Reform’s ‘Trumpian’ legal threats hint at more aggressive approach to media
“It was Trumpian,” said Mark Mansfield, editor and CEO of Nation.Cymru, a small English-language Welsh news service.“It has perhaps given us a flavour of how a Reform UK government would behave towards the media.”Mansfield is referring to what he described as an attempt by a figure at Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party to “bully” his publication, but he believes a wider lesson might be learned.On 12 November, Nation.
Cymru published an article when Reform’s only Welsh parliament member, Laura Anne Jones, was banned from the Senedd chamber for 14 days after using a racial slur to describe Chinese people.The news website named Ed Sumner, now head of communications at Reform, as being one of the recipients of the offensive WhatsApp messages while working for her in August 2023.Sumner’s name had been redacted in a Senedd report on the subject, but as Nation.Cymru had exposed the story – revealing the existence of the WhatsApp messages in the first place a year earlier, and having named Sumner at the time – the news service chose to name him again.On the day of publication, they received a letter from Adam Richardson, a barrister from 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square chambers, who said he was representing Sumner.
He accused the news service of “misuse of private information” and “breach of confidence”, as well as breach of the editors’ code.The news service was given two days to take Sumner’s name out of the article, otherwise Richardson said he had been instructed to commence proceedings and pursue damages.“We were surprised really, because Reform hates us but they haven’t actually threatened us before,” said Mansfield.As well as representing individual clients through his chambers, Richardson additionally works for the Reform UK national party, describing himself as a “barrister for Reform”.Despite the legal letter from Richardson, Mansfield said he was having none of it.
No, was the response to Richardson’s demand.But that was not the end of the matter.A second letter from Richardson that day said his client would now seek “aggravated damages” if Sumner’s name was not removed, Mansfield said.Legal precedents cited by Richardson included that of the supermodel Naomi Campbell’s successful privacy claim in 2004 against the Daily Mirror when she was photographed as she came out of a Narcotics Anonymous clinic.Mansfield responded again with a refusal.
More emails came, said Mansfield, who accused Richardson of seeking to “bully into silence a small Welsh news outlet”.Richardson denied that in his subsequent letter, Mansfield said.Mansfield asked Richardson whether he also acted for Reform UK.That was irrelevant, Richardson responded, who suggested Mansfield get independent legal advice.On 19 November, Mansfield’s news service published a new story, headlined: “Reform UK barrister tries to bully NationCymru into removing top party official’s name from story”.
Mansfield said the line of communication had gone quiet since.A Reform source said: “Nation Cymru is a far-left Welsh nationalist blog pretending to be an honest media outlet.They make the Guardian look like a rightwing paper.They have broken the editors’ code numerous times and lack any journalistic standards.”The press regulator, Ipso, has received five complaints against Nation.
Cymru since 2022.Only one of those, regarding comments attributed to a planning officer, was upheld on the grounds of accuracy.Richardson described Mansfield’s characterisation of his approach as “inaccurate” and rejected any suggestion of “bullying”, adding that the Nation.Cymru editor had displayed an “unusual amount of personal animus in response to a prescribed legal process on behalf of a client”.“For the avoidance of doubt, the matter had nothing to do with Reform UK’s broader media approach, nor did it concern any attempt to inhibit legitimate reporting,” he added.
Questions are being asked, though: is Reform, riding high in the polls, taking a more aggressive approach to the media?Mansfield’s description of his experience as “Trumpian” chimes with that of the publisher of the Nottingham Post and its website Nottinghamshire Live, after the nearly 150-year-old paper was barred from speaking to the council’s leader and removed from media mailing lists by the Reform-led Nottinghamshire county council.The council only relented last month after being threatened with legal action.The Independent’s political editor, David Maddox, wrote in September that he had been warned by an unnamed senior member of Reform’s leadership team that the Independent would be banned from its events if the news website did not change a critical story or the tone of its questions and coverage.They did not follow through on the threat, Maddox added.Last March, the BBC felt forced to apologise to Reform after describing it as “far-right”.
“There are very significant implications of calling a political party, and by implication, its leader and senior leadership team, far-right,” said the party’s deputy leader, Richard Tice, who had previously championed free speech,“It is that which is defamatory and libellous,That is why they have apologised immediately,”In recent weeks, it has been Richardson – as a “barrister for Reform” – who has been communicating with the Guardian as the party’s legal representative regarding the newspaper’s intention to publish claims made about Nigel Farage by multiple school contemporaries of his at Dulwich College,After the Guardian first put the claims to Reform UK, Richardson described the allegations of racist and antisemitic behaviour as “wholly untrue” and a “grave and actionable libel”.
After reflecting on Richardson’s response, the Guardian put further allegations to him.A final response from Richardson warned that if “the Guardian proceeds to publish any allegation suggesting that Mr Farage engaged in, condoned, or led racist or antisemitic behaviour, or that such claims bear upon his present character or fitness for office, proceedings will be issued without further notice.”The Guardian published an article of about 3,700 words on 18 November with the headline: “‘Deeply shocking’: Nigel Farage faces fresh claims of racism and antisemitism at school.”A Reform spokesperson told reporters in Westminster that the story was denied.“It’s one person’s word against another,” they said.
Asked whether the party would sue the Guardian, he responded: “Not at this stage.”It might be reasonably argued that the deployment of legal threats is just a sign that Reform UK is a party that is serious about power.A Reform UK spokesperson said: “Reform engages far and wide with media and journalists.Additionally, Nigel Farage answers more questions from the media every week than any other party leader.“Just as journalists are fully within their rights to criticise our elected officials, Reform are completely justified in pushing back against untrue and unbalanced coverage.
