H
politics
H
HOYONEWS
HomeBusinessTechnologySportPolitics
Others
  • Food
  • Culture
  • Society
Contact
Home
Business
Technology
Sport
Politics

Food

Culture

Society

Contact
Facebook page
H
HOYONEWS

Company

business
technology
sport
politics
food
culture
society

CONTACT

EMAILmukum.sherma@gmail.com
© 2025 Hoyonews™. All Rights Reserved.
Facebook page

Welfare bill: what compromises have been made and how will claimants be affected?

1 day ago
A picture


It is less than a year since Keir Starmer led the Labour party to a historic landslide election victory.And yet even with a Commons majority of 165, the prime minister looked to be heading for defeat on his government’s welfare bill which includes a major package of cuts to social security payments.That was until a last-minute compromise with his backbenchers, reached after fraught negotiations on Wednesday night and Thursday before the bill is voted on next Tuesday.Liz Kendall, the work and pensions secretary in charge of the bill, will publish the full details of the changes on Monday.But already the outlines are becoming clear.

So what does the U-turn mean for people on benefits and how will it be paid for?At the heart of the government’s plans were changes to Pips – the regular payments designed to help disabled people have a good quality of life.The money is supposed to be used for extra living costs, including practical items such as stairlifts or wheelchairs, but the amount being claimed has ballooned in recent years and is forecast to continue rising rapidly.Ministers wanted to set a higher bar for eligibility to reduce the amount being paid out.Under the new system, claimants would have to score four points in one category to be eligible.The categories include whether a person is able to move around unaided, whether they can wash themselves and whether they can cook their own meals.

The tougher eligibility rules would have meant people who could not wash half of their body or cook their own meals might not have received the payment.Many Labour MPs who opposed the changes wanted to scrap those new rules altogether.The compromise that has been reached is a promise that the new rules will apply only to new claimants and that the entire criteria system will be reviewed in conjunction with disabled people.Meg Hillier, a senior Labour MP and one of the leading rebels, said on Friday: “Disabled people will be able to co-produce benefit changes with government, including how the four points on Pip changes will be applied.”It remains unclear whether any changes recommended as part of that review, being led by the welfare minister Stephen Timms, will be made before the bill passes.

One rebel said on Friday they wanted further assurances on what Timms would be able to look at and when he would make his recommendations,One major complaint from Labour MPs was that the health element of universal credit was due to be frozen in cash terms over the parliament,This payment goes to people with severe conditions, such as a terminal illness or recovering from cancer,House of Commons research seen by the Guardian suggests freezing that payment would have cost claimants about £250 a year by the end of the parliament,Ministers have now agreed to lift it in line with inflation.

Kendall had promised to spend £1bn on supporting people back into work, including a guarantee of training or employment for people aged 18 to 21, and a promise that people receiving health benefits would not be automatically re-assessed if they went back into work.The work and pensions secretary said on Thursday she was going to increase the amount of money for those schemes and make £1bn available to spend this year, rather than later in the parliament.Ruth Curtice, the head of the Resolution Foundation thinktank, said on Friday she believed the changes would cost £3bn.This includes the knock-on effects on other benefits such as carers’ allowance, which is paid to those who care for people receiving Pips.This is in addition to the more than £1bn that the chancellor has promised to spend undoing large parts of her cuts to winter fuel payments.

As a result, Labour MPs are unable to rule out tax rises in the autumn budget.Before Wednesday night, more than 120 Labour MPs had signed a rebel amendment to Tuesday’s welfare bill which would have paused it indefinitely.With the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats also likely to vote against or abstain on the measures, that would have proved enough to defeat the government.Hillier said on Friday the government concessions had won over the support of many of her colleagues.All the select committee chairs who signed the rebel amendment are now understood to be on board, as is Louise Haigh, the former transport secretary.

Many Labour MPs will probably vote against it anyway,“This smacks of a face-saving exercise more than it does doing right by my sick & disabled constituents,” the Labour MP Clive Lewis tweeted,“I’ll still be voting against,”Labour party officials hope that the rebels will be limited largely to leftwing members of the Socialist Campaign Group, who do not have the numbers to defeat the government on their own,
societySee all
A picture

