The stats don’t lie. Australia’s tax system is designed to benefit the wealthiest and the rest of us pay for it | Greg Jericho
New figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics reveal just how much an average Australian earns.Being “rich” might not see you living like a Kardashian but we need to acknowledge that earning more than 90% of people puts you in the top 10%, and that much of the tax system is geared to benefit you.Asking who is rich is a question that can send shivers down the spines of politicians.I’ve encountered more than a few progressives who are at pains to protest that they are not rich despite being on a very good wicket.They immediately reel off their CV of working-class roots as though they are worried someone is about to accuse them they came from Greece with a thirst for knowledge.
There is far too much preciousness about wealth and income – and it benefits those who are doing a lot better than they would like you to know.Australia does not have an official poverty line and so we rely only on the 1972 definition of the Henderson Poverty Line, which is not comparable to international measures.Even given that, a single person on jobseeker is living about 40% below the poverty line.If the graph does not display click hereThat isn’t something that perturbs the government too much, and certainly not more than it did suggestions of affecting the wealth of the 80,000 Australians with more than $3m in superannuation.The way we talk about wealth and high incomes is so skewed that, for example, the government’s own advice on superannuation refers to the ASFA line that a “comfortable retirement” involves being able to have:Top level private health insuranceFast reliable NBNA computer and smartphone with good data allowance/streaming servicesA reasonable carRegular leisure activities including club membership, cinema visits and exhibitionsConfidence to use air conditioning in the home and afford all utilitiesOccasional restaurant mealsAn annual domestic trip to visit family, andOne overseas trip every seven years.
For most, that is not comfortable, that is a dream,It’s why we have a system where each year the richest 10% get nearly $22bn a year in tax breaks to use superannuation – nearly double the $12,2bn the government spends funding public schools and $5bn more than the $16,9bn spent on jobseeker,So lets not let those who want to keep feathering their very plush nests get away with pretending that they are doing it hard scrabble.
A few years ago Anthony Albanese was quick to argue that being on $200,000 a year did not make you rich.It was a very silly statement then and remains silly now.The Bureau of Statistics’ recent annual characteristics of employment survey reveals just how much Australians earn.As always, we need to be careful with terminology.Average (more technically known as the mean) is not the same as median.
If you hear someone talk about average earnings, just realise that is more than what most Australia earn.Median is the halfway point – half earn more, half earn less.We also need to be careful if someone is talking about average full-time earnings, as opposed to total earnings, and also whether they are talking about men, who as a rule earn more than women.For ease of understanding I have converted all figures to annual rather than weekly earnings.This year the average annual male full-time earnings is $111,592, well above the overall median earnings for all workers of $74,100:If the graph does not display click hereIf you earned more than $156,000 you earned more than 90% of Australians, and if you earned $176,930 you earned more than 90% of Australians working full-time:If the graph does not display click hereIt’s worth noting that the current full-time minimum wage of $49,296 puts you in the bottom 10% of full-time earners, and the jobseeker rate, which is equivalent to annual earnings of $20,634, has you well in the bottom 10% of all earnings.
So, let’s dispense with the bullshit that such amounts in any way discourage people from wanting to work or are too high to run a business.Even in New South Wales earning $200,000 puts you well in the top 10%:If the graph does not display click hereBut don’t call them rich, they might get sad.We also know age and gender plays a big role.Most men in their late 30s to late 50s earn about $100,000 a year, while a majority of women never earn more than $80,000:If the graph does not display click hereThe figures highlight that having children hurts women’s earnings much more than men’s.In their early 20s, women actually have higher median full-time earnings than men but the gap widens in the mid-30s and never closes – even for full-time workers:If the graph does not display click hereOne of the best things about these annual figures is it allows us to also compare the median earnings in each state with the median house price.
The picture across most states is one of despair for how things were even just five years ago, let alone 20 or more:If the graph does not display click hereIn just five years the value of a median prices house in Sydney has gone from 12,8 times the median annual full-time earnings to 16,1 times,Housing affordability is a major reason why those in the top 10% do not feel “rich”,And that might be fair.
