Should the Australian Open finals be played at an earlier time? | Simon Cambers and Joey Lynch

A picture


The first time I covered the Australian Open, in 2001, the final began at 2pm.Andre Agassi beat Arnaud Clement in a lopsided final that lasted one hour, 46 minutes.This year marked my 18th visit and on Sunday I wondered aloud (on the internet) why, since 2005, the Australian Open men’s final has been played at night, when Wimbledon, the US Open and Roland-Garros are all afternoon starts.Overseas broadcast rights are incredibly lucrative, of course.Tennis Australia has invested millions of dollars in the expansion and improvement of Melbourne Park and the Australian Open, paying the players far more prize money than in the past.

That money has to be recouped, so having the men’s final at night, also offering fans hours to be in the grounds and spend money, makes sense,European TV and Asian TV, the latter an especially big source of income for Tennis Australia, like the evening start, because the time zones work nicely,In the US, though, 7,30pm Melbourne time equates to 3,30am in New York.

Many people mentioned the heat.Well, the Australian Open has a heat rule so if it’s too hot, they close the roof and the players and crowd are in air-conditioning.The fans in the grounds watching on big screens need more shade, yes, but the tournament has pledged to improve that in future years.What about the 6pm News, an institution in Australia? In this era of 24-hour news and streaming, how many people even watch just one thing these days? Younger people, whom Tennis Australia want to attract, watch TV in different ways, even watching TV and their phone at the same time.And with children back to school today, many young people could not watch, while staying up late was problematic for parents too.

As it happened, the final on Sunday finished around 11pm, which is a lot earlier than it might have been,Had Carlos Alcaraz and Novak Djokovic gone to a fifth set, it would have been well past midnight,Many, including support crew and media, have to stay on at least an extra couple of hours after finals finish,The US Open moved the men’s final even earlier last year, from 4,15pm to 2pm.

Wimbledon starts at 4pm and Roland-Garros at 3pm.The AFL grand final is still an afternoon start.No one is saying the Australian Open should set its schedule for the US, but why not start a little earlier, say, 5pm instead? Simon CambersCertainly, there are reasons as to why it should.But quite simply, it doesn’t need to.Nor, more importantly, should it have to.

You’ve probably seen the social media posts that kickstarted this whole debate – a (largely benign but now deleted) musing from an American that “they should have found a way” to play the men’s final at a time more suitable for television audiences on the US east coast,The poor bloke never stood a chance,The reflexive response whenever an American is perceived to be dictating how they should organise things is one of the few remaining facets of Australian life that unites us – doubly so when this involves institutions such as the Australian Open, an event that has become just as much a cultural one as sporting,But such a visceral reaction does provide some insight into just why organisers wouldn’t want to upset the locals, especially given they just set a new record of 1,150,044 fans passing through the gates for the main draw and 1,368,043 across the tournament,Add to this the significant investment made by Australian rights holders that want primetime events to broadcast, as well as the dangers of the intense summer heat for attendees not ensconced in the air-conditioned interior of Rod Laver Arena, and there are plenty of practical reasons for organisers to keep the status quo.

Besides, the US has a grand slam tournament called the US Open.There is also Wimbledon and the French Open, which serve Europe but also take place at times that suit the American palete.The French Open’s finals moved to 3pm last year, giving them a much more friendly 9am start time in New York, but retaining a hostile 11pm start time in Melbourne.The Australian Open isn’t just about Australia, either.It’s the grand slam of the Asia Pacific.

When you add China, Japan, Korea, and a large swathe of Indonesia, almost a quarter of the world’s population falls within the UTC +8 and UTC +10 time zones – billions of viewers (and potential consumers) in a sweet spot for the finals,Bearing in mind that primetime Melbourne already offers comfortable morning viewing in Europe, why do Australia’s habitually sleepless sports fans, who have consumed World Cup finals, Formula One, the Tour de France and more through a haze of caffeine and fatigue, largely without complaint, have to shift?And just maybe, in a global sport – China just last August unveiled a plan to “vigorously develop tennis” after Zheng Qinwen’s Olympic gold – this perhaps should be seen as not only equitable, but as an opportunity,Joey Lynch
cultureSee all
A picture

From Nouvelle Vague to Mock the Week: your complete entertainment guide to the week ahead

