Ascot’s bold move in turf war leaves racing fighting to avoid constitutional crisis
The racing industry is such a broad and varied collection of professions, venues and interests that at times it can feel like the Holy Roman empire: there is always a turf war or two going on somewhere, but never to such an extent that the whole thing falls apart,Ascot’s announcement on Monday that it will quit the Racecourse Association (RCA) at the end of the year, however, feels like more than just another localised dispute,The email dropped at 9am on a bank holiday, as if to underline that the king’s track means business, and where Ascot has led, others may follow, putting the future of a trade association that dates back to 1907 in serious doubt,The spark that lit the fuse, just two months ago, was Charles Allen’s departure as chair of the British Horseracing Authority (BHA), after a brief and ultimately fruitless attempt to impose a modern governance structure, including a fully independent board of directors, on Britain’s second-biggest spectator sport,Ascot, along with the Jockey Club, which operates major tracks including Cheltenham, Aintree, Epsom and Newmarket, and also three key “big independent” tracks – Newbury, York and Goodwood – subsequently wrote to the RCA calling for “a formal governance review” of the Association, to ensure “significant views from key racecourses can influence outcomes”.
The source of the major racecourses’ anger was plain: a belief – or rather a conviction – that the RCA’s one-track, one-vote structure hands too much power to smaller venues, and in particular, the 16 courses operated by Arena Racing Company (ARC), which has a quantity-over-quality business model to service the off-course betting market.Since the RCA gets to nominate two members of the BHA’s current board, Ascot and its co-signatories felt their views – including support for Lord Allen’s fully independent board – were not getting a fair hearing at the top of the sport.Chester 1.30 Adonius 2.05 Partisan Hero 2.
35 Amelia Earhart 3.05 Benvenuto Cellini 3.40 Ruby’s Angel 4.10 Arabian Desert 4.45 Miami Matrix (nb)Newton Abbot 1.
45 Centara 2,15 Name Me Nicely 2,45 Storminhome 3,15 Northern Air 3,50 Reel Orange 4.
20 JuggernautKelso 1.55 Dartmouth Castle 2.25 The Clonmel Kid 2.55 Starlyte 3.25 Fairly Fulling 4.
00 Maillot Blanc 4.32 Tanking Along 5.02 Whatdeawant 5.32 AllroadsleadtoromFontwell 5.42 Washington Singer 6.
12 La Cadalora 6,42 Land Girl’s Luck 7,12 Rapid Mission 7,42 Majestic Moment 8,12 Major DinoKempton 6.
00 Sceptic 6.30 Victory Ace 7.00 Brilliant Star 7.30 Venetian Gold 8.00 Ribenska (nap) 8.
30 Yehudi 9.00 Hint Of The JungleThe deadline set for an “acceptable proposal” for reform was the end of April, and Ascot wasted little time in submitting its resignation four days later.All eyes now are on the Jockey Club, British racing’s biggest commercial organisation, and while it has given the RCA an extension to its deadline, it is unlikely that an operator as sharp and well-connected as Felicity Barnard, Ascot’s CEO, would have led the charge without believing the Jockey Club would be next through the door.If or when the Jockey Club follow suit, the BHA will face a constitutional crisis, since the RCA’s two spots on the board depend on it being “the person most representative in Great Britain of the interests of owners of racecourses”.Without Ascot, the Jockey Club’s major tracks and the likes of Goodwood, York and Newbury, the RCA would not come close.
It is possible that, when faced with what is potentially an existential crisis, the RCA will come up with proposals for change that meet with the Jockey Club’s approval, and Wilf Walsh, the RCA’s chair, can draw on a wealth of experience both within racing and in industry in trying to strike a balance.But that would still mean a major shift of power towards the biggest tracks, and less influence for those further down the pecking order.In terms of what this may mean for punters and racegoers, it is tempting draw a parallel with the formation of the Premier League in the early 1990s, when England’s biggest clubs broke away from the Football League, to grab a much bigger slice of the sport’s TV revenues.Tempting, but arguably misleading, as the two sports have different structures, fanbases and revenue streams, not least income from off-course betting that means ARC can stage hundreds of meetings each year that attract a few hundred spectators at best.It is not a straightforward division either between the major tracks, with significant income from ticket sales, hospitality and, more recently, the Hong Kong-based World Pool in addition to their off-course media rights, and ARC’s heavily betting-dependent model.
There is also a cohort of smaller independent tracks, from Plumpton in the south to Kelso in the Scottish borders and dotted around in between.Chester, a member of the Large Independents group alongside Goodwood and York, stages its May festival this week, but also operates Bangor-on-Dee and Musselburgh.Nor is there any real scope for promotion or relegation.There is a more general argument, though, that while the formation of the Premier League was excellent news for the country’s most famous clubs, and made little difference to the old Division Three teams that were used to rubbing along with little cash and a loyal, local fanbase, the pinch was felt mostly keenly by some familiar names somewhere in between.Plumpton, in fact, quit the RCA two years ago, as Peter Savill, its owner and also a former chair of the British Horseracing Board, the BHA’s predecessor, felt the RCA’s representatives on the BHA board did not adequately represent the views of small independent tracks.
