Cricket nerds love precedent so maybe England can channel spirit of Lord’s 2005
The parallels are imperfect but, as with Michael Vaughan’s Ashes winners, hyper-aggressive cricket with a tweaked approach in the second Test is the 2025 cohort’s only chance of winningTwenty years on, a montage of the 2005 Ashes still tingles the spine.Close your eyes and you can probably make your own, with an Embrace soundtrack if you want to be right on the nose.Chances are you’ll see Kevin Pietersen and Andrew Flintoff belting sixes with lusty abandon; Geraint Jones wheeling away after winning the epic Edgbaston Test; Ashley Giles calmly patting the winning runs at Trent Bridge; Flintoff’s messianic dismissal of Ricky Ponting at Edgbaston; Simon Jones detonating Michael Clarke’s off stump at Old Trafford.All those moments came in England victories or winning draws.But no 2005 montage is complete without images of Ponting being cut below the eye or Justin Langer’s right elbow ballooning in real time.
Both wounds were inflicted by Steve Harmison on the first morning at Lord’s, a game that Australia won emphatically by 239 runs.When the story of the series was written, those blows – and the way England duffed Australia up in the first innings – were an essential chapter.The hope for England fans is that any montages of the 2025-26 Ashes will include similar moments from Perth: Steve Smith being hit twice on the elbow and once on the hand, Cameron Green wobbling like a drunken sailor after wearing a beauty from Mark Wood on the side of the head.On Saturday, as two nations tried to make sense of the first two-day Ashes Test in more than a century, dozens of emails were sent to the Guardian’s over-by-over coverage.One, from Tom Van der Gucht, countered the prevailing view among England fans that the apocalypse was due before sundown.
“I have a feeling this is our Lord’s 2005 moment and we’ll come back and win the series from here,” he wrote,“Our bowlers, for at least one innings, went toe to toe while our batters effectively blew it with a rush of blood to the head,Australia are there for the taking,You mark my words …”Cricket nerds love a precedent,In this case, England fans will cling to anything that doesn’t involve a wearingly familiar story: England lose the first Test in Australia, then the second, then the third …The parallels with Lord’s 2005 are compelling if imperfect.
Some of the details have been twisted, like dreams in a David Lynch film.In that game, for example, it was Australia who batted first and drowned in testosterone, bowled out for 190 in 40.2 overs.An immense bowling performance on the first evening – in this case by Glenn McGrath rather than the entire England attack – gave them a first-innings lead.This is where the stories diverge: Australia batted England out of the game in the third innings, with Clarke strumming 91 from 106 balls.
They won handsomely in the end, but like Perth the victory was built on individual greatness (for Mitchell Starc and Travis Head, read McGrath and to an extent Clarke in 2005) rather than a complete team performance.In both Tests, a much-hyped England pace attack showed they could unsettle and unseat the Australian batters.Smith hasn’t struggled as much in a Test innings since he was a leg-spinner who batted a bit.In 2005 England didn’t really wound the Australian batters after Lord’s – partly because that was the liveliest pitch, mainly because the physical threat, unprecedented for an England attack against Australia, had been established.There was also, hiding in plain sight, a detail that would define the series.
In an otherwise poor individual performance – “I bottled it” – Flintoff dismissed Adam Gilchrist twice.For the rest of the series, Flintoff was the bogeyman’s bogeyman.There are no obvious parallels at Perth but then we didn’t appreciate the significance of Flintoff’s wickets at the time.Harry Brook’s first-innings fifty also had echoes of Kevin Pietersen’s outrageous batting (57 and 64 not out in totals of 155 and 180), including a gobsmacking six off Australia’s postage-stamp seamer.Most of all, on both occasions there were industrial quantities of opprobrium.
England – who went into the 2005 series on a run of 14 wins in 18 Tests, all achieved playing ultra-aggressive cricket – were savaged after Lord’s,They were just another English Ashes shower: “a bunch of drips” according the Mirror, “Vaughan Again Losers” in the Sun,Between Tests, the captain, Michael Vaughan, bowled twice at Lord’s, met the coach, Duncan Fletcher, to do some technical work in the nets,They kept talking about how submissive, Pietersen aside, England’s batting had been at Lord’s,“The loss in the first Test actually was the switch,” said Fletcher later.
“We said: ‘Enough is enough now.If we carry on like this we will get drilled again.’”With McGrath absent – another twisted detail, given Pat Cummins may return at Brisbane – England skedaddled to 132 for one from 27 overs on the first morning at Edgbaston.They eventually belted 407 from 79.2 overs, an unprecedented onslaught at the time; their approach veered from calculated risk to giddy recklessness.
“The manner in which we played on that first day was the turning point of the entire series,” said Vaughan,Stokes’s team crave a similar turning point, but they are not for turning,At Perth last week they were ultimately beaten by an all-time-great innings from Head, the platonic ideal of Bazball,He just had a much smarter gameplan,First Test, Lord'sAustralia 190 (Harmison 5-43) and 384 (Clarke 90, Katich 67, Martyn 65)England 155 (Pietersen 57, McGrath 5-53) and 180 (Pietersen 64*, McGrath 4-29)Australia won by 239 runsSecond Test, EdgbastonEngland 407 (Trescothick 90, Pietersen 71, Flintoff 68) and 182 (Flintoff 73, Warne 6-46)Australia 308 (Langer 82, Ponting 61) and 279 (Lee 43*, Flintoff 4-79)England won by two runsFletcher’s quote from 2005 can be adapted to suit this team’s wants and needs.
