‘Coffee is just the excuse’: the deaf-run cafe where hearing people sign to order

A picture


Wesley Hartwell raised his fists to the barista and shook them next to his ears.He then lowered his fists, extended his thumbs and little fingers, and moved them up and down by his chest, as though milking a cow.Finally, he laid the fingers of one hand flat on his chin and flexed his wrist forward.Hartwell, who has no hearing problems, had just used BSL, British Sign Language, to order his morning latte with normal milk at the deaf-run Dialogue Cafe, based at the University of East London, and thanked Victor Olaniyan, the deaf barista.“I have to be honest: when this cafe first opened near my office, I avoided it because the whole idea made me anxious,” said Hartwell, a lecturer at the university.

“But now I’m fascinated.Sign language is amazing.I’m thinking of taking a course so I can learn more.”What gave Hartwell the confidence to try BSL was the cafe’s touchscreen menu.Instead of just listing the coffees and cakes on sale, the menus show videos of their BSL translation.

For many deaf BSL users, this kind of direct access is crucial.BSL is a first language for tens of thousands of people in the UK.Olaniyan, who has worked at the cafe for five years and now does shifts alongside a degree in accounting and management at the University of Reading, seemed mildly amused by the reactions of hearing people to the video menu.“I was brought up by hearing people, so I have no problem in the hearing world,” he signed.“But hearing people often feel anxious communicating with us.

If this technology helps them, that’s great, but I’m fine as I am,”In the past two years, there has been an explosion of digital and AI-linked products aiming to bridge communication barriers between the deaf and hearing worlds, from signing avatars to large generative models that aspire to rival mainstream AI platforms,Independent evaluations of many of these systems remain limited, however, and sign language researchers caution that current tools still struggle with linguistic nuance, regional variation and context, particularly in high-stakes settings such as healthcare and law,But the ambitions are striking: the UK startup Silence Speaks has built an avatar-based system that converts text into BSL, claiming it can convey contextual meaning and emotional cues,The British project SignGPT, backed by £8.

45m in funding, is developing models to translate between BSL and English in both directions, while also building what it describes as the largest sign languages dataset in the world,Sign languages AI research has also become increasingly collaborative and international: a new £3,5m UK-Japan research project is developing systems trained on natural deaf-to-deaf conversation data rather than interpreter recordings,Much of this recent progress has come quickly,When Prof Bencie Woll, a co-investigator of the SignGPT project at University College London’s Deafness, Cognition and Language Research Centre, first entered the field of BSL research, communication beyond face-to-face interaction was extremely limited for deaf people.

“The rest of the world was moving ahead with technology, but deaf people were often left behind,” she said,“What’s different now is the pace,In the last couple of years, the deaf community has benefited from an explosively powerful mix of possibilities,”Historically, technology has not always been positive, Woll cautioned,“There has often been a fantasy, particularly among researchers who don’t understand sign languages, that it is a quick fix.

That you take a sign language, turn it into written English – and you’ve made deaf people’s lives wonderful,” she said,That assumption led to what Woll described as “really terrible technology”, including wearable translation suits, bulky gloves and head-mounted cameras designed to process signing,“All of these were doomed to failure,” she said, “because they were designed by people who did not understand sign languages and did not ask deaf people what they wanted, let alone work alongside deaf experts from the start,The community has been frustrated for years by the proliferation of bad solutions,”Yet the need for solutions is real.

About 70 million people worldwide are deaf or hard of hearing,In the UK, census data records about 151,000 BSL users,For roughly 25,000 of them, BSL is their primary language,It is a distinct, natural language with its own grammar and structure, not a signed version of English,For this group, written and spoken English is often a second – or even a third language, following lip-reading, Sign Supported English or family-invented gestures.

This has practical consequences: subtitles and written text are not always adequate substitutes for direct BSL access,A large 2017 study of deaf children aged 10 to 11 found that reading ability was significantly below expected age levels for 48% of deaf children educated using spoken language only, and for 82% of those whose everyday language was a sign language,Dr Lauren Ward has the unusual role of leading on AI technology for the deaf community at the Royal National Institute for Deaf People (RNID), advising government and industry,“The pace of change has been so fast that RNID has made the unusual decision to employ engineers,” she said,“The potential to help the deaf community is huge – but so is the potential to cause harm.

”Deaf people have long been early adopters of technology: SMS messaging transformed communication in the 1990s.But Ward said the last two years had brought a new intensity of interest and concern.“It has suddenly moved from university labs into startups and commercial products,” she said.This shift has been enabled by advances in machine learning and related technologies that finally make the processing of large-scale sign languages technically possible.Increased research funding, improved datasets and greater involvement from deaf researchers have also quickened the pace, as has a wider acknowledgment of the longstanding gap between the access deaf people are legally entitled to and what is delivered in practice: reliable sign languages provision has been promised for decades but has all-too-often failed to materialise.

This combination of opportunity and risk makes the current moment a double-edged sword, Ward said.“It is incredibly exciting, and the next five years could bring real improvements,” she said.“But there is a danger that private companies respond by focusing on profit rather than working with the deaf community and being led by them.”Dr Maartje De Meulder, a deaf scholar and consultant on sign languages AI, agreed the stakes were high.“At the moment, deaf people are largely excluded from vast amounts of online information, from educational videos to government websites,” she said.