A clear set of actions is needed to improve NHS maternity services | Letters

This inquiry (Wes Streeting announces investigation into ‘failing’ NHS maternity services, 23 June) needs to get to the heart of why NHS maternity services in England are falling far short of where they need to be.It must leave no stone unturned; there are significant, systemic challenges that affect trusts’ ability to consistently deliver high-quality care, deep-rooted issues with morale and culture within maternity services and, as you highlight (Editorial, 23 June), the “shockingly higher risk of mortality faced by black and Asian mothers” and those from more deprived backgrounds.There have been innumerable recommendations and a regulatory landscape that has become complex, distracting and difficult for trusts to navigate. Trust leaders will welcome proposals to introduce one clear set of actions to improve care across every NHS maternity service.Saffron CorderyDeputy chief executive, NHS Providers After a number of years overseeing maternity and perinatal services at regional level, this proposal frustrates me

1 day ago
A picture

‘I don’t think my brain should have gone through that’: five young people on their experience of smartphones as teens

What do people who got – and one who didn’t get – internet-connected phones in their adolescence actually think about the impact they had on them?Debate and anxiety about teen and preteen access to smartphones and social media is raging. One paper has likened smartphones to a “parasite” on our brains, while another study suggests moderate use of social media does not have a harmful effect on young people. In the US more than 100,000 parents have joined an online pledge to delay giving children smartphones until at least the eighth grade and in Australia a ban on under-16s using social media will come into effect in December. Despite all this, OECD figures released in May show 70% of 10-year-olds and 98% of 15-year-olds have internet-connected smartphones.So is giving teenagers smartphones that big a deal?To find out, we asked four twentysomethings who got a smartphone at some point in their teen or preteen years – and one who didn’t

1 day ago
A picture

Felicity Whittaker obituary

No one who met my friend Felicity Whittaker, who has died aged 96, could ever forget her. Not the dozens of disadvantaged and often troubled children whom she cared for, nor fellow protesters from Ban the Bomb days to Extinction Rebellion marches. And certainly not the many friends who enjoyed her lively and engaging company in Highgate in north London and later in Bedford.Felicity was born in London to Lydia Bilbrook, an actor, and George Harrison Brown, a journalist. Her parents separated when she was a small child, and she and Lydia moved to Santa Monica Canyon, near Hollywood, where Lydia was part of the British actors’ community and appeared in several films

1 day ago
A picture

Triple threat of smoking, drinking and weight ‘puts a million in England at risk of early death’

One in 50 people aged 16 or older in England are at risk of an early death because they smoke, drink too much and are overweight, research has found.This “triple threat” increases the risk of diseases such as cancer and diabetes and in some cases means people dying 20 years earlier than they should, a senior doctor has said.About 1 million people in England are living with that threat, an analysis of the Health Survey for England by the charity Action on Smoking and Health (Ash) has revealed. They are the 2.2% of the population who use tobacco, drink more than 14 units of alcohol a week and are overweight or obese, as judged by having a body mass index (BMI) of 25 or more

1 day ago
A picture

As a carer, I’m not special – but sometimes I need to be reminded how important my role is | Natasha Sholl

When I started watching the Disney+ show Dying for Sex, I was wary that the cancer storyline might hit a bit too close to home, after our teenage son was diagnosed with cancer in 2022.The series follows Molly (Michelle Williams) who decides to leave her marriage and pursue sexual pleasure after being diagnosed with stage four cancer. And yet while it’s a difficult watch for obvious reasons, it wasn’t the “cancer stuff” that hit me where it hurts (everywhere); it was the portrayal of Nikki (Jenny Slate), Molly’s best friend, who takes over as carer when Molly leaves her husband. Nikki loses her job, her relationship, her house, her own mental health. And it’s very rare that we see the role of a carer highlighted in pop culture in this way

2 days ago
A picture

People dying early of cancer costs UK economy £10.3bn a year, study finds

People dying early of cancer costs the UK economy £10.3bn a year, more than any other health condition, a study has revealed.That is the total cost of the 350,000 years of lost productivity recorded across Britain every year because adults have died prematurely of the disease, according to Cancer Research UK (CRUK).Each early death costs the economy an average of £61,000, according to the charity’s first research into how much the country loses as a result of the growing toll of cancer diagnoses and deaths.In 2021, cancer caused the loss of more productive years of life than any other condition – 350,000 years

2 days ago
recentSee all
A picture

Thames Water court case shows there are alternatives to massive infrastructure

about 5 hours ago
A picture

‘He left us with nothing’: the British investors swindled by a German property firm

about 8 hours ago
A picture

Online hacks to offline heists: crypto leaders on edge amid increasing attacks

about 9 hours ago
A picture

Jeff in Venice: seven takeaways from the Bezos-Sánchez wedding

1 day ago
A picture

Novak Djokovic confident Wimbledon is his ‘best chance’ of extending slam record

about 2 hours ago
A picture

India thrash England by 97 runs in first women’s T20 cricket – as it happened

about 4 hours ago