V&A censored catalogues after demands by Chinese printer
One of the UK’s leading museums has accepted demands by a Chinese firm that publishes its catalogues to remove images that fall foul of the country’s censorship laws.The Victoria and Albert Museum has agreed to requests by the Chinese printing company to delete maps and images from at least two recent exhibition catalogues, according to documents released to the Guardian after freedom of information requests.Like other prominent institutions, including the British Museum, Tate and the British Library, the V&A often uses Chinese printers because they can produce catalogues at half the cost of British or European companies.But in doing so, they have to accede to censorship requests relating to any topics or images deemed sensitive by the Chinese government, such as Buddhism, Taiwan, Tibet, Tiananmen Square and pro-democracy activities.The disclosures from the V&A lay bare the detailed scope of China’s censorship on museum publishers.
They show how Beijing’s red pen even extends to historical maps and photographs on seemingly unrelated subjects such as Fabergé eggs and British Black music.They also show the apparent willingness of a publicly funded UK institution to agree to Chinese suppression despite the problems it can cause in the production process.For the catalogue of the Music is Black exhibition, which opens this Friday, the V&A wanted to use a 1930s illustration of trade routes of the British empire.But an email from the V&A’s Chinese printers sent last November said it had fallen foul of Beijing’s censorship body, the General Administration of Press and Publication or GAPP.The email from the Chinese printers, C&C Offset Printing, said: “There is a map on p10 relates to China (there is China border here and we need to use the standard maps from Chinese Government) and GAPP rejected it.
Our suggestion is to delete this map or use another image.”The V&A agreed despite bafflement at the decision.An internal email exchange between V&A colleagues revealed the censorship had caused a delay in printing the catalogue.It said: “It’s a historic map showing British colonial rule so nothing to do with China – just shows China on the map and that seems to be enough to warrant rejection! Printing paused while we amend files … SORRY.”The map was due to illustrate an introduction to the catalogue by Gus Casely-Hayford, the director of V&A East.
An email to him said it was too late to find alternative printers.It said: “We were aware of sensitivity around contemporary maps but it now clearly applies to historic maps too.As we have ordered the paper to the printer it is sadly too late to move print to Europe, so we’ve had to put back the schedule a week in order to find a replacement illustration.”Casely-Hayford replied by saying: “So sorry- must have been very stressful.” He also suggested replacing the censored map with a Dennis Moore photograph.
Eventually the V&A used a photo of people arriving in Southampton on the liner Begoña after a voyage from the West Indies.The V&A also agreed to pull another map it wanted to use for catalogue to a 2021 exhibition Fabergé: Romance to Revolution.It also removed a photograph of Lenin from the book because the Chinese printers said Lenin could be deemed “sensitive” by GAPP.An email from the V&A production team to one of its curators expressed frustration at the censorship.It said: “The Chinese printer is not able to print the book with the revolution/Lenin image at the start of your essay.
I should have foreseen this, but the list of restrictions is ever changing.”The V&A said in a statement that the changes demanded by China on these catalogues were “minor”.It said: “We carefully consider, on a case-by-case basis, where we print all of our books.We sometimes print in China, but maintain close editorial oversight.We were comfortable making minor edits, as they did not affect the narrative and we would obviously pull production if we felt any requested change was problematic.
”The Tate, the British Museum and the British Library have all also used Chinese printers on recent catalogues and books currently available for sale in their shops.The British Museum refused to respond to questions about how it dealt with any China censorship requests on at least eight recent publications it has had printed in China.A spokesperson said: “We work with a range of printers across Europe and Asia.Print orders are placed with suppliers based on a number of factors including quality, availability of materials, schedules and cost.” They added: “We won’t be commenting any further on the matter.
”The British Museum is chaired by George Osborne, who as chancellor championed closer economic links with Beijing and promoted a “golden decade” in UK-China relations,The British Library claimed it had never had an issue with censorship on the catalogues it had printed in China,A Tate spokesperson confirmed Chinese printers had published several of its children’s books and some catalogues, but added: “Tate Publishing has never changed the content of any books at the request of a printer,”A UK publisher who asked not to be named said: “We have tried to print in this country, but is just very expensive,We just had a quote from a Welsh printer that was double what we’re paying in China.
There is always a delay in the print process while it goes through a body in China that checks up things.There are sensitivities about maps and anything that mentions Tibet for example.”A former employee of C&C Offset Printing said: “Of course printing content disapproved by Chinese government is forbidden.Why should it be surprising? It’s a Chinese company.”
Five key questions: who overruled decision to deny Mandelson security clearance?
