Keir Starmer faces ‘judgment day’ as Mandelson vetting debacle grows
Keir Starmer’s claim he was “staggered” not to have been told of Peter Mandelson’s vetting failure has provoked incredulity across Westminster and accusations that he sacked a senior civil servant to save his premiership.Senior government figures said the prime minister faced “judgment day” next week when Olly Robbins, who is understood to be furious at being forced to quit the Foreign Office, is expected to appear before a powerful committee of MPs.With Starmer’s position remaining precarious ahead of a statement he intends to make to MPs on Monday, the Guardian revealed on Friday that Starmer was left in the dark about information relating to Mandelson’s security vetting failure by two other top civil servants.The cabinet secretary, Antonia Romeo, and Catherine Little, the Cabinet Office’s permanent secretary, became aware of the situation last month.Government sources denied the two officials had been “sitting on” the knowledge that UK Security Vetting (UKSV) had advised that Mandelson should be denied clearance to become the UK’s ambassador to the US.
They said the civil servants were involved in a complex process of checks to establish the risks in sharing highly sensitive data, including with the prime minister, who was only told about it on Tuesday.With leaders of all the other major political parties calling for him to quit, Starmer insisted he did not know that Mandelson had failed a security vetting process, or that the Foreign Office had overruled the decision.He said it was “unforgivable” he was not told about the vetting recommendation, which was revealed by the Guardian on Thursday.The prime minister said he was “furious” about what had happened, while Downing Street squarely blamed the Foreign Office, with Starmer’s official spokesperson saying No 10 had “repeatedly” sought the facts of the case but was not told.Asked if this amounted to a “cover-up”, they did not reject this, saying: “Well, the prime minister was not informed and he’s made clear that it is staggering that he was not informed.
”Within hours of the disclosure, Robbins was forced out of his job as permanent secretary of the Foreign Office,The former top official is understood to be extremely angry at what he believes to be his unfair treatment by the prime minister, and is said to believe that he was following due process,Robbins could give his side of the story early next week, with the Commons foreign affairs select committee inviting him to give evidence on Tuesday,Some ministers are concerned he will use his public appearance before MPs to hit back at No 10’s version of events, which could be damaging for Starmer,“I would be amazed if Olly didn’t keep receipts,” said one senior MP.
Ciaran Martin, a former senior civil servant with past involvement in vetting work, who is a close friend of Robbins, told the BBC that the sacked official appeared to have been made a scapegoat.He said vetting had been wrongly presented as a simple pass or fail, when it was instead a “risk assessment”, and that it was entirely standard for officials to decide whether the balance of risk was acceptable.“There is no abuse of process, there is no failure of process.Not only is there no duty to disclose the details of a vetting case, there is a duty not to disclose them.The one thing you never do is tell ministers of any kind, because otherwise the vetting system would collapse,” he said.
However, a second senior government official with knowledge of the vetting process suggested it was highly unusual for the Foreign Office to reject UKSV advice like this, arguing that Robbins could have informed a senior minister of that fact at least, even if he did not share the details.The foreign affairs committee chair, Emily Thornberry, said: “In his [previous] answers to us, Olly Robbins, through omission, failed to tell us the truth by leaving out his decision to overrule the deep vetting advice.“We knew there was pressure on Robbins to confirm Mandelson’s appointment since that had been announced in public already and he would not want to be the person that, weeks into his new job at the Foreign Office, said there is a problem with it.“What we do not know is if there was an extra continued pressure applied to him from Downing Street or elsewhere, and that is what we would like to ask him.”The prime minister, who was in Paris on Friday for a meeting of nations working to keep the strait of Hormuz open, will appear before MPs on Monday to give a statement about what happened in relation to Mandelson and what he knew.
Many Labour MPs were dismayed the Mandelson affair was once again inflicting damage on the government, especially just weeks before crucial local elections,“It does seem incredible that he didn’t know, but the problem is that it’s quite possible as well,” one backbencher said,Some believe the Mandelson vetting farrago could be terminally damaging for a prime minister who had come to government promising to clean up politics,“I can’t see how he survives this,” one said,“I just don’t think it’s feasible for him to say he didn’t know anything.
I’m angry and really sad.”A majority, however, appeared to be backing him.“Now is not the time to start agitating over the leadership, when the global situation is so volatile and the domestic economic fallout is potentially so serious”.The Tory leader, Kemi Badenoch, said: “There can be no more cover-up, no more excuses, no more delays.”The public, she said, had a “right to know” why Mandelson had failed his vetting.
The Lib Dems have asked the prime minister’s ethics adviser to investigate Starmer for failing to tell parliament Mandelson had failed security vetting as soon as he became aware on Tuesday night.The Guardian has learned that Adrian Fulford, a retired court of appeal judge who led the Southport inquiry, is expected to review Mandelson’s vetting process and the wider system.The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know.If you have something to share on this subject you can contact the Guardian's UK Politics team confidentially using the following methods:The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories.Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs.
