Anger remains white hot in Whitehall over Olly Robbins sacking
Fury within Whitehall about the treatment of Olly Robbins remains white hot several days on from Keir Starmer’s decision to sack the senior Foreign Office civil servant.“It’s just total self-serving, narrow, selfish, political-endgame stuff,” said one supporter of Robbins, who was dismissed for failing to tell the prime minister that the now disgraced former US ambassador Peter Mandelson had not passed UK security vetting.There is strong support for Robbins within Whitehall, with senior civil servants said to believe he was in effect sacked for doing what No 10 wanted by swiftly passing Mandelson through vetting, and putting in place mitigations to get around the security concerns.But on the political side, civil servants have expressed incredulity and anger at what they see as the prime minister being blindsided by another Mandelson-related bomb.Starmer has described the decision not to tell him about the failed vetting as “staggering”.
It is a new low point for the relationship between No 10 and the civil service, after the ousting of the relatively new cabinet secretary Chris Wormald in February, and the prime minister’s accusation a year ago that “too many people in Whitehall are comfortable in the tepid bath of managed decline”.“The net effect is a chilling one,” said one mid-ranking official.“Why will we do anything vaguely risky that ministers want if we think they won’t have our backs if it goes wrong?”Any goodwill that existed towards a Labour administration after 14 years of the Conservatives appears to have evaporated in light of the perceived brutality of the way Robbins and Wormald have been treated.Robbins learned he was losing his job in the civil service by letter on Monday morning, several days after Starmer forced him out as permanent secretary.Giving his own side of the story at a parliamentary hearing on Tuesday, the career civil servant, who has worked under many prime ministers since Gordon Brown, sounded shocked at the way he had been so peremptorily dismissed.
He would not elaborate on the exact reasons given.“The guild of former permanent secretaries is on his side,” one former senior No 10 official said.“Going back to days gone by, I don’t think [the former cabinet secretary] Jeremy Heywood would have allowed a permanent secretary to have been dismissed like this.Even under the Conservatives there was more respect for the civil service, and even Liz Truss getting rid of Tom Scholar was more of a ‘new broom’ approach and about wanting her own staff, rather than this sort of public humiliation towards one of his own appointments.”Dave Penman, the general secretary of the FDA union for civil servants, who sat behind Robbins during Tuesday’s parliamentary hearing, put it robustly: “After the evidence today, people will look at this and come to the conclusion that Olly was tossed out by the prime minister and did absolutely nothing wrong.
He got the sack for doing what he was asked to do,“I don’t think anyone is going to conclude that Olly should have been dismissed or treated the way he was,It was completely unjustifiable, and yet that’s what happened,”A string of grandees, including the former cabinet secretary Gus O’Donnell and the former permanent secretary of the Foreign Office Simon McDonald, have also questioned the wisdom of dismissing Robbins,O’Donnell warned of a crisis in relations between ministers and civil servants.
While the rows continue over who is to blame, the concern within the Foreign Office is now the security implications of greater disclosure around vetting, and frustration with No 10 for allowing it to happen, with one source describing some of the security establishment as “having kittens”.Peter Ricketts, a former diplomat, gave his verdict that Robbins came across as an “outstanding civil servant, forensic, complete master of the issues and passionately committed to national security and the integrity of the vetting process”.However, Sir Richard Dearlove, the former director of MI6, took a slightly different view in an interview with Times Radio, saying that while responsibility lay with No 10 and Robbins was a “scapegoat”, he should have walked into No 10 and said: “The man has failed his vetting”.Other former officials who have been in effect forced out on Starmer’s watch are also observing almost gleefully from the sidelines, willing Robbins on to do some damage to No 10.In his evidence, Robbins made no direct criticism of Starmer but he did signal difficult relations with the political side, talking of “an atmosphere of pressure” and “dismissive” attitude to the vetting process.
And he refused to name the more junior officials who had taken part in the vetting, saying he did not want more “scapegoating”.Robbins also revealed his discomfort at No 10’s inquiries about installing a former director of communications, Matthew Doyle, in a diplomatic role, when experienced officials were being moved out of their posts.“It does seem that Robbins has been pretty badly set up by No 10 and it reflects pretty badly on the judgment of No 10 all round,” said Alex Thomas, a former civil servant and the Institute for Government’s executive director for impact and influence.But he also reflected on whether politicians and civil servants could have worked better together during the process related to Mandelson, saying: “The sadness for me is of two tribes that don’t seem to be working well together.“Olly would absolutely say he understood what the prime minister wanted, and was doing a good job as a civil servant, but it wasn’t treated effectively as a shared question that you work through, with a sense of ministers and civil servants not just being aligned, but actually working together in a trusting relationship to deal with an issue.
