Talismanic Mitchell Starc adds final flourish to his imperious Ashes series | Geoff Lemon

A picture


It was right that Mitchell Starc should clean up the last two English wickets of this Ashes.Right, too, that Travis Head should mop up a few more runs, but for all of the enjoyment that Head brings with his Jayasuriya-lite batting and his Boon-lite persona, the difference in the series has been the other left-hander.The fifth morning of the Sydney Test took Starc to 31 wickets at 19, and crossing 30 is the stuff of great Ashes series.Sixteen other Australians have done it, a list mostly comprised of players who only need be identified by surnames.In the manner of schoolteachers meeting you as an adult, some people are stuck with a memory of Starc as he was at the beginning: a lanky possessor of promise with the risk of being wayward, expensive or injured.

In the manner of truly fast bowlers, he is seen as part animal, part force of nature: his feats are elements unleashed, not the work of brain and skill.He is admired for that while still viewed as livestock.Like, Gandalf’s horse is awesome, but it’s still a horse.Hopefully, that perception keeps changing as it should increasingly have done over recent years.He has become Australia’s most durable quick, and far more consistent in accuracy and performance.

Thursday’s two wickets took Starc to 433 for his career, past Richard Hadlee, level with Rangana Herath, one behind Kapil Dev.Another seven would take him past Dale Steyn, into the top 10 wicket-takers of all time.Then there is the current Ashes series, which may, when all is said and done, crown that vast career.For eight years, Starc has done national duties within the comfort of a four-man bowling operation: their 35 Tests together far exceeds any other cricket quartet.Even if one is missing, the others make it feel like home.

Until this series: Starc got one Test out of Pat Cummins, effectively one out of Nathan Lyon, while Josh Hazlewood stayed home on the treadmill.In their collective absence, he assumed the responsibility of leading the line, bowling with smarts and stamina.All five Tests, and his third-most overs in a series.His pace never dropped, staying in the mid-140s in metric terms right up until his final spell.He swung the new ball on occasion, got it to jag the other way using wobble seam, and delivered relentless accuracy, constantly threatening the right-handers’ outside edges with balls that jumped off a length, and working the left-handers with his angle in.

Then you account for his runs: the 77 in Brisbane was match-defining, after England had made a proper first-innings score and had Australia within reach.Instead of getting to build a lead during daylight, Starc instead forced England to begin addressing a hefty deficit at dusk.In Adelaide Australia were way under par on the first innings, only for Starc’s 54 to be part of adding an even hundred runs for the last three wickets, as well as eating up part of the 40C second day and avoiding some time fielding in the heat.The calculus is this: Australia probably would have won Perth, and might have won Adelaide and Sydney, with someone else batting in the spot where Head made his hundreds.Without Starc, Australia would likely have lost the first two Tests and possibly the third.

Of particular note was how he stifled England’s opening partnership, and how he broke Ben Duckett.After an excellent couple of years in Tests and one-day cricket, Duckett had developed into one of England’s few bankers.His partnership with Zak Crawley was a key part of England’s plan, given the way the pair at home in 2023 had been able to put pressure on Australia with attacking strokeplay from the jump.Four times Starc knocked over one or other of them in the first over of an innings, including both times at Perth to set the tone.Nine of his wickets in total were the two openers.

Their partnerships were 0, 0, 5, 48, 37, 4, 7, 51, 35, and 4,The 51 did help England pinch their win at Melbourne, given the chase was so low, but Duckett’s contribution was sloppy and ended with his boot blown off by a Starc yorker several levels in class above the defence that was facing it,Overall the opener was squashed, unable to get away even when he made starts,Six times he was out between 20 and 42, and never went beyond the latter,Crawley ended up having the better series despite averaging 27, with his scores of 76 and 85 at least providing a toehold in Brisbane and Adelaide.

