay and performance should be transparent and contestable.Most of all, workers need a voice in how these technologies are introduced.

AI should not be something used on people behind closed doors and then justified in the language of efficiency.It should be shaped by the people whose lives it will affect – and research has found that involving workers in the process improves their job quality and allows employers to integrate AI more effectively.The choice about how AI will reshape work is not being made in Silicon Valley boardrooms or summit speeches.It is being made right now, workplace by workplace, across Britain and around the world.And unless we pay attention, the new AI divide will become one more inequality that arrives quietly, embeds itself deeply and is only recognised once it is already everywhere.

Nazrul Islam is a chair professor of business and co-director of the Centre of FinTech at the University of East London’s Royal Docks School of Business and Law
sportSee all
A picture

The Spin | ‘We have a hoot on the field’: Oswestry CC boasts 10 mother-daughter pairs

Women and Girls section has built strong family dynamic since launching in 2018 – and embraced Wags monikerThe acronym Wags first entered popular consciousness in 2006 during England’s football World Cup adventures in Baden-Baden. Victoria Beckham, Cheryl Tweedy and the gang became a sneering tabloid obsession, their matching outfits, nightclub antics and hair extensions gleefully picked apart.Twenty years later, a very different set of Wags are causing a stir at Oswestry Cricket Club on the north Shropshire-Wales border. The thriving Women and Girls section (WaGs) has an astonishing 10 mother and daughter pairs who have played competitive cricket together, ranging from 12 years old to 67.The oldest member is the irrepressible Jools Payne, team manager and founding player

13/5/2026
A picture

From the Pocket: Voss coached the way he played and his brutal football failed Carlton

When John Elliott died in 2021, the old, dark, imperial Carlton was dead. The new Carlton was grounded on “respect, humility and integrity”. The new president was a master networker. The new chief executive was the best administrator in football. The new coach had been one of the great players of his generation

13/5/2026
A picture

Cleary to finish up as Panthers coach and end greatest modern-day NRL dynasty

Ivan Cleary has 18 months remaining in his current role at the Penrith Panthers before the four-time premiership-winning NRL coach steps aside and his assistant Peter Wallace takes over.The 55-year-old announced on Wednesday he would not renew his contract when it expires at the end of next season, but will remain in Penrith in an advisory role beyond 2027.He said he had mulled over the decision for the past 12 months.“It’s a decision that I haven’t taken lightly,” Cleary said. “But I’ve thought about [it] for quite a long time

13/5/2026
A picture

Billy Knight obituary

Billy Knight, who has died aged 90, was a stalwart of British tennis long before Andy Murray changed the landscape of the game in the UK.During the 1950s and 60s – an era that saw his compatriots Mike Davies, Bobby Wilson and Mike Sangster struggle to challenge the dominance of Australian and American players – Knight racked up 47 singles titles, won 21 of his 34 Davis Cup matches and earned a grand slam title at Roland Garros by teaming up with Mexico’s Yola Ramirez to win the French mixed doubles crown. Earlier he had been a Wimbledon and Australian junior champion.Unusually for a British player, Knight was a clay court specialist. With a game based on powerful ground strokes and an effective left handed serve, he won the British Hard Court Championships at Bournemouth three times (in 1958, 1963 and 1964) and, on the slowest of red clay courts in Hamburg, took the German title over the South African No 1, Ian Vermaak, in 1959

12/5/2026
A picture

Rory McIlroy claims he knew LIV was in trouble and breakaway tour was always a ‘risk’

Rory McIlroy has revealed he heard rumblings of impending trouble for LIV Golf weeks before Saudi ­Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF) ­confirmed it would withdraw funding for the circuit. The Masters champion believes the PIF approach highlights the danger of sport ­becoming reliant on anything that can be affected by world affairs.LIV is engaged in a race against time to survive with PIF, which has bestowed more than $5bn (£3.7bn) on the tour, to exit at the end of 2026. News of that, which emerged in the immediate aftermath of ­McIlroy’s ­successful defence at Augusta National last month, shocked those within LIV but not the Northern Irishman

12/5/2026
A picture

Jake Paul admits broken jaw from Anthony Joshua fight may have ended boxing career

Jake Paul has admitted the broken jaw he suffered during his loss to Anthony Joshua in December may have ended his boxing career.The YouTuber turned boxer was stopped during December’s fight after a brutal shot from former world champion Joshua. Paul said the injury is still being monitored five months later.“We’ll see what my doctors say,” Paul told Uncrowned on Monday. “I’ll be able to get a more accurate timeframe, or can I even fight again? That is definitely in the realm and possibilities of things [that I can’t]

12/5/2026
cultureSee all
A picture

Joseph Fiennes on parenting, politics and banning children from social media: ‘Stand up, Keir, this is your kids’ generation’

9/5/2026
A picture

From The Sheep Detectives to Rivals: your complete entertainment guide to the week ahead

9/5/2026
A picture

Historic Oxford cinema under threat as Oriel College refuses to extend lease

7/5/2026
A picture

Arthur Miller opens up about marriage to Marilyn Monroe in newly unearthed recordings

7/5/2026
A picture

Man charged over bomb hoax after Peter Kay show evacuated

2/5/2026
A picture

Royal Opera House calls for release of Georgian bass singer jailed over democracy protests

11/5/2026