Liz Kendall is a listening kind of woman but can’t seem to hear Labour discontent on welfare bill | John Crace
It was clear from the start that this was largely a domestic dispute.The Labour benches were as tightly rammed as they are for prime minister’s questions and everyone had come determined to have their say.No longer willing to be sidelined by ministers as “noises off”.No one had just turned up because they had nowhere better to be.On the other side of the Commons, only a handful of Tory backbenchers had made the effort to show up.
Fair enough.Disabled and vulnerable people have never really been their priority.To be charitable, maybe they just found it a bit awkward intruding on the government’s private grief.If Liz Kendall had any nerves about facing down her own party with the concessions – or measures, as she preferred to call them – that had been forced out of the government, then she kept them well hidden.It’s counterintuitive to imagine that some Labour MPs came into politics to make life harder for some disabled people, but Liz might just be that person.
She knows – as we all do – that the welfare system isn’t working properly.That we have a far higher proportion of people on benefits than almost every other European country.But she is prepared to make life worse for people with disabilities as collateral damage.For the greater good and all that.For the first five minutes of Kendall’s statement, you would have been hard pushed to know that for much of the last week she and Keir Starmer had been scrabbling around to prevent a rebellion that could have killed off her welfare changes at Tuesday’s second reading.
Liz spoke of her commitment to equality and social justice, how she was creating real opportunities and support,Just not necessarily for everyone,“The system we inherited doesn’t work,” she said,No one was going to disagree with that,Then we got to the concessions.
Sorry, measures.I will try to keep up.Liz had come to all this entirely on her own.Had no idea so many of her own MPs were not just unhappy but furious with it.First, she wanted everyone to live entirely in the present.
Well, between now and November next year.It seemed to work for her.Here was the deal.Everything would continue as is till November 2026.After that, anyone who becomes disabled would have to look after themselves.
It would teach people to be more responsible.To think harder before they went down with life-changing illnesses or injuries.I can’t say fairer than that, said Liz.People get stuck on legacy benefits the whole time.A two-tier benefits system was the norm.
Nothing to see here.You win some, you lose some.It was time to treat personal independence payments on a first come, first served basis.But look, Liz continued, I’m a listening kind of woman.And I’m listening now.
Only she didn’t appear to be hearing the murmurs of discontent coming from the benches behind her.She was in a world of her own.She will go to her grave swearing she has always been one of the good guys.Listening also involved announcing a review of Pips in consultation with various disability charities.Only this review was going to have a novel twist.
It wasn’t actually going to listen to anyone or accept any recommendations because the changes to Pip were going to come into force regardless, well ahead of any report that nice Mr Timms, a junior minister in the department, might publish,Sorry but not sorry,Liz knew she was right and that was all there was to it,But people with disabilities would feel they had been included,Which was nice.
Liz took off her glasses as she neared the end.To show she meant business.There would be an extra £300m of real money for employment support.Not pretend money.Money that has already been announced.
It would all cost £2.5bn and she hadn’t a clue how it was going to be funded.But that was the chancellor’s problem, not hers.It was she that had made her do this.It wasn’t easy, she said.
Something of an understatement.Her own MPs were twitching, desperate to have their say.First we had to sit through the reply of Helen Whately, the shadow work and pensions secretary.She had plenty to say about how she thought the welfare bill might be cut – stop paying out for less serious mental health disorders – but nothing on why previous Tory governments had failed to make any of the necessary reforms.You could almost feel Helen dying a little as she sank into her own irrelevance.
Kendall merely observed it was all the Tories’ fault and that they had caused the two-tier system.The very two-tier system she had only just defended.Liz does need to stop living entirely in the present.It’s playing havoc with her memory.During the next 90 minutes or so, the only person defending the reforms was Liz.
Not even one Labour MP came to her rescue,The closest we got was the odd damning with faint praise,Thank you for making some concessions, but do you think you could go away and come back with something a little better? We’re all for reform,Just not at the expense of the most vulnerable,Debbie Abrahams expressed concerns that the review would be pointless as the reforms were going ahead anyway.
Liz praised her insight.That was precisely the point of the review.Never start a review before you know what the conclusions are going to be.Rachael Maskell said she hadn’t come in to politics to push 150,000 into poverty.Liz shrugged.
You win some, you lose some.The chorus of disapproval got even louder.Vicky Foxcroft was also dismissive of the review.Andy McDonald asked for the bill to be pulled.Florence Eshalomi wanted to make sure carers would be protected.
They would, said Liz.But only up till November next year.After that carers should stop enabling newly disabled people by refusing to look after them.Come the end, Kendall looked out on her feet.Even her righteous certainty seemed to have taken a small dent.
But we’d all be back again on Tuesday for the second reading.Liz would have to suck it all up again.And hope that the whips had done their job in keeping the number of rebels as low as possible.This hadn’t quite been a humiliation.But losing the vote would be.