But while it might be harder for someone on $200,000 or even just in the top 10% to afford a house and allow you to feel rich or wealthy, let us not mistake that difficulty for the plight of the vast majority for whom inequality means actual hardship.And never let it mean we keep handing the richest tax breaks while saying we can’t afford to lift people out of poverty.Greg Jericho is a Guardian columnist and chief economist of the Australia Institute
BMA accused of hypocrisy as its own staff threaten to strike over pay
The British Medical Association is facing a strike over pay by its own clerical staff, prompting calls of hypocrisy as NHS resident doctors in England launch five days of strike action with the union’s backing.Talks between the BMA and the GMB union failed to come to a resolution on Tuesday, raising the prospect of a strike by clerical and administrative staff at the health union in the new year, sources said.It is understood that GMB, which represents 75% of the internal staff at the BMA, are “getting ballot ready”, in reference to the prospect of getting backing for a strike.The BMA said it was facing “extremely challenging financial constraints” but offering above market rates of pay.As it sought to talk down the demands of its own staff on Tuesday, a second team of negotiators also failed to reach terms with the health secretary, Wes Streeting, over the demands of resident doctor members
Ex-Labour metro mayor and Your Party organiser Jamie Driscoll joins Greens
Jamie Driscoll, the former Labour metro mayor for North of Tyne who later played a role setting up Your Party, has joined the Greens, the party has announced.It comes two days after five Labour councillors in the north London borough of Brent defected to the Greens, saying they were disillusioned about the party’s direction under Keir Starmer.Driscoll, a former Newcastle councillor who served as mayor from 2019 to 2024, left Labour in 2023 after the party blocked him from running again. He stood as an independent, coming second to Labour’s Kim McGuinness.Driscoll was later involved in efforts to set up a new leftwing party in association with the former Labour MPs Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana, which eventually became Your Party
Nigel Farage told to apologise by 26 of his school contemporaries
Nigel Farage has been told to apologise for his alleged teenage racism by 26 school contemporaries who have written an open letter telling of their “dismay and anger” at his response in recent weeks.In a united challenge to the Reform UK leader, the alleged victims and witnesses condemn him for what they describe as his refusal to acknowledge his behaviour at Dulwich college.They also criticise him for saying their allegations about his past behaviour are politically motivated.“The accusation … is false,” the letter states.They call for Farage, who has denied “directly” targeting anyone with racist or antisemitic abuse or having “intent” to hurt anyone, to publicly recognise the events described
George Osborne joins OpenAI: ex-chancellor adds tech post to his CV
The former UK chancellor George Osborne is joining OpenAI to lead the ChatGPT developer’s relationships with governments around the world.He will head a division known internally as OpenAI for Countries, through which the San Francisco artificial intelligence startup works with governments on national-level AI rollouts.The former Conservative politician will add the role to his growing portfolio of positions which include: chair of the British Museum; adviser to the cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase; and host of a podcast with the former Labour minister Ed Balls.Osborne is moving on from his role as senior managing director at Evercore, which acquired the investment bank Robey Warshaw in July where he was partner, and will be based in London rather than Silicon Valley.His hiring by OpenAI is the latest sign the big US tech firms are becoming increasingly focused on boosting AI adoption by national governments
Deals put UK-US trade relationship in the spotlight | Letters
Far from costing British lives, as Aditya Chakrabortty suggests (What will be the cost of Keir Starmer’s new medicines deal with Donald Trump? British lives, 11 December), the UK-US medicines agreement is designed to support NHS patients by improving access to new and innovative treatments.The agreement raises the baseline threshold used by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to assess the cost-effectiveness for new medicines, enabling more treatments to be considered for NHS use.It does not retrospectively increase the price of existing branded medicines. It also caps repayment rates for newer medicines at no more than 15% from 2026 to 2028, replacing an unpredictable system that has hampered investment and patient access to cutting-edge treatments.The UK has fallen behind international competitors in both life sciences investment and access to innovative medicines
Ministers ‘break word’ on protecting nature after weakening biodiversity planning rule
The government has broken its promise to protect nature by weakening planning rules for housing developers, groups have said.While developers once had to create “biodiversity net gain” (BNG), meaning creating 10% more space for nature on site than there was before the building took place, the housing minister Matthew Pennycook announced exemptions to this rule on Tuesday.Under the new rules developments under 0.2 hectares are exempted from the policy. Analysis from the Wildlife Trusts has found that this means a combined area across England the size of Windsor forest will now not be restored for nature
Reeves defends Grangemouth intervention; Warner Bros urges investors to reject $108bn Paramount bid – as it happened
The stats don’t lie. Australia’s tax system is designed to benefit the wealthiest and the rest of us pay for it | Greg Jericho
Amazon in talks to invest $10bn in developer of ChatGPT
UK insists US tech deal not dead as Trump threatens penalties against European firms
If he never returns, Terence Crawford’s legacy as one of boxing’s greats is secure | Bryan Armen Graham
Miami Dolphins to bench QB Tua Tagovailoa after missing playoffs