Anger as Nationwide refuses members a binding vote on boss’s 43% pay hike
Nationwide is under fire for refusing to give members a binding vote on a 43% pay rise for its chief executive, Debbie Crosbie, that could mean her pay package reaches up to £7m.Campaigners say it leaves the building society’s members with fewer rights than shareholders of listed UK banks and exposes a worrying “loophole” in building society rules.Nationwide says that after its £2.9bn takeover of Virgin Money, Crosbie’s pay should compete with that offered by banks such as Lloyds and NatWest.However, the board is offering members only an “advisory” vote at its annual general meeting (AGM) on 25 July, meaning there are no repercussions if they reject it.
Large high street banks are required to hold a binding vote on their pay policies at least once every three years, under laws governing large businesses listed on the London Stock Exchange.If shareholders reject the policy, they have to revert to the old pay plan and put a revised pay deal to shareholders within 12 months.Nationwide could do the same, but said it is already going further than required under the Building Societies Act, which requires binding votes only for the election of board members.A spokesperson said: “As part of our commitment to member engagement and transparency, Nationwide voluntarily puts the remuneration policy to the membership on an advisory basis at the AGM and we currently have no plans to change this approach.”While Nationwide has never held a binding vote on pay, it has also never proposed such a large remuneration package for its chief executive, which could result in a record payout, up from £4.
8m now to £7m.That is close behind NatWest Group, which in April secured backing for a package worth up to £7.7m for its chief executive, Paul Thwaite.Luke Hildyard, the director of the High Pay Centre thinktank, described the situation as a “loophole in the governance of building societies”.“Mutuals are supposed to have a more collective approach to business than corporate banks, but while the banks are required to revise pay policies that are rejected by a majority of shareholders, and provide a response to the stock market if more than 20% vote against, building societies can in theory ignore their members,” he said.
“The Nationwide case, where there may be significant discomfort with the huge pay out planned for the chief executive, highlights the need for the loophole to be closed.”Crosbie’s £7m pay deal has angered some members.“I’m a Nationwide customer and didn’t know about this? Please send me a voting form immediately,” one posted on X.“Building societies are supposed to be the good guys.The apple has fallen far from the tree,” another said.
Sara Hall, the co-executive director at the campaign group Positive Money, said Nationwide “hiking its chief executive’s pay because that’s what the big banks are doing would be completely at odds with what building societies are supposed to stand for”.Sign up to Business TodayGet set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morningafter newsletter promotionThe move is “counterintuitive for an institution whose main selling point is putting its customers before shareholders”, Hall added.A Nationwide spokesperson pushed back against the criticism, saying its pay proposals – although advisory – “always received overwhelming member support”.“Any suggestion that we would ever ignore a vote against it is simply ridiculous.We always consider their views and at the last AGM over 94% of votes were in favour of the proposed remuneration policy,” they said.
“Nationwide delivered record member value last year, we are still first for customer satisfaction among high street banks, and more people switched their current accounts to Nationwide than to any other brand.“We have managed this because we can attract, retain and motivate talented leaders.Even after the changes that are being proposed at the AGM, Nationwide’s chief executive will still be paid substantially less than the other large banks.”
More than 23m Britons think they may be due compensation for mis-sold car loans, UK poll finds
More than 23 million people believe they could be due compensation for a mis-sold car loan, according to a poll before this month’s supreme court decision.Borrowers, banks and the government are anxiously awaiting the ruling, which could trigger one of the biggest redress schemes since the £50bn payment protection insurance (PPI). The PPI saga forced UK banks to compensate people who had bought often worthless insurance cover.The survey, conducted for the consumer law firm Slater and Gordon, found that 45% of people think they might be entitled to a payout over a car finance plan taken out between 2007 and 2021.The car loans scandal has been rumbling on for more than a year, but ballooned in October when a court of appeal judgment vastly expanded a Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) investigation into potentially harmful commission arrangements
UK carmakers on track to meet EV sales target despite intense lobbying to lower quota
Carmakers are on track to meet existing UK electric car sales targets despite having successfully lobbied the government to water them down.Electric car sales made up 21.6% of sales in the first half of 2025, only marginally below the 22.06% share needed to meet existing rules once concessions are taken into account, according to an analysis by New AutoMotive, a thinktank.The Conservative government under Rishi Sunak brought in the zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) mandate
Elon Musk’s ‘America’ party could focus on a few pivotal congressional seats
The new US political party that Elon Musk has boasted about bankrolling could initially focus on a handful of attainable House and Senate seats while striving to be the decisive vote on major issues amid the thin margins in Congress.Tesla and SpaceX’s multibillionaire CEO mused about that approach on Friday in a post on X, the social media platform he owns, as he continued feuding with Donald Trump over the spending bill that the president has signed into law. On Saturday, without immediately elaborating, the former Trump adviser announced on X that he had created the so-called America party.“One way to execute on this would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts,” wrote Musk, who is the world’s richest person and oversaw brutal cuts to the federal government after Trump’s second presidency began in January. “Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring they serve the true will of the people
Minister demands overhaul of UK’s leading AI institute
The technology secretary has demanded an overhaul of the UK’s leading artificial intelligence institute in a wide-ranging letter that calls for a switch in focus to defence and national security, as well as leadership changes.Peter Kyle said it was clear further action was needed to ensure the government-backed Alan Turing Institute met its full potential.In a letter to ATI’s chair, seen by the Guardian, Kyle said the institute should be changed to prioritise defence, national security and “sovereign capabilities” – a reference to nation states being able to control their own AI technology.The call for new priorities implies a downgrading of ATI’s focus on health and the environment, which are two of three core subjects for the institute, alongside defence and security, under its “Turing 2.0” strategy
Wimbledon organisers apologise after line-calling system turned off in error
Wimbledon organisers have apologised after the electronic line-calling system was turned off in error at a crucial moment in Sonay Kartal’s match on Centre Court.The British No 3’s opponent, the 34-year-old Russian veteran Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova, accused the All England Club of home bias and said a game had been stolen from her when the AI-enhanced technology missed a call.Pavlyuchenkova, on game point, became convinced that a Kartal shot had landed long but there was no “out” call by the system which controversially replaced line judges this year.The umpire, Nico Helwerth, who did not know the system had been turned off, said the technology was “unable to track the last point”, which had to be replayed.“I don’t know if it’s in or it’s out
Remorseless Australian bowling onslaught blows away West Indies in second Test
The second Test in Grenada finished like the first in Barbados, with a batting performance as shambolic and uninspired from the home side as their bowling had been impressive. Everybody is bored of the eulogies for West Indies cricket: we’ve all been reading them for 25 years, and some of us have been writing them for what feels as long. But it doesn’t matter how many times you’ve seen The Shawshank Redemption, you still feel a pang of sadness when Tommy Williams steps out to meet Warden Norton for a midnight chat.Australia shot down West Indies with as little remorse, all out for 143 in less than 35 overs on day four, the visitors winning by 133 runs at the Grenada National Stadium and going 2-0 up to win the series. It’s not that the scoreline is a surprise, given the resource disparity between the teams and administrations, but it still feels wrong to feel that a Test side has no chance of chasing once a target approaches 250
I was sexually assaulted by a celebrity after starring in a cult film at 19. My quest for justice changed the course of my life
Young carer ‘amazed’ as Guardian readers pay off her £2,000 fine for benefit rules mistake
Trevor Hendy obituary
Sally Adams obituary
Women in poorest parts of England and Wales ‘will spend only two-thirds of life in good health’
Vital steps to move the NHS from cure to prevention | Letters