The mediocre Ashes: England arrived as a rabble and Australia weren’t much better | Geoff Lemon
As far as endings go, it ended nicely,People streamed on to the Sydney Cricket Ground, wanting to get close to the trophy presentation and to have a canter on the turf,Nothing thrills an audience more than a chance to walk the stage,On a sun-kissed blue-heaven day, the match had finished early enough to leave plenty of afternoon to spare,Later Usman Khawaja soaked that up with his own crowd of family and friends, on his last day as a Test player.
These endings are supposed to signal the close of something momentous.Another Ashes wrapped up, another chapter in the rivalry written.Still, once it was done, the whole thing felt like it had been more hole than doughnut.It’s not because it wasn’t a close series; we’re past that, nobody has seen one of those in Australia in 50 years.This was more deeply about the quality of performance.
The media caravan arrived in Perth after months of buildup, which is media driven but also driven by public interest,We counted down, we prophesied, we prognosticated, we cast bones and read entrails, we tipped coffee cups upside down, sourced skin of salamander and sketched the fine traceries of the wing of a bat,Finally, with all that done, it began,And 31 hours later, it was over,That left 11 more days of waiting and wondering, before a pink-ball spank-a-thon in Brisbane whose result was decided after two and a half days, even if it took four to play out.
Adelaide went the distance but was still a procession of wickets given away, before another two-day embarrassment for all concerned in Melbourne.England arrived as a rabble.Whether in the back of the mind or the back of the throat, the whole Brendon McCullum and Ben Stokes era had this trip as its endpoint.Selections and mindset work were geared towards it.When the mission was finally due, they approached winning in Australia like a rich kid approaches getting into Harvard: write KENNEDY on the entrance essay and assume it will work out fine.
After years of chat about attitude and ethos and philosophy, of how very positive they would be in their cricket, this lot didn’t spend a minute on how to play it in a different country.What do you mean we didn’t win, don’t you know who we are?The thing is, Australia weren’t much better.Certainly not 4-1 better.The bowlers saved the day along with Alex Carey, Travis Head played a blinder, Steve Smith came good when it was over.The rest were the definition of mediocre.
England got blamed for the two-day matches, but they couldn’t have happened without both teams collapsing.When batting conditions got difficult, the shared attitude was that it was unreasonable to attempt staying in.In better conditions Australia’s bigger scores rode on luck.As badly as England batted and bowled, they might still have won the thing had they held their catches.Australia were there for the taking but weren’t taken.
Across the teams, who averaged over 40? Head, Smith, Carey, Jacob Bethell, Joe Root.Harry Brook somehow got close while playing match-losing shots in each of the first three Tests.Every other specialist bat averaged between 18 and 27.Mediocrity was the standard.These were teams that mystifyingly conspired to allow Brydon Carse to firstly play five Tests and secondly take 22 wickets, the most for an Englishman in Australia since Jimmy Anderson in 2011, despite largely bowling like a drain.
Even management seemed ad hoc.These were teams that picked part-time spinners at No 8 after being spooked by a pitch that yielded 1,454 runs.These were teams that shook up their batting orders like microwave popcorn.Khawaja was an opener who never ended up opening but did have a few hits at No 4 and No 5.Josh Inglis wafted about at No 7 as a non-keeping batter, behind the keeper.
Cameron Green had to play every Test regardless of runs.Ollie Pope had to play three of them despite sliding around at the crease as disconcertedly as a horse on ice skates.England’s only choice to replace a makeshift No 3 was a makeshift No 3.Bethell’s eventual selection with no appreciable first-class career will be held up as the tour’s success story: yes, he played a delightful innings and he may keep confounding convention.It’s also true that betting your car on a hand of blackjack doesn’t become a sound approach to automotive finance just because you pull an ace alongside a picture.
If all of this sounds negative, it is,There were players who were honourable exceptions, there were entertaining moments, and there was a general standard below what you would expect,In dozens of conversations with spectators during the final two Tests, unprompted, a repeat adjective has been “unfulfilled”,Almost a million people went to the expense and the effort of going to watch the best, and didn’t get it,More than a million would have gone, breaking any series record, but for losing seven days of play.