Hyper-aggressive cricket is their only chance of winning in Australia, but they also need to tweak their approach.If, at Brisbane, they continue driving on the up well wide of off stump, they will get drilled again.And if that happens, the montages of the 2025-26 Ashes will be full of English batters getting out, not their bowlers landing symbolic blows on day one of the series.
ChatGPT firm blames boy’s suicide on ‘misuse’ of its technology
The maker of ChatGPT has said the suicide of a 16-year-old was down to his “misuse” of its system and was “not caused” by the chatbot.The comments came in OpenAI’s response to a lawsuit filed against the San Francisco company and its chief executive, Sam Altman, by the family of California teenager Adam Raine.Raine killed himself in April after extensive conversations and “months of encouragement from ChatGPT”, the family’s lawyer has said.The lawsuit alleges the teenager discussed a method of suicide with ChatGPT on several occasions, that it guided him on whether a suggested method would work, offered to help him write a suicide note to his parents and that the version of the technology he used was “rushed to market … despite clear safety issues”.According to filings at the superior court of the state of California on Tuesday, OpenAI said that “to the extent that any ‘cause’ can be attributed to this tragic event” Raine’s “injuries and harm were caused or contributed to, directly and proximately, in whole or in part, by [his] misuse, unauthorised use, unintended use, unforeseeable use, and/or improper use of ChatGPT”
Europe loosens reins on AI – and US takes them off
Hello, and welcome to TechScape. I’m your host, Blake Montgomery, writing to you from an American grocery store, where I’m planning my Thanksgiving pies.In tech, the European Union is deregulating artificial intelligence; the United States is going even further. The AI bubble has not popped, thanks to Nvidia’s astronomical quarterly earnings, but fears persist. And Meta has avoided a breakup for a similar reason as Google
Macquarie Dictionary announces ‘AI slop’ as its word of the year, beating out Ozempic face
AI slop is here, it’s ubiquitous, it’s being used by the US president, Donald Trump, and now, it’s the word of the year.The Macquarie Dictionary dubbed the term the epitome of 2025 linguistics, with a committee of word experts saying the outcome embodies the word of the year’s general theme of reflecting “a major aspect of society or societal change throughout the year”.“We understand now in 2025 what we mean by slop – AI generated slop, which lacks meaningful content or use,” the committee said in a statement announcing its decision.“While in recent years we’ve learnt to become search engineers to find meaningful information, we now need to become prompt engineers in order to wade through the AI slop. Slop in this sense will be a robust addition to English for years to come
AI could replace 3m low-skilled jobs in the UK by 2035, research finds
Up to 3m low-skilled jobs could disappear in the UK by 2035 because of automation and AI, according to a report by a leading educational research charity.The jobs most at risk are those in occupations such as trades, machine operations and administrative roles, the National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER) said.Highly skilled professionals, on the other hand, were forecast to be more in demand as AI and technological advances increase workloads “at least in the short to medium term”. Overall, the report expects the UK economy to add 2.3m jobs by 2035, but unevenly distributed
‘It’s hell for us here’: Mumbai families suffer as datacentres keep the city hooked on coal
As Mumbai sees increased energy demand from new datacenters, particularly from Amazon, the filthiest neighbourhood in one of India’s largest cities must keep its major coal plantsEach day, Kiran Kasbe drives a rickshaw taxi through his home neighbourhood of Mahul on Mumbai’s eastern seafront, down streets lined with stalls selling tomatoes, bottle gourds and aubergines–and, frequently, through thick smog.Earlier this year, doctors found three tumours in his 54-year-old mother’s brain. It’s not clear exactly what caused her cancer. But people who live near coal plants are much more likely to develop the illness, studies show, and the residents of Mahul live a few hundred metres down the road from one.Mahul’s air is famously dirty
One in four unconcerned by sexual deepfakes created without consent, survey finds
One in four people think there is nothing wrong with creating and sharing sexual deepfakes, or they feel neutral about it, even when the person depicted has not consented, according to a police-commissioned survey.The findings prompted a senior police officer to warn that the use of AI is accelerating an epidemic in violence against women and girls (VAWG), and that technology companies are complicit in this abuse.The survey of 1,700 people commissioned by the office of the police chief scientific adviser found 13% felt there was nothing wrong with creating and sharing sexual or intimate deepfakes – digitally altered content made using AI without consent.A further 12% felt neutral about the moral and legal acceptability of making and sharing such deepfakes.Det Ch Supt Claire Hammond, from the national centre for VAWG and public protection, reminded the public that “sharing intimate images of someone without their consent, whether they are real images or not, is deeply violating”
System failed our daughter, say parents, as NHS trust fined £200,000 over death
Peers are just doing their job in scrutinising the assisted dying bill | Letters
Online betting firms to pay billions more in UK tax, Reeves confirms
‘I didn’t even know this type of attack existed’: more than 200 women allege drugging by senior French civil servant
Horrific death of Kardell Lomas sparks urgent calls for new independent oversight of police
CPS to train staff on ‘spectrum of abuse’ in violence against women and girls