This is not the answer to the threats Britain faces | Letters
The strategic defence review is premised on an increasing threat in Europe from Russian territorial expansion (Keir Starmer vows to make Britain ‘battle-ready’ as he unveils defence spending plans, 2 June),The lessons of Ukraine underline the reality of that threat,But there are other threats to the UK that require engagement across the world and that will not be solved by more drones and more bullets,Battles for territory and for political power beyond Ukraine result in death and despair for millions,Climate change, deepening inequality, poverty, famine and the displacement of populations generate humanitarian agendas that a country such as ours should respond to.
They also constitute threats to us.We should not dispense with foreign aid to bolster a narrow perception of what we need to defend against.But what about cost?As Dan Sabbagh asks (Spending constrains Labour’s defence review – but no harm in gradualism, 2 June), even if we accept the need to strengthen the readiness of our conventional forces, why do we need to spend more on nuclear weapons?The existing nuclear deterrent is dreadful in and of itself.Even if we are uncertain about the US’s resolve, the UK and France could unleash mass destruction with what they have now.Surely we cannot see a scenario when we would need to, or choose to, deploy nuclear weapons on the battlefield?We should redirect the funding for more nuclear weapons in the defence review to overseas aid.
It’s not enough, but it does signal that we are not being diverted in our commitment to those in the most dire need across the world by the agenda of Vladimir Putin and his coterie in Moscow.Neil SmallLeeds Traditionally, we have seen our armed forces as being necessary to protect Britain’s territorial integrity and safeguard our way of life and independence.As Dan Sabbagh points out, our territorial integrity is not under threat.As for our way of life and independence, there is no threat to this from Vladimir Putin: he does not appear to have any interest in the way we conduct our internal affairs, and even if he did, there is not much leverage he could apply.The same cannot be said for the American administration, which can exercise enormous leverage over our government and has distinct ideas about how it would like to influence our internal affairs, made painfully clear by JD Vance in his Munich speech earlier this year.
Part of this leverage resides in the nature of the dependence of British armed forces on American equipment and support.Under the defence review, this degree of dependence will remain – we will be renewing our nuclear deterrent (missiles provided by the US) and probably buying more equipment from the US.Should we not be looking at decoupling ourselves from the US rather than exposing ourselves to pressure from a potentially malevolent government? Richard HendersonBristol One must presume that our “battle-ready” prime minister did not read your exemplary interview with Neta Crawford last week (How the US became the biggest military emitter and stopped everyone finding out, 30 May), outlining her analysis of the true costs to the biosphere of an escalation in military spending.Or does not care.The economics aside, the political choices before Keir Starmer and all global leaders in this Anthropocene twilight of “ecological collapse” (‘Half the tree of life’: ecologists’ horror as nature reserves are emptied of insects, 3 June) are exquisitely stark.
Either they devote their full energies to the climate emergency and so genuinely lead in attempting to heal an international system’s self-destructive path to planetary annihilation,Or they reprise the last cold-war, nuclear-tipped, military confrontation of the 1980s and so, this time, seal it,Which is it to be? Dr Mark Levene New Radnor, Powys The prime minister proposes to increase conventional defence spending and bring back a form of national service to “make Britain safer”,But documents in the House of Commons library state that we will be spending £118bn between 2023 and 2033 on our nuclear deterrent,If nuclear weapons aren’t keeping us safe, what is the point of them? Why not spend this huge sum on social care, housing and other similar projects that would benefit the whole community.
Most people would then be happy to let the prime minister have his soldiers, while life improves for everyone else,Peter Loschi Oldham, Greater Manchester Zoe Williams’ description of sexual violence in war was a hard read, but a timely reminder, given the bullish talk flowing from the strategic defence review, that war is always an atrocity in one form or another (The story of war is one of kidnapping, slavery and rape,And what we talk about is strategy and territory, 2 June),The second world war ended with the atrocities of atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki,I support strengthening our defences to keep Britain safe from attack, but if nuclear weapons are part of that, let us remember that they are a deterrent, not an opportunity.
