Can X be banned under UK law and what are the other options?
The UK government is threatening Elon Musk’s X with the nuclear option under the country’s online safety laws: a ban.The social media platform is under pressure from ministers after it allowed the Grok AI tool, which is integrated within the app, to generate indecent images of unsuspecting women and children.The government has said it will support the media regulator Ofcom, which has launched an investigation into X, if it decides to push ahead with a ban.But is such a move likely?The Online Safety Act (OSA) contains a provision that allows Ofcom to seek a court order imposing “business disruption measures” on a website or app that is in breach of the legislation.These measures are in effect a block on the recipient operating in the UK.
This is because they include ordering an internet service provider to block access to a platform or requiring payment providers or advertisers to withdraw their services from that business.These measures are a de facto ban on the platform that is on the receiving end of them.Ofcom is focusing on whether X has breached the act in the following ways: failing to assess the risk of people seeing illegal content on the platform; not taking appropriate steps to prevent users from viewing illegal content such as intimate image abuse and child sexual abuse material; not taking down illegal material quickly; not protecting users from breaches of privacy law; failing to assess the risk X may pose to children; and not using effective age checking for pornography.In its statement confirming an investigation, Ofcom was clear that such a scenario would be an option of last resort if it finds X in breach, saying such a move was reserved for “serious cases of ongoing non-compliance”.Its words were less gung-ho than the government’s because if the watchdog doesn’t follow procedure under the OSA correctly, it faces the threat of X seeking a judicial review – a court process where a judge rules whether a decision made by a public body was lawful.
Banning X because the government of the day says it should be banned is not a legal basis for pulling the plug.Ofcom said it must follow due process as part of its investigation.“As the UK’s independent online safety enforcement agency, it’s important we make sure our investigations are legally robust and fairly decided,” it said.Ofcom’s own guidance also makes clear this is not workaday punishment under the act and such measures are not a “matter of routine”.“We acknowledge that business disruption measures are a significant regulatory intervention and therefore we are unlikely to find it appropriate to apply to the courts for business disruption measures as a matter of routine where we have identified failures, or likely failures, to comply with enforceable requirements,” Ofcom said.
The regulator can force companies to take specific steps to comply with the OSA or to remedy harms caused by breaching the legislation.It can also impose fines of £18m or 10% of worldwide revenue, whichever is larger.X’s revenues are not public but according to estimates from the market research company eMarketer it was expected to make $2.3bn in advertising turnover last year, which would equate to a fine of more than $200m.And of course Ofcom has to decide whether the OSA has been breached in the first place.
It will look at evidence of whether the law has been broken,If it decides there has been a breach, it will issue a provisional decision to the company, which will then be given an opportunity to respond before Ofcom makes its final decision,This is Ofcom’s most consequential investigation yet so it will not want to make mistakes in haste,But it has launched a formal inquiry very quickly, indicating an awareness of the public and political concern about the deluge of AI-made intimate images on X since Christmas,Lorna Woods, a professor of internet law at the University of Essex, said Ofcom could bring forward business disruption measures quickly.
“At one end of the scale you have a typical Ofcom investigation, which could take six to nine months,But at the other end Ofcom could take an expedited approach and decide there has been a breach quite quickly – and can seek to implement business disruption measures rapidly,” she said,Ofcom would have to decide that such is the seriousness of the breach, and X’s failure to remedy it, that it has to take the option of last resort,
Post your questions for R&B star Jill Scott
In the age of GLP-1s and the deep-plane facelift making dozens of famous women appear perpetually 32 years old, there’s something extra heartening about Pressha, the lead single from three-time Grammy-winner Jill Scott’s sixth album. “I wasn’t the aesthetic / I guess, I guess, I get it / So much pressure to appear just like them / Pretty and cosmetic,” she sings in a coolly unimpressed kiss-off to a former paramour too cowardly to be seen with her in public.It’s typical of the 53-year-old neo-soul superstar’s direct way with singing about femininity – a quality that’s made her an in-demand collaborator with artists including Dr Dre, Pusha T, Will Smith, Common and Kehlani. As well as having several US No 1 albums to her name, Scott is an artist’s artist: her new record features Tierra Whack, JID and Too $hort; she was originally discovered by Questlove back in her spoken-word days before releasing her platinum-certified debut Who Is Jill Scott? Words and Sounds Vol 1 in 2000.As well as music, Scott has maintained a vivid acting career, starring as James Brown’s wife, Deirdre or “Dee Dee”, in the 2014 biopic Get on Up and taking roles in HBO’s adaptation of Alastair McCall Smith’s The No 1 Ladies’ Detective Agency and BET+’s TV adaptation of The First Wives’ Club
