Flawed council shake-up plans will not deliver savings | Letters

A picture


Polly Toynbee is correct to point out the foolishness of a massive local government reorganisation, given other priorities (Is No 10 seeking its own destruction? Why else would it botch its council plans and hand a victory to Farage?, 18 February).What she does not mention is that this reorganisation will lead to a large increase in inequality.The district councils that are being abolished are rising from the ashes as town and parish councils and, unlike other councils, they can set their own precept and cannot be capped.The largest town councils have budgets of more than £5m and more than 124 parish councils have budgets of over £1m.These councils tend to be in the wealthier suburban and rural areas, and can protect their residents from austerity, unlike residents of large, disadvantaged urban areas.

If you live in an area with a parish council, you will have a good library, open spaces and playgrounds will be well maintained, and you will have a thriving youth club,If you do not, your library will have closed and your playground will be covered in glass where the teenagers drink on a Saturday night following the closure of their youth club,The government is giving grants to disadvantaged areas, but they will revert to their previous state within a few years due to a lack of local government funding,Despite the warm words from the chancellor, the cuts continue,David KennedyMenston, West Yorkshire The government seems bent on replacing one broken system with another.

Local authorities have two broad functions.One is to deliver services equitably, efficiently and economically.The other is to be the living, beating heart of the communities they serve, offering local leadership and advocacy.It is, of course, a question of balance.Councils need to be big enough to be efficient, but small enough to care.

Governments do not seem to understand that.Unitary councils are certainly more publicly relatable than the two-tier system.But in choosing a population baseplate of around 500,000, this government has made it clear that any concept of local responsiveness has been abandoned in favour of an ill-conceived search for savings.It is no better than planning on the back of a fag packet.Two “super councils”, as proposed where I live, will simply be too large to be responsive to the needs of such a large and diverse range of towns and smaller population centres.

Perversely, it will also be too small to justify a combined mayoral authority, because it is not an economic entity on its own.The proposals represent another centralising nail in the coffin of local government.Of course, if you just want your bins collected, none of that matters.But as a former three-time council chief executive, I pray for another U-turn.Bernard QuorollGuildford, Surrey Why Labour is wasting energy on an unnecessary reform of local government is, as Polly Toynbee points out, puzzling.

A cynic might suggest that the reason is something scarcely mentioned in the debate: larger authorities with fewer councillors representing local interests offer more scope for the kind of large-scale planning that is needed to take forward the government’s ambitious growth strategy.Westminster finds local council opposition to new runways, roads, railways, housing estates, power stations and so on a nuisance.Maybe local government reorganisation is driven by a desire to weaken it.Peter Taylor-GoobyCanterbury Polly Toynbee has hit the local government reorganisation nail on the head.As a senior county council officer, I went through the reorganisation in the 1990s.

Far from creating a more rational system, it resulted in a hotchpotch of new authorities, some of which struggled to establish sound services, and a puzzling set of changes to county councils.The process took up huge amounts of time and money, and diverted attention from planning and delivering good services into sorting out thousands of details such as changed boundaries, contracts and responsibility for future liabilities (not unlike Brexit).The adage that form should follow function seemed to be less important than working on the assumption that reorganisation was an easy panacea.Looking at exactly what needs doing and seeing how well you could do it through minimal organisational change makes more sense – less exciting, but the public needs good services, not political excitement.Andrew SeberWinchester My district council, East Devon, is due to be abolished in the name of “efficiency” some 50 years after it was created from an efficiency bonfire of urban and rural councils.

The district only consumes 7% of the tax it collects from me, so I see little scope for savings.All the local services it manages – maintaining electoral rolls, running elections, dealing with household waste, street cleaning, local planning, collecting council tax etc – are essential.The only certainty is that I will have fewer councillors to turn to.There is no consensus on how district councils should be reorganised in Devon, and my fear is that rural areas will be cast adrift from the inherently more efficient urban ones.As for mayors, even Andy Burnham might struggle to make himself known in a county that is 70 miles wide and 70 miles deep, with little public transport.

