From the Pocket: Andrew Dillon needs authenticity and nuance, not AFL talking points
In 2023, the late Sam Landsberger wrote a piece in the Herald Sun recalling how Andrew Dillon came to work at the AFL,Dillon was driving down Punt Road in the early 2000s after playing a game for amateur club Old Xaverians,Senior AFL administrator Ben Buckley, who was recruiting for an in-house counsel, was in the next lane and spotted his former Xavs teammate,“Hey Dills,” he shouted across traffic, “you’re a lawyer, aren’t you?”A quarter of a century later, a line from North Melbourne coach Alastair Clarkson in an interview with Jay Clark jumped off the page on Sunday,“I spoke to Gil [McLachlan] on Tuesday night and he says: ‘This will all be resolved by the end of next week,’” Clarkson said.
“This was the grand final week of 2022.Just talk to ‘Dills’ and this will all be resolved.”Both say so much about how the AFL does business.And in the second instance, about how so many people involved in the Hawthorn racism scandal were in over their heads.Clarkson’s comments give a snapshot of what sort of operator Dillon was for more than two decades.
Whether you wanted to sort out a minor quibble or douse a major inferno, he was the man you called.Given the backroom roles he played in some of the biggest issues the sport was confronted with, he could easily have been a more divisive figure.But he was the sort of man who would penalise you, fine you or charge you, and leave you liking and respecting him when you put the phone down.The question mark was always whether he would excel at being the frontman, at being the face of the league and the sport.On the weekend, Dillon did the rounds of the major radio stations.
Here’s a few of his answers,On the unevenness of the competition: “Look, I think it’s something you keep an eye on,”On the cost-of-living pressures which are dissuading fans from going to games: “It’s a really good question and it’s something we are acutely aware of,”On a mandatory five weeks suspension for homophobic slurs: “I would not be expecting that we’d be dealing with that again – sometimes there’s mitigating circumstances and sometimes there’s aggravating,”On his preference for a day or twilight grand final: “Tradition is really important, but so is progression.
”And finally, on the controversy over Sydney’s tribute to the victims of the Bondi terror attack: “I don’t know the ins and outs of scripts and the like.”None of those responses fell under the train wreck category, though a few came close.But all were typical of his communication style – wooden, scripted, equivocal and often just plain unsatisfactory.In this regard, he will always be compared with Gillon McLachlan.The former AFL chief executive was a master charmer, disarmer and deflector.
He was a born frontman, and he would have made a fine politician or the head of a wagering company.Dillon will never be that type of leader.He’ll never be someone who can go on a show like The Front Bar and banter with comedians, or flick questions from experienced journalists down to fine leg.And that’s not a bad thing.After all, we should be wary of leaders who have mastered the art of speaking supposedly off the cuff with lines that are often heavily workshopped.
But there are issues in and around the game that require decisive leadership, nuanced conversations and proper words.Some are the usual football related issues – day or night grand finals, equalisation, fixturing.Others are broader societal concerns – terrorism, homophobia, cost of living – the kind of issues the AFL has always considered itself worthy of commenting and leading on.Dillon often responds to questions and criticism by pointing to crowds, ratings, memberships and finances.Indeed, anyone running a business would look at the AFL’s numbers and concede that it’s doing a good job.
But much of the angst that surrounds the way this sport is run could be assuaged by a CEO who wasn’t so tethered to his suggested talking points.Running the AFL demands a lot.You have to be commercially savvy, be well respected by your inner circle, be a good delegator and have a genuine love for your sport – all areas where Dillon cannot be questioned.In the modern media landscape, however, the ability to sit in front of a microphone and speak authentically and persuasively has never been more critical.And it’s an area where Dillon is failing badly.
