The Starmtrooper rebellion: welfare bill showed Labour’s new MPs have minds of their own

A picture


As Labour officials sounded warnings to Downing Street last month about the scale of the rebellion against the government’s welfare bill, one concern was particularly stark: many of the supposedly loyal 2024 intake were among the rebels.Officials were told not to worry, however, sources have told the Guardian.Many of those MPs had been personally selected at the general election by Morgan McSweeney and other senior advisers to Keir Starmer.The “Starmtroopers”, as they had come to be known, could be talked down with a simple phone call.This week’s dramatic events in the Commons, when ministers had to gut their own bill less than two hours before a vote when confronted with a widespread and sustained rebellion, have proved the folly of making assumptions about the class of 2024.

Far from being blindly loyal, these 243 MPs have proved in their first year to be a diverse, wilful and occasionally troublesome group to manage.“We are showing ourselves to be slightly less controllable by the party than people would have thought,” said one.Another added: “They are finding out we are capable of independent thought, because many of us have actually lived a life beforehand.We are not just lobby fodder [MPs who have little role but to vote as they are told].”Among the new Labour MPs were Chris Ward, Starmer’s former chief of staff, who is now his parliamentary aide; Georgia Gould, the former head of Starmer’s local Camden council, and Josh Simons, the former head of the Starmerite thinktank Labour Together, who did all vote for the bill on Tuesday.

Several were selected late in the day, leading to accusations that the leadership was “parachuting in” its favoured candidates before local activists could object.They included Torsten Bell, the former head of the Resolution Foundation thinktank, and Luke Akehurst, a member of Labour’s governing national executive committee.But several of the new intake have participated, or even spearheaded, rebellions against the government in their first 12 months.Chris Hinchliff, the MP for North East Hertfordshire, led a rebellion against the planning bill.His colleague Neil Duncan-Jordan, organised one against the cuts to winter fuel payments.

Duncan-Jordan is emblematic of a particular sort of new MP: the 33 “bonus” Labour MPs who were not expected to win their seats and are proving difficult to whip.This was abundantly clear during this week’s standoff between the government and backbenchers.Out of the 126 signatories to the first reasoned amendment, which would have put the bill on pause indefinitely, 70 were newly elected MPs.They included Yuan Yang, the former Financial Times journalist, and Polly Billington, who advised Ed Miliband when he was Labour leader.“The Starmtrooper stuff was completely insane,” said one former Labour adviser who was close to the selection process.

“These are a clever, impressive group of people.But with that comes independent thought.”Labour insiders say there are several reasons this intake of MPs is proving trickier to manage than expected.Beyond the bonus MPs, many of whom were not carefully vetted, there is a far larger group of members who have brought with them expertise from various sectors of society and are unwilling to act against the interests of those they used to represent.Marie Tidball, for example, introduced Starmer on stage at the Labour conference in 2023.

But as a disabled MP and long-term campaigner for disability rights, she was unwilling to vote for the welfare bill, and gave one of the most powerful speeches in the Commons against it.Others say Downing Street has been poor at giving roles to MPs who might be newly elected but are often experienced in politics or other fields.“I’m a campaigner,” said one.“But I’ve not been given any campaigning to do.I’ve had to invent my own local campaigns to run.

”The truculence of the new intake is causing irritation for some in the party,One new MP who has remained loyal to the leadership said: “There is a lot of political naivety here,They don’t understand that a year after a historic victory, we shouldn’t be undermining the leadership that helped get them elected,”Another ally said previous generations of MPs had been bound together by traumatic events in the past, which had taken some of the heat out of regular Commons votes,“This group hasn’t voted on a war yet, or seen one of their colleagues killed,” the person said.

