‘We’ve got to listen to dead women’: critical part of Queensland’s DV response stops reviewing all recent deaths
The Queensland advisory board tasked with reviewing domestic and family violence deaths has quietly stopped routinely analysing new cases, and has not looked into most of the latest deaths for more than two years.Guardian Australia’s Broken trust investigation has uncovered evidence and allegations that raise concern about the way the coronial system investigates women’s deaths and the accuracy of Queensland’s DFV statistics.Coroners have repeatedly made rulings that nothing more could have been done to prevent homicides, in the face of evidence of serious policing and system failures that have contributed to women’s deaths and the mounting toll.Queensland’s Domestic and Family Violence Death Review and Advisory Board is considered a “critical” part of the state’s response to domestic and family violence.Its aim is to “prevent future avoidable deaths”.
The board has historically analysed comprehensive reports about all DFV-linked deaths, identified systemic issues raised by those cases, made recommendations for reform, and published detailed anonymised case studies in its annual report.Some of these have revealed significant police failures that would otherwise have not been made public.But Guardian Australia can reveal the board has stopped routinely reviewing deaths.Its last two annual reports do not include detailed case studies and instead look at mostly historic cases that fit chosen “focus areas”.Sign up: AU Breaking News emailProf Molly Dragiewicz, a DFV researcher, resigned from the board this year citing concerns about the “change in focus”.
“I am resigning due to the board’s change in focus away from comprehensive timely review of domestic and family violence deaths, publishing substantial annual data reports on those cases, making current case-based recommendations to strengthen systems responses to prevent future deaths, and publicising those findings to educate the public and professionals about domestic and family violence,” Dragiewicz wrote in her resignation letter,Her letter said the board lacked representation from domestic and sexual violence services and First Nations experts,She said this “presents a challenge for meaningful case analysis and the formulation of pragmatic recommendations to improve practice, policy, and procedure to prevent future deaths”,“Death reviews play an essential violence prevention role as the single most comprehensive and accurate data source on domestic and family violence cases and responses to them,” she wrote,“I hope that the board returns to its exemplary work fulfilling its core functions in the near future.
”Betty Taylor, the founder of DFV charity the Red Rose Foundation and a former death review board member, said she was concerned the board had stopped “centring women’s experiences”.“We’ve got to hear survivors voices … we’ve got to listen to dead women.They’ll tell us more about what’s gone wrong than anyone.We can only do that by doing the most thorough reviews.”The board is supported by a “unit” of coronial staffers and a representative of the Queensland police service, who review cases and provide reports to coroners and the board.
Guardian Australia has obtained a review of the unit from 2020 that found significant concerns about staff wellbeing, processes and a lack of expertise.Multiple people familiar with the unit’s work say its operation has become “significantly worse” since the review and have raised concerns that problems with cases are not being picked up.The review found that the unit had been ineffective due to resource changes, a lack of staff and that staff were susceptible to psychological injury.For long periods, more than half the unit’s roles have been vacant.“The unit holds a critical role in the state’s DFV response and it is therefore imperative to ensure it is set up to operate in a high-performance capacity within the intended organisational design,” the review found.
It also found the unit had no “fit-for-purpose” database.Data and other information about DFV deaths “used to support national decisions” was kept in an Excel spreadsheet.This practice continued long after the review.The coroner’s court of Queensland did not respond directly when asked if the data was being kept in a spreadsheet.It said in a statement there had been “investment in leadership data capability” at the coroner’s court registry.
Kate Pausina, a former senior detective, worked periodically as the police liaison to the unit.She says that liaison position was often vacant, including at the time of the murders of Hannah Clarke, Doreen Langham and Kelly Wilkinson – cases in which there have been documented police failings.“And they’re [just the] high-profile deaths that we’re aware of when no one was there,” she says.“There was nobody there to go through the system of looking at reportable deaths every day to find out how many others would should have fallen within the scope.” Pausina says on one occasion, when she returned from a four-week holiday, she found 18 deaths during that period in which there was a history of domestic and family violence but which “weren’t looked at or reported at all”.
A whistleblower from within the coroner’s court, Elsie*, reported concerns as part of a disclosure to the Crime and Corruption Commission in 2024,“Queensland’s coronial system was under-resourced and failing to adequately support coroners and the bereaved,” Elsie said in her statement to the CCC,“There were significant leadership issues in the coroner’s court, including ineffective communication, limited approachability, lack of accountability or transparency in decision making, failures to address staff concerns, and an urgent need to upskill most leadership personnel,”Elsie alleged staff in the unit were “so traumatised and distressed one started to lose their hair in clumps,Another expressed suicidal thoughts.
I was really scared someone would take their own life.”A spokesperson from the coroner’s court said support for vicarious trauma was available to board members and staff.The spokesperson confirmed that the board had decided to look at themed cases – rather than the latest – over the past two years, and that those had included some recent cases that fit the chosen theme.“The work plan and approach of the board to its case review function is settled at the commencement of each financial year,” the spokesperson said.In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is on 13 11 14 and the national family violence counselling service is on 1800 737 732.