This is the basis for a healthy, functioning democracy.”For Mansfield, though, there is another way to see it, as he explained on his news site: “It seems free speech only exists for people who agree with them.”The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know.If you have something to share on this subject, you can contact us confidentially using the following methods.Secure Messaging in the Guardian appThe Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories.
Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs.This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said.If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu.Select ‘Secure Messaging’.SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and postIf you can safely use the Tor network without being observed or monitored, you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform.
Finally, our guide at theguardian.com/tips lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each.
One in four unconcerned by sexual deepfakes created without consent, survey finds
One in four people think there is nothing wrong with creating and sharing sexual deepfakes, or they feel neutral about it, even when the person depicted has not consented, according to a police-commissioned survey.The findings prompted a senior police officer to warn that the use of AI is accelerating an epidemic in violence against women and girls (VAWG), and that technology companies are complicit in this abuse.The survey of 1,700 people commissioned by the office of the police chief scientific adviser found 13% felt there was nothing wrong with creating and sharing sexual or intimate deepfakes – digitally altered content made using AI without consent.A further 12% felt neutral about the moral and legal acceptability of making and sharing such deepfakes.Det Ch Supt Claire Hammond, from the national centre for VAWG and public protection, reminded the public that “sharing intimate images of someone without their consent, whether they are real images or not, is deeply violating”
Can’t tech a joke: AI does not understand puns, study finds
Comedians who rely on clever wordplay and writers of witty headlines can rest a little easier, for the moment at least, research on AI suggests.Experts from universities in the UK and Italy have been investigating whether large language models (LLMs) understand puns – and found them wanting.The team from Cardiff University, in south Wales, and Ca’ Foscari University of Venice concluded that LLMs were able to spot the structure of a pun but did not really get the joke.An example they tested was: “I used to be a comedian, but my life became a joke.” If they replaced this with: “I used to be a comedian, but my life became chaotic,” LLMs still tended to perceive the presence of a pun
Civil liberties groups call for inquiry into UK data protection watchdog
Dozens of civil liberties campaigners and legal professionals are calling for an inquiry into the UK’s data protection watchdog, after what they describe as “a collapse in enforcement activity” after the scandal of the Afghan data breach.A total of 73 academics, senior lawyers, data protection experts and organisations including Statewatch and the Good Law Project, have written a letter to Chi Onwurah, the chair of the cross-party Commons science, innovation and technology committee, coordinated by Open Rights Group, calling for an inquiry to be held into the office of the information commissioner, John Edwards.“We are concerned about the collapse in enforcement activity by the Information Commissioner’s Office, which culminated in the decision to not formally investigate the Ministry of Defence (MoD) following the Afghan data breach,” the signatories state. They warn of “deeper structural failures” beyond that data breach.The Afghan data breach was a particularly serious leak of information relating to individual Afghans who worked with British forces before the Taliban seized control of the country in August 2021
Meet the AI workers who tell their friends and family to stay away from AI
When the people making AI seem trustworthy are the ones who trust it the least, it shows that incentives for speed are overtaking safety, experts sayKrista Pawloski remembers the single defining moment that shaped her opinion on the ethics of artificial intelligence. As an AI worker on Amazon Mechanical Turk – a marketplace that allows companies to hire workers to perform tasks like entering data or matching an AI prompt with its output – Pawloski spends her time moderating and assessing the quality of AI-generated text, images and videos, as well as some factchecking.Roughly two years ago, while working from home at her dining room table, she took up a job designating tweets as racist or not. When she was presented with a tweet that read “Listen to that mooncricket sing”, she almost clicked on the “no” button before deciding to check the meaning of the word “mooncricket”, which, to her surprise, was a racial slur against Black Americans.“I sat there considering how many times I may have made the same mistake and not caught myself,” said Pawloski
Bro boost: women say their LinkedIn traffic increases if they pretend to be men
Do your LinkedIn followers consider you a “thought leader”? Do hordes of commenters applaud your tips on how to “scale” your startup? Do recruiters slide into your DMs to “explore potential synergies”?If not, it could be because you’re not a man.Dozens of women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after a series of viral posts suggested that, for some, changing their gender to “male” boosted their visibility on the network.Others rewrote their profiles to be, as they put it, “bro-coded” – inserting action-oriented online business buzzwords such as “drive”, “transform” and “accelerate”. Anecdotally, their visibility also increased.The uptick in engagement has led some to speculate that an in-built sexism in LinkedIn’s algorithm means that men who speak in online business jargon are more visible on its platform
Leading law firm cuts London back-office staff as it embraces AI
The law firm Clifford Chance is reducing the number of business services staff at its London base by 10%, with the increased use of artificial intelligence a factor behind the decision.The head of PwC has also indicated that AI may lead to fewer workers being hired at the accountancy and consulting group.Clifford Chance, one of the largest international law firms, is making about 50 roles redundant in areas such as finance, HR and IT with role changes for up to 35 other jobs, according to the Financial Times, which first reported the cuts.Greater use of AI and reduced demand for some business services are behind the cuts, the FT report said, as well as more work being done at offices outside Clifford Chance’s main UK-US operations, in countries such as Poland and India.A spokesperson for Clifford Chance said: “In line with our strategy to strengthen our operations, we can confirm we are proposing changes to some of our London-based business professional functions
Chef Skye Gyngell, who pioneered the slow food movement, dies aged 62
How to make the perfect butter paneer – recipe | Felicity Cloake's How to make the perfect …
Fluffy and fabulous! 17 ways with marshmallows – from cheesecake to salad to an espresso martini
The Shaston Arms, London W1: ‘Just because you can do things doesn’t mean you should do them’ – restaurant review | Grace Dent on restaurants
Goblets of borscht, turkey-shaped madeleines: why Martha Stewart’s fantastical menus are still an inspiration
Winter has finally kicked in – it’s time to crack out the casserole dish and get stewing