Anne ConstantineGreat Gransden, Cambridgeshire
EU agrees to increase flight delay times before passengers get compensation
EU countries have agreed to increase the amount of time aircraft passengers are delayed before they can qualify for compensation.Passengers on short-haul flights would have to be delayed by four hours or more before they could claim compensation, under the plans. For long-haul flights delays would have to be six or more hours. Current EU rules dictate that passengers can ask for compensation if their flight is delayed for more than three hours.The EU countries also agreed to increase the amount of compensation for those delayed on short-haul flights from €250 (£211) to €300, but plan to reduce compensation for long-haul flights from €600 to €500
Donald Trump calls for big cut to US interest rates after jobs report shows hiring slowdown – as it happened
Newsflash: Hiring slowed across the US economy last month, and fewer jobs were created than previously thought in March and April too.The US added 139,000 new jobs in May, according to the latest non-farm payroll report, with the US unemployment rate unchanged at 4.2%.Economists had expected the non-farm payroll to rise by 130,000 jobs, so this is slightly higher than forecast.The U
Shopper put on facial ID watchlist after dispute over 39p of paracetamol at Home Bargains
A London woman has made a data complaint after discovering she had been put on a facial recognition camera watchlist at a Home Bargains store after a dispute over 39p worth of paracetamol.She learned of her entry on a database of banned customers when a member of staff at the store in Grove Farm retail park in Chadwell Heath asked her to leave and directed her attention to a Facewatch sign.Facewatch is a facial recognition system used by retailers to identify and deter shoplifters by analysing CCTV footage and comparing faces against a private database of known offenders. It triggers an alert to staff when a match is made by the software.Stores including Asda, Budgens, Sports Direct and Costcutter have used the technology, despite privacy campaigners arguing that the surveillance infringes the rights of shoppers
Trump says Musk has ‘lost his mind’ and dismisses peace offering
Donald Trump appeared to dismiss a peace overture from his former close political ally Elon Musk on Friday, calling him someone who had “lost his mind” as the extraordinary falling out between the two men looked set to continue.The US president and the richest person in the world – who had been tasked with slashing the federal government – fell out in spectacular fashion on Thursday in a series of escalating social media posts that roiled the political world.On Friday, ABC News interviewed Trump by phone and he doubled down on his newfound hostility to Musk, who had backed him with millions of dollars in the 2024 election campaign.The news channel asked Trump about reports of a call scheduled with Musk for later in the day. “You mean the man who has lost his mind?” Trump replied, saying he was “not particularly” interested in talking to him right now
French Open 2025 semi-finals: Alcaraz battles past Musetti, Sinner v Djokovic to come – live
Tomorrow, of course, we’ll be bringing you the women’s final between the top two seeds, Aryna Sabalenka and Coco Gauff. It’s hard to look beyond the former, who’s playing better and absolutely devastated Iga Swiatek in the deciding set of the semi. But Gauff has a terrific temperament and an equally good backhand, knows she can win a major, and that she’s facing an opponent who isn’t totally at home on clay and still has a collapse in her. Sabalenka remains a warm favourite, but she is pregnable.TNT have just shown a great little spot with Andre Agassi, who says that of the three best movers on tour, De Minaur and Paul are 5% slower on clay, where Alcaraz is only 1 or 2% down
Horse racing: Minnie Hauk holds on for Oaks glory after thrilling Epsom duel – live
5.10pm Debenhams Handicap bettingMiss Information 2/1Partisan Hero 9/2Rhoscolyn 9/2Stanage 8/1Alzahir 12/1Majestic Wave 14/1Darkness 18/1Legal Reform 22/1Marlay Park 25/1Samuel Colt 33/1Persuasion 40/1Golden Mind 40/1Full betting via Oddschecker5.10pm Debenhams HandicapThe getting-out race on the Friday card has not been much of a friend to the punters in recent seasons, with relatively unfancied winners in the last three seasons including Bowman, at 80-1, in 2022, and it is probably not a race to get seriously involved with this time around, either. That said, Rhoscolyn will be a popular pick to win it for a third time, after going in at 9-2 and 9-1 in 2021 and 2024 respectively, while ALZAHIR, at around 10-1,could well step up on his run behind Old Cock in a strong race at York last time.SELECTION: ALZAHIR1 Mirsky (Oisin Murphy) 9-4 Fav 2 Alpha Crucis (Jason Watson) 8-1 3 Julia Augusta (Tom Marquand) 40-1 10 ran Non Runner: 104
Amazon promises fake reviews crackdown after investigation by UK watchdog
23andMe back on the auction block after former CEO makes 11th-hour bid
UK sales of new Tesla cars slump by more than a third amid Musk backlash
Amazon ‘testing humanoid robots to deliver packages’
English-speaking countries more nervous about rise of AI, polls suggest
Trump family disown debut of crypto wallet: ‘I know nothing about this project!’