Other international helplines can be found via www,befrienders,orgDo you know more? Contact ben,smee@theguardian,com
After a teddy bear talked about kink, AI watchdogs are warning parents against smart toys
As the holiday season looms into view with Black Friday, one category on people’s gift lists is causing increasing concern: products with artificial intelligence.The development has raised new concerns about the dangers smart toys could pose to children, as consumer advocacy groups say AI could harm kids’ safety and development. The trend has prompted calls for increased testing of such products and governmental oversight.“If we look into how these toys are marketed and how they perform and the fact that there is little to no research that shows that they are beneficial for children – and no regulation of AI toys – it raises a really big red flag,” said Rachel Franz, director of Young Children Thrive Offline, an initiative from Fairplay, which works to protect children from big tech.Last week, those fears were given brutal justification when an AI-equipped teddy bear started discussing sexually explicit topics
One in 10 UK parents say their child has been blackmailed online, NSPCC finds
Nearly one in 10 UK parents say their child has been blackmailed online, with harms ranging from threatening to release intimate pictures to revealing details about someone’s personal life.The NSPCC child protection charity also found that one in five parents know a child who has experienced online blackmail, while two in five said they rarely or never talked to their children about the subject.The National Crime Agency has said that it is receiving more than 110 reports a month of child sextortion attempts, where criminal gangs trick teenagers into sending intimate pictures of themselves and then blackmail them.Agencies across the UK, US and Australia have confirmed a rising number of sextortion cases involving teenage boys and young adult males being targeted by cyber-criminal gangs based in west Africa or south-east Asia, some of which have ended in tragedy. Murray Dowey, a 16-year-old from Dunblane, Scotland, killed himself in 2023 after becoming a victim of sextortion on Instagram and Dinal De Alwis, 16, killed himself in Sutton, south London, in October 2022 after being blackmailed over nude photographs
Small changes to ‘for you’ feed on X can rapidly increase political polarisation
Small changes to the tone of posts fed to users of X can increase feelings of political polarisation as much in a week as would have historically taken at least three years, research has found.A groundbreaking experiment to gauge the potency of Elon Musk’s social platform to increase political division found that when posts expressing anti-democratic attitudes and partisan animosity were boosted, even barely perceptibly, in the feeds of Democrat and Republican supporters there was a large change in their unfavourable feelings towards the other side.The degree of increased division – known as “affective polarisation” – achieved in one week by the changes the academics made to X users’ feeds was as great as would have on average taken three years between 1978 and 2020.Most of the more than 1,000 users who took part in the experiment during the 2024 US presidential election did not notice that the tone of their feed had been changed.The campaign was marked by divisive viral posts on X, including a fake image of Kamala Harris cosying up to Jeffrey Epstein at a gala and an AI-generated image posted by Musk of Kamala Harris dressed as a communist dictator that had 84m views
Foreign interference or opportunistic grifting: why are so many pro-Trump X accounts based in Asia?
When X rolled out a new feature revealing the locations of popular accounts, the company was acting to boost transparency and clamp down on disinformation. The result, however, has been a circular firing squad of recriminations, as users turn on each other enraged by the revelation that dozens of popular “America first” and pro-Trump accounts originated overseas.The new feature was enabled over the weekend by X’s head of product, Nikita Bier, who called it the first step in “securing the integrity of the global town square.” Since then many high-engagement accounts that post incessantly about US politics have been “unmasked” by fellow users.An Ivanka Trump fan account that posts about illegal immigration to the US was shown to be based in Nigeria
London councils enact emergency plans after three hit by cyber-attack
Three London councils have reported a cyber-attack, prompting the rollout of emergency plans and the involvement of the National Crime Agency (NCA) as they investigate whether any data has been compromised.The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC), and Westminster city council, which share some IT infrastructure, said a number of systems had been affected across both authorities, including phone lines. The councils shut down several computerised systems as a precaution to limit further possible damage.The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) said the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham had also reported an attack. Together the three authorities provide services for more than half a million Londoners
European parliament calls for social media ban on under-16s
Children under 16 should be banned from using social media unless their parents decide otherwise, the European parliament says.MEPs passed a resolution on age restrictions on Wednesday by a large majority. Although not legally binding, it raises pressure for European legislation amid growing alarm about the mental health risks to children of unfettered internet access.The European Commission, which is responsible for initiating EU law, is already studying Australia’s world-first social-media ban for under-16s, which is due to take effect next month.In a speech in September, the commission’s president, Ursula von der Leyen, said she would watch the implementation of Australia’s policy
Bakery chain Gail’s plans to open 40 more outlets as sales soar
Is gen Z’s love of fried chicken pushing Britain to ‘peak pizza’?
How big tech is creating its own friendly media bubble to ‘win the narrative battle online’
More than 1,000 Amazon workers warn rapid AI rollout threatens jobs and climate
Panthers shock Rams, Texans beat Colts and Bucs best Cardinals: NFL week 13 – as it happened
Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri voice frustration at McLaren’s strategy