Denmark welcomes Trump ruling out force to take Greenland, before ‘future deal’ framework announced – as it happened

A picture


Denmark’s foreign minister has said Donald Trump’s statement that he would not use force to take Greenland was positive, even though the US president hasn’t dropped his ambitions to acquire the islandLars Lokke Rasmussen told reporters (Bloomberg reports):“What is clear after this speech is that the president’s ambition [to own Greenland] remains intact,“It is, in isolation, positive that it is being said that military force will not be used, but that does not make the problem go away,The challenge is still there,”Big breaking news tonight from Davos: Donald Trump has announced that he and Nato chief Mark Rutte have agreed the framework of a “future deal” over Greenland,It’s not clear what the details are – Trump says the proposed solution would be a great one for the US, and all NATO NationsAnd significantly, Trump says he won’t impose the 10% tariffs threatened on eight European countries including the UK.

Here’s the post, from Trump’s Truth Social site:Based upon a very productive meeting that I have had with the Secretary General of NATO, Mark Rutte, we have formed the framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland and, in fact, the entire Arctic Region.This solution, if consummated, will be a great one for the United States of America, and all NATO Nations.Based upon this understanding, I will not be imposing the Tariffs that were scheduled to go into effect on February 1st.Additional discussions are being held concerning The Golden Dome as it pertains to Greenland.Further information will be made available as discussions progress.

Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, and various others, as needed, will be responsible for the negotiations — They will report directly to me,Thank you for your attention to this matter!DONALD J,TRUMP PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAOur US Politics Live blog is tracking all the developments, with Shrai Popat, here:Donald Trump ruled out using military force to annex Greenland, but called for “immediate negotiations” to acquire the Arctic island,The US president also told world leaders at the World Economic Form at Davos that a US acquisition of Greenland would strengthen the Nato alliance,Meanwhile at several points during his speech, Trump appeared to confuse Greenland with Iceland, claiming “Iceland” had caused a drop in stock prices yesterday – when markets fell as a result of his threat to impose new tariffs on eight European countries.

The White House swiftly did its best to deny the confusion,The US president repeated his usual claims that Nato has treated the US unfairly, and “it’s time that Nato steps up” as “we are helping them with Ukraine”,He claimed that Greenland costs Denmark “hundreds of millions a year to run it”, and while Denmark is “a small country and wonderful people, it is very expensive” for “a very big piece of ice”,He also repeated his – offensive – questioning of whether Nato “would be there for us” (see also: 9/11),The European parliament suspended work on the EU-US trade deal, in protest against Trump’s threat to impose 10% tariffs on EU exports unless the bloc supports his bid to take over Greenland.

Bernd Lange, head of the European parliament trade committee, said until “the threats [on Greenland] are over there will be no possibility for compromise” on ratifying the US deal, which promised Americans a new era of 0% tariffs on many industrial exports.And a meeting between Trump and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy is expected to take place tomorrow, with the US president saying on Wednesday that “we are reasonably close to deal on Ukraine”.Earlier, we reported that Donald Trump appeared to confuse Greenland with Iceland during his speech in Davos, and – despite what we all heard – the White House is now steadfastly denying that there was a mix-up at all.To elaborate on our earlier post, in one of several such mix-ups, Trump said:They’re [Nato] not there for us on Iceland, that I can tell you, I mean our stock market took the first dip yesterday because of Iceland, so Iceland’s already cost us a lot of money.Despite this fact, in response to a journalist highlighting Trump’s mix-ups on X, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt hit back with this denial:No he didn’t, Libby.

His written remarks referred to Greenland as a ‘piece of ice’ because that’s what it is,You’re the only one mixing anything up here,Leavitt included a screenshot of a search for Greenland featuring a picture of a block of ice in the sea in front of some land,The Norwegian finance minister and former Nato secretary general Jens Stoltenberg has told CNN it was “important” that Donald Trump had ruled out using military force to annex Greenland,Of course, that is an important message, because up to now many were afraid that he actually was going to threaten to use force to acquire Greenland.

Nonetheless, he continued, Greenland and Denmark’s “territorial integrity should be respected by all”.Stoltenberg also noted to CNN that politicians should be careful while texting each other, as “it may become public”.It comes after Trump shared text messages from other leaders on social media earlier this week, including Norway’s PM Jonas Gahr Støre and French president Emmanuel Macron.Donald Trump has just delivered brief remarks at a business leaders’ reception at Davos, I’ll bring you any key quotes here once we get them through.After some confusion over timings, the Trump/Zelenskyy meeting is now confirmed to be taking place tomorrow, not today – and the Ukrainian president will travel to Davos for that meeting.