If Ascot’s decision to quit the RCA ultimately leads to a governance structure for racing in which the major tracks hold more sway, my guess would be that the less productive tracks in ARC’s portfolio could be particularly vulnerable,Its all-weather courses efficiently deliver a consistent stream of “product” for the betting industry,The turf tracks, not so much,With Ascot, the country’s premier track, leading the charge, racing’s governance structure may finally be set for long overdue reform,It promises to be a messy and painful process, however, with possible casualties among the current muster of 59 tracks If you have a particular favourite, now might be a good time to visit.
Farage’s partner refuses to confirm how she paid for house in his constituency
Nigel Farage’s partner, Laure Ferrari, has refused to confirm how she paid for a house in the Reform leader and MP’s constituency of Clacton, adding “there’s more than one way to pay for a house”.In an interview with French publication Le Monde, Ferrari was questioned over revelations in the Guardian that she had purchased a house in her name in Clacton after Farage had claimed to be the buyer.Farage initially said the arrangement was for “security” reasons. Some months later, he told reporters that Ferrari came from “a very wealthy French family and can afford it” – although a subsequent BBC investigation raised further questions about the size of her family’s alleged wealth.Quizzed by Le Monde on the issue, the publication said she “dodged” the question
‘Close to zero impact’: US study casts doubt on effect of phone ban in schools
Strict bans on mobile phones in schools have “close to zero” impact on student learning and show no evidence of improvements in attendance or online bullying, a study has found.Researchers at US universities including Stanford and Duke looked at nearly 1,800 US schools where students’ phones were kept in locked pouches and found little or no differences in outcomes compared with similar schools without strict bans.The report concluded that among schools instituting a ban: “For academic achievement, average effects on test scores are consistently close to zero.”The results will come as a disappointment to teaching unions and campaigners in England who backed the government’s recent move to restrict the use of mobile phones in schools. A ban is likely to come into force next year
Badenoch defends seeking a ban on pro-Palestine marches but not Tommy Robinson ones – as it happened
Kemi Badenoch also used her Today interview to defend her argument that pro-Palestine marches should be banned because they platform antisemitism, but that marches organised by the far-right activist Tommy Robinson should be allowed.When it was put to Badenoch that the Robinson marches were a platform for anti-Muslim hate, Badenoch said that the marches were “different”, and that two Jewish men were killed at Heaton Park synagogue last year and that another two Jewish men were almost killed in Golders Green last week.When it was put to her that Muslims might feel threatened by some of the things said at a Robinson event, she insisted that the two sorts of marches were “not the same”.She went on:double quotation markCriticism of religion is allowed in this country. We mustn’t mix the two things
Farage deploys the rottweiler to distract from awkward £5m gift story | John Crace
It’s a classic from the Donald Trump playbook: everything’s been going a bit tits up, so you create a distraction. Get everyone looking in the wrong direction. Last week was the worst in months for Reform. First the party was pegged back in the opinion polls, then the Guardian revealed Nigel Farage had been given a £5m handout by Christopher Harborne, a Thai-based crypto dealer. A donation that Nige had never thought to declare
There’s no excuse for boozing at work | Brief letters
I am sorry, Gaby Hinsliff, but I cannot defend MPs’ booze culture (My advice to Hannah Spencer? Before calling out MPs’ boozing, try to understand the reasons behind it, 1 May). As a retired nurse, there were times when my colleagues and I were working long hours under a great deal of stress, often making life and death decisions. There is no excuse for drinking at work. Hannah Spencer was right to call it out.Patricia HowlettSouth Benfleet, Essex Friends at Abberton reservoir recently encountered a group of women in a bird hide who gave a whole new meaning to the term “hen party”
Greens must take immediate action against antisemitism in party, says Lucas
The former Green leader Caroline Lucas has called for the party to take immediate action against candidates who have made antisemitic comments or posts, following a series of cases before Thursday’s elections.Lucas, who led or co-led the party for six years and served as its first MP, said that while the number of such cases was limited, they could not be ignored.“Statements that have now come to light from a handful of @TheGreenParty candidates are totally unacceptable & require immediate action,” she wrote on X. “There’s no place for antisemitism or any hate speech in the party. This is a society-wide problem and needs to be rooted out wherever it’s found
GameStop shares fall 10% after CEO skirts questions over eBay acquisition details
AI platforms reference Nigel Farage more than other leaders when prompted on UK politics, study shows
Vine video-sharing app is back – and battling AI slop
GameStop makes $55.5bn takeover offer for eBay
AI facial recognition oversight lagging far behind technology, watchdogs warn
Guilty until proven innocent: shoppers falsely identified by facial recognition system struggle to clear their names