David DanielBudleigh Salterton, Devon Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
societySee all
A picture

Obstructive sleep apnoea costs UK and US economies £137bn a year, research finds

Obstructive sleep apnoea costs the US and UK economies more than £137bn ($185bn) a year, according to research.People with the serious health condition repeatedly stop breathing temporarily while asleep; they tend to snore very loudly and can wake up gasping for breath.Sufferers will also often experience excessive daytime fatigue. The condition is thought to affect about 1 billion people globally – including 8 million in the UK – though up to 85% are undiagnosed. Untreated, it is linked to increased risks of heart attack and stroke

A picture

Young bearing the brunt of UK tax and wage changes, says BoE economist

The negative effect of a combined increase in employers’ taxes and minimum wages has been “particularly acute” for young people, the Bank of England’s chief economist has warned.Huw Pill said on Tuesday that the increase in national insurance contributions (NICs) from April last year and the government’s efforts to equalise the “national living wage” had caused a particular problem for young people trying to find jobs.Official figures released last week showed that unemployment among 16- to 24-year-olds is higher than the EU average for the first time, rising to 16.1% in the final three months of 2025. This is the highest level, including the pandemic, since 2014, when the jobs market was still recovering from the financial crisis

A picture

Flawed council shake-up plans will not deliver savings | Letters

Polly Toynbee is correct to point out the foolishness of a massive local government reorganisation, given other priorities (Is No 10 seeking its own destruction? Why else would it botch its council plans and hand a victory to Farage?, 18 February).What she does not mention is that this reorganisation will lead to a large increase in inequality. The district councils that are being abolished are rising from the ashes as town and parish councils and, unlike other councils, they can set their own precept and cannot be capped. The largest town councils have budgets of more than £5m and more than 124 parish councils have budgets of over £1m. These councils tend to be in the wealthier suburban and rural areas, and can protect their residents from austerity, unlike residents of large, disadvantaged urban areas

A picture

Underwear care advice is just pants | Brief letters

So, we are supposed to throw away underwear that is more than six months old and wash the rest at 60C (Do we really need to replace our underwear every six months?, 23 February). There is no consideration of the ecological cost of adding to the mountain of discarded clothing, the cost of producing more cheap underwear and the added cost of heating water to 60C. Also, there is no evidence shown that wearing such underwear is harmful. I don’t know how I made it to the age of 77.Kathleen HooperPenistone, South Yorkshire The Bafta ceremony made it clear that, to its shame, the BBC sees the slogan “Free Palestine” as far more offensive than the most disgusting racist term in the dictionary – and acted accordingly (BBC producers say they ‘didn’t hear’ N-word slur as ‘working in a truck’, following second Baftas apology, 23 February)

A picture

‘Tics are involuntary’: people with Tourette syndrome on Baftas outburst

It was an incident that sparked a furore: during Sunday’s Bafta ceremony Tourette syndrome (TS) activist John Davidson made several outbursts, including shouting the N-word as actors Delroy Lindo and Michael B Jordan were presenting a prize on stage.Among others to comment on the incident were actors including Oscar winner Jamie Foxx and Wendell Pierce, who starred alongside Jordan in The Wire.Writing below a post about the incident on Instagram, Foxx said Davidson’s use of the N-word was “Unacceptable”, adding: “Nah he meant that shit”, while Pierce wrote on the platform X: “It’s infuriating that the first reaction wasn’t complete and full throatted [sic] apologies to Delroy Lindo and Michael B Jordan. The insult to them takes priority. It doesn’t matter the reasoning for the racist slur

A picture

Government accused of caving in to building lobby amid plans to shake up housing sector in England

The government has been accused of bowing to lobbying by housebuilders, in proposals that would prevent English local authorities from pursuing improvements to low-carbon homes standards.Under a consultation on planning rules, councils would be issued with guidance that would effectively limit their scope to demand builders construct new homes within their areas to the highest possible standards.These changes to the National Planning Policy Framework would benefit housebuilders, which could be assured of the same standards across England, but would bind the hands of councils, some of which have declared a “climate emergency”.Ministers have yet to publish separate much-delayed rules for the future homes standard (FHS), which requires new homes to be built with low-carbon equipment such as heat pumps, high-grade insulation and solar panels. But there are fears that the FHS will not go far enough