England in Women’s World Cup semi-finals but questions remain for Charlotte Edwards

A picture


It’s official: Sunday’s World Cup match between England and New Zealand will be Sophie Devine’s last one-day international.After their loss against India on Thursday, New Zealand can no longer qualify for the semi-finals: the 36-year-old Devine, who made her international debut in 2006 and has represented her country for more than half her life, will not be signing off with another world title.She still has the chance to finish with a win, though.The New Zealand captain has already scored 266 runs in the tournament, including a century against Australia, so it could be a fierce tussle against England’s attack – and an emotional one.Expect to see tears come the anthems, as well as blood and sweat in the sweltering humidity of Visakhapatnam.

“If I’m absolutely carked at the end of it, who cares? I want to be carried off the field in that last game,” Devine said on the BBC’s No Balls podcast last week.For England, the outcome of the match is academic: they are already through to the knockouts, can no longer top the group and will therefore face the loser of Saturday’s Australia v South Africa match in their semi-final, come what may.Does that mean they will be happy to permit the great stateswoman of Kiwi cricket to wrap up her ODI career in style? Absolutely not, according to the England captain, Nat Sciver-Brunt.“We want to win,” she said.“We haven’t been to Visakh yet, so we’ll be working out the conditions there, and working out how best we want to play and best use the wicket.

Hopefully going into the knockout stages with a win and taking confidence from that,”For New Zealand, this match is an ending; the hope for Sciver-Brunt and the head coach, Charlotte Edwards, is that it will be a beginning of something much bigger,ODI cricket was the big project for Edwards when she took on the role,In her words: “We’ve got to look at our ODI game; I think that’s probably an area that we’ve underperformed in for a while,”Nine months into the Great Post-Ashes Rebuild, what has actually changed? Not the personnel, certainly.

Sciver-Brunt and Heather Knight are still the mainstays of England’s batting; Lauren Bell remains the spearhead of the pace attack; while Sophie Ecclestone continues to lead the spin contingent.Em Arlott was plucked from county obscurity by Edwards last summer, but has barely featured in this tournament.What Edwards has done is attempt to carve out new roles for existing players.Some changes have been more successful than others.The new-look opening partnership of Amy Jones and Tammy Beaumont struggled in what should have been their easier matches against Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Pakistan.

On the other hand, bringing Linsey Smith into the 50-over fold, to bowl reliably at both ends of the innings, looks increasingly like a masterstroke.Edwards knew it would work because it was the role she had Smith doing at Southern Vipers.Apparently having worked in domestic women’s cricket is actually an advantage when taking on a role as the national head coach – who knew?Edwards is also loyal to players – sometimes to a fault.It is a source of intense frustration to see repeated middle-order collapses caused by an inability to play spin, while Danni Wyatt-Hodge – so adept at playing on subcontinental pitches – sits idly on the bench.England’s only team changes this tournament came when Edwards had her hand forced by the illness of Bell and Ecclestone.

It would be entirely unsurprising to see her select the same XI for the New Zealand match, the semi-final and (should they get that far) the final.Sign up to The SpinSubscribe to our cricket newsletter for our writers' thoughts on the biggest stories and a review of the week’s actionafter newsletter promotionAfter this tournament, England’s focus will shift to T20 cricket: there is a home 20-over World Cup to prepare for.But that should not be an excuse for sidestepping difficult questions about their 50-over lineup.A middle order which can barely muster a run together is never going to be capable of beating a team such as Australia.More worrying still is the question of what happens when Knight (aged 34) and Sciver-Brunt (33) are no longer around to prop up England’s batting.