This is an extract from Guardian Australia’s free weekly AFL email, From the Pocket.To get the full version, just visit this page and follow the instructions
Starmer unlikely to allocate more time for assisted dying bill, ministers believe
Senior ministers believe Keir Starmer will not intervene to give the assisted dying bill further time in the next session of parliament as he is wary of opening up new divisions among Labour MPs.The bill, which was passed by the Commons, is now certain to be blocked in the House of Lords without ever reaching a vote because of the large number of amendments its opponents have tabled and debated.MPs who spoke to the Guardian said they had been “radicalised” in favour of a serious overhaul of the House of Lords because of the way the bill had been in effect killed off by a handful of peers who oppose it, many of them former Tory MPs, including Thérèse Coffey and Mark Harper.Opponents have argued that the number of amendments – more than 1,200 – has been necessary because of the bill’s flaws that could put vulnerable people at risk.The Scottish parliament voted down a similar bill on Tuesday night by 69 votes to 57
Danger of prisoners who have nothing to lose | Letter
The Prison Governors’ Association is right to warn about “nothing-to-lose” prisoners attacking notorious inmates such as Ian Huntley (Governors warn of increasing violence of ‘nothing-to-lose’ inmates attacking notorious prisoners, 13 March). But the warning barely scratches the surface.The deeper problem is that the system itself contains many people with little to lose, either inside or outside prison. Thousands arrive already trapped in cycles of addiction, trauma, homelessness and untreated mental illness, with little stake in life beyond the prison walls. Prison rarely repairs this damage; more often it compounds it
What everyone gets wrong about the science of lip-reading | Letter
Regarding your article (Royals and celebrities warned to watch words as lip-reading videos go viral, 15 March), the public needs to be aware that lip-reading is not an exact science and research shows that only about 30% of information can be seen on the lips in the best of circumstances. This is because the remainder of speech shapes are inside the mouth, hidden from view.So lip-reading is very much guesswork and relies on a great deal of factors, including having good English competency, which many congenitally deaf people do not have due to lack of support in education; having the person being lip-read close enough to see clearly, their head still, with slow, clear lip patterns; nothing hiding the mouth like beards or hands; having an accent that is familiar to the person lip-reading; plenty of facial expressions and gestures, and so on.The TV programme Code of Silence was unrealistic, as is most people’s understanding of deafness. Lip-reading and hearing-aided technology have been mythologised to deaf people’s detriment, so that we must live up to an impossible dream
Having my ears syringed left me with tinnitus | Letter
I sympathise with Freya Bennett (A moment that changed me: I was planning to be a musician – then I had my ears syringed, 11 March). In 2010, I found that my hearing was being muffled by a buildup of wax in my ears. I had always imagined that having ones ears syringed was a straightforward, risk-free process.An appointment was made at my local GP practice, and a healthcare assistant, without any explanation as to what to expect or any warning about side-effects, essentially turned the irrigation machine, like a water pistol, up to full and blasted out the wax. The power of the jet was such that I actually jerked my head away in shock
What is behind the UK’s meningitis outbreak and how serious is it?
Meningitis infections in a county in the south-east of England continue to increase, with five new cases confirmed on Wednesday in what experts have said is one of the fastest-growing outbreaks of the disease they have seen in the UK.On 15 March, the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), a public health body, issued a public health alert confirming two people had died during an outbreak of meningitis.It had occurred in and around Canterbury, a city of about 60,000 people in the county of Kent, near London.Health officials later confirmed the strain involved was meningitis B (MenB).As of 17 March, the UKHSA said there were 20 cases of invasive meningococcal disease
Tell us: what has someone done that made you feel less lonely?
Was someone there for you when you were feeling lonely? As part of the Guardian’s Well Actually series, we would like to hear about the ways people have helped each other feel less isolated. You can tell us your story below.You can tell us your story using this form.Please include as much detail as possible. Please note, the maximum file size is 5
Peter Smith obituary
Rukmini Iyer’s quick and easy reccipe for crispy baked gnocchi puttanesca | Quick and easy
How to make Irish stew – recipe | Felicity Cloake's Masterclass
DakaDaka, London W1: ‘Like a 2am lock-in on a Tbilisi back street’ – restaurant review | Grace Dent on restaurants
Fallouts and financial woes: inside Heston Blumenthal’s sinking empire
Mother’s Day UK recipes: three delicious ideas to make for your mum from Ravinder Bhogal