Nouvelle VagueOut now Never bet against Richard Linklater: the veteran director (Dazed and Confused, Boyhood) loves turning his hand to different genres, and his latest is a typically mellow dramatisation of the period in French film history that saw the likes of Jean-Luc Godard, François Truffaut and Claude Chabrol shake off their lives as critics and become bona fide film legends.Is This Thing On?Out nowIt sounds like an improbable standup bit in itself, but no: here we have a Hollywood comedy inspired by the life of the UK’s own John Bishop. Will Arnett plays the man in a troubled marriage who decides to give open mic a go and is a surprise hit, while Laura Dern plays his wife. Directed by Bradley Cooper (yes, the Bradley Cooper).PrimateOut nowCome on now, people: chimpanzees are unsuitable enough as pets to start with

A picture

Catherine O’Hara managed to make difficult characters utterly delightful

One of the later and less beloved Christopher Guest comedies featuring his troupe of peerless, often SCTV-related improvisers is For Your Consideration, a medium-funny savaging of Hollywood’s feverish awards-season prestige campaigning.The film’s unquestionable highlight is Catherine O’Hara, playing an actor who gets a whisper of awards buzz for a schlocky, still-filming drama called Home for Purim, and slowly loses her mind with the knowledge that she could maybe, possibly be recognized by her peers. O’Hara, known for her distinctively brassy yet malleable trill of her voice and her frequently red hair, peels back her performer’s bravado to expose the frenzied need beneath it. She somehow plays the outsized beneath the regular-sized, as her Marilyn Hack goes from plugging-away workhorse to desperate striver. Unsurprisingly, O’Hara briefly generated awards buzz of her own for playing this part; even less surprisingly, an Oscar nomination was not forthcoming

A picture

Catherine O’Hara, actor known for Home Alone and Schitt’s Creek, dies aged 71

Catherine O’Hara, actor known for Schitt’s Creek, Home Alone and Best in Show, has died at the age of 71.Her manager confirmed the news to Variety. She died after a brief illness.O’Hara started her comedy career in the 1970s and helped to create the Canadian sketch show SCTV. She broke into film in the 1980s with her first big-screen credit in the romantic comedy Nothing Personal with Donald Sutherland, and in 1985 she had a role in Martin Scorsese’s black comedy After Hours

A picture

Colbert on Springsteen’s anti-ICE song: ‘Do you know how hard it is to rhyme with Minneapolis?’

Late-night hosts spoke about Bruce Springsteen’s anti-ICE song and Donald Trump’s repeated attacks on Ilhan Omar.On The Late Show, Stephen Colbert spoke about Trump’s “plunging popularity over his goons’ brutality”, which has reportedly left him unsettled and backed into a corner, according to reports.Colbert said that was the most dangerous place for him to be because “if you startle him when he’s cornered, he’ll inflate his neck pouch”.The “incredibly unpopular mass deportations” have also led Bruce Springsteen to write a fiery anti-ICE song called Streets of Minneapolis.The much-loved musician previously wrote a song about the Aids crisis called Streets of Philadelphia

A picture

Ṣọpẹ́ Dìrísù: ’If the west doesn’t say a film is good, that doesn’t mean it’s no good’

When Ṣọpẹ́ Dìrísù becomes animated during conversation, his speaking voice – ordinarily a sort of polished inner-city London dialect – dances into a smooth Nigerian accent. As it happens, his shoulders ease, his eyes smile, he is totally relaxed. If it is true that we become the most distilled versions of ourselves when we are at our most comfortable, then it is clear here that the very essence of Dìrísù’s personhood is a Nigerian man.The opportunity to nurture his Nigerian identity was a significant factor in Dìrísù’s decision to take on his latest film, the Bafta-nominated My Father’s Shadow. The entire project – on which he serves both as lead actor and executive producer – was shot on location in Lagos, the country’s former capital city, over an eight-week period in early 2024

A picture

‘Begging my boyfriend to get one’: Paul Mescal inspires yet another fashion craze with Hamnet earring

While Chloé Zhao’s Hamnet has been nominated for eight Academy Awards including best picture, for many it is a tiny silver hoop earring worn by Paul Mescal in his portrayal of William Shakespeare that steals the show. Worn in his left ear lobe, the barely there hoop has people fixated online.“Begging my boyfriend to get a tiny hoop earring too,” reads one post dedicated to the accessory. “I cried for over half of Hamnet, but Paul Mescal’s slutty little earring made me feel conflicted,” reads another.Mescal previously sent viewers of Normal People into a frenzy over Connell’s chain, a thin silver “Argos chic” necklace, and shortly after thrust short shorts into the mainstream