Mindy Meng Wang on the ‘disorienting’ experience of her father’s funeral – and the Chinese cyber-opera it inspired
The guzheng virtuoso remembers being shocked by the traditional ceremony in China’s north-west. Now she’s processing it on stageGet our weekend culture and lifestyle emailWhen Mindy Meng Wang’s father died in 2015, the Melbourne-based musician found herself navigating grief while also organising his funeral in her home city in north-western China. It was to be an elaborate, three-day ceremony filled with prescribed rites, including burning paper effigies, ritualised crying and prayer chants.Looking back, Wang describes the experience as “completely shocking and disorienting”. “There were so many rules for what I had to do over those three days, and so many things that I could not understand,” she says
Hawaii: A Kingdom Crossing Oceans review – a feather-filled thriller full of gods, gourds and ghosts
British Museum, LondonThis retelling of Captain Cook’s death and the merging of two cultures is a trove of miraculously preserved wonders – but beware of the shark-toothed club!Relations between Britain and the Pacific kingdom of Hawaii didn’t get off to a great start. On 14 February 1779 the global explorer James Cook was clubbed and stabbed to death at Hawaii’s Kealakekua Bay in a dispute over a boat: it was a tragedy of cultural misunderstanding that still has anthropologists arguing over its meaning. Cook had previously visited Hawaii and apparently been identified as the god Lono, but didn’t know this. Marshall Sahlins argued that Cook was killed because by coming twice he transgressed the Lono myth, while another anthropologist, Gananath Obeyesekere, attacked him for imposing colonialist assumptions of “native” irrationality on the Hawaiians.It’s a fascinating, contentious debate
Three board members and board chair resign from Adelaide festival as Randa Abdel-Fattah sends legal notice
The Adelaide festival is facing an unprecedented leadership crisis after three board members resigned this weekend.The journalist Daniela Ritorto, the Adelaide businesswoman Donny Walford and the lawyer Nick Linke stepped down at an extraordinary board meeting on Saturday following the board’s controversial decision to dump the Palestinian Australian author Randa Abdel-Fattah from the 2026 writers’ week program.Separately on Sunday evening, festival board chair Tracey Whiting confirmed that she had decided to resign, “effective immediately”.She did not detail her reasons for resigning, saying only in a statement: “Recent decisions were bound by certain undertakings and my resignation enables the Adelaide Festival, as an organisation, to refresh its leadership and its approach to these circumstances.”“My tenure as Chair has been immensely enjoyable, as has working with the terrific AF team
Adelaide festival did not dump Jewish columnist from 2024 program despite request from Randa Abdel-Fattah and others
The Adelaide festival board did not dump a Jewish columnist from its 2024 lineup at Adelaide writers’ week, despite being lobbied by a group of 10 academics – including Randa Abdel-Fattah – to do so.On Saturday South Australia’s premier, Peter Malinauskas, claimed that the board had dumped the New York Times pro-Israel columnist Thomas Friedman in 2024, and reiterated his support for the festival board’s decision on Thursday to remove Abdel-Fattah, a Palestinian Australian academic, from this year’s program.“I note the Adelaide Festival also made its own decision to remove a Jewish writer from the Adelaide Writers’ Week program in 2024 in very similar circumstances,” Malinauskas told the Guardian through a spokesperson on Saturday.“I support that decision, and the consistent application of this principle.”On Saturday News Corp publications picked up on the premier’s statement, reporting the apparent inconsistency between the public outcry against Abdel-Fattah’s removal compared with the alleged removal of Friedman two years earlier, which did not ignite the massive boycott the writers’ week is now seeing, making the 2026 event look increasingly untenable
Eddie Izzard: ‘I once ran 90km in just under 12 hours. That was a tough day’
When you started performing your one-woman Hamlet, how much did you labour over your delivery of the play’s most iconic lines, such as “To be or not to be”?The first thing I found when I was rehearsing Hamlet was that I felt very at home. I thought, “That’s unusual – I should be quaking in my boots!” I just felt very at ease and happy to be there. But the first time I performed “to be or not to be” on stage, there was a sense of – aren’t bells supposed to ring here? Isn’t there supposed to be a klaxon?I come to “to be” in a slightly different way each night so hopefully the audience haven’t seen it done that way before. I was a street performer for years, so I know how to talk to an audience, which is what they were doing in Shakespeare’s time; they were performing to the people, not at them. Actors got into this fourth-wall thing in the 1800s, it wasn’t there in Elizabethan times
The pulmonaut: how James Nestor turned breathing into a 3m copy bestseller
Four NHS trusts in England declare critical incidents after ‘surge’ in A&E admissions
‘People are desperate’: ADHD clinicians in England on a system in chaos
Man who infected woman with HIV after stopping treatment is jailed
I loved my teaching job. But as a trans man in Texas, quitting was the only way to get my dignity back
HMRC accepted ‘tolerable’ risk of harm in child benefit fraud crackdown