The debate over assisted dying and palliative care | Letters
I do not disagree with Gordon Brown that palliative care should be better funded, but to present palliative care as the alternative to assisted dying is to present a false equivalence, since the principles behind the two are quite different (MPs have personal beliefs, but also solemn duties: that’s why they must reject the assisted dying bill this week, 16 June).The principle behind the entitlement to good palliative care is that one should be entitled to good medical care – in this instance, as death approaches.The principle behind the right to an assisted death is that one should be entitled to determine the time and manner of one’s passing.If one were always to prioritise the right to good medical care above the right to have control over one’s death, it is unlikely that assisted dying would ever be legalised, as there will always be some medical care for somebody that could be better funded.But that is to choose to prioritise one principle over another.
Quite simply, MPs need to decide whether, as a matter of principle and within strict limits, a person should be entitled to determine the time and manner of their own death.Implementation of that principle will be difficult in just the same way as the implementation in law and practice of any principle.The numerous revisions to the assisted dying bill reflect that difficulty, but do nothing to undermine the principle behind the bill.Dr Alistair MacdonaldHuddersfield, West Yorkshire Gordon Brown states that “every year, more than 600,000 people die in the UK.It is estimated that between 75% and 90% of them should have the benefit of palliative care, and that 100,000 terminally ill people do not receive the palliative care they need.
” I agree that this is a dreadful situation.But I don’t see the logic in denying an assisted death to those who meet all the safeguards in the bill and do not want to suffer due to the shortage of palliative care.This seems to be punishing individuals because successive governments have failed to sort out sufficient funding for palliative care.He also states that “we should not deny terminally ill people the freedom to choose.But there is no effective freedom to choose if the alternative option, the freedom to draw on high-quality end-of-life care, is not available.
” Perhaps he should put himself in the shoes of someone whose pain cannot be relieved even by high-quality end-of-life care, or someone with a neurodegenerative disease where palliative care cannot always help,For these people, there is no other option but to continue suffering,Where is the compassion in saying: “Sorry, you can’t have an assisted death until we have sorted out palliative care for all?” Katy BarnettLondon While we can all agree with Gordon Brown that hospice and palliative care need more funding I don’t feel that this is an argument against assisted dying,Palliative care doesn’t always work,My son died in his local hospice with the highest level of palliative care available.
I was with him at his admission when the consultant said: “I will not be able to control your pain well enough for you to sleep,” This turned out to be the case and he suffered horribly for several weeks,I believe that assisted dying doesn’t shorten life, it shortens death,In his article, Brown worries about people being coerced by their families,In my 17 years as a nurse I looked after many dying patients and don’t remember any incidence of a family wanting to speed the process (unless their loved one was clearly suffering).
It was usually the opposite, with the patient ready to go and the family pleading with the doctors to try anything else to keep them alive.Brown argues that taking part in assisted dying would change the role of the medical profession from one of purely caregiving, but I disagree.I always did my utmost to minimise my patients’ suffering and if the ability to shorten that suffering had been available, I would have felt it to be wholly appropriate to my caring role.Amanda McGeeRedcar, North Yorkshire Thank you, Gordon Brown, for stating cogently why MPs should reject the assisted dying bill at the free vote on Friday.If the vote is passed, some of the responsibility for when terminally ill people die will pass from palliative care teams and GPs to lawyers.
This will just make it more expensive and conflictual, and will deflect from the need to invest in palliative care that Brown pinpoints.Legislators, and people approaching death who fear losing control, should read the literature on shared decision-making, which is basically how GPs interact with patients.If used correctly, it is just as empowering as “patient choice” and obviates the need for lethal injection.Shared decision-making could become the legal framework for end-of-life care decisions, if accompanied by expert, empathic and properly funded primary care and palliative care.Dr Jeremy Seymour Sheffield Thank you, Gordon Brown, for wisely and eruditely voicing concerns with the assisted dying bill.