Some round the prime minister are worried that this group of MPs now has a taste for rebellion and will do it again in the future,Several are now sounding the alarm about their concerns relating to proposed changes to special educational needs, which are due to be published in the autumn,Others believe the experience of the last week might have had the opposite effect, and scared many off trying the same tactics again,“At times it felt like we came close to toppling the government,” said one new MP,“We won’t try that again in a hurry.

politicsSee all
A picture

Seven of Labour’s newest MPs look back on a ‘relentless’ first year

Labour won hundreds of new MPs in the 2024 general election. One year later, how do they think the government is doing?Labour’s first year back in power has been marked by high stakes and harsh realities.Despite ambitious promises, the party has struggled to maintain the support of voters – reflected in low poll numbers and a near defeat on its big welfare legislation.For new MPs the challenge has been to push urgent reforms while navigating Westminster’s unforgiving terrain.Seven rising Labour voices speak about the year that has tested them all

A picture

Streeting sets out digital overhaul of NHS centred on ‘doctor in your pocket’ app

Wes Streeting has staked the future of the NHS on a digital overhaul in which a beefed-up NHS app and new hospital league tables are intended to give patients unprecedented control over their care.A dramatic expansion of the role of the NHS app will result in fewer staff than expected by 2035, with Streeting banking on digital efficiencies to reduce the number of frontline workers, a move described as a “large bet” by health experts.The digital tool will enable patients to self-refer when they need help, book appointments with clinicians, receive advice from an AI GP or see their medical records.“The NHS app will become a doctor in your pocket, bringing our health service into the 21st century,” the health secretary said as he launched the government’s much-trailed 10-year health plan.Highlighting that those who use private healthcare already get instant advice, remote consultations with a doctor and choice over their appointments, he promised that “our reforms will bring those services to every patient, regardless of their ability to pay”

A picture

The Starmtrooper rebellion: welfare bill showed Labour’s new MPs have minds of their own

As Labour officials sounded warnings to Downing Street last month about the scale of the rebellion against the government’s welfare bill, one concern was particularly stark: many of the supposedly loyal 2024 intake were among the rebels.Officials were told not to worry, however, sources have told the Guardian. Many of those MPs had been personally selected at the general election by Morgan McSweeney and other senior advisers to Keir Starmer.The “Starmtroopers”, as they had come to be known, could be talked down with a simple phone call.This week’s dramatic events in the Commons, when ministers had to gut their own bill less than two hours before a vote when confronted with a widespread and sustained rebellion, have proved the folly of making assumptions about the class of 2024

A picture

Anti-apartheid activists would have been called terrorists under logic banning Palestine Action, Peter Hain says – as it happened

The Labour peer Peter Hain, who was a leading anti-apartheid campaigner in the UK and who led the direct action protests that disrupted South African rugby and cricket tours in 1969 and 1970, told peers that he was “deeply ashamed” that his party was banning Palestine Action.If he was doing that today, he would be “stigmatised as a terrorist, rather than vilified, as indeed I then was”, he said. He went on:That militant action could have been blocked by this motion [the order banning Palestine Action] as could other anti-apartheid activity, including militant protests to stop Barclays Bank recruiting new students on university campuses, eventually forcing Barclays to withdraw from apartheid South Africa.Remember also that Nelson Mandela was labelled a “terrorist” by the apartheid government, by British prime minister Maragret Thatcher, by the United States and other Western governments during much of the Cold War.Mandela even remained on the US terrorism watchlist until 2008, many years after becoming South Africa’s first democratically elected president and receiving the Nobel Peace Prize

A picture

Welfare reform bill fiasco re-empowers parliament | Letters

The one upside that the government can draw from the welfare reform bill debacle is that it demonstrates the genuine tension between the different roles of parliament and government (Keir Starmer forced into dramatic climbdown to pass welfare reform bill, 1 July). It can be presented as chiming in with the view of many voters that politics today does not work and that all governments simply do what benefits themselves.The government’s failure to forge a constructive relationship with its backbench Labour MPs lies at the heart of its need for the last-minute revisions of its proposals, but a recharging of that relationship could well resonate with the electorate.For voters, it is the way that they see their representative that has the most significance. Each MP has the difficult task of balancing their responsibilities to their constituents, their party and their consciences

A picture

SMILE, it’s just a normal day for Labour’s happy family of Keir, Rachel and Wes | John Crace

The show must go on. Less than 48 hours after the government’s welfare bill was left in tatters and a day after Rachel Reeves breaking down in tears at prime minister’s questions had caused falls in the financial markets, Keir Starmer, his chancellor and the health secretary were keen to present a clean slate.Everything was totally normal. Couldn’t be more normal. This had been just another ordinary week in Westminster