London AI firm says Getty copyright case poses ‘overt threat’ to industry
A London-based artificial intelligence company, Stability AI, has claimed that a copyright case brought by the global photography agency Getty Images represents an “overt threat” to the generative AI industry,Getty’s case against Stability AI for copyright and trademark infringement relating to its vast photography archives reached the high court in London on Monday,Stability allows users to generate images using text prompts, and its directors include James Cameron, the Oscar-winning film director of Avatar and Titanic,But Getty called the people who were training the AI system “a bunch of tech geeks” and claimed they were indifferent to the problems their innovation might create,Stability countered by alleging that Getty was using “fanciful” legal routes and spending approximately £10m to fight a technology it feared was “an existential threat” to its business.
Getty represents the work of almost 600,000 content creators globally.It alleges Stability trained its image generation model on its vast database of copyrighted photographs.As a result the program, called Stability Diffusion, outputs images with Getty Images watermarks still on them.Getty alleges that Stability was “completely indifferent to what they fed into the training data”.It told the court the system amounted to “sticking our trademark on pornography” and “AI rubbish”.
Lawyers for Getty said the dispute over the unlicensed use of thousands of its photographs, including images of celebrities, politicians and news events, “is not a battle between creatives and technology, where a win for Getty Images means the end of AI”.They added: “The problem is when AI companies such as Stability want to use those works without payment.”Lindsay Lane KC, representing Getty Images, said: “This was a bunch of tech geeks who were so excited by AI that they were indifferent to any of the dangers or problems it presents.”In submissions to the court on Monday Getty claimed Stability had trained its image generation model on databases that contained child sexual abuse material.Stability is fighting the overall Getty claim and its lawyer said the allegations relating to child sexual abuse material were “repugnant”.
A spokesperson for Stability AI said it was committed to preventing misuse of its technology, “particularly in the creation and dissemination of harmful content, including CSAM [child sexual abuse material]”.It said it had robust safeguards “to enhance our safety standards to protect against bad actors”.Sign up to TechScapeA weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our livesafter newsletter promotionThe case comes amid a wider campaign from artists, writers and musicians, including Elton John and Dua Lipa, to protect their copyright from alleged theft by generative AI companies, which then use it to allow their customers to create new pictures, music or text.The UK parliament is locked in a similar dispute after the government proposed that copyright holders would have to opt out of their material being used to train algorithms and produce AI-generated content, otherwise it would be free to use by tech companies.“Getty Images, of course, recognises that the AI industry overall may be a force for good, but that doesn’t justify allowing those developing AI models to ride roughshod over intellectual property rights,” said Lane.
The trial, which is scheduled to run for several weeks, will focus in part on the use of images by celebrated photographers, including photos of the former Liverpool football coach Jürgen Klopp taken by the award-winning British sports photographer Andrew Livesey; a picture of the Chicago Cubs baseball team by Gregory Shamus, an American sports photographer; a photo of the actor and musician Donald Glover by Alberto Rodriguez; and photos of the actor Eric Dane and film director Christopher Nolan by Andreas Rentz,Seventy-eight thousand pages of evidence have been disclosed in the case and AI experts are being called to give evidence from the University of California, Berkeley and the University of Freiberg in Germany,
Policymakers who think AI can help rescue flagging UK economy should take heed | Heather Stewart
From helping consultants diagnose cancer, to aiding teachers in drawing up lesson plans – and flooding social media with derivative slop – generative artificial intelligence is being adopted across the economy at breakneck speed.Yet a growing number of voices are starting to question how much of an asset the technology can be to the UK’s sluggish economy. Not least because there is no escaping a persistent flaw: large language models (LLMs) remain prone to casually making things up.It’s a phenomenon known as “hallucination”. In a recent blogpost, the barrister Tahir Khan cited three cases in which lawyers had used large language models to formulate legal filings or arguments – only to find they slipped in fictitious supreme court cases, and made up regulations, or nonexistent laws