No Ashes can be played to a formula, but this should go down as one where something central was missing,It can’t all be about endings,
UK ministers considering leaving X amid concern over AI tool images
UK ministers are considering leaving X as a result of the controversy over the platform’s AI tool, which has been allowing users to generate digitally altered pictures of people – including children – with their clothes removed.Anna Turley, the chair of the Labour party and a minister without portfolio in the Cabinet Office, said on Friday that conversations were happening within the government and Labour about their continued use of the social media platform, which is controlled by Elon Musk.The government has come under mounting pressure to leave X after the site was flooded with images including sexualised and unclothed pictures of children generated by its AI tool, Grok.Turley told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “X, first and foremost, has to get its act together and prevent this. It has the powers to do this, and we need to make sure there are firm consequences for that
Grok turns off image generator for most users after outcry over sexualised AI imagery
Grok, Elon Musk’s AI tool, has switched off its image creation function for the vast majority of users after a widespread outcry about its use to create sexually explicit and violent imagery.The move comes after Musk was threatened with fines, regulatory action and reports of a possible ban on X in the UK.The tool had been used to manipulate images of women to remove their clothes and put them in sexualised positions. The function to do so has been switched off except for paying subscribers.Posting on X, Musk’s social media network, Grok said: “Image generation and editing are currently limited to paying subscribers
Grok being used to create sexually violent videos featuring women, research finds
Elon Musk’s AI tool Grok has been used to create sexually violent and explicit video content featuring women, according to new research, as the British prime minister added to condemnation of images it has created.Grok has also been used to undress an image of Renee Nicole Good, the woman killed by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent in the US on Wednesday, and to portray her with a bullet wound in her forehead.Research by AI Forensics, a Paris-based non-profit organisation, found about 800 images and videos created by the Grok Imagine app that included pornographic content. Paul Bouchaud, a researcher at AI Forensics, said: “These are fully pornographic videos and they look professional.”One photorealistic AI video viewed by the NGO showed a woman, tattooed with the slogan “do not resuscitate”, with a knife between her legs
Grok AI: is it legal to produce or post undressed images of people without their consent?
The deluge of images of partly clothed women – stripped by the Grok AI tool – on Elon Musk’s X has raised further questions over regulation of the technology. Is it legal to produce these images without the subject’s consent? Should they be taken off X?In the UK alone there is some doubt over the answers to these queries. Social media regulation is a nascent area, let alone trying to control the deployment of artificial intelligence. There are laws in place to tackle the problem, such as the Online Safety Act, but the government has yet to introduce additional measures such as banning nudifying apps.It is a criminal offence to share intimate images of someone without their consent under the Sexual Offences Act in England and Wales, which includes images created by AI
Hundreds of nonconsensual AI images being created by Grok on X, data shows
New research that samples X users prompting Elon Musk’s AI chatbot Grok demonstrates how frequently people are creating sexualized images with it. Nearly three-quarters of posts collected and analyzed by a PhD researcher at Dublin’s Trinity College were requests for nonconsensual images of real women or minors with items of clothing removed or added.The posts offer a new level of detail on how the images are generated and shared on X, with users coaching one another on prompts; suggesting iterations on Grok’s presentations of women in lingerie or swimsuits, or with areas of their body covered in semen; and asking Grok to remove outer clothing in replies to posts containing self-portraits by female users.Among hundreds of posts identified by Nana Nwachukwu as direct, nonconsensual requests for Grok to remove or replace clothing, dozens reviewed by the Guardian show users posting pictures of women including celebrities, models, stock photos and women who are not public figures posing in snapshots.Several posts in the trove reviewed by the Guardian have received tens of thousands of impressions and come from premium, “blue check” accounts, including accounts with tens of thousands of followers
Musk lawsuit over OpenAI for-profit conversion can go to trial, US judge says
Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI is to go to trial after a US judge said there is plenty of evidence to support the billionaire’s case.The world’s richest man, who co-founded OpenAI, is suing the ChatGPT developer and its chief executive, Sam Altman, over claims its leaders violated the organisation’s founding mission by shifting to a for-profit model.The US district judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, California, told a hearing there was plenty of evidence that suggested OpenAI’s leaders made assurances that its original nonprofit structure was going to be maintained.She said there were enough disputed facts to let a jury consider the claims at a trial scheduled for March, rather than decide the issues herself. Rogers said she would issue a written order after the hearing that addresses OpenAI’s attempt to throw out the case
Keeping up with Fran Jones: the tennis star refusing to let rare condition define her
Henry Pollock: ‘I don’t look at a challenge and think what could go wrong? I’m just excited’
Brendon McCullum keen to carry on with England but wants to ‘steer the ship’
NFL playoff predictions: who will seize a wide-open Super Bowl race?
Chess: Hastings Masters guards tradition and produces an English co-winner
Minnesota Timberwolves hold moment of silence for woman killed by ICE officer