Tough talk from Streeting – but he still needs a deal with big pharma

A picture


Wes Streeting gets top marks for fighting talk in his battle with the pharmaceutical companies over the price of prescription medicines,After the health secretary walked away from talks with the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) on Friday, he stuck the boot in,The “shortsighted” pharma industry had rejected “a serious and generous” offer, he said,It should be more “collaborative” instead of making “unaffordable” demands,The government could not allow British patients and taxpayers to be ripped off.

Yet Streeting surely also knows this standoff cannot be allowed to last indefinitely.Portraying the pharma companies as greedy may be good political theatre – and, since we are talking about some of the world’s biggest and richest corporations, the sentiment is hardly controversial.But at the end of this process the government still needs a deal.If not, its boasts about making the UK a life sciences “superpower” will ring hollow.And the cold reality, unfortunately, is that Streeting is negotiating with global companies that also have reasons to play hard.

The new ingredient in the mix is the Trump factor.The US president’s demand that global pharma companies reduce their US drug prices to European levels has turned the spotlight on the UK like never before.The companies do not want the UK, a mere 2.5% of the global market, to be used as a price reference point for the more important (for them) US market.As life looks from the boardrooms of big pharma, there is a danger in allowing the UK to continue to enjoy better terms on drug prices than much of the rest of rich Europe.

In the old days there was an inbuilt acceptance that the UK would get decent terms, relatively speaking.The NHS carried the pricing muscle of being a single buyer, and the UK could offer soft “ecosystem” benefits, such as excellent research facilities, links with universities and the ability to run clinical trials on development drugs at scale.For 70-odd years, deals were done under “voluntary” price schemes that were not really voluntary because the non-volunteered terms were worse.The pure Trumpian focus on price has changed the dynamic – and, critically, it has landed as relations between the UK and the industry have been deteriorating for about a decade.The companies’ longstanding grumble is that the voluntary price scheme, designed to promote innovation while protecting the NHS budget, has spat out bigger and bigger clawback payments to the NHS on prescription medicines.

Last year’s tally was 23%, compared with single-digit levels under comparable schemes in the rest of Europe.The other complaint is about the willingness to buy new medicines in the first place.The “value for money” criteria applied to new drugs by Nice, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, have not changed since 2001.Add it all up and the key statistic, as the ABPI and its members point out loudly, is that the UK spends only 9% of its healthcare budget on prescription medicines, versus 17% in Germany and Italy and 15% in France.A clash looked inevitable at some point; the Trump factor has probably accelerated events.

In Streeting’s shoes, his offer probably did feel serious – net spending on medicines would increase by about £1bn over the next three years with billions more promised over the next decade.For a government as cash-strapped as the UK’s, that does count as generous.But you also see why for, say, the average chief executive of a big US pharma company who lives in fear of Trump’s demands on prices, it didn’t move the dial.The £1bn sum is in the context of projected clawback payments, according to the industry, of £13.5bn over the next three years.

And the promise to raise UK spending on medicines from 0.3% of GDP to 0.6% is a good intention rather than a solid commitment.It is hard to know where this quarrel goes next.In theory, the current voluntary agreement can run unaltered all the way to 2028, but if that were to happen it would be a disaster for the government’s life sciences strategy.

While there is posturing on all sides, the companies clearly are not making it up entirely when they say investment tends to go to where innovation is rewarded, as they see it.AstraZeneca’s recent $50bn (£37bn) investment in the US is a case in point; in one sense, it was political.Sign up to Business TodayGet set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morningafter newsletter promotionOne can sympathise with Streeting’s predicament.He is obliged to take a UK-centric view of budgets but is dealing with a global industry.He has also inherited tensions that have been a decade in the making and were made worse by the Covid pandemic.