“No one is ever going to have the resources to translate the entire internet into sign languages, so even partial solutions could be transformative.”Neil Fox, a deaf research fellow at the University of Birmingham, agreed that if avatar translation reached sufficient quality, it could open up many online spaces currently closed to deaf users.But all are highly cautious.Rebecca Mansell, the chief executive of the British Deaf Association, said this “has become a very lucrative area and too many projects involve deaf people only tokenistically”.“It is all happening very fast, and there is a real risk that solutions will be imposed on us,” she added.

Mansell also raised concerns about regulation and appropriate use.“An avatar might be fine for ordering something simple,” she said, “but what about a cancer diagnosis? In schools, a human interpreter is often the only friend a deaf child has.”Dr Louise Hickman, from the Minderoo Centre for Technology and Democracy and lead author of the report BSL Is Not For Sale, has worked in AI ethics for a decade.“Many companies claim they can solve these problems without understanding the linguistic and cultural complexity of BSL,” she said.“Current avatar systems still lack the nuance of human interpreters, which creates risks in medical and legal settings.

”Hickman also pointed to the limits of available data.“British Sign Language is not the same as Irish Sign Language or American Sign Language.There are regional dialects within England.This means the data available for training AI systems is extremely limited.”So where, she asked, will appropriate training data come from?“The deaf community wants innovation,” she said, “but we want to slow this down so we can shape it and make sure it genuinely benefits us.

”Back at the cafe, Hakan Elbir, its founder, saw little need for more complex tools than his static BSL video menu,“People talk a lot about innovation, but for most deaf people it is still theoretical,” he said,“What I wanted was a meaningful daily interaction for hearing people,”“Coffee is just the excuse,” he added,“I didn’t need complicated technology to break down barriers.

I just needed people to interact openly,”Waiting for his latte at the counter, Hartwell quietly practised the sign for “flat white”, proving that it was this simple, human interaction – supported but not overshadowed by technology – that was drawing him back, one signed coffee order at a time,
technologySee all
A picture

‘It’s really sad’: US TikTok users rethink app over concerns about privacy and censorship

Many TikTok users across the US say they’re rethinking their relationship with the platform since its ownership and terms and conditions have recently changed, with some citing censorship and lack of trust as reasons why they’re removing themselves from the app.Keara Sullivan, a 26-year-old comedian, says TikTok jumpstarted her career and provided a pathway to getting a manager and a literary agent.“I’m not one of those creators who’s a TikTok hater,” said Sullivan, who has more than half a million followers on the platform. “I’m very transparent about the fact that where I am in my career is largely because of TikTok.”That’s why, she said, it’s “really sad” for her to step away from the platform – at least for now

A picture

Why TikTok’s first week of American ownership was a disaster

A little more than one week ago, TikTok stepped on to US shores as a naturalized citizen. Ever since, the video app has been fighting for its life.TikTok’s calamitous emigration began on 22 January when its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, finalized a deal to sell the app to a group of US investors, among them the business software giant Oracle. The app’s time under Chinese ownership had been marked by a meteoric ascent to more than a billion users, which left incumbents such as Instagram looking like the next Myspace. But TikTok’s short new life in the US has been less than auspicious

A picture

US authorities reportedly investigate claims that Meta can read encrypted WhatsApp messages

US authorities have reportedly investigated claims that Meta can read users’ encrypted chats on the WhatsApp messaging platform, which it owns.The reports follow a lawsuit filed last week, which claimed Meta “can access virtually all of WhatsApp users’ purportedly ‘private’ communications”.Meta has denied the allegation, reported by Bloomberg, calling the lawsuit’s claim “categorically false and absurd”. It suggested the claim was a tactic to support the NSO Group, an Israeli firm that develops spyware used against activists and journalists, and which recently lost a lawsuit brought by WhatsApp.The firm that filed last week’s lawsuit against Meta, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, attributes the allegation to unnamed “courageous” whistleblowers from Australia, Brazil, India, Mexico and South Africa

A picture

We have lost so much of ourselves to smartphones: can we get it back?

In 2003, the Stanford social scientist BJ Fogg published an extraordinarily prescient book. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do predicted a future in which a student “sits in a college library and removes an electronic device from her purse”. It serves as her “mobile phone, information portal, entertainment platform, and personal organiser. She takes this device almost everywhere and feels lost without it.”Such devices, Fogg argued, would be “persuasive technology systems … the device can suggest, encourage, and reward”

A picture

Elon Musk had more extensive ties to Epstein than previously known, emails show

Elon Musk had more extensive – and more friendly – communications with the financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein than previously publicly known, according to documents released on Friday by the Department of Justice. Emails in the files appear to show the two cordially messaging each other on two separate occasions to make plans for Musk to visit Epstein’s island.The documents include Musk and Epstein emailing in both 2012 and 2013 to determine when Musk should make the trip to Little St James. Neither exchanges appear to have resulted in Musk visiting the island, due to logistical issues.“Will be in the BVI/St Bart’s area over the holidays

A picture

What good is a social media ban when screens are rife in classrooms? | Letters

Your recent coverage of children’s screen use (How screen time affects toddlers: ‘We’re losing a big part of being human’, 22 January) highlights an issue that still receives remarkably little attention: the amount of screen time built into the school day. While politicians debate bans on social media for under‑16s, and teachers report children trying to swipe the pages of books, it is puzzling that the question of screen time in schools is left out of discussions.Every morning, most primary school children are greeted by an electronic whiteboard glowing in the classroom, often left on all day. Lessons are delivered as slides, tablets are used for activities, and many schools require homework to be completed online.When it rains, “wet play” means more screen‑based entertainment