In short, Starc took the oxygen out of England’s top order, which then allowed him to work away at the middle.He got Joe Root three times, Ben Stokes five, and only half a dozen of his wickets came against the bowlers.Head caught the eye with his 629 runs, but so did Starc with some pearlers: the swing back into Crawley’s pad at Sydney, the jag through the gate of Stokes in Adelaide.Player of the series adjudication needs more depth than just who topped the scoring.Mitchell Starc should be remembered for this one.

politicsSee all
A picture

‘Go back home’: Farage schoolmate accounts bring total alleging racist behaviour to 34

Thirty-four school contemporaries of Nigel Farage have now come forward to claim they saw him behave in a racist or antisemitic manner, raising fresh questions over the Reform leader’s evolving denials.One of those with new allegations is Jason Meredith, who was three years below Farage at Dulwich college, a private school in south-east London. He claims that Farage called him a “paki” and would use taunts such as “go back home”.Meredith, 58, who is of Anglo-Indian heritage and has lived in Switzerland where he works as a product manager since 1999, said it was support for anti-racism that motivated him to come forward.He told the Guardian: “What really irked me was the denial [by Farage] of being racist

A picture

Farage accused of ‘parroting Kremlin lines’ after remarks on UK troops in Ukraine

Nigel Farage has been accused of “parroting Kremlin lines” after saying that he would vote against any UK government plans to deploy the military in Ukraine.On Tuesday, Britain and France said they would be ready to send troops to Ukraine after a peace deal, but the Reform UK leader said he would vote against any such move to put boots on the ground.Farage’s comments cast doubt on his commitment to the UK’s national security, the cabinet minister Pat McFadden said. He accused the politician of taking a pro-Russia stance on the issue, which he said should give voters “pause for thought”.“This guarantee is not just for Ukraine, it’s for the whole of Europe,” he said

A picture

Mandelson accuses European leaders of ‘histrionic’ reaction to Trump’s Greenland stance

Peter Mandelson has accused European leaders including Keir Starmer of a “histrionic” reaction to Donald Trump’s plan to take over Greenland, arguing that without “hard power and hard cash” they will continue to slide into unimportance in the “age of Trump”.In his first political comments since being sacked as Britain’s ambassador to Washington last year, Lord Mandelson said Trump had achieved “more in a day than orthodox diplomacy was able to achieve in the past decade” when he captured the Venezuelan president, Nicolás Maduro.The intervention is likely to be seen as a criticism of the British prime minister, who has attempted to walk a diplomatic tightrope since the US captured Maduro. This week he signed a statement calling on the US president to respect Danish sovereignty over Greenland after a White House statement said the US was looking into “a range of options” in an effort to acquire Greenland, adding that using the US military to do so was “always an option”.On Wednesday evening, Starmer “set out his position on Greenland” in a phone conversation with Trump, Downing Street said without giving further details of the call

A picture

Reeves condemns Farage opposition to lifting two-child benefit cap

Rachel Reeves has said she was angered by Nigel Farage’s suggestion that only British-born families should have the two-child benefit cap lifted, saying the Reform UK leader would keep children in poverty based on their skin colour.The chancellor, who will introduce legislation to lift the cap on Thursday, said it had been a burden for her not to be able to do so sooner, but it had been vital to do it at a moment of market stability.Farage told a press conference on Wednesday that his party would vote against the scrapping of the two-child limit, having previously suggested he could back the change. He said he was concerned it would “benefit huge numbers of foreign-born people”.Reeves said those comments were akin to saying some families deserved to have children in poverty

A picture

Marinera oil tanker changed flags ‘five times in five years’, says defence secretary – as it happened

The defence secretary, John Healey, told the Commons that the UK, at the request of the US, supported efforts to intercept an Russian-flagged tanker in the North Atlantic. Healey said: “The vessel refused to comply with the US’s exercise of its sanctions jurisdiction on 20 December, after which the US Coast Guard vessel Monroe pursued the ship across the Atlantic. This is a sanctioned, stateless vessel which carries a long history of nefarious activity and shares close links with both Iran and Russia.” Healey said there was a deployment of Royal Navy and RAF assets including airborne surveillance and RFA Tideforce and no UK personnel took part in the operation.Healey said he is visiting Kyiv “soon” to continue discussions on supporting Ukraine’s long term armaments and policing of any ceasefire

A picture

It’s unwise for Labour to attack the Green party and its wealth tax proposal | Letters

The Fabian Society’s Joe Dromey could not be more wrong in arguing that the Labour leadership should attack the Greens and Reform UK as representing “twin populisms” (Zack Polanski offering voters fantasy solutions, says head of Fabian Society, 31 December). Dromey dismisses the Green party’s support for a wealth tax as a “fantasy” policy. Yet this is a policy that eight in 10 Labour voters support. I have been campaigning for wealth taxes for years, and large numbers of Labour MPs now back such a measure.Dromey argues that a wealth tax could not fund all the investment we need in our communities