Starmer offers Labour MPs major welfare bill concession
Keir Starmer has offered Labour backbenchers a major concession over disability benefits in a last-ditch attempt to limit the largest rebellion of his premiership and get his controversial welfare bill over the line.Stephen Timms, the welfare minister, told MPs on Tuesday afternoon the government would shelve plans to make major cuts to personal independence payments. Instead ministers will only make changes to the disability payments after Timms has reported the findings of his review into the whole system, which is due to conclude next autumn.Under the original plans, from November 2026 claimants would need to score four points in a daily living activity to qualify for Pip. Timms said: “[MPs] across the house during this debate have raised concerns that the changes to Pip are coming ahead of the conclusions of the review of the assessment that I will be leading
People in the UK: what do you think of Labour’s first year in government?
Labour will mark a year in power on 5 July, the first time the party has been in government since 2010. From a U-turn on welfare cuts and scrapping NHS England, to trying to secure peace in Ukraine and managing the special relationship with Donald Trump, we want to know how you feel the party’s first 12 months in government have been.What are your thoughts on the decisions that have been made so far? Has anything surprised you during the last year? Have your views changed since Labour came into power or do you feel the same way you did when they won the general election?As part of putting your experiences at the heart of our journalism, we’re particularly interested in hearing your voice notes on what you think. These can be sent to us on WhatsApp on +447825903400.You can tell us your views of how you feel Labour has fared during the last 12 months by filling in the form below, or sending us a voice note on WhatsApp on +447825903400
Removing hereditary peers is not enough to reform Lords, poll suggests
Plans to change the House of Lords by removing only the remaining hereditary peers do not go far enough in the eyes of the public, polling suggests.Just 3% of those surveyed backed the government’s plans, with 56% of respondents agreeing that ministers should additionally limit the number of peers the prime minister is able to appoint to the upper chamber for life.The hereditary peers bill is due to enter its report stage in the House of Lords on Wednesday, after five days of debate with line-by-line consideration of more than 100 amendments during March and April.The bill fulfils part of Labour’s manifesto pledge for “immediate reform of the House of Lords”. Labour described the Lords as “too big”, with changes “overdue and essential”, promising not just to remove the hereditary peers but also to introduce a mandatory retirement age of 80, participation requirements, make it easier to remove disgraced members, and overhaul the appointments process to improve the quality of peers
Leading Labour rebel backs welfare bill amid sustained defiance
Downing Street has “listened” and “honoured” the promises it made on changes to the welfare bill, one of the key rebels, Meg Hillier, has said, saying she would vote for the bill on Tuesday.The Treasury select committee chair, who authored the original amendment that would have killed off the government’s flagship welfare changes, offered her support amid a continued backlash over the bill from dozens of MPs.Hillier suggested she disagreed with the work and pensions select committee chair, Debbie Abrahams, who said on Monday that the government had not held up its side of the bargain over the timing of a promised review into disability benefits, co-produced with disabled people.“I’ve not always been happy about how No 10 has engaged with MPs in general, but on this they acted in good faith: listened, made an offer and honoured it,” Hillier said, confirming she would vote for the bill.She said the key concession that had been secured was that no current claimant would be affected by the changes to universal credit and personal independence payments (Pip)
Who are the key Labour rebels in the revolt against Starmer’s welfare bill?
Keir Starmer’s welfare reforms hang by a thread the day before a vote that could define his premiership. The prime minister was almost certainly heading for his first Commons defeat in government before a last-minute deal reached last week between government officials and leading rebels.However, the result remains uncertain, with Labour MPs warning on Monday that they could not back the bill in its current form. Many are angry about the fact that the controversial four-point system to qualify for personal independence payments (Pips) will take effect in November 2026, no matter the outcome of a government review into the system.With ministers still unsure of winning the vote, Labour whips were calling colleagues throughout Monday to gauge support levels
No 10 plan to avert Labour welfare rebellion in chaos amid division over scale of concessions
Downing Street’s plans to see off a major Labour welfare rebellion were in chaos on Monday night, amid continued brinkmanship between MPs and the government over the scale of the concessions.There was significant division between government departments over how to respond to rebels’ demands – with seemingly little idea how to quell continuing anger ahead of the knife-edge vote on Tuesday.The select committee chairs Meg Hillier, Debbie Abrahams, Sarah Owen and Helen Hayes were among MPs in the House of Commons chamber who were publicly expressing doubts that the concessions agreed last week go far enough.One senior MP organising the Labour rebellion said a statement from Liz Kendall, the work and pensions secretary, on the promised compromises was a “disaster and raised more questions than it answered”.Other MPs who had previously backed an amendment by Hillier said they would now back the bill at its second reading or abstain, but would vote against it after that if their questions still were not answered
Most women in England and Wales have seen abusive male behaviour in past year, says poll
Health inequality is linked to gross disparities in wealth | Letters
The Vivienne died from cardio-respiratory arrest due to ketamine use, inquest finds
People having IVF should get time off work for appointments, say UK campaigners
NHS will use AI in warning system to catch potential safety scandals early
Britain in 2025: sick man of Europe battling untreated illness crisis