The revelation that Peter Mandelson failed his security vetting clearance, only for the decision to be overruled by the Foreign Office so he could take up his post as ambassador to the US, raises a number of questions.According to multiple sources, Mandelson was initially denied clearance in late January 2025 after a developed vetting process, a type of a highly confidential background check carried out by UK Security Vetting (UKSV), a division of the Cabinet Office.By that stage he had already been announced as Keir Starmer’s pick for ambassador in Washington. Within two days, the Foreign Office had overruled the UKSV decision, granting him clearance despite the recommendation from security officials. It is not known who made the decision to overrule security officials, or why
Officials debate withholding Mandelson vetting documents from parliament
Exclusive: Opinions split on ‘unprecedented’ release of files, despite demand for ‘all papers’ related to ex-US ambassador’s appointmentRevealed: Mandelson failed vetting but Foreign Office overruled decisionFive key questions: who overruled decision to deny Mandelson security clearance?Senior government officials have been considering whether to withhold from parliament sensitive documents that show Peter Mandelson failed security vetting before he assumed the role of US ambassador, the Guardian can reveal.Any such decision could amount to an extraordinary breach of a parliamentary vote that ordered the release of “all papers” relevant to Mandelson’s appointment.The Guardian has revealed that Mandelson did not receive vetting clearance from security officials, but that their decision was overruled by the Foreign Office to ensure he could take up his post.According to multiple sources, officials across government have been in dispute over whether to release documents that would reveal those facts, and other information about Mandelson’s security vetting, to the parliamentary intelligence and security committee (ISC).The committee has been entrusted by parliament with the role of assessing the most sensitive papers relating to Mandelson’s appointment
Revealed: Mandelson failed vetting but Foreign Office overruled decision
Guardian investigation uncovers decision by UK security officials to deny clearance before Mandelson took up role as US ambassadorOfficials debate withholding Mandelson vetting documents from parliamentFive key questions: Who overruled the decision to deny Mandelson security clearance?Peter Mandelson failed his security vetting clearance but the decision was overruled by the Foreign Office to ensure he could take up his post as ambassador to the US, an investigation by the Guardian can reveal.According to multiple sources, Mandelson was initially denied clearance in late January 2025 after a developed vetting process, a highly confidential background check by security officials.Keir Starmer had by then announced he would be making Mandelson the UK’s chief diplomat in Washington, posing a dilemma for officials at the Foreign Office, who decided to use a rarely used authority to override the recommendation from security officials.Mandelson’s failure to secure vetting approval has not previously been publicly revealed, despite intense scrutiny over his appointment and the release by the government of 147 pages of documents supposed to shed light on the case.Further documents are due to be released
Blue Labour gets bluer with MP’s noble quest for a summer of sex | John Crace
We could almost be back in the San Francisco of the 1960s. Tune in, turn on, drop out. Make love not war. A hippy counterculture that turned its back on the American involvement in Vietnam. One determined to shape a new world order
CEO of bitcoin firm championed by Nigel Farage leaves company
The chief executive of a bitcoin company promoted by Nigel Farage has left his role as the venture attempts to convince investors that it is going to deliver “long-term value” for shareholders.Stack BTC was launched to much fanfare in March this year, with Farage and former chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng becoming some of its first shareholders. The company says its founder is Paul Withers, a friend of the Reform UK leader who owns a gold bullion company that Farage has also promoted, Direct Bullion.However, Stack BTC is a renamed company which was founded in 2021 by Jai Patel, whose departure as chief executive was announced on Wednesday. The company, formerly called Kasei Investment Holdings, invested in cryptocurrency and a range of other digital assets
David Lammy still plays an important role in UK foreign policy – but he is not the only one
The first foreign official JD Vance met with after he returned from peace talks with Iran in Islamabad this week was not a diplomat or foreign policy official – it was David Lammy, the UK’s justice secretary and deputy prime minister.Lammy will follow his trip to Washington, where he saw the vice-president and the secretary of state, Marco Rubio, with another to Barcelona, where he will represent the UK at a conference of global progressives, and then one to the Gulf.The whistle-stop diplomacy from the former foreign secretary has prompted questions in Whitehall over who is really driving the government’s foreign policy at a time when it is more important than ever.“Obviously the prime minister is in charge of the government’s foreign policy, especially when it is so important domestically as well,” said one government official.“Beneath him though there are quite a lot of people all of whom are doing slightly different jobs and who think of themselves as the real foreign secretary
Andy Simpson, the unluckiest England rugby player in history, finally gets his Test cap
Will revival of Crystal Palace’s ‘hallowed turf’ create more athletics history?
The secret is out as Wests Tigers threaten to end 15-year NRL finals drought | Jack Snape
LIV Golf meeting in New York fuels speculation over rebel tour’s future
Sir Craig Reedie obituary
Unhappy Verstappen ‘has to be listened to’ over new rules, says F1 chief Domenicali