It means that he will be meeting the Ukrainian president just as his peace envoy Steve Witkoff will be in Moscow for talks with Russia’s Vladimir Putin.Trump is now holding top-level meetings here at the World Economic Forum.The US president has met with Polish President Karol Nawrocki following his address to the World Economic Forum in Davos, the White House says.There’s quite a scrum of security people, and WEF delegates, at the part of the congress centre set aside for bilateral meetings.The U.

S.president also had meetings scheduled with the leaders of Switzerland, Egypt and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte.He was due to meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Thursday, Reuters says.Denmark’s foreign minister has said Donald Trump’s statement that he would not use force to take Greenland was positive, even though the US president hasn’t dropped his ambitions to acquire the islandLars Lokke Rasmussen told reporters (Bloomberg reports):“What is clear after this speech is that the president’s ambition [to own Greenland] remains intact.“It is, in isolation, positive that it is being said that military force will not be used, but that does not make the problem go away.

The challenge is still there.”Tonight, join Jonathan Freedland, Tania Branigan, Anand Menon and Nick Lowles as they reflect on the first year of Donald Trump’s second presidency – and to ask if Britain could be set on the same path.Book tickets here or at guardian.liveDonald Trump’s pledge today not to use force to take control of Greenland is going down well in the financial markets.The Dow Jones industrial average share index is up almost 1% so far today at 48,944 points, clawing back most of Tuesday’s losses when geopolitical fears rocked the markets.

The broader S&P 500 index is up just over 1%,Kathleen Brooks, research director at brokerage XTB, reports that the ‘sell America trade’ has become the ‘buy America trade’,Here’s why:The President’s speech at Davos was the most anticipated event of the week,It was delivered in his traditional style: very long, full of anecdotes, and wide ranging in terms of scope,However, there were two key takeaways for markets.

Firstly, Trump will not take Greenland by force and 2, Trump wants the economy to run hot to send US stocks flying north,Nigel Farage has suggested the world would be a “better, more secure place” if America took over Greenland, PA Media report,The Reform leader is here in Davos, and discussed Trump’s speech at an event at USA House (the American delegation’s base here, in a Davos church),But Farage also acknowledged that the move would not be consistent with national sovereignty, or his belief in national self-determination,He says:“I have no doubt that the world would be a better, more secure place if a strong America was in Greenland, because of the geopolitics of the High North, because of the retreating ice caps and because of the continued expansionism of Russian icebreakers, of Chinese investment.

“So yes, would America owning Greenland be better for the world in terms of safety and stronger for Nato? It would.“However, if you believe in Brexit, and if you believe in celebrating America’s 250th birthday, if you believe in the nation states and not globalist structures, you believe in sovereignty.“And if you believe in sovereignty, you believe in the principle of national self-determination.”WEF attendees are mulling over Trump’s speech.My colleague Heather Stewart has just been chatting to the economic historian Adam Tooze, who’s been watching Trump’s speech here in Davos.

He compared the attitude of US Trump supporters he’s met here to that of a “serial abuser,” saying one top US executive had told him, “this is how it’s going to be: we’re going to beat up on you [Europe]; it’s going to hurt - then we’re going to beat up on you some more,You’re going to squeal,And then we’re going to do some kind of a deal on our terms,”He added,“They’re just simply saying, ‘you have to accept this is how we are now,This is what it’s like’.

”Asked about how other governments should respond, Tooze said:“I think we ought to be thinking quite hard about whatever the international equivalent of getting up and leaving is,We need to strengthen ourselves, and have coalitions of friendly people,”From one populist to another…,,Argentina’s president Javier Milei is now giving a special address, and tells WEF that “Machiavelli is dead”.

He’s banging the drum for liberalism, and outlining how we need to return to “Judeo-Christian values” to save the west, with some philosophical musings on the rights of man.Quotes to follow…Gavin Newsom, the governor of California, described Trump’s speech as the “one of the most insignificant hours I’ve spent in years - and I think the world spent”.My colleague John Collingridge reports that Newsom gave Trump’s special address a withering review here in Davos, saying:“It was significant in its insignificance.He said what we all knew- that he’s not going to invade Greenland.”Newsom, one of the leading contenders among Democratic candidates for president in 2028, said it was “boring, and at times boorish”.