This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said,If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu,Scroll down and click on Secure Messaging,When asked who you wish to contact please select the Politics (UK) team,For end-to-end encrypted email correspondence you can create a free Proton Mail account and email us at guardian.
politics.desk@protonmail.com.You can message the UK Politics team using Signal or WhatsApp on +44 7824 537227.Finally, our guide at theguardian.
com/tips lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each.
AFC Bournemouth’s owner Bill Foley behind US takeover of Exeter Chiefs
Bill Foley, owner of AFC Bournemouth, is poised to take control of Exeter Chiefs in a multimillion-pound deal that will bring Premier League and Hollywood glamour to English club rugby.The Guardian revealed this week that Exeter’s chair, Tony Rowe, had agreed to sell the club to a wealthy American investor, and can now disclose the club’s new owner will be Foley’s multisport investment company, Black Knight Sports and Entertainment.The Black Knight Football Club that owns Bournemouth includes the Hollywood actor Michael B Jordan, who won this year’s best actor Oscar for his role in Sinners, as a minority shareholder.Foley’s investment vehicle, Cannae Holdings, provides most of the multi-club group’s funding, however, and is understood to be behind the bid for Exeter. Cannae’s chief executive, Ryan Caswell, was captured by TNT Sport’s cameras sitting next to Rowe at Sandy Park during Saturday’s 35-28 home defeat by Northampton
‘I’m extremely lucky to be here’: Jelena Dokic on childhood dreams and talking tennis
Australia’s former world No 4 player and now respected pundit speaks about highs and lows in her life, and the importance of family on successAll sports stars know that dealing with highs and lows comes with the territory, as part of the job. But few have been through such extremes as Jelena Dokic, who spent her whole career – and much of her life –navigating painful moments. Abused, physically and psychologically, by her father, Dokic suffered from depression and an eating disorder and, at her very lowest moments, contemplated suicide.But Dokic never gave up, showing rare resilience, built from her experience growing up in a war-torn country and being a refugee twice. (Dokic was born in Croatia – part of the former Yugoslavia – and moved to Serbia, before settling in Australia
Hampshire v Somerset, Warwickshire v Essex, and more: county cricket – as it happened
Hampshire were frustrated by Somerset’s wagging tail, but wiped out the deficit before bad light stopped play at Southampton. There was no century for James Rew, caught uncharacteristically skewing a half-volley for 86, one of three wickets for Codi Yusuf.Tom Abell made 49, Lewis Gregory was out to Kyle Abbot for the ninth time in 13 matches, but it was 22-year-old Alfie Ogborne who caused Hampshire the most pain, whooping three sixes in an enterprising last-wicket stand. Hampshire lost Toby Albert to a leg injury early on, but Nick Gubbins’ undefeated 70 helped them to a 96-run lead.After play, Somerset’s head coach, Jason Kerr, was asked about Rew’s chances of playing for England: “He is a good enough player to play international cricket … he’s an incredible talent and one that should get international recognition
Fin Smith’s last-gasp try breaks Exeter hearts and wins thriller for Northampton
Spring is here, the pitches are firming up and the playoff race is intensifying. As dramatic finishes go this was right up there, with both Northampton and Exeter sensing they had the game won at different moments. In the end the decisive thrust came from the Saints via a last-minute try from their England fly-half Fin Smith which kept the league leaders on track for a home semi-final.It had briefly seemed that a 77th-minute try from the Chiefs replacement Paul Brown-Bampoe, magnificently converted from wide out by Henry Slade, would ensure three points for both teams. Instead Smith came scampering past a couple of tired would-be Chiefs tacklers and had both the pace and nerve to skip away for a hugely valuable score
Scotland 7-84 England: Women’s Six Nations rugby union – as it happened
Sarah Rendell has filed her report in a flash! Just like a speeding Kildunne down the left wing.Murrayfield’s foundations were ‘rocked” as Sarah put it. Fair play. That felt like a seismic shellacking.Thanks for keeping me company
England run in 12 tries as Kildunne sparks demolition of Scotland in Women’s Six Nations
The fortress walls of Murrayfield were finally at Scotland women’s disposal for their first standalone game but England rocked its foundations with a statement performance where fans were left questioning if the world champions had injury problems at all.The 30,498 crowd was a record attendance for a women’s solo sporting event in Scotland but they were shocked into silence after the hosts failed to live up to the occasion. Scotland were poor, particularly in defence, as England ran riot, with 12 tries and scoring the most points they have against their old rivals since their 89-0 result back in 2011. If Scotland turn up in Italy next week in the same form, Fabio Roselli’s team will be licking their lips.Scotland were their own worst enemy with 13 handling errors and a tackle completion rate of just 59%, meaning the hosts missed 52 tackles
US tech firms successfully lobbied EU to keep datacentre emissions secret
Liz Kendall urges UK public to embrace AI as government makes first £500m fund investment
‘How do I end a call?’: the elderly Japanese people determined to master smartphones
Labour and Lib Dem MPs demand ‘shameful’ Palantir NHS contract be scrapped
Man used AI to make false statements to shut down London nightclub, police say
NAACP lawsuit accuses Elon Musk’s xAI of polluting Black neighborhoods near Memphis