Having just retired from NHS primary care service in a deprived area, I have witnessed the progress over 40 years of palliative care services, which remain hamstrung by an unfair funding model.This will not change if the impetus to provide universality is removed by focusing on the right to die.A doctor’s oath to do no harm does not, in my view, extend to ending life.Dr Martin BelshamThetford, Norfolk Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
OpenAI boss accuses Meta of trying to poach staff with $100m sign-on bonuses
The boss of OpenAI has claimed that Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta has tried to poach his top artificial intelligence experts with “crazy” signing bonuses of $100m (£74m), as the scramble for talent in the booming sector intensifies.Sam Altman spoke about the offers in a podcast on Tuesday. They have not been confirmed by Meta. OpenAI, the company that developed ChatGPT, said it had nothing to add beyond its chief executive’s comments.“They started making these giant offers to a lot of people on our team – $100m signing bonuses, more than that comp [compensation] per year,” Altman told the Uncapped podcast, which is presented by his brother, Jack
‘It’s terrifying’: WhatsApp AI helper mistakenly shares user’s number
The Meta chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, called it “the most intelligent AI assistant that you can freely use”. But Barry Smethurst, 41, a record shop worker trying to travel by rail from Saddleworth to Manchester Piccadilly, did not agree.Waiting on the platform for a morning train that was nowhere to be seen, he asked Meta’s WhatsApp AI assistant for a contact number for TransPennine Express. The chatbot confidently sent him a mobile phone number for customer services, but it turned out to be the private number of a completely unconnected WhatsApp user 170 miles away in Oxfordshire.It was the beginning of a bizarre exchange of the kind more and more people are having with AI systems, in which chatbots try to negotiate their way out of trouble, deflect attention from their mistakes and contradict themselves, all in an attempt to continue to appear useful
Amazon boss tells staff AI means their jobs are at risk in coming years
The boss of Amazon has told white collar staff at the e-commerce company their jobs could be taken by artificial intelligence in the next few years.Andrew Jassy told employees that AI agents – tools that carry out tasks autonomously – and generative AI systems such as chatbots would require fewer employees in certain areas.“As we roll out more generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done,” he said in a memo to staff. “We will need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today, and more people doing other types of jobs.“It’s hard to know exactly where this nets out over time, but in the next few years, we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce
Up to 70% of streams of AI-generated music on Deezer are fraudulent, says report
Up to seven out of 10 streams of artificial intelligence-generated music on the Deezer platform are fraudulent, according to the French streaming platform.The company said AI-made music accounts for just 0.5% of streams on the music streaming platform but its analysis shows that fraudsters are behind up to 70% of those streams.AI-generated music is a growing problem on streaming platforms. Fraudsters typically generate revenue on platforms such as Deezer by using bots to “listen” to AI-generated songs – and take the subsequent royalty payments, which become sizeable once spread across multiple tracks
Elon Musk’s X sues New York over hate speech and disinformation law
Elon Musk’s X Corp filed a lawsuit on Tuesday against the state of New York, arguing a recently passed law compelling large social media companies to divulge how they address hate speech is unconstitutional.The complaint alleges that bill S895B, known as the Stop Hiding Hate Act, violates free speech rights under the first amendment. The act, which the governor, Kathy Hochul, signed into law last December, requires companies to publish their terms of service and submit reports detailing the steps they take to moderate extremism, foreign influence, disinformation, hate speech and other forms of harmful content.Musk’s lawyers argue that the law, which goes into effect this week, would require X to submit “highly sensitive information” and compel non-commercial speech, which is subject to greater first amendment protections. The complaint also opposes the possible penalty of $15,000 per violation per day for failing to comply with the law
How AI pales in the face of human intelligence and ingenuity | Letters
Gary Marcus is right to point out – as many of us have for years – that just scaling up compute size is not going to solve the problems of generative artificial intelligence (When billion-dollar AIs break down over puzzles a child can do, it’s time to rethink the hype, 10 June). But he doesn’t address the real reason why a child of seven can solve the Tower of Hanoi puzzle that broke the computers: we’re embodied animals and we live in the world.All living things are born to explore, and we do so with all our senses, from birth. That gives us a model of the world and everything in it. We can infer general truths from a few instances, which no computer can do
Pepper spray use in youth prisons irresponsible amid racial disparities, watchdog warns
Ondine Sherwood obituary
The debate over assisted dying and palliative care | Letters
NHS nurse ordered to remove ‘antisemitic’ watermelon video call background launches legal action
Teenagers who report addictive use of screens at greater risk of suicidal behaviour, study shows
US supreme court upholds Tennessee ban on youth gender-affirming care