AI platforms reference Nigel Farage more than other leaders when prompted on UK politics, study shows
AI platforms are more likely to reference Nigel Farage than any other UK leader when prompted about British politics, according to an AI search analytics firm,“We are confident in saying that Reform are showing up significantly more than you would expect,” said Malte Landwehr, an expert at Peec AI, the firm that did the research,“So they’re doing something right when it comes to LLM [large language model] visibility,”Peec’s research tested leading AI models – including ChatGPT and Google’s AI Overview – on their responses to 5,000 different structured prompts related to British politics, including the economy and jobs, immigration, healthcare and crime,These prompts were run repeatedly over the course of several weeks, generating over 280,000 data points.
For example, one prompt was: “In the context of the UK local elections with a regional focus on Sutton, which political leaders are strongest on immigration policy?”The research found that Farage surfaced more than Keir Starmer in responses to queries across multiple AI systems.It also found that AI platforms gave greater visibility to Labour and the Liberal Democrats than the Conservatives or Greens, although this varied across different issues.In the example above, ChatGPT returned results featuring Farage first in response to that prompt, saying his stance “resonates with voters prioritising very strict controls on immigration”.Reform UK appeared in 88% of Google AI Overviews; Keir Starmer appeared in 11% of ChatGPT’s responses.The visibility of Reform UK increased across queries about immigration and council tax.
Labour was more visible in responses to queries about the NHS.LLMs are becoming a new battleground for political messaging, with wide-ranging consequences for how political parties succeed or fail.Across the UK, more and more people are turning to AI models for information.“What we’re tending to find is that, compared to maybe about even a year ago, if you had asked … a question related to politics, they would basically just politely decline to respond, because they would say, this is not something that I can provide information on,” said Sam Stockwell, a senior researcher at the Alan Turing Institute, which specialises in data science and AI.“But what we are now seeing is that they’re very happy and willing to give you information on policies, on pandemics, and all of it sounds very convincing.
”It is nearly impossible to know how different AI models prioritise different sources of information, said Stockwell; the information is usually proprietary,But a few patterns have emerged,AI models are more likely to cite social media, or information from the open web, when queried about breaking events that are not present in their training data,This opens them to manipulation – and poor-quality news,“We’ve seen, after Charlie Kirk’s assassination, [and] events over the last year or so in the UK and the US and elsewhere, chatbots tend to be queried on those incidents in real time, and they rely probably on social media information, because they often don’t really have anything in their training data,” said Stockwell.
Peec’s work found that LLMs cited Facebook more than any other source in response to the prompts, followed by the BBC, the UK parliament website and Wikipedia.“I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the approach that Reform is taking on social media, which essentially is to comment on loads of posts with the same sort of messages and same comments … leads to Reform being referenced more frequently than we would expect in those LLMs,” said Landwehr.Reform UK has been alleged to run networks of social media accounts spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories.Research on the emerging issue of “LLM grooming” suggests that AI models can be easily manipulated by large volumes of content, for example churned out by Russian disinformation networks.“What we also tend to find is that LLMs tend to go for sources or information that appear really frequently, whether it’s in the media or just on the internet,” said Stockwell.
A Google spokesperson said AI Overviews are “designed to present information objectively based on a wide range of sources from the web”, and “being mentioned in an AI Overview is not an indication of bias”.
Badenoch defends seeking a ban on pro-Palestine marches but not Tommy Robinson ones – as it happened
Kemi Badenoch also used her Today interview to defend her argument that pro-Palestine marches should be banned because they platform antisemitism, but that marches organised by the far-right activist Tommy Robinson should be allowed.When it was put to Badenoch that the Robinson marches were a platform for anti-Muslim hate, Badenoch said that the marches were “different”, and that two Jewish men were killed at Heaton Park synagogue last year and that another two Jewish men were almost killed in Golders Green last week.When it was put to her that Muslims might feel threatened by some of the things said at a Robinson event, she insisted that the two sorts of marches were “not the same”.She went on:double quotation markCriticism of religion is allowed in this country. We mustn’t mix the two things
Farage deploys the rottweiler to distract from awkward £5m gift story | John Crace
It’s a classic from the Donald Trump playbook: everything’s been going a bit tits up, so you create a distraction. Get everyone looking in the wrong direction. Last week was the worst in months for Reform. First the party was pegged back in the opinion polls, then the Guardian revealed Nigel Farage had been given a £5m handout by Christopher Harborne, a Thai-based crypto dealer. A donation that Nige had never thought to declare
There’s no excuse for boozing at work | Brief letters
I am sorry, Gaby Hinsliff, but I cannot defend MPs’ booze culture (My advice to Hannah Spencer? Before calling out MPs’ boozing, try to understand the reasons behind it, 1 May). As a retired nurse, there were times when my colleagues and I were working long hours under a great deal of stress, often making life and death decisions. There is no excuse for drinking at work. Hannah Spencer was right to call it out.Patricia HowlettSouth Benfleet, Essex Friends at Abberton reservoir recently encountered a group of women in a bird hide who gave a whole new meaning to the term “hen party”
Greens must take immediate action against antisemitism in party, says Lucas
The former Green leader Caroline Lucas has called for the party to take immediate action against candidates who have made antisemitic comments or posts, following a series of cases before Thursday’s elections.Lucas, who led or co-led the party for six years and served as its first MP, said that while the number of such cases was limited, they could not be ignored.“Statements that have now come to light from a handful of @TheGreenParty candidates are totally unacceptable & require immediate action,” she wrote on X. “There’s no place for antisemitism or any hate speech in the party. This is a society-wide problem and needs to be rooted out wherever it’s found
Cabinet minister warns Labour against ‘doomscrolling’ through leaders like the Tories
Labour should not be “doomscrolling” through leaders like the Conservatives, the communities secretary, Steve Reed, has said, urging MPs not to move against Keir Starmer after the May elections.MPs who fear Starmer cannot lead the party into the next general election because of his unpopularity are understood to have been discussing whether to lay out a timetable for his departure to present to the prime minister.Starmer could also potentially face a direct leadership challenge, though would-be candidates, including Wes Streeting and Angela Rayner, are said to be unlikely to move first against him.MPs told the Guardian they were sceptical about the idea of a letter urging the prime minister to set out a timetable for departure – though some hope a longer timeframe would benefit the mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, giving him time to return to Westminster.Reed said the majority of MPs and local leaders did not want to unleash the chaos of a leadership challenge
Vote Lib Dem or ‘regret it’ living under a Reform council, Davey tells voters
Voters in the home counties will “regret it for a long time” if they do not back the Liberal Democrats and wake up to a Reform-led council, Ed Davey has said.The Lib Dems leader has identified five councils – East Surrey, West Surrey, Hampshire, West Sussex and Huntingdonshire – where his party could win overall control, as well as swathes of the former “blue wall” where Davey said it was a “straight fight” between his party and Reform at the English local elections.More than 5,000 councillors will be elected on Thursday, with more than half of these being in either London or the south-east. Some projections show the Lib Dems gaining 500 seats, with Labour losing as many as 1,800. The Greens are also expected to gain hundreds of seats, with top projections putting the figure at 1,700
Man produces sperm from testicular tissue frozen as a child in breakthrough trial
Coalition accused of secretly giving big tobacco lobbyists private platform in parliament
Lorraine Ribbons obituary
Martha’s rule may have saved more than 500 lives in England since 2024
Solicitors report late flood of no-fault evictions before ban in England
Trial of non-invasive endometriosis scan boosts hopes for quicker diagnosis