It’s another thread pulled from the relationship,”
Middle East war ‘could wipe out 75% of chancellor’s budget headroom’; UK inflation climbs to 3.3% – as it happened
Oil prices have gone back above $100 a barrel again.Reversing earlier declines, Brent crude is now 2.1% ahead at $100.57 a barrel, after Iran seized two ships in the strait of Hormuz, tightening its grip on the strategic waterway. Overnight, Donald Trump extended the two-week ceasefire between the US and Iran, until Tehran comes up with a peace proposal
Ryanair to close check-in 20 minutes earlier amid concern over Europe border queues
Ryanair will close airport check-in desks 20 minutes earlier to avoid passengers missing flights, it has announced, amid concern over border queues in Europe.The budget airline, which carries 200 million passengers annually, will require all passengers dropping bags or checking in at the airport to do so one hour before take-off rather than the current 40-minute deadline.Ryanair said the change, which will take effect from November, would give more time for passengers to clear airport security and passport control and reduce the number who miss flights through being stuck in queues.While the move was not prompted by the introduction of Europe’s entry-exit system (EES), which requires most non-EU citizens to provide biometric data at the border, the airline said the system had been a factor in increasing passport queues.Waits of several hours have been reported at some airports in the phased introduction of EES since October
‘Get back to work’: Amazon faces fresh scrutiny over workplace safety record
Amazon, one of the world’s largest employers, has for years faced scrutiny over its safety record. When Billy Foister, a 48-year-old worker, died after a heart attack inside one of the tech giant’s warehouses in September 2019, managers were accused of telling staff to “get back to work”.When another worker died this month at a distribution center in Troutdale, Oregon, an Amazon spokesperson claimed they had collapsed from an “existing medical issue”. They denied a report that a nearby employee was told: “Please get back to work.”As Donald Trump’s administration continues to overhaul federal government oversight of workplace safety, workers inside Amazon and labor advocates say the company’s injury rates, and how it treats injured workers, remain a problem
Anthropic investigates report of rogue access to hack-enabling Mythos AI
The AI developer Anthropic has confirmed it is investigating a report that unauthorised users have gained access to its Mythos model, which it has warned poses risks to cybersecurity.The US startup made the statement after Bloomberg reported on Wednesday that a small group of people had accessed the model, which has not been released to the public because of its ability to enable cyber-attacks.“We’re investigating a report claiming unauthorised access to Claude Mythos Preview through one of our third-party vendor environments,” said Anthropic.Bloomberg said a “handful” of users in a private online forum gained access to Mythos on the same day Anthropic said it was being released to a small number of companies including Apple and Goldman Sachs for testing purposes.It reported that the unnamed users got to Mythos through access that one of them had as a worker at a third-party contractor for Anthropic and by deploying methods used by cybersecurity researchers
‘For billionaires, not boxers’: De La Hoya warns over Ali Act overhaul in Senate hearing
A US Senate hearing on the future of boxing laid bare a sharp divide over the sport’s direction on Wednesday, as longtime boxing figures including Oscar De La Hoya warned of proposed changes that could erode fighters’ rights while executives aligned with an Ultimate Fighting Championship-backed push for a centralized model argued they would bring structure and investment.“When one system controls access, choice becomes theoretical, not real,” professional boxer Nico Ali Walsh told lawmakers, framing the stakes of a debate that could dramatically reshape boxing’s economic model. “When that happens, you fight who you’re told to fight or you don’t fight at all.”At issue is a House-passed overhaul of the Muhammad Ali Boxing Reform Act that would allow the creation of centralized “Unified Boxing Organizations” (UBOs) operating alongside the current fragmented system. Supporters say the approach would simplify matchmaking and attract investment
Lando Norris backs Max Verstappen to stay in F1 after drivers win rule changes
Lando Norris has said he believes Max Verstappen will continue to race in Formula One but that it would be “a miss” for the sport if the four-time world champion did decide to leave owing to his dissatisfaction with the way this season’s new regulations have affected how drivers race.Verstappen has been outspoken in his dislike of the new regulations and their focus on electrical energy management that now makes up almost 50% of the car’s power output. He has intimated he might leave the sport but, with the rules having been adjusted by the FIA in an effort to address concerns of all drivers this week, Norris felt the Dutchman would remain in F1.“Hopefully things get better and I just saw that he said he wants to win the fifth world championship at the minute, so I’m sure he’ll stay longer than people say,” Norris said.The McLaren driver, who is the defending world champion, noted, however, that it would very much be F1’s loss if Verstappen left because he was disenchanted
UK politics: Labour MP calls for Starmer’s resignation to end ‘psychodrama’ – as it happened
No one can look Starmer in the eye … and the Mandy saga is not going away | John Crace
Britain’s military dependence on US ‘no longer tenable’, says former Nato chief
How Olly Robbins’ knightly charm glossed over burning questions on Mandelson vetting
Taxes on UK workers have risen at fastest rate in rich world, says OECD
Jennie Formby, Labour’s former general secretary, says she has joined Greens