‘We’re being attacked all the time’: how UK banks stop hackers
It is every bank boss’s worst nightmare: a panicked phone call informs them a cyber-attack has crippled the IT system, rapidly unleashing chaos across the entire UK financial industry.As household names in other industries, including Marks & Spencer, grapple with the fallout from such hacks, banking executives will be acutely aware that, for them, the stakes are even higher.Within hours of a successful bank hack, millions of direct debits could fail, leaving rents, mortgages and wages unpaid. Online banking may be blocked, cash machine withdrawals denied, and commuters left in limbo as buses and petrol stations reject payments. News of the attack could spark panic, leading to a run on rival lenders, as customers pull money from their accounts amid fear the disruption could spread
UK government rollout of Humphrey AI tool raises fears about reliance on big tech
The government’s artificial intelligence (AI) tool known as Humphrey is based on models from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google, it can be revealed, raising questions about Whitehall’s increasing reliance on big tech.Ministers have staked the future of civil service reform on rolling out AI across the public sector to improve efficiency, with all officials in England and Wales to receive training in the toolkit.However, it is understood the government does not have overarching commercial agreements with the big tech companies on AI and uses a pay-as-you-go model through its existing cloud contracts, allowing it to swap through tools as they improve and become competitive.Critics are concerned about the speed and scale of embedding AI from big tech into the heart of government, especially when there is huge public debate about the technology’s use of copyrighted material.Ministers have been locked in a battle with critics in the House of Lords over whether AI is unfairly being trained on creative material without credit of compensation
Hey AI! Can ChatGPT help you to manage your money?
Artificial intelligence seems to have touched every part of our lives. But can it help us manage our money? We put some common personal finance questions to the free version of ChatGPT, one of the most well-known AI chatbots, and asked for its help.Then we gave the answers to some – human – experts and asked them what they thought.We asked: I am 35 years old and want to ensure I have a comfortable retirement. I earn about £35,000 a year and have a workplace pension, in which I have saved £20,000
Bath’s treble win blends yesteryear charm with the recently unthinkable | Michael Aylwin
At the 29th time of asking, Bath are champions of England once more. At five to five on a sunny afternoon here, Ben Spencer passed to Finn Russell – the married couple, as their coach, Johann van Graan, likes to call them – and Russell kicked it somewhere, anywhere but on the pitch to put an end to decades of pain out west.In 1996, when titles were won the old-fashioned way, the notion it would take so long for Bath, who had just won their sixth in eight years – their 10th cup in 13, and their fourth double – to become champions of England again would have seemed absurd. Only a little more absurd than the notion they would win it might have seemed three years ago, when they finished bottom of the table, spared the indignity of relegation only by the very different way English rugby is organised these days.The most telling difference, though, is that thing about paying players
Bavuma’s brave team make giant leap for South African Test cricket | Andy Bull
South Africa lost their shot at winning this World Test Championship in 2022, when their board announced the team were going to play 28 games in the next four years. They lost it for a second time during the spring of last year, when they packed their reserve team off to play a series against New Zealand because their centrally contracted players had to stay back and play in a franchise tournament.They lost it a third time when the team were bowled out for 138 on Thursday morning and they lost it a fourth when they let Australia’s tail put on 134 runs for the last four wickets, leaving them needing 282 to win. Finally, after they had just about run out of ways to lose, they won.The last runs came hard and the winning ones seemed to be the most difficult of all
Reeves braced for OBR forecasts to blow £20bn hole in tax and spending plans
Vodafone terminates contracts of 12 franchisees who joined £120m lawsuit
Workers in UK need to embrace AI or risk being left behind, minister says
Tell us: what questions do you have about the impacts of smartphones on children?
Hitchins dismantles Kambosos inside eight to retain 140lb title at Garden
Tyrrell Hatton cool but Matt Fitzpatrick rages as Sam Burns keeps US Open lead