One of the problems with the Jon Lewis regime was its tendency to bury its head in the sand: Edwards cannot afford to behave in a similar fashion,By reaching the semi-finals, England have already achieved the minimum expectation laid out by Edwards before the tournament began,But their six-wicket loss against Australia on Wednesday brought back unwelcome memories of January’s Ashes whitewash,If Edwards is going to shake off England’s unfortunate recent reputation of imploding when the green-and-gold hits the fan, winning back the hearts and minds of the public in the process, getting them into a World Cup final – a feat Lewis never quite managed – would be a decent start,
cultureSee all
A picture

The Guide #214: Sleep-inducing songs and tranquilising TV – the culture that sends us to sleep (in a good way)

How do you sleep at night? If you’re like Hannah, a recent subject of the Guardian’s My cultural awakening column, it’s to the sound of a rat whisking eggs. The series shares stories of people who made a significant life change thanks to a piece of popular culture, and in the case of Hannah, that meant curing insomnia by watching Ratatouille. Every night for the last 15 years, at home or abroad, she switches on the Pixar classic and, within minutes, finds herself dropping off, thanks to the film’s comforting, consistent soundscape. It’s so effective, in fact, she’s never even seen it all the way through.Hannah’s might be a bit of an extreme example, but her tale does touch on something universal: culture seems to play an increasingly important role these days in helping people nod off

A picture

Seth Meyers on Trump’s White House ballroom: ‘This couldn’t be any more of a bait and switch’

Late-night hosts mocked Donald Trump’s demolition of the East Wing of the White House and the corporate sponsors of his $300m gilded ballroom.On Thursday’s Late Night, Seth Meyers expressed disbelief over the president’s gilded ballroom project for the White House. “It would be bad enough if Trump’s biggest priority was just building a gilded vanity project for himself, but it’s so much worse,” he said. “Because to do it, he’s tearing down a somewhat well-known and beloved piece of property.”That would be the entire East Wing of the presidential residence, which has stood for 120 years

A picture

Seth Meyers on Trump’s White House demolition: ‘This is insane’

Late-night hosts dissected Donald Trump’s kingly behavior, from the destruction of the White House’s East Wing to his demand for payment from the justice department.“We have warned for years that Donald Trump is destroying American institutions,” said Seth Meyers on Wednesday evening, “but of course when we said ‘destroying’, we meant metaphorically speaking. We didn’t mean that he was literally destroying buildings.”“But I guess Trump heard that and thought, ‘On it.’ Because now he’s literally destroying the East Wing of the White House,” the Late Night host continued

A picture

Toe-curling fashion: how did toe shoes become so popular?

Caitlin, I am a big proponent of not yucking someone else’s yum. But this is testing me. What are on those girlies’ feet?They’re toes, Cait. They’re toes. More specifically, toes encased in rubber to create a kind of foot-glove-trainer

A picture

Stephen Colbert on Trump’s White House East Wing demolition: ‘So deeply unsettling’

Late-night hosts reacted to Donald Trump’s partial demolition of the East Wing of the White House for his proposed $250m gilded ballroom.“At this point, we’re nine months into this, you’d think it would be impossible for us to be shocked by Donald Trump,” said Stephen Colbert on Tuesday’s Late Show. “But give the man credit – every so often, he takes the time to attach the electrodes to our nipples. And then it feels like the first time.”Case in point: on Monday, as part of his White House renovation project to construct a gilded ballroom, Trump sent out a backhoe to rip off a part of the East Wing

A picture

Jon Stewart on Donald Trump: ‘He’s the imitation crab of kings right now’

Late-night hosts recapped the record-breaking No Kings rallies against Donald Trump and mocked Republican attempts to dismiss the protests.Jon Stewart returned to his Daily Show post on Monday night, riding high from the energy of the No Kings rallies against Trump over the weekend, which Mike Johnson, the US House speaker, dismissed as the “hate America rally, and Scott Bessent, the US treasury secretary, called participants “the farthest left, the hardest core, the most unhinged in the Democratic party”.“So, this weekend, we sat in our bunkers, doors locked, windows boarded, muskets and cyanide pills at the ready, prepared for whatever the hardest core had in store,” Stewart joked. “Do your worst, display your Marxism to its fullest!”In truth, the peaceful protests drew more than 7 million people in 2,700 locations in all 50 states, for the largest single-day protest against a sitting president in US history. “It was kind of an incredible turnout that was somewhat inspiring,” Stewart said