Report finds £2m of surplus UK general election funds ‘essentially disappeared’
Almost £2m given to candidates in the 2024 general election has “essentially disappeared” from the public’s view of British political campaign finance, a report claims.It notes that 170 candidates received in total almost £2m more than they were legally allowed to spend locally during the election, raising questions about where the surplus funds went after the campaign.The donors who funded them are also tricky to identify, especially if the candidate was unsuccessful.The effect is a lack of transparency around who is funding constituency campaigns and what subsequently happens to excess funds.If a candidate received more money than they could spend, they might transfer the surplus to the central party.
As a result, parties could use candidates as a “back door” for money from donors hoping to remain anonymous, the report says.The report’s authors, an academic at the University of Antwerp and a Liberal Democrat peer, have recommended three solutions to make it easier for the public to see who is funding candidates.“There is a lot of money flowing to candidates that essentially disappears from the readily accessible public record,” Mark Pack, the president of the Lib Dems and a peer, told the Guardian.Details of donations to central parties and local associations are routinely reported by the Electoral Commission, with extra disclosures made during elections.But contributions given to candidates, and how much they spent, are not available for public inspection from council returning officers until more than a month after polling day.
The Electoral Commission publishes headline figures per candidate on donations and expenditure, without the details of who funded their campaigns, months after the election.The report’s authors, Chris Butler and Pack, sought a sample of the spending returns submitted by the candidates from the Electoral Commission.The watchdog provided them, but removed the identity of the donors.This results in an “illogical” situation in which donors who give directly to a party, subject to a minimum reporting threshold, appear in the Electoral Commission’s database, while donors to individual candidates are obscured.Pack said he thought this was “hard to justify” on the watchdog’s cited grounds of data protection.
“The point of there being a place to say who your donors are in the form is so that people can look it up and check,” he said.Pack believes there are reasonable grounds for the Electoral Commission to revise its position.The government is expected to bring a new elections bill, which could be an opportunity to change the complicated rules on political financing.As for the almost £2m surplus funds from the last election, “we don’t know what is happening to that money”, Pack said.He suggested that some may have been given to the central parties, which could use it against their national spending limit while benefiting the candidate’s local efforts, such as with target letters to voters in that constituency.
“There is not a clear ‘what did you do with your surplus’ box on the expense forms,” he said,Butler and Pack also propose the Electoral Commission publish the details of the direct donations as part of its political finance database, and proactively share their data with the House of Commons authorities to ensure candidates who become MPs are properly registering donations,A spokesperson for the Electoral Commission said: “While the Electoral Commission publishes information on candidate spending to aide transparency, we do not have the legal authority to publish donors’ personal data from candidate returns,“We recognise that the current political finance framework could be strengthened further, and have recommended that our remit be extended to include candidates, which would simplify the regulatory process for candidates and improve transparency for voters,”
Bank of England keeps interest rates at 4.25% but hints at cuts to come
The Bank of England has left interest rates on hold at 4.25%, though it signalled further cuts in the cost of borrowing later this year after “clearer evidence” of rising unemployment amid a slowing economy.Six members of the Bank’s nine-member monetary policy committee (MPC) voted to keep rates on hold while three supported a reduction to 4%, to add to the four quarter-point cuts since last August.The Bank’s governor, Andrew Bailey, said interest rates “remain on a gradual downward path” after “seeing signs of softening in the labour market”. He cautioned, however, that the world was “highly unpredictable” and it was difficult to predict when interest rates would next be reduced
Recruiter Hays warns global slump in hirings will halve its profits
A slump in hiring activity at businesses around the world means profits will more than halve at Hays, the global recruitment company has warned, sending its shares down more than 10%.Demand for new permanent staff has fallen sharply, reflecting “low levels of client and candidate confidence as a result of macroeconomic uncertainty”, Hays told investors in an unscheduled update.The recruiter, which finds workers across the world for corporations such as Airbus and Sony, now expects its pre-exceptional operating profit to be about £45m for its current financial year, compared with City expectations of £56.4m. Last year Hays reported a profit of £105
Shell boss warns of ‘huge impact on trade’ if Israel-Iran conflict escalates
An escalation in the Middle East conflict could have a “huge impact on global trade”, the boss of the oil company Shell has warned, as Donald Trump suggested the US could enter the air war between Israel and Iran.Shell, one of the biggest traders of oil and natural gas in the world, said it had contingency plans in case the conflict disrupted flows from the region. There is a risk that a blockage in the strait of Hormuz could shock the energy market.Speaking at an energy conference in Tokyo, Wael Sawan, the chief executive of Shell, said: “If that artery is blocked, for whatever reason, it has a huge impact on global trade… We have plans in the eventuality that things deteriorate.”About a quarter of the world’s oil trade passes through the strait of Hormuz, which links the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean
Federal Reserve holds interest rates, defying Trump’s demand to lower them
The US Federal Reserve kept interest rates on hold, but signaled it might make two cuts this year, as Donald Trump continues to break with precedent and demand lower rates.Policymakers at the American central bank lifted their projections for inflation this year, as the US president stands by his controversial tariff plans, and downgraded their estimates for economic growth.Uncertainty has faded, they said, but remains significant. The Fed chair, Jerome Powell, cautioned that officials expect tariffs imposed by Trump to increase prices over the course of the summer.“Increases in tariffs this year are likely to push up prices and weigh on economic activity,” Powell told reporters
John Lewis tells some head office staff to work in office at least three days a week
John Lewis is asking some head office staff to spend at least three days a week in the office or out on the road in the latest shift away from working from home.The department store group said members of its commercial teams – which include those working in buying and merchandising – should work no more than two days a week from home from July. Previously they were allowed to work up to three days a week at home.The change at the employee-owned group, which is renowned for its good treatment of workers, including access to holiday homes and a generous pension scheme, comes amid a broader shift among businesses ranging from the retailer Boots to Amazon and JP Morgan, which have told staff they must return five days a week.Last month, HSBC told staff in its UK high street banks that it may cut their bonuses if they did not work in the office at least 60% of the time
What could Albanese do to improve productivity? Here is a short, non-exhaustive list | Greg Jericho
In his address last week at the National Press Club, the prime minister announced a “productivity roundtable” in concert with the Productivity Commission’s latest inquiry into the issue. I won’t be at the roundtable but I do have a few ideas.First off, remember that productivity is the amount you produce with the hours and equipment you have. Work better with what you have or (usually) get better equipment to do your work faster, and productivity increases.It is not about reducing the cost of producing things
Keir Starmer needs to crack down on misconduct in politics, John Major says
‘He just told me lies to have sex with a teenage girl’: Natalie Fleet MP on grooming, statutory rape and fighting back
Keir Starmer to chair emergency Cobra meeting to discuss Israel-Iran conflict
UK benefits system could collapse if payments are not cut, Liz Kendall says
DWP says transitional payments scheme for those losing Pip ‘one of most generous ever’ – UK politics live
The Philpster exhausts his repertoire with return to Rwanda at PMQs | John Crace