And it may be that no deal is possible until it is clearer what Trump has in store for US prescription drug prices and tariffs on imported medicines.But the bottom line is still that the UK cannot afford to have dysfunctional relations with an industry it regards, rightly, as crucial to its growth strategy.Sooner or later, negotiations will have to resume.
societySee all
A picture

Some of us boomers would love to downsize – but where to? | Letters

Philip Inman takes a very London-centric view (Can a nation in crisis rely on the baby boomer generation to step up? I think the UK is about to find out, 21 August). Certainly in my small northern town, retirees haven’t had a financial bonanza from property price hikes. Also in my part of the world services that used to be provided by local authorities are now largely undertaken by an army of older people, including litterpicking, gardening in communal areas, local radio, school holiday activities for children, and food bank collection and delivery. Not to mention the myriad charities who couldn’t provide services without the time given by retirees.At the moment older people are reluctant to move into the housing provided by some private developers, as this can leave a financial headache for their children when they die

A picture

Domestic violence screening tool should be replaced, Jess Phillips says

The main screening tool used to determine which domestic violence victims need support has “obvious problems” and should be replaced, the UK safeguarding minister, Jess Phillips, has said.Phillips is reviewing systems, including the Dash (domestic abuse, stalking, harassment and “honour-based” violence) questionnaire, largely relied on by police, social services and healthcare workers across the UK since 2009 to assess risk.Academics and others working in the sector have raised concerns about the 27-question tool, which assesses answers to decide which respondents are deemed high risk so they can be referred to specialist care.Phillips told the BBC’s File on 4 that she was reviewing the entire system supporting victims but said it would not change overnight.“My instinct is that the tool doesn’t work, but until I can replace it with something that does, we have to make the very best of the system that we have,” Phillips said

A picture

Ovarian cancer blood test can detect disease early, study suggests

Scientists have developed a simple blood test to spot ovarian cancer early that could “significantly improve” outcomes for women with the disease.More than 300,000 women, mostly over the age of 50, are diagnosed worldwide each year, according to the World Cancer Research Fund. Ovarian cancer is often diagnosed late, which makes treating the condition more difficult.The test trialled by UK and US researchers looks for two different types of blood markers in those showing symptoms of the disease, which include pelvic pain and a bloated tummy. It then uses machine learning to recognise patterns that would be difficult for humans to detect

A picture

UK to clarify definition of ‘honour’-based abuse in drive to cut violence against women and girls

Ministers are introducing a clearer legal definition of “honour”-based abuse in an attempt to catch more perpetrators and protect women and girls from violence and coercion.The law change is intended to improve how public services respond to “honour”-based abuse in England and Wales, and forms part of Labour’s plan for change, which includes a pledge to halve violence against women and girls.Teachers, police officers, social workers and healthcare workers will receive training to spot the signs of “honour”-based abuse and better support victims, while an awareness-raising campaign will encourage victims to come forward.Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, said: “All forms of ‘honour’-based abuse are devastating crimes that can shatter lives. There is no ‘honour’ in them

A picture

UK mothers earn £302 a week less than fathers, analysis shows

Women with children earn £302 less every week than men with children: one-third less per week and almost 20% less per hour, according to analysis based on ONS data.This means that Mums’ Equal Pay Day falls on 1 September this year, almost three months earlier than Equal Pay Day for all women. From this date, mothers are working for free for the rest of the year compared with fathers.“The reason the gender pay gap worsens so significantly after having children is because starting a family has a disproportionately negative impact on women’s earnings,” said Joeli Brearley, the founder of Growth Spurt, an online back-to-work scheme for parents.The analysis has been acknowledged as accurate by the Office for National Statistics

A picture

Maroushka Monro obituary

My friend Maroushka Monro, who has died aged 78, was a writer, poet, counsellor and at one time an agony aunt.In the booming magazine world of the 1980s, her writing talent earned her a job assisting Katie Boyle, the agony aunt at TV Times. Then she was headhunted by the teen magazine Just Seventeen, where for three years, from 1988 until 1991, she put heart and soul into her role as their agony aunt. She would typically receive up to 800 letters a week, and would frequently respond directly and personally to her readers.Maroushka was forced to relinquish her job because of illness, in the form of the highly debilitating condition spasmodic torticollis, which caused her head to turn rigidly to one side