“Fire and fury amounting to quite literally absolutely nothing”,Newsom said Europe “should be worried if they don’t respond firmly, with conviction to stand tall and what more evidence do you need of that than today?”He said the response of European leaders including France’s Emmanuel Macron appeared to have tempered Trump,“What happened yesterday he responded to, and multiple things happened yesterday - it was not just Macron and the EU president’s speech, and Carney’s speech, but the markets reacted,”
recentSee all
A picture

Davos: US support for Ukraine ‘never doubted’, says Nato chief, amid scepticism over Trump’s Greenland ‘deal’ – live updates

Good morning from Davos, amid relief and scepticism that Donald Trump has reached a rather vague agreement with Nato over Greenland.Hours after telling the World Economic Forum that he wouldn’t use force to seize the island from Denmark, Trump surprised us by declaring that “the framework of a future deal” on Greenland had been reached, after talks with Nato chief Mark Rutte.With Trump lifting the threat to impose new tariffs on eight European countries, the crisis that was threatening to rupture the Nato military alliance may have eased.But….leaving the forum last night, Rutte told the AFP newswire:“I think it was a very good meeting tonight

A picture

The year of the ‘hectocorn’: the $100bn tech companies that could float in 2026

You’ve probably heard of “unicorns” – technology startups valued at more than $1bn – but 2026 is shaping up to be the year of the “hectocorn”, with several US and European companies potentially floating on stock markets at valuations over $100bn (£75bn).OpenAI, Anthropic, SpaceX and Stripe are among the big names said to be considering an initial public offering (IPO) this year.The success of their flotations – whether the shares maintain their value, rise or fall – could shape concerns about the AI race and whether the resulting market mania is a bubble.Some may have had plans to float last year that were delayed or derailed by the US federal shutdown and sweeping government job cuts hitting the market watchdog. This year is shaping up to be similarly geopolitically choppy, with Trump’s latest tariff threats against European allies over Greenland casting a shadow over shares this week

A picture

My analogue month: would ditching my smartphone make me healthier, happier – or more stressed?

When I swapped my iPhone for a Nokia, Walkman, film camera and physical map, I wasn’t sure what to expect. But my life soon started to changeWhen two balaclava-clad men on a motorbike mounted the pavement to rob me, recently, I remained oblivious. My eyes were pinned to a text message on my phone, and my hands were so clawed around it that they didn’t even bother to grab it. It wasn’t until an elderly woman shrieked and I felt the whoosh of air as the bike launched back on to the road that I looked up at all. They might have been unsuccessful but it did make me think: what else am I missing from the real world around me?Before I’ve poured my first morning coffee I’ve already watched the lives of strangers unfold on Instagram, checked the headlines, responded to texts, swiped through some matches on a dating app, and refreshed my emails, twice

A picture

Big tech continues to bend the knee to Trump a year after his inauguration

Hello, and welcome to TechScape. I’m your host, Blake Montgomery, the Guardian’s US tech editor.One year ago today, Donald Trump was inaugurated as president of the United States. Standing alongside him that day were the leaders of the tech industry’s most powerful companies, who had donated to him in an unprecedented bending of the knee. In the ensuing year, the companies have reaped enormous rewards from their alliance with Trump, which my colleague Nick Robins-Early and I wrote about last month after Trump signed an executive order prohibiting states from passing laws regulating AI

A picture

Australian Open 2026: Sinner, Osaka and Wawrinka in round two action – live

Wawrinka nudges 4-3 ahead on serve in the fourth set, a set he must win if his Australian Open career is to continue, because this is the 40-year-old’s final trip to Melbourne and he’s trailing the French qualifier Arthur Gea by two sets to one.I should also mention Maddison Inglis’s three-set victory. The home qualifier – Australia’s last woman standing in the singles – defeated the experienced German Laura Siegemund and awaits the winner of Osaka v Sorana Cirstea. They’re due on Margaret Court Arena in about five minutes’ time, while Sinner and Duckworth will soon make their entrance on Rod Laver.Inspired qualifier Maddison Inglis has ridden an emotional rollercoaster in her first grand slam appearance in four years to book a spot in the Australian Open third round

A picture

McLaren to continue fairness approach in F1 despite nervy end to last season

The McLaren team is to continue its policy of pursuing a rigorous fairness towards Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri for the 2026 Formula One season. That is despite their doing so last season allowed a late challenge from Red Bull’s Max Verstappen which might have prevented the team securing the drivers’ title, which was ultimately won by Norris.Last year McLaren enjoyed the most competitive car for most of the season and from the off, the team insisted their drivers would be free to race one another and the team would apply what they referred to as their “papaya rules” to ensure they were scrupulously fair to both in racing situations.It was an admirable approach but one that attracted criticism, not least as the team found themselves with increasingly complex precedents set when they did, at times, intervene. At the same time, with the drivers taking points off one another across the year, it let Verstappen back into the title fight, which he lost by just two